1. Ethical Publishing in Biodiversity Conservation Science
- Author
-
Diogo Veríssimo, Thomas Pienkowski, Melissa Arias, Laure Cugnière, Hunter Doughty, Mirjam Hazenbosch, Emiel de Lange, Annalyse Moskeland, and Molly Grace
- Subjects
article processing charge ,commercial publisher ,ethical publishing ,journal ,nature conservation ,open access ,paywall ,publishing model ,plan s ,Ecology ,QH540-549.5 - Abstract
For many researchers, particularly in academia, publishing in peer-reviewed journals is a necessity, with major implications for their career progression. Yet, it is increasingly recognised that the current scientific publishing model is not fair and equitable, which can have severe consequences for the way science is accessed and used in nature conservation. We evaluated the publishing model of 426 conservation science journals against the Fair Open Access (FOA) principles. Two-thirds of journals, together publishing nearly half of all articles, complied with only two or fewer FOA principles. Only twenty journals (5%), publishing 485 articles per year (
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF