1. A prospective randomized comparison of simultaneous integrated boost with sequential boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.
- Author
-
Mani, Nilesh, Aggarwal, Sushil, Kumar, Ishan, Mandal, Abhijit, Jaiswal, Garima, Ranjan, Rakesh, Jaiswal, Anil, Gupta, Neha, Singh, Ankita, Mourya, Ankur, Aggarwal, Lalit, and Choudhary, Sunil
- Subjects
INTENSITY modulated radiotherapy ,HEAD & neck cancer ,VOLUMETRIC-modulated arc therapy ,OVERALL survival ,PROGRESSION-free survival - Abstract
Purpose: A comparison of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with sequential boost (SEQ) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy along with concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) was made with regard to their survival outcomes and toxicity profile. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 patients were enrolled between October 2016 and March 2019. They were randomized into two arms, SIB and SEQB. All patients were treated with 6 MV photon beam on Linear Accelerator with weekly concurrent cisplatin at 35 mg/m
2 . Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary end points and acute and late toxicities were the secondary end points. Results: The median follow-up period was 40.6 and 37.3 months for SIB and SEQB, respectively. At the end of 5 years, the median OS was 40.6 and 37.3 months (P = 0.947) and the median DFS was 35.1 and 37.3 months in the SIB and SEQB arms, respectively (P = 0.991). Complete response at 3 months was 64.7% and 76.5% and partial response was 23.5% and 17.6%, whereas progressive disease was 11.8% and 5.9% in SIB and SEQB arms, respectively. Acute dermatitis, mucositis, dysphagia, and salivary gland toxicities were higher in the SIB arm compared to the SEQB arm. Conclusion: SIB and SEQ arms were comparable in terms of OS and DFS. However, the acute toxicities were higher in the SIB arm, although the difference was not significant, compared to the SEQB arm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF