Search

Introduction: Spine fixation surgery for traumatic vertebral fractures is associated with severe pain and is often difficult to control. Traditionally systemic opioids have been the mainstay of analgesia for these procedures, which can lead to hyperalgesia, nausea, ileus, sedation, cognitive impairment, dependence, etc., limiting usage of opioids. The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided procedure with easily identifiable sonoanatomy. We hypothesized that a multimodal approach involving ESPB to a conventional analgesic regimen with local infiltration for patients undergoing major traumatic spine surgeries might provide better perioperative analgesia and reduce the need for postoperative opioid requirements. Material and Methods: A randomized control prospective trial was conducted on 34 ASA grade I -II patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled to undergo elective posterior spine fixation surgery with ASIA B to E after traumatic spine fracture under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to Group A which included patients who received general anesthesia with ESPB, and Group B, or the control group, included patients who received general anesthesia with systemic analgesics and postoperative local infiltration without ESPB. Intraoperative total fentanyl consumption, VAS score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours, time to activate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, total morphine consumption, and opioid-related side effects were monitored and compared in both groups. Results: Postoperative PCA morphine consumption was significantly lower in group A patients who received ESPB than those in the control group (17.06 ± 9.59 vs 37.82 ± 9.88 P value = <0.0001). VAS scores at rest and movement at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 hours were significantly lower (P value = 0.05) in the ESPB group compared with the control group at all time points. Conclusion: Bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block, when administered in traumatic spine patients undergoing spine fixation surgery, provides better analgesia with statistically decreased VAS scores and less postoperative opioid requirement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The article presents six successful cases using the interlaminar approach, with favorable postoperative outcomes. However, the article also highlights potential complications and the need for caution during the procedure. The document provides a detailed description of the technique, which involves specialized instruments and a 4K camera system. It emphasizes the importance of proper patient selection and surgeon skill for successful outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Aims: We compared classical (medial) and modified (lateral) thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIP) with only general anaesthesia (GA) using multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgeries. Methods: In this study, 100 patients aged 18--70 years were randomised to Group cTLIP (conventional TLIP block with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine with GA), Group mTLIP (modified TLIP block with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine with GA), and Group C (only GA using multimodal analgesia). The primary outcome was to assess the total peri-operative opioid consumption in the first 24 h. The secondary outcomes were to assess pain score upon arriving in the post-anaesthesia care unit, time to first analgesic need after surgery, post-operative opioid consumption in 24 h, and incidence of nausea and vomiting. Results: The total peri-operative opioid consumption in Group cTLIP (507.58 (258.55) µg) and Group mTLIP (491.67 (165.39) µg) was significantly lower than that in Group C (1225.4 (237.03) µg); (P < 0.001). However, it was comparable between groups cTLIP and mTLIP (P = 0.767). Pain score was comparable in groups cTLIP and mTLIP. It was significantly lower than Group C (P = 0.001). Rescue analgesia was needed in all (100%) patients of Group C but in only 15.2% of patients of the cTLIP and mTLIP groups. No patient in groups cTLIP and mTLIP complained of nausea and vomiting in the first 24 h, whereas it was significantly higher (61.8%) in Group C (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The analgesic effect of the modified TLIP block was not superior to the conventional TLIP block. Both techniques provided the same intra-operative and post-operative analgesia for lumbar disc surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Opioids form the basis of perioperative pain management but are associated with multiple side effects. In opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), several non-opioid drugs or neuraxial/regional blocks are used as substitutes for opioids. Ketamine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, provides intense analgesia. However, there is a shortage of literature on the effects of ketamine-based OFA on hemodynamics (HD) and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 adult patients. The patients in Group OFA (n = 30) received OFA with ketamine and ketofol (1:5) infusion, and those in Group OBA (n = 30) received opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) with fentanyl and propofol infusion. The postoperative pain-free period, pain scores, rescue analgesia, intraoperative HDs, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: The mean pain-free period in Group OFA (9.86 ± 1.43 hr) was significantly higher than that in Group OBA (6.93 ± 1.93 hr) (P = 0.002). During the postoperative 48 hours, the total requirement of fentanyl was considerably lower in Group OFA (P < 0.05). There was a significantly higher incidence of hypertension in Group OFA (46%) and hypotension (43%) in Group OBA (43%), respectively. Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was more common in Group OBA at the 2nd and 6th hr (P = 0.046 and P = 0.038) Conclusion: OFA with ketamine and ketofol provided adequate postoperative analgesia with a lower incidence of PONV after spine surgery. However, hypertension in the ketamine group and hypotension in the propofol group required fine titration of the infusion rate of drugs during the intraoperative period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Intraoperative regional analgesia and enhanced recovery are standard care models aimed at reducing perioperative opioid use following spine surgeries. This study aimed to examine the analgesic effect of retrolaminar block in promoting recovery and pain relief after posterior lumbar discectomy. Methods: The patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar discectomy were randomised into the retrolaminar group (n = 36) (received an intra-operative bilateral retrolaminar block with 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, 2 mL (8 mg) of dexamethasone, and 2 mL of magnesium sulphate 10% (200 mg) on each side) and control group (n = 36) (received standard general anaesthesia). Primary outcomes were recovery time (time from isoflurane discontinuation to the first response to verbal command) and time to discharge (time from admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) to discharge from the PACU, when Aldrete score was ≥9). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The extubation, recovery, and discharge times were significantly shorter in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the retrolaminar group for up to 8 h compared to only 2 h in the control group (P < 0.001). The time to first administration of ketorolac post-operatively was significantly longer in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The total consumption of ketorolac post-operatively was significantly reduced in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intra-operative retrolaminar block is an easy and effective opioid-free regional anaesthesia technique that improves recovery after posterior lumbar discectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel regional anesthetic technique that can provide effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries. This block targets the dorsal rami of thoracolumbar nerves as they pass through the paraspinal muscles. Multilevel spine surgeries are often prolonged, requiring extended duration of postoperative analgesia. Objective: To compare the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia of TLIP block when given with and without dexamethasone as an additive to bupivacaine. Methodology: This was a prospective, double‑blinded randomized study done on 20 patients undergoing two‑ or three‑level lumbar spine surgeries. Ten patients in group C received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine alone, whereas 10 patients in Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone along with 20 ml of bupivacaine for TLIP block before skin incision. Time for first analgesic request and pain scores using Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale were measured postoperatively. Results: The mean duration of sensory block was longer in group D when compared to group C (502.00 ± 95.13 vs. 383.5 ± 54.53 min with a P value of 0.001). The amount of rescue analgesic requirement was also higher in group C compared to group D. Conclusion: Dexamethasone, as an additive to bupivacaine, prolongs the duration and improves the quality of TLIP block for lumbar spine surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 14-year-old girl with congenital hydrocephalus and early-onset scoliosis presented with sudden onset of severe headache on the fourth postoperative day of scoliosis correction (definitive fusion). On evaluation, she was found to have cerebellar haemorrhage on computed tomography scan with the findings of obstructive hydrocephalus. Posterior fossa bleed with hydrocephalus contributing to raised ICP was suspected initially. Headache persisted despite treating the patient with analgesics and antioedema measures. There was no history of postural variation of headache. As the drain output was not coming down, even by the sixth postoperative day, low cerebrospinal fluid pressure headache was considered and the drain was removed, which resulted in marked improvement of headache. Subsequent wound exploration revealed grade III dural tear at D10 level, which was repaired and the headache subsided completely. The linear pattern of haemorrhage in the cerebellum is classical of remote cerebellar haemorrhage, which is seen rarely following spinal surgeries with associated dural tear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of a multi-level bilateral ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block as a part of fast-track spinal deformity surgery. The traditional surgeries for correcting spinal deformities are associated with postoperative pain, blood loss, functional limitations, and potential complications. The use of multimodal analgesia, including opioids, can have adverse effects. The retrolaminar block technique has been found to be effective in reducing opioid consumption. The article presents two cases where the multi-level bilateral retrolaminar block was performed, resulting in minimal opioid consumption and lower pain scores for up to 24 hours post-surgery. However, the study did not assess the dermatomal coverage, which is considered a limitation. [Extracted from the article]

Background: There are several approaches for lumbar fusion, although there is yet to be a consensus on which approach is the best. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative blood loss and acute postoperative pain in single-level mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgeries for the degenerative spine. Methods: Thirty-two patients were assigned by the surgeon to OLIF or TLIF groups - 16 in mini-open OLIF and 16 in open TLIF groups. The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin, numerical rating scale (NRS) at proposed time intervals for 24 h postoperative, and rescue analgesics used were compared among the groups. The operative duration and hospital stay in both groups were also compared. Results: The OLIF group showed significantly higher postoperative hemoglobin (11.5 vs. 10.5 g %, P = 0.04), lower 24-h postoperative pain scores on movement, (NRS 4 vs. 5.5, P = 0.0001), and shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs. 7 days, P = 0.003) than TLIF group. However, the surgery duration was significantly longer in OLIF than in TLIF (190 vs. 150 min, P = 0.005). Intraoperative hemodynamics, other postoperative pain scores at variable time points, and rescue analgesics given were comparable among groups (P > 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss was lower in OLIF than TLIF (275 vs. 500 mL) but was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Mini-open OLIF has favorable perioperative outcomes compared to open TLIF. Patients have higher postoperative hemoglobin and lesser pain on movement on the first postoperative day, leading to earlier mobilization and a shorter hospital stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: One of the most frequent etiologies for spinal surgery is unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis (ULS). To decompress affected structures while maintaining or restoring stability through fusion, surgeons utilize a variety of procedures. When paired with interbody fusion, posterior fusion is most applied, resulting in greater fusion rates. The two most popular techniques for implementing spinal fusion are posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). As a result, these two procedures have been assessed formally. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent interbody fusion for lumbar stenosis through PLIF and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF was performed. The patients were followed up for 24 months and fusion rates, Visual Analog Score (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) alongside the MacNab clinical outcome score, were assessed. The Bridwell interbody fusion grading system was used to evaluate fusion rates in computed tomography (CT). Results: Operations were performed in 60 cases where patients suffered from ULS. PLIF was performed on 33 patients (55%) (14 males and 19 females) and 27 patients (45%) (11 males and 16 females) who underwent MI-TLIF. In 87% of our respective cohort, either the L4–5 or the L5–S1 level was operated on. Overall fusion rates were comparable between the two groups; however, the TLIF group improved more in terms of VAS, ODI, and MacNab scores. On average, MI-TLIF surgery was longer and resulted in reduced blood loss. MI-TLIF patients were more mobile than PLIF patients postoperatively. Conclusion: With well-established adequate results in the literature, TLIF offers benefits over other methods used for interbody lumbar fusion in ULS or other diseases of the spine. However, MI-TLIF may procure more advantageous for patients if MI methods are implemented. In this instance, TLIF outperformed PLIF due to shorter operating times, less blood loss, faster ODI recovery, better MacNab scores, and a greater decline in VAS pain ratings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the (1) 90-day surgical outcomes and (2) 1-year revision rate of robotic versus nonrobotic lumbar fusion surgery. Methods: Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery at our institution were identified and propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion based on robotic assistance during surgery. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes, including 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revisions, were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05. Results: Four hundred and fifteen patients were identified as having robotic lumbar fusion and were matched to a control group. Bivariant analysis revealed no significant difference in total 90-day surgical complications (P = 0.193) or 1-year revisions (P = 0.178). The operative duration was longer in robotic surgery (287 + 123 vs. 205 + 88.3, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic fusion was not a significant predictor of 90-day surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 [0.32–1.67], P = 0.499) or 1-year revisions (OR = 0.58 [0.28–1.18], P = 0.142). Other variables identified as the positive predictors of 1-year revisions included levels fused (OR = 1.26 [1.08–1.48], P = 0.004) and current smokers (OR = 3.51 [1.46–8.15], P = 0.004). Conclusion: Our study suggests that robotic-assisted and nonrobotic-assisted lumbar fusions are associated with a similar risk of 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revision rates; however, robotic surgery does increase time under anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the increasing amount of elective spine fusion patients presenting with cardiac disease and congestive heart failure, it is becoming difficult to assess when it is safe to proceed with surgery. Assessing the severity of heart failure (HF) through ejection fraction may provide insight into patients' short- and long-term risks. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the severity of HF on perioperative outcomes of spine fusion surgery patients. Study Design/Setting: This was a retrospective cohort study of the PearlDiver database. Patient Sample: We enrolled 670,526 patients undergoing spine fusion surgery. Outcome Measures: Thirty-day and 90-day complication rates, discharge destination, length of stay (LOS), physician reimbursement, and hospital costs. Methods: Patients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery were isolated and stratified by preoperative HF with preserved ejection fraction (P-EF) or reduced ejection fraction (R-EF) (International Classification of Diseases-9: 428.32 [chronic diastolic HF] and 428.22 [chronic systolic HF]). Means comparison tests (Chi-squared and independent samples t-tests, as appropriate) compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, procedural characteristics, LOS, 30-day and 90-day complication outcomes, and total hospital charges between those diagnosed with P-EF and those not R-EF. Binary logistic regression assessed the odds of complication associated with HF, controlling for levels fused (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval]). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Totally 670,526 elective spine fusion patients were included. Four thousand and seventy-seven were diagnosed with P-EF and 2758 R-EF. Overall, P-EF patients presented with higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (all P < 0.001). In relation to No-HF, P-EF patients had higher rates of 30-day major complications including pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarctions (MI), sepsis, and death (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, P-EF was associated significantly with increased odds of pneumonia (OR: 2.07 [1.64–2.56], P < 0.001) and sepsis (OR: 2.09 [1.62–2.66], P < 0.001). Relative to No-HF, R-EF was associated with significantly higher odds of MI (OR: 3.66 [2.34–5.47]), CVA (OR: 2.70 [1.67–4.15]), and pneumonia (OR: 1.85 [1.40–2.40]) (all P < 0.001) postoperative within 30 days. Adjusting for prior history of MI, CAD, and the presence of a pacemaker R-EF was a significant predictor of an MI 30 days postoperatively (OR: 2.2 [1.14–4.32], P = 0.021). Further adjusting for history of CABG or stent placement, R-EF was associated with higher odds of CVA (OR: 2.11 [1.09–4.19], P = 0.028) and MI (OR: 2.27 [1.20–4.43], P = 0.013). Conclusions: When evaluating the severity of HF before spine surgery, R-EF was associated with a higher risk of major complications, especially the occurrence of a myocardial infarction 30 days postoperatively. During preoperative risk assessment, congestive HF should be considered thoroughly when thinking of postoperative outcomes with emphasis on R-EF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article in Neurology India presents a surgical technique for treating a specific type of hangman fracture that affects the C2-C3 vertebrae. The procedure involves inserting screws and rods to stabilize the fractured vertebrae and promote fusion. The authors discuss the benefits of this technique, such as direct fracture fixation, motion preservation, and prevention of long-term complications. They also mention potential risks, such as vertebral artery injury and the development of kyphosis. The article provides detailed instructions on the surgical procedure, including patient positioning, incision, and placement of bone graft. A video link is provided for further reference. [Extracted from the article]

The BIS value may decrease by cerebral hypoperfusion. We report a case in which the BIS value suddenly decreased during cervical spine surgery, which led us to find cervical screws compressing the vertebral arteries. In a 79-year-old man undergoing cervical spine surgery, the BIS suddenly decreased from about 40 to 10-20, about 4 h after the start of surgery. Intraoperative 3-dementional computed tomography indicated that both the two tips of cervical screws inserted in the 6th cervical vertebra were within bilateral transverse foramens. These cervical screws were removed, and the BIS increased immediately. The cervical screws were re-inserted again thorough the same vertebra into the bilateral transverse foramens, and the BIS decreased immediately. Postoperatively, cerebral hypoperfusion due to compression of bilateral vertebral arteries by two cervical screws was identified. The BIS may be a useful to detect cerebral hypoperfusion due to compression of the vertebral artery by a cervical screw. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Thoracolumbar spine surgery is one of the most painful surgical procedures. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane (ESP) block on post-operative cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods: Seventy adults posted for thoracolumbar spine surgery were randomised into the control group [Number of patients (n)=35], who received general anaesthesia without any nerve block, and the intervention group (n = 35), who received bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided ESP block at the level of spine surgery with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL after standard general anaesthesia. Along with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine, post-operative analgesia was standardised for both groups. Total morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) score to evaluate pain, overall patient satisfaction, and any side effects were compared at 24 h. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: Post-operative total morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group [5.69 (1.549) versus 9.51 (1.634) mg; P < 0.001]. Post-operative VAS scores were also significantly decreased in the intervention group at rest (P < 0.001) and on movement (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were more favourable in the intervention group [3.8 (0.4) versus 3.2 (0.6); P < 0.001]. Post-operative nausea and vomiting were found more in the control group but were not significant (n = 14 versus 8; P = 0.127). Conclusion: US-guided ESP block significantly reduces post-operative morphine consumption and improves analgesia and patient satisfaction without adverse effects in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Histopathological examination of the effects of Tisseel, Cova, Glubran and Coseal, which are used for sealing purposes in spinal surgery practice, on epidural fibrosis is aimed. Methods: Forty Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups in our study as Group 1 (n=8) control group (Laminectomy); Group 2 (n=8) Cova group (Laminectomy + Cova); Group 3 (n=8) Tissel group (Laminectomy + Tisseel); Group 4 (n=8) Coseal group (Laminectomy + Coseal); and Group 5 Glubrane group (Laminectomy + Glubrane). Control group was only applied laminectomy. After laminectomy to other groups, Cova was applied to the 2nd group, Tissel to the 3rd group, Coseal to the 4th group and Glubran to the 5th group in surgical fields. After the rats were monitored in separate cages for 6 weeks after the operation, the relevant spinal level was extracted and the samples were examined histopathologically and the results were evaluated statistically. Results: It was found that there was a statistically significant difference in Tisseel and Glubran groups in terms of fibrosis grading compared to the control group, and this had a positive effect on fibrosis. Compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference on fibrosis in Cova and Coseal groups. Conclusion: As dura adhesive agents used in spinal surgery practice did not increase spinal epidural fibrosis statistically significantly, we concluded that these products can be used safely during spinal surgery if necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the preference of spine surgeons between MD for microdiscectomy and endoscopic discectomy (ED) surgery for the management of lumbar pathologies in a lower-middle-income country (LMIC). Methodology: An online survey assessing the preference of spine surgeons for various lumbar pathologies was developed and disseminated in "Neurosurgery Cocktail" a social media platform. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software with a level of significance <0.05. Results: We received responses from 160 spine surgeons having a median experience of 6.75 years (range 0–42 years) after residency. Most of the spine surgeons preferred MD over ED, preference being homogeneous across all lumbar pathologies. In ED, the interlaminar approach was preferred more frequently than the transforaminal approach. The most commonly chosen contraindication for the interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach was ≥ 3 levels lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (n = 117, 73.1%) and calcified LDH (n = 102, 63.8%), respectively. There was no significant association between the type of approach preferred (MD vs. ED; and interlaminar vs. translaminar endoscopic approach) with the type of workplace and the level of experience. Conclusion: Spine surgeons were inclined toward MD over ED, due to various reasons, such as a steep learning curve, lack of training opportunities, and upfront expenses. There is a pressing need for the upliftment of ED in LMICs which requires global action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multiple Myeloma is a B-cell malignancy which can cause variety of lesions of the spine and spinal cord. The management of patients with spinal cord compression (SCC), and the efficacy and security of minimally invasive therapeutic approaches, are the main topics of discussion. Methods: To systematically review the scientific literature on neurosurgical aspects of MM spinal cord lesion management, a search was conducted among scientific papers in the databases ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and PubMed using keywords and Boolean operators. These comprise MM and lesions of the spine and spinal cord. Each database was searched from the earliest available article to January 2017. Results: According to the literature, low-dose radiotherapy, antimyeloma medications, and bisphosphonates comprise the mainstay management for symptomatic spinal lesions. The decision to operation is based on presence of myelopathy and degree of spinal cord compression. Conclusions: As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions may be drawn: (1) surgery is a valuable option for MM patients with symptomatic spinal involvement who experience rapid neurological deterioration with SCC and/or mechanical instability and (2) it is important to ensure that the benefits of surgical treatment outweigh the risks, as patients with MM are susceptible to infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates (1-9%) remain high despite the widespread adoption of infection control bundles. Topical vancomycin has emerged as an effective strategy to reduce the rate of SSI in patients undergoing spinal surgery including instrumentation. However, its use and efficiency in cranial neurosurgery is not well established. The aim of this study is to study the efficacy of topical vancomycin in cranial neurosurgery. Methods: A systematic search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data regarding type of surgery, use of implants, the dose of vancomycin, technique of administration in each study, outcomes, rate of SSI, and the interval between surgery and SSI; possible complications related to antibiotic use were collected. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in the qualitative analysis with 3,446 patients. SSI developed in 1.6% of the patients in the vancomycin group as compared to 5.28% in the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.24 with 95% CI: 0.12-0.51 (P-value: <0.00001). The difference between the subgroups was significant (P-value: < 0.00001). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 27.2. The studies showed low heterogeneity with an I2 of 24%. Meta-regression analysis showed that the number of patients in a study, duration of follow-up, and year of publication did not contribute significantly to effect size. Conclusion: The limited systemic absorption of vancomycin and broad-spectrum led to its widespread applicability in the prevention of SSI in all types of cranial neurosurgery. Cases with implantable pulse generators, cranioplasty, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures have all demonstrated their unequivocal effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is one of the commonly preferred regional anesthesia techniques in the recent past for various procedures including spine surgeries. The main advantages of ESPB are the ease of performing the technique and the lesser chance of complications. Many studies have proven that ESPB plays an important role in reducing perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the length of stay in the hospital. Thus it has been adopted as one of the measures for the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Nevertheless, the role of bi-level ESPB and a continuous catheter technique are the major research gaps and thus require further research in this population. The details of these two methods are discussed elaborately here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is increasingly gaining recognition as an alternative to open microdiscectomy for the treatment of intervertebral disk herniation. Apart from the neuraxial blockade, and general anesthesia, there is literature demonstrating the performance of endoscopic lumbar discectomy under sole local anesthesia infiltration. This is particularly advantageous as an awake patient assists the surgeon by verbalizing and preventing any inadvertent nerve root damage. However, marked pain has been reported during key steps such as endoscope port installation and radiculolysis. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an interfascial paraspinal block that soaks the spinal nerve roots with epidural spread providing superior analgesia for endoscopic discectomy. The utility of ESP block as a perioperative analgesic technique following spine surgery is well established; there are no reports of successful endoscopic discectomy performed using this block. This article emphasizes the utility of ESP block as the sole anesthetic technique for minimally invasive spine surgery in the awake state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: This study evaluates the effectiveness of long-acting antihypertensive drugs (clonidine and enalaprilat) in blunting the intubation response. Also, the study seeks to determine how effectively clonidine and enalaprilat can maintain stable haemodynamics during a change in position. Methods: After ethical committee approval and trial registration, a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted with 71 consenting patients scheduled for elective spine surgery in a prone position under general anaesthesia. Group C received clonidine 2 µg/kg, and Group E received enalaprilat 1.25 mg diluted in normal saline as an intravenous infusion given over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in response to the infusion of the study drugs, induction, tracheal intubation and change in position were recorded. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Results: Clonidine infusion caused a significant fall in heart rate post-infusion and post-induction with propofol (p value <0.05). Both clonidine and enalaprilat caused a significant fall in mean arterial pressure (MAP) post-infusion and post-induction (p value <0.05). Clonidine effectively blunted the intubation response with no increase in HR and MAP following intubation. Enalaprilat caused a significant rise in HR in response to intubation. On proning, there was a significant fall in MAP in both groups. Conclusion: Clonidine is effective in blunting the intubation response. Preoperative infusion of clonidine and enalaprilat causes hypotension during a change of position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Airway management in cervical spine injury patients requires manual in-line stabilization (MILS) of the neck to avoid exacerbation of cord injury, which impedes visualization of glottis during laryngoscopy. Specially designed blades such as McCoy and C-MAC D-blades can improve laryngoscopic view in such patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of C-MAC D-blades and the McCoy laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation using MILS in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Material and Methods: This randomized, prospective study was performed in 60 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I–III, either sex, 18 to 60 years of age undergoing elective cervical spine surgery. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups, group D and group M. Intubation was performed using a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in group D and a McCoy laryngoscope in group M using MILS. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, laryngoscopy and intubation times, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, Cormack Lehane (CL) grading with and without external laryngeal pressure (ELP), need for bougie or change of blade or operator, and change in hemodynamics following intubation were recorded. Results: Group D showed lower mean IDS scores than group M (P value < 0.0001). There were statistically significant differences found in duration of laryngoscopy (group D < group M), CL grading without ELP (group D: CL-1,2a >CL-2b, 3; group M: CL-1,2a group M), need for ELP and lifting force (group D < group M), and hemodynamic responses after intubation (group D < group M). Conclusion: A C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope provides better and rapid visualization of glottis with less intubation difficulties than a McCoy laryngoscope during intubation using MILS in patients with cervical spine injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Sugammadex (SUG) has been associated with changes in coagulation studies. Most reports have concluded a lack of clinical significance based on surgical blood loss with SUG use at the end of surgery. Previous reports have not measured its use intraoperatively during ongoing blood loss. Our hypothesis was that the use of SUG intraoperatively may increase bleeding. Material and Methods: This was a single site retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing a primary posterior cervical spine fusion, aged over 18 years, between July 2015 and June 2021. The primary outcomes compared were intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) and postoperative drain output (PDO) between patients receiving SUG, neostigmine (NEO) and no NMB reversal agent. The objective was to determine if there was a difference in primary endpoints between patients administered SUG, NEO or no paralytic reversal agent. Primary endpoints were compared using analysis of variance with a P value of 0.05 used to determine statistical significance. Groups were compared using the Chi-squared test, rank sum or student's t test. A logistic regression model was constructed to account for differences between the groups. Results: There was no difference in median EBL or PDO between groups. The use of SUG was not associated with an increase in odds for >500 milliliters (ml) of EBL. Increasing duration of surgery and chronic kidney disease were both associated with an increased risk for EBL >500 ml. Conclusion: Intraoperative use of SUG was not associated with increased bleeding. Any coagulation laboratory abnormalities previously noted did not appear to have an associated clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) after spine surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. With the advent of machine learning, an opportunity exists for more accurate prediction of such events to aid in prevention and treatment. Methods: Seven models were screened using 108 database variables and 62 preoperative variables. These models included deep neural network (DNN), DNN with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, simple linear regression, and gradient boosting classifier. Relevant metrics were compared between each model. The top four models were selected based on area under the receiver operator curve; these models included DNN with SMOTE, linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression. Separate random sampling of each model was performed 1000 additional independent times using a randomly generated training/ testing distribution. Variable weights and magnitudes were analyzed after sampling. Results: Using all patient‑related variables, DNN using SMOTE was the top‑performing model in predicting postoperative VTE after spinal surgery (area under the curve [AUC] =0.904), followed by lasso regression (AUC = 0.894), ridge regression (AUC = 0.873), and linear regression (AUC = 0.864). When analyzing a subset of only preoperative variables, the top‑performing models were lasso regression (AUC = 0.865) and DNN with SMOTE (AUC = 0.864), both of which outperform any currently published models. Main model contributions relied heavily on variables associated with history of thromboembolic events, length of surgical/anesthetic time, and use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis. Conclusions: The current study provides promise toward machine learning methods geared toward predicting postoperative complications after spine surgery. Further study is needed in order to best quantify and model real‑world risk for such events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs) utilize a retroperitoneal approach that avoids the intraperitoneal organs and manipulation of the anterior vasculature encountered in anterior approaches to the lumbar spine. The approach was championed by spinal surgeons; however, general/vasculature surgeons may be more comfortable with the approach. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare short‑term outcomes following LLIF procedures based on whether a spine surgeon or access surgeon performed the approach. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified all one‑ to two‑level LLIFs at a tertiary care center from 2011 to 2021 for degenerative spine disease. Patients were divided into groups based on whether a spine surgeon or general surgeon performed the surgical approach. The electronic medical record was reviewed for hospital readmissions and complication rates. Results: We identified 239 patients; of which 177 had approaches performed by spine surgeons and 62 by general surgeons. The spine surgeon group had fewer levels with posterior instrumentation (1.40 vs. 2.00; P < 0.001) and decompressed (0.94 vs. 1.25, P = 0.046); however, the two groups had a similar amount of two‑level LLIFs (29.9% vs. 27.4%, P = 0.831). This spine surgeon approach group was found to have shorter surgeries (281 vs. 328 min, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stays Length of Stay (LOS) (3.1 vs. 3.6 days, P = 0.019); however, these differences were largely attributed to the shorter posterior fusion construct. On regression analysis, there was no statistical difference in postoperative complication rates whether or not an access surgeon was utilized (P = 0.226). Conclusion: Similar outcomes may be seen regardless of whether a spine or access surgeon performs the approach for an LLIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient‑reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery. Methods: Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary one‑ or two‑level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all‑cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient‑reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1‑year postoperative point. Alpha was set at P < 0.05. Results: Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90‑day surgical reoperations (P = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function (P = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability (P = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90‑day all‑cause readmissions (P = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (P = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90‑day all‑cause readmissions. Conclusions: Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all‑cause 90 days readmissions and 90‑day surgical readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) or Forestier’s syndrome may reduce vertebral mobility, thus affecting the stability of adjacent vertebral segments and promoting spinal stenosis, vertebral dislocation, and unstable fracture secondary to low‑energy trauma. Aims: This study aimed to contribute with a case series of three patients affected by DISH undergone surgery with occipitocervical fixation for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability since the poor literature about CVJ instability and surgery in patients affected by DISH. Settings and Design: This was a multicentric case series. Subjects and Methods: Literature about CVJ instability and surgery in patients affected by DISH is poor. Thus, we present a case series of three patients affected by DISH, who underwent surgery with occipitocervical fixation with different clinical and radiological patterns. Results: CVJ represents one of the most mobile joints of the spine and is at greater risk for instability. Moreover, instability itself may act as primum movens for several degenerative conditions such as cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and cervical deformities. On the contrary, DISH itself may worsen CVJ instability because of subaxial spine stiffness. In case of DISH, the rigid unit formed by several ossified vertebral bodies acts as a long lever arm, increasing the forces applied to the hypermobile CVJ and reducing the dynamic buffer capability of ossified spine. On the other hand, vertebral instability increases the odds of fractures. In such cases, CVJ posterior instrumentation and fusion is an effective and feasible surgical technique, aimed to restore vertebral stability and to halt the progression of spinal stenosis. Conclusions: Due to the altered dynamics cervical spine along with the possible comorbidities, treatment indication and surgery for patients affected by DISH must be tailored case by case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether the lumbar paraspinal muscle/fat ratio influences the outcomes of patients who had simple decompressive surgeries for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or lumbar spinal stenosis. We also wanted to see if the spinopelvic parameters change with surgery and whether this change influences the outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (20 patients) and LDH (20 patients) who underwent simple discectomy or decompressive surgery between November 2021 and May 2022. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were performed before and 3 months after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were measured on whole spine radiographs before and 3 months after surgery. On axial magnetic resonance images, paraspinal muscle volume and muscle/fat ratios were calculated. All data were statistically analyzed with SPSS program. Results: There was a significant improvement in VAS, Oswestry, and JOA scores after surgery. We observed that more preoperative paraspinal muscle mass was positively correlated with lumbar lordosis (LL) and negatively correlated with sagittal vertical axis (SVA), VAS leg scores, and Oswestry scores. Furthermore, we observed a positive correlation between preoperative SVA and VAS leg scores. Conclusion: Despite limited number of patients, and shorter follow‑ups, this prospective study demonstrates a correlation among the lumbar paraspinal muscle/fat ratio, preoperative/postoperative spinopelvic parameters, and surgical outcomes. Increased paraspinal muscle ratio was correlated with lower SVA values and increased LL; lower VAS leg scores; higher Oswestry scores which reflects better surgical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Stagnara wake-up test is a simple reproducible neuromonitoring method during spinal surgery which replaces the evoked potential monitoring in the absence of neuromonitoring facilities. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) effect on the intraoperative wake-up test is still unclear. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of DEX on the quality of wake-up test during spinal correction surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled study was carried out over 62 patients randomized into two equal groups planned for elective minimally invasive corrective spine surgery. Instead of atracurium administration in the control group, patients in the experimental group were administered titrated continuous intravenous infusion of DEX at a dose of 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/hour. Lidocaine 2% spray around the vocal cords was done in both the groups to facilitate toleration of the endotracheal tube. Results: The DEX group showed statistically significant longer duration and better quality of the wake-up test. Statistically significant better haemodynamic state, a lower amount of intraoperative sedatives and higher amount of intraoperative analgesics were also evident in the DEX group. The postoperative Ramsay sedation scale was significantly lower in the DEX group just after extubation. Conclusion: The DEX use has shown an improving effect on the wake-up test quality, with slightly prolonged wake-up time. The present work supports the use of DEX as an adjuvant drug alleviating the need for the neuromuscular blockade, inducing a better haemodynamic profile, exhibiting better sedation and improving the awakening condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intrathecal morphine is a very good analgesic agent and was used frequently in the past. Its use has decreased over the years due to side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, pruritis, and so on. Also, with the introduction of drugs like clonidine and the availability of ultrasonography for regional blocks, the role of morphine has declined. Yet, there are surgeries where intrathecal morphine supersedes all other analgesic modalities to provide excellent intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Positioning of patients during surgery, whether prone or head down, can lead to airway edema which, in turn, may lead to a difficult airway, and enhanced chances for reintubation. We aimed to assess and evaluate modified Mallampati class (MMC) change in patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 80 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery. The MMC was assessed up to 48 h postoperatively. The time taken by the patients in the postoperative period for MMC class to revert to preoperative value and airway complications, if any, was noted. Other parameters observed were surgical duration, intraoperative fluids used, and blood loss to look for any significant correlation with changes in MMC. Results: MMC increase by one grade was observed in 73 patients (91%). MMC in 54 patients (74%) returned to baseline within 18 h, in 12 patients (16%) it took 24 h, and in the remaining 7 patients (10%) the time taken was 36 h. Conclusion: It was concluded and established by this study that the MMC declined by one grade and reverted to baseline value within 36 h. This change in MMC necessitates extra caution to be adopted during the postoperative period as surgery in a prone position may predispose to an increased risk of encountering difficult reintubation. The change in MMC was not significantly correlated to intraoperative variables like duration of surgery, amount of intraoperative fluid given, and blood loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical processes can be associated with a stress and anxiety in the patient triggering changes in blood pressure and heart rate adversely effecting the induction and recovery process from anesthesia. These effects are more pronounced in setting of regional anesthesia where the patient is awake intraoperatively. A calm and quite environment maintained during surgery can be helpful in blunting the stressful response of the patient. Hence, we studied the effect of music therapy on hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for abdominal and lower limb surgeries and its effect on the visual analog scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (SSTAI) score. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study where 60 patients of either gender between 18 and 65 years were divided into two groups of 30 patients each. The patients belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I or II. The patients were randomized into Group M (those who listened to music) and Group C (those who did not listen to music). After the induction of spinal anesthesia, headphones were applied to all the patients and music was started in Group M. The intraoperative parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, the VAS, and the SSTAI scale were recorded and compared in both the groups. Patient satisfaction was also recorded. Results: Patients who listened to music during surgery had significantly better VAS score, SSTAI score, and patient satisfaction. The hemodynamic parameters in both groups were comparable. Conclusion: Music therapy intraoperatively in patients undergoing lower limb and abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia can have better patient outcomes with a higher patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Neurological recovery in cervical myelopathy remains unpredictable. There is contradictory literature regarding the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in such cases. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the morphological changes in the spinal cord in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and compare them with clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: This is a single‑center, prospective, observational study. All patients with multilevel (two or more levels) cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing anterior spine surgery were included in the study. Patient demographics and radiological findings were recorded. MRI was repeated immediately post‑op and at 1‑year follow‑up. MRI classification system based on axial images was used to evaluate presurgery and postsurgery changes and correlate them with clinical information. Results: The study comprised 50 patients (40 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 59.5 years. Average duration of symptoms before surgery was 6.29 months. Thirty‑four patients underwent two‑level decompression, while 16 patients underwent more than two‑level decompression. Average duration of follow‑up was 26.82 months. Mean pre‑op Nurick grade was 2.84, and mean recovery rate was 56.73. Most common pre‑op MRI type was type 1. Analysis of data by logistic regression showed better recovery rate with lower age, lower pre‑op Nurick grade, and lower pre‑op MRI type. Conclusion: MR classification based on signal intensity changes in axial images have been found to correlate with recovery rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of a sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) block for postoperative pain management in lumbar disc hernia repair. The authors describe a case study in which a 58-year-old male patient underwent discectomy for a lumbar hernia. The patient received an ultrasound-guided S-ESP block as part of a multimodal anesthesia plan, and experienced effective pain relief without complications. The authors suggest that further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism of action and appropriate clinical indications for the sacral ESP block. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Aims: Acute pain management in drug addicts is a critical yet understudied topic. Drug addicts have a decreased pain threshold, impairing anaesthetic pain control. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative quality of recovery in addicts and non-addicts after receiving erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with general anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty males, aged 18-60 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II, scheduled for elective lumbar decompression surgery, were divided into two equal groups. Group A included 30 addicts and group N included 30 non-addicts. Both groups received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL bupivacaine (0.25%) before induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was comparison of the 24-hour postoperative quality of recovery (QoR-15) score. The secondary outcomes were time to first analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, morphine consumption, and adverse events. Results: The QoR-15 score was higher in group N (median = 128.5, interquartile range = 107-136) than in group A (118 [99-130]), indicating a better recovery in group N. The visual analogue scale pain score was lower in group N than in group A, especially in the first 12 hours postoperatively. Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in group N than in group A (mean ± standard deviation: 8.67 ± 2.74 and 5.53 ± 1.64 hours, respectively, P =0.001), Morphine consumption was significantly higher in group A than in group N (9.62 ± 3.2 and 7.08 ± 2.57 mg, respectively, P =0.041). Conclusion: Drug addicts experienced decreased analgesic efficacy of ESPB compared to non-addicts, with comparable postoperative QoR-15 score following lumbar decompression surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The practice of neuroanaesthesia has expanded significantly in recent years to keep up with various challenges posed in the perioperative care of patients for neurosurgical, interventional, neuroradiological, and diagnostic procedures. Technological advancements in neuroscience include the intraoperative use of computed tomography scans and angiograms for vascular neurosurgery, magnetic resonance imaging, neuronavigation, expansion of minimally invasive neurosurgery, neuroendoscopy, stereotaxy, radiosurgery, the performance of increasingly complex procedures, advancements in neurocritical care, etc. Recent advancements in neuroanaesthesia that can meet these challenges include the resurgence of ketamine, opioid-free anaesthesia, total intravenous anaesthesia, techniques to facilitate intraoperative neuromonitoring, awake neurosurgical and spine surgeries, etc. The current review provides an update on the recent advancements in neuroanaesthesia and neurocritical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgery is a well-known and effective method of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The present study aimed to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid (TXA), nitroglycerin (NTG), and remifentanil (REF) on hemorrhage prevention during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 135 participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. A randomized block design was used for subject assignment to three groups including TXA, NTG, and REF. The hemodynamic parameters, bleeding rate, hemoglobin level, and the amount of infused propofol were measured and recorded after surgery. Data were then analyzed in SPSS software using Chi-square test and analysis of variance. Results: The mean age of participants in the study was 42.12 ± 7.93 years, and all three groups were equal in terms of demographic characteristics (P > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.008). The mean heart rate (HR) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.05). The propofol dosage used in the TXA group was higher than the two groups of NTG and REF (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, the greatest MAP variability was observed in the NTG group. Higher mean HR and propofol consumption was observed in the NTG and TXA groups when compared to REF. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in oxygen saturation or bleeding risk. Based on these findings, REF may be considered a preferred surgical adjunct over TXA and NTG during lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The equilibrium between supply and demand for red blood cells is increasing unpredictably in many countries. An understanding of trends in blood usage profile and current usage can help predict future trends in demand and to put efforts to reduce use in particular areas. This study helps in analyzing the pattern of red blood cell utilization in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a blood bank, tertiary care hospital over a period of 6 months. All the requests coming to blood bank with information regarding patient's demographic details, diagnosis and indication for transfusion, type of request, blood transfused or returned were collected and reviewed. Crossmatch transfusion (CT) ratio, transfusion index (TI), and transfusion probability were also calculated. Results: A total of 10,364 patients (20,399 requests) utilized total 32,608 units of blood and its components, out of those 14,195 units of packed red cells units were utilized. March month had maximum number of requests and utilization. Most of the requests for blood were from the inpatients (wards) and were requested and utilized in the age group of 21–30 years with male predominance. Patients in the division of medicine utilized most blood. Although the division of surgery requested most of the blood, on an average, they utilized only one-third of the requested product. Overall, anemia was the most common indication for red cell utilization. In surgical group, spine surgery had a maximum CT ratio. Neurosurgery and hand surgery had the lowest TI in all specialties. Hand surgery and spine surgery had a lowest transfusion probability. Overall, utilization rate in our study was 59.8%. Conclusion: A regular review of blood unit's usage is very important to estimate the blood utilization pattern in any hospital. Profile of blood utilization will act as indicator for quality management of blood bank. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: This was an observational study. Objectives: The treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) remains a matter of debate. We report our experience with ten patients affected by symptomatic TDH, surgically treated through costotransversectomy. Methods: A total of ten patients (four men and six women) with single-level symptomatic TDH were surgically treated by two senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2009 and 2021. The most common type was a soft hernia. TDHs were classified as lateral (5) or paracentral (5). Preoperative clinical symptoms were varied. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range: 12–67 months). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Frankel grading system, and the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scoring system were used as outcome scores. Results: Postoperative CT study documented satisfactory decompression either on the nerve root or the spinal cord. All patients experienced a reduction of disability with an improved mean ODI score by 60%. Six patients reported total recovery of neurological function (Frankel Grade E) and four patients improved by 1 Grade (40%). The overall recovery rate estimated with the mJOA score was 43.5%. We reported the absence of significant difference in outcome compared to either calcified and noncalcified discs or paramedian and lateral location. Four patients had minor complications. No revision surgery was required. Conclusion: Costotransversectomy represents a valuable tool for spine surgeons. The major limit of this technique is the possibility to approach the anterior spinal cord. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post spinal surgery syndrome(PSSS) has always been considered only for the pain it causes. However, many other neurological deficits do happen after lower back surgery. The aim of this review is to look into the various other neurological deficits that could happen after a spinal surgery. Using the keywords, foot drop, cauda equina syndrome, epidural hematoma, nerve and dural injury in spine surgery, the literature was searched. Out of the 189 articles obtained, the most important were analyzed. The problems associated with spine surgery have been published in the literature but are much more than the failed back surgery syndrome and cause more discomfort to the patients. To bring about a more sustained and collective awareness and understanding of these complications following spinal surgery, we encompassed all these complications under the heading of PSSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various pain generators can lead to low backpain. It includes conditions affecting the muscles, lumbar spine, joints, traversing and exiting nerve roots etc. The IASP named 2021 the year as the Global Year About Back Pain, highlighting its importance. Multiple modalities exist for the treatment of conditions causing low-back pain, including non-pharmacological therapies, drugs, percutaneous minimally invasive techniques and surgeries. This review aims at providing a cursory view of the common ailments causing low backache and its corresponding minimally invasive techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In December 2019, a cluster of atypical cases of pneumonia was reported in Wuhan, China, which was later designated as Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Feb 11, 2020. We all are facing a global pandemic, and it is very important to be clear that there is no correct roadmap to navigate this difficult situation. It is imperative to state that this global pandemic impacted the spine care services of our institute. In the present study, we have assessed the spine surgeries performed by orthopedic surgeons in terms of volume and etiologies during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared the data with a pre-COVID period. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from all patients who underwent spinal surgeries at our institute under the department of orthopedics from August 20, 2019 to August 20, 2020 (a total of 12 months duration). The data was then divided into two groups--pre-COVID period (August 20, 2019-February 19, 2020-6 months) and during the COVID pandemic (February 20, 2020-August 20, 2021-6 months). Results: A total of 140 patients underwent surgery at our institute from August 20, 2019 to August 20, 2020. Of these, 91 patients underwent surgery during the pre-COVID period, and 49 patients underwent surgery during the COVID pandemic. In this devastating phase of the pandemic, our department's total number of surgeries significantly declined to 46.15%. The routine surgeries performed during the pandemic phase show a steep fall from 59.34% in the pre-COVID period to 10.20%. Conclusion: This paper is meant to focus attention on the exorbitant reduction in the operative workflow of the spine patients during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary healthcare institute. It is the need of the hour that orthopedic surgeons maintain equilibrium while providing the best possible treatment to their patients and limiting the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is effective for spine surgeries but is deep and technically demanding. Sacral ESPB is a novel approach for sacrococcygeal procedures and can potentially cover lumbar dermatomes by the cranial drug spread. This is the first reported case series demonstrating the potential analgesic efficacy of sacral ESPB for lumbar spine surgeries. Five patients with radiculopathy at the lumbosacral area level were scheduled for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). General anaesthesia was induced as per standard practice. All patients received sacral ESP in a prone position under ultrasound guidance with a needle inserted in-plane while targeting the fascial plane between the S2 median crest and overlying muscles. All the included patients had good analgesia in the postoperative period and required minimal opioid analgesic doses. Sacral ESPB is an easy, effective, and safe technique in the scheme of multimodal analgesia for TLIF surgeries as a component of pre-emptive analgesia, where the main goal is an opioid-sparing effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is increasingly being used for anaesthesia and analgesia of the hip, knee and thigh. It can be administered via two ultrasound-guided approaches, suprainguinal and infrainguinal. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the suprainguinal approach of FICB with infrainguinal approach of FICB in patients undergoing above knee orthopaedic surgeries. Methods: In this single-centre, double-blinded randomised trial, 32 patients undergoing above knee lower limb orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomised into group I (infrainguinal FICB) and S (suprainguinal FICB). They were given ultrasound-guided FICB with 30 mL 0.2% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia using the respective approaches. Injection tramadol was administered as a rescue analgesic when Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4. A blinded observer recorded pain score (NRS) from the initiation of the block every 2 h for 24 h. Time to first rescue analgesia, total duration of analgesia and analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction score were noted. Results: The mean pain scores were comparable between the two groups at all time intervals till 24 h except at 12 h and 20 h, when pain intensity was significantly less in group S than in group I. Total tramadol consumption was also significantly less in group S. There was no significant difference in time to first rescue analgesia and total duration of analgesia between the two groups. At 24 h, the patient satisfaction score was significantly better in group S. Conclusion: Suprainguinal FICB has superior analgesic efficacy over infrainguinal FICB in terms of reduced pain intensity, reduced 24-h tramadol consumption and better patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) provides an objective assessment of nociception - anti-nociception balance but is influenced by multiple confounders. The effect of change of position on SPI, has not been studied extensively. The aim of the study was to observe the effect of prone positioning on SPI and its correlation with hemodynamic variables, in patients undergoing lumbar and thoracic spine surgery. Material and Methods: This prospective observational pilot study included 14 patients. In addition to hemodynamic monitoring, SPI, entropy and pulse pressure variability (PPV) were monitored. Propofol and Fentanyl infusions were used for maintenance of anesthesia. The patients were made prone on bolsters and all the variables were recorded every 5 minutes in supine position and after making prone for 20 minutes, before and after incision, muscle splitting and laminectomy. Results: Comparing the last value of the variables in the supine position with those immediately after making prone, SPI increased by 16.36 units (P = 0.003), followed by gradual reduction over the next 20 minutes. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate increased transiently (Pvalue = 0.028 and 0.025, respectively) without any significant change in PPV. Surgical incision also led to a significant increase in SPI. Conclusion: Prone positioning leads to significant increase in SPI, probably due to increased sympathetic tone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) are better predictors of fluid responsiveness than static indices. There is a strong correlation between PPV and SVV in the prone position when assessed with the fluid challenge. However, this correlation has not been established during intraoperative hypotension. Our study aimed to assess the correlation between PPV and SVV during hypotension in the prone position and its relationship with cardiac index (CI). Material and Methods: Thirty patients aged 18–70 years of ASA class I–III, undergoing spine procedures in the prone position were recruited for this prospective observational study. Hemodynamic variables such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), PPV, SVV, and CI were measured at baseline (after induction of anesthesia and positioning in the prone position). This set of variables were collected at the time of hypotension (T-before) and after correction (T-after) with either fluids or vasopressors. HR and MAP are presented as median with inter quartile range and compared by Mann-Whitney U test. Reliability was measured by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Generalized estimating equations were performed to assess the change of CI with changes in PPV and SVV. Results: A statistically significant linear relationship between PPV and SVV was observed. The ICC between change in PPV and SVV during hypotension was 0.9143, and after the intervention was 0.9091 (P < 0.001). Regression of changes in PPV and SVV on changes in CI depicted the reciprocal change in CI which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: PPV is a reliable surrogate of SVV during intraoperative hypotension in the prone position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) in degenerative deformity activates spinal compensatory mechanisms to maintain neutral C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7SVA), such as an increase in pelvic tilt (PT) and decreased thoracic kyphosis (TK). We study the extent to which PT increase and TK reduction contribute to the compensation of pelvic incidence (PI)-LL mismatch. Methods: A cohort of 43 adult patients with adult degenerative thoracolumbar deformity were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic spinopelvic measurements were obtained before and after corrective surgery. Pearson correlations were calculated. Results: Preoperative PI-LL mismatch significantly correlated with an increase in PT and a decrease in TK in the whole cohort r = +0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.8) and r = −0.67 (95% CI − 0.81–−0.47), respectively, at a relative rate of 0.37 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.07) and − 0.57 (SD: 0.09), respectively. In patients with low PI, only TK showed a significant correlation with PI-LL mismatch, r = −0.56 (95% CI − 0.8 to − 0.16), at a rate of − 0.57 (SD: 0.19). The high PI subgroup showed a significant correlation with PT, TK, and C7SVA, r = 0.62 (95% CI 0.26–0.82), r = −0.8 (95% CI − 0.9–−0.58), and r = 0.71 (95% CI 0.41–0.87) at rates of 0.48 (SD: 0.11), −0.72 (SD: 0.12), and 0.62 (SD: 1.27). Conclusions: Decreased TK represented a more consistent compensatory mechanism in patients with high and low PI when compared to an increase in PT. PI-LL mismatch induced more pronounced changes in TK than did PT in both subgroups. Patients with high PI relied more on increases in PT and a relative decrease in TK to compensate for PI-LL mismatch than patients with low PI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Steadily increasing expenditure in the United States health-care system has led to a shift toward a value-based model that focuses on quality of care and cost-effectiveness. Operations involving the spine rank among some of the most common and expensive procedures performed in operating rooms nationwide. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are a useful tool for reporting levels of outcome and analyzing patient recovery but are both under-utilized and nonstandardized in spine surgery. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using the PubMed database, focusing on the most commonly utilized PROMs for spine disease as well as spinal deformity. The benefits and drawbacks of these PROMs were then summarized and compared. Results: Spine-specific PROMs were based on the class of disease. The most frequently utilized PROMs were the Neck Disability Index and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale; the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; and the Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22) for cervicothoracic spine disease, lumbar spine disease, and spinal deformity, respectively. Conclusion: We found limited, though effective, use of PROMs targeting specific classes of disease within spine surgery. Therefore, we advocate for increased use of PROMs in spine surgery, in both the research and clinical settings. PROM usage can help physicians assess subjective outcomes in standard ways that can be compared across patients and institutions, more uniquely tailor treatment to individual patients, and engage patients in their own medical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]