Search

Purpose A previously published risk stratification algorithm based on renal mass biopsy and radiographic mass size was useful to designate surveillance vs the need for immediate treatment of small renal masses. Nonetheless, there were some incorrect assignments, most notably when renal mass biopsy indicated low risk malignancy but final pathology revealed high risk malignancy. We studied other factors that might improve the accuracy of this algorithm. Materials and Methods For 202 clinically localized small renal masses in a total of 200 patients with available R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching main renal artery or vein and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score, preoperative renal mass biopsy and final pathology we assessed the accuracy of management assignment (surveillance vs treatment) based on the previously published risk stratification algorithm as confirmed by final pathology. Logistic regression was used to determine whether other factors (age, gender, R.E.N.A.L. score, R.E.N.A.L. score components and nomograms based on R.E.N.A.L. score) could improve assignment. Results Of the 202 small renal masses 53 (26%) were assigned to surveillance and 149 (74%) were assigned to treatment by the risk stratification algorithm. Of the 53 lesions assigned to surveillance 25 (47%) had benign/favorable renal mass biopsy histology while in 28 (53%) intermediate renal mass biopsy histology showed a mass size less than 2 cm. Nine of these 53 masses (17%) were incorrectly assigned to surveillance in that final pathology indicated the need for treatment (ie intermediate histology and a mass greater than 2 cm or unfavorable histology). Final pathology confirmed a correct assignment in all 149 masses assigned to treatment. None of the additional parameters assessed improved assignment with statistical significance. Conclusions Age, gender, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, R.E.N.A.L. score components and nomograms or combinations of these factors do not improve the predictive performance of a small renal mass management risk stratification algorithm based on renal mass biopsy and radiographic mass size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We determined whether diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract cancer affects intravesical recurrence and cancer specific mortality. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective, multi-institutional study we evaluated 208 patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract cancer who had no perioperative systemic chemotherapy, history of invasive bladder cancer, distant metastasis or incomplete followup data. Of these 208 patients 55 who composed the study group underwent diagnostic ureteroscopy before nephroureterectomy while 153 serving as controls did not. We analyzed intravesical recurrence and cancer specific survival using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test used to assess significance. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in patient characteristics or upper urinary tract cancer stage and grade while followup, and the proportion of multiple tumors and lymphovascular invasion positive tumors were significantly greater in controls. The 2-year bladder recurrence-free survival rate was 60.0% in the study group and 58.7% in controls. There was no significant difference in the intravesical recurrence rate between the 2 groups (log rank test p = 0.972). Estimated Kaplan-Meier cancer specific survival was 88.3% and 78.1% at 5 years in the study and control groups, respectively (log rank test p = 0.0687). Conclusions: Diagnostic ureteroscopy did not affect intravesical recurrence or cancer specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract cancer undergoing nephroureterectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]