Search

To avoid ventilator-associated lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treatment, respiratory management should be performed at a low tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg and plateau pressure of ≤30 cmH2O. However, such lung-protective ventilation often results in hypercapnia, which is a risk factor for poor outcomes. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the removal of a catheter mount (CM) and using heated humidifiers (HH) instead of a heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME) for reducing the mechanical dead space created by the CM and HME, which may improve hypercapnia in patients with ARDS. This retrospective observational study included adult patients with ARDS, who developed hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 45 mm Hg) during mechanical ventilation, with target tidal volumes between 6 and 8 mL/kg and a plateau pressure of ≤30 cmH2O, and underwent stepwise removal of CM and HME (replaced with HH). The PaCO2 values were measured at 3 points: ventilator circuit with CM and HME (CM + HME) use, with HME (HME), and with HH (HH), and the overall number of accidental extubations was evaluated. Ventilator values (tidal volume, respiratory rate, minutes volume) were evaluated at the same points. A total of 21 patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS who were treated under deep sedation were included. The values of PaCO2 at HME (52.7 ± 7.4 mm Hg, P < .0001) and HH (46.3 ± 6.8 mm Hg, P < .0001) were significantly lower than those at CM + HME (55.9 ± 7.9 mm Hg). Measured ventilator values were similar at CM + HME, HME, and HH. There were no cases of reintubation due to accidental extubation after the removal of CM. The removal of CM and HME reduced PaCO2 values without changing the ventilator settings in deeply sedated patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS on lung-protective ventilation. Caution should be exercised, as the removal of a CM may result in circuit disconnection or accidental extubation. Nevertheless, this intervention may impr, Medicine, 100(36), art. no. e27199; 2021

Endotoxemia often occurs in patients with gram-positive infections. The possible mechanism is thought to be bacterial translocation after enterocyte hypoperfusion injury. However, the association between endotoxemia and enterocyte injury among patients with gram-positive septic shock has never been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between endotoxemia and enterocyte injury in gram-positive septic shock patients and to evaluate the association among endotoxemia, subsequent clinicalcourse, and other related factors.This was a posthoc analysis of a prospective observational study that evaluated the capability of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein(I-FABP), an indicator of enterocyte injury, to predict mortality. Among 57 patients in septic shock, those whose causative microorganisms were gram positive were included. The correlation between endotoxin activity (EA), which indicates endotoxemia,and I-FABP levels upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), the clinical course, and other related factors were evaluated.A total of 21 patients were examined. One-third of the patients presented with high EA levels at the time of ICU admission.However, there was no significant correlation between EA and I-FABP levels (Spearman r=0.002, P=.993). Additionally, high EA levels were not associated with abdominal complications after ICU admission or mortality. Similarly, high EA levels were not associated with severity scores, inotropic scores, or lactate levels upon ICU admission, which were previously reported to be factorsrelated to high EA levels.In this posthoc analysis, no correlation was observed between endotoxemia and enterocyte injury among patients in gram-positive septic shock. Additionally, high EA levels were not associated with the clinical course and reported factors related to endotoxemia.Although our results need to be validated in a large prospective cohort study, hypoperfusion enterocyte injury might not be a cause of endotoxemi, Medicine, 98(28), e16452; 2019