Search

Purpose: Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy-guided lymph node dissection compared to extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study at 3 tertiary centers in France between February 2012 and May 2019. Eligible patients had clinically localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. After intraprostatic injection of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid, the locations of the sentinel lymph nodes were defined by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Surgical excision of the sentinel lymph nodes was performed using intraoperative gamma probe guidance. After resection of the sentinel lymph nodes, extended pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in all patients. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel lymph node biopsy method using extended pelvic lymph node dissection as the reference standard. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02732392). Results: A total of 162 men cN0M0 (CT scan and bone scan) were enrolled: 106 (65.4%) and 56 (34.6%) patients had intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, respectively. The median number of nodes retrieved was 14 (mean 16, IQR 10-21) per patient. At final pathological analysis, 22 patients (13.6%) were pN+. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy method in detecting patients with at least 1 lymph node metastasis were 95.4% (95% CI, 75.1-99.7), 100% (95% CI, 96.6-100), 99.2% (95% CI, 95.5-99.9), and 100% (95% CI, 80.7-100), respectively. Conclusions: Our multicenter prospective study supports that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a very effective and sensitive method for pelvic lymph node staging in patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Female urethral reconstruction can be used successfully to treat a heterogeneous group of urethral disorders through an expanding number of unique approaches. Understanding the diverse etiologies of female urethral stricture and loss is essential in evaluating and diagnosing patients. Although there is an appreciable body of literature addressing female urethral reconstruction individually, there is a paucity of resources that approach this issue holistically. We discuss the relevant female urethral anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis and evaluation of female urethral disorders, and current reconstructive techniques, as well as published outcomes data and potential future directions for female urethral reconstruction. Materials and Methods We reviewed articles published in English and indexed in the PubMed®, Embase® and Google Scholar™ databases, and consulted textbooks. Key search terms used were female, urethra, urethral reconstruction, urethroplasty, pathology, stricture, vaginal flap, bladder flap, graft, dilation, pubovaginal sling, catheterization, imaging, tissue engineering and bioscaffold. We created a synopsis of relevant articles, including original research studies and reviews. Results Urethral tissue loss and strictures are caused by traumatic injuries, iatrogenic injuries and, rarely, infections and malignancies. A comprehensive patient history and physical examination are critical for diagnosis. Flexible cystoscopy, voiding cystourethrography and endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging can help to determine the surgical method of repair. Minimally invasive approaches to female urethral reconstruction are associated with poor outcomes. Definitive treatment options for repair of female urethral stricture include vaginal flap/wall urethroplasty, graft urethroplasty and distal urethrectomy with advancement meatoplasty. Repair techniques for urethral loss include primary closure, vaginal flap/wall urethroplasty and bladder flap urethroplasty. Vaginal flap approaches with well vascularized grafts and buccal mucosal grafts have high success rates. Tissue engineered grafts are being investigated as a novel treatment modality. Conclusions Female urethral reconstruction is complex, and one must carefully evaluate patients afflicted with urethral disorders. Urethral stricture and urethral loss have different etiologies. Variations of a standard approach might best address the condition of an individual patient. Long-term outcomes data are not available for contemporary techniques of female urethral reconstruction. The highest success rates have been reported with vaginal flap and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Further studies focusing on newer reconstruction techniques and long-term outcomes are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic bowel injury is associated with significant morbidity and mortality when unrecognized. We assessed the incidence and outcomes of bowel injury in a contemporary cohort of patients, and reviewed the literature to examine the impact of experience with time on the incidence and consequences of bowel injury. Materials and Methods: Between 2006 and 2009 we performed 1,073 laparoscopic surgeries on the upper urinary tract, adrenal gland and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Patients incurring bowel injury were identified retrospectively. We reviewed complications and management. In a separate literature survey we identified 21 studies on laparoscopic bowel injury from 1993 to 2009. We analyzed etiology, incidence and management. Results: Bowel injury occurred in 8 cases (0.75%), including 6 and 2 identified intraoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Mechanisms included Veress needle and trocar placement, dissection and thermal injury. Intraoperative management included oversewing the injury, bowel resection and observation. No patient with intraoperatively recognized bowel injury sustained a postoperative adverse event. Patients with unrecognized injury presented in delayed fashion and required multiple procedures to manage the injury. No deaths occurred in this series. Urology series of bowel injury showed a combined 0.65% incidence in 14,447 laparoscopic procedures with 46.7% of injuries unrecognized at surgery. While the incidence of bowel injury has increased with time, the percent of unrecognized bowel injury has dramatically decreased from the early (70.4%) to the more recent (36.9%) laparoscopic era. Conclusions: The incidence of laparoscopic bowel injury has increased in the last 17 years. However, morbidity and mortality have decreased due to immediate recognition and repair. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]