Search

Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE conflict of interest forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the public and can be viewed upon request.

Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Study Design: Review article., Objective: To provide a comprehensive review and update on the evaluation and management of Hangman's fractures., Summary of Background Data: Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture of the C2 vertebrae, and the prevalence is increasing with our aging population. Although these injuries are associated with good clinical outcomes and low rates of neurologic injury, they must be promptly recognized and treated according to patient and fracture factors., Methods: A review of the literature., Results: Neurologic injuries are uncommon in typical Hangman's fractures but are more of a concern in atypical Hangman's fractures due to lack of dissociation of the posterior ring of C2. The nonoperative treatment of stable type I, II, and atypical fractures with external immobilization leads to excellent long-term outcomes as does the operative treatment of unstable type IIa, III, and atypical fractures., Conclusions: Stable injury patterns can be treated with immobilization alone, whereas unstable injury patterns necessitate surgical treatment. Prompt diagnosis and treatment Hangman's fractures is paramount, and when managed properly, patients can have excellent clinical and neurologic outcomes., Competing Interests: B.L. reports participation in the Medtronic Biologics advisory board for spine related-fusion technologies. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objective: To use opportunistic computed tomography (CT) screening to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) in patients presenting with spinal fractures and the rate of identification and treatment at our institution., Background: OP remains a highly underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. Opportunistic abdominopelvic CT scans offer a feasible, accessible, and cost-effective screening tool for OP., Methods: Retrospective review of 519 patients presenting as trauma activation to the emergency department of a Level 1 Trauma Center after a spinal fracture. Patients were excluded if under the age of 18 or lacking a CT scan upon arrival in the emergency department. Hounsfield Units (HU) were measured at the L1 vertebral level on CT scans to determine bone density levels. Values of ≤100 HU were considered osteoporotic, whereas 101-150 HU were osteopenic., Results: A total of 424 patients were included. The average HU was 204.8 ± 74.3 HU. Of the patients, 16.7% were diagnosed as osteopenic and 9.9% as osteoporotic. The mean age was 65 ± 14 years for osteopenic patients and 77 ± 11 years for osteoporotic. A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between age and bone density. Of the patients, 42.5% with low bone density HU measurements had a previously documented history of OP/osteopenia. There was a statistically significant association between females and low bone density. Patients injured in a fall were statistically significantly more likely to have lower bone densities than those in motor vehicle accidents. Of the osteoporotic patients, 9.5% were treated by our institution's fragility fracture team., Conclusions: Our study shows that among a cohort of patients with spinal fractures, 58% of patients with radiographic signs of OP are currently undiagnosed, resulting in a low treatment rate of OP. Increasing and standardizing the use of opportunistic CT scans would allow an increase in the diagnosis and treatment of OP in patients with spinal fractures. Further, opportunistic CT scans could also be useful for a broader orthopedic population at high risk of fragility fractures., Level of Evidence: Level II-therapeutic., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: This project aimed to improve physicians' adherence to evidence-based practices regarding the selection and administration of intra-articular knee injections for patients with osteoarthritis. The project also aimed to empower patients by increasing their awareness of these evidence-based practices., Introduction: In the management of knee osteoarthritis, intra-articular injections are commonly used when initial treatments prove inadequate. However, issues such as patients' demand for rapid relief and variability in physicians' familiarity with optimal practices often lead to suboptimal treatment decisions and potential adverse outcomes., Methods: This project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit process. Initially, physicians were surveyed on the topic under consideration, and hospital records were reviewed. Subsequently, targeted interventions were implemented, including briefings and the distribution of informative flyers., Results: The baseline audit indicated low adherence with all audit criteria. Various parameters, such as adherence to best clinical practices, informed decision-making by patients, and the recommendation of alternative treatment modalities, were significantly lacking. Following the interventions, substantial improvements were observed, including higher rates of adherence to best clinical practices by physicians for multiple criteria, such as stepwise referral to conservative therapy options and the content of intra-articular injections., Conclusions: Adherence to best clinical practices can be improved through educational briefings for physicians on the most current evidence-based treatment practices for injectable substances in knee osteoarthritis. The active engagement of patients, facilitated by informative flyers and physician assistance, contributed to better involvement in their treatment choices. However, the participation of health care institutions and providers as well as lifelong education practices may be necessary for more comprehensive and sustainable changes., Spanish Abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A277., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 JBI. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Case: We describe treatment of severe multilevel congenital thoracic fusion in a 3-year-old girl with Apert Syndrome by posterior element excision, posterior column osteotomies, and gradual distraction with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) with 3-year follow-up. We also describe short-term follow-up with similar management in an 8-year-old patient with a congenitally fused thoracic spine from Jarcho-Levin syndrome., Conclusion: Posterior element resection and targeted posterior column osteotomies combined with gradual distraction with MCGR offers a promising treatment course for children with severe thoracic insufficiency syndrome derived from congenital fusions., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C476)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Introduction: ChatGPT-4, a chatbot with an ability to carry human-like conversation, has attracted attention after demonstrating aptitude to pass professional licensure examinations. The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic and decision-making capacities of ChatGPT-4 in clinical management specifically assessing for accuracy in the identification and treatment of soft-tissue foot and ankle pathologies., Methods: This study presented eight soft-tissue-related foot and ankle cases to ChatGPT-4, with each case assessed by three fellowship-trained foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons. The evaluation system included five criteria within a Likert scale, scoring from 5 (lowest) to 25 (highest possible)., Results: The average sum score of all cases was 22.0. The Morton neuroma case received the highest score (24.7), and the peroneal tendon tear case received the lowest score (16.3). Subgroup analyses of each of the 5 criterion using showed no notable differences in surgeon grading. Criteria 3 (provide alternative treatments) and 4 (provide comprehensive information) were graded markedly lower than criteria 1 (diagnose), 2 (treat), and 5 (provide accurate information) (for both criteria 3 and 4: P = 0.007; P = 0.032; P < 0.0001). Criteria 5 was graded markedly higher than criteria 2, 3, and 4 (P = 0.02; P < 0.0001; P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ChatGPT-4 effectively diagnosed and provided reliable treatment options for most soft-tissue foot and ankle cases presented, noting consistency among surgeon evaluators. Individual criterion assessment revealed that ChatGPT-4 was most effective in diagnosing and suggesting appropriate treatment, but limitations were seen in the chatbot's ability to provide comprehensive information and alternative treatment options. In addition, the chatbot successfully did not suggest fabricated treatment options, a common concern in prior literature. This resource could be useful for clinicians seeking reliable patient education materials without the fear of inconsistencies, although comprehensive information beyond treatment may be limited., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

To perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) successfully, a surgeon must be able to place the implants in a position that will restore and duplicate the patient's baseline anatomy and soft-tissue tension. One of the critical factors is the restoration of femoral offset. It is the goal of this review to precisely define measurement of offset in THA, describe its role in hip joint biomechanics, outline alterations that can be performed intraoperatively, and explain how it can create potential pathologic states. If there is a lack of offset restoration, it can result in a host of complications, including bony impingement with pain, edge loading or prosthetic joint instability, and alterations in the muscle length-tension relationship leading to reduced motor performance. Excessive femoral offset can increase hip abductor muscle and iliotibial band tension resulting in greater trochanteric pain regardless of the surgical approach. The purpose of this review was to analyze intraoperative surgical factors, choice of prosthetic implant type and position that are required to maximize stability, and dynamic motor performance after THA., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

The Management of Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies examining the treatment of OA of the hip in adults (aged 18 years and older). Based on the best current available evidence, this guideline contains eight recommendations and nine options to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians managing patients who have been diagnosed by a trained healthcare provider with OA of the hip and are currently undergoing treatment. It is also intended to serve as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Case: A 53-year-old man with bilateral sacroiliac (SI) fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction internal fixation with subsequent loss of fixation. Revision involved the placement of pelvic brim screws and robotic-assisted lumbopelvic fixation, resulting in minimal blood loss and soft-tissue injury. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had healed and was advanced to full weight-bearing status., Conclusion: Percutaneous SI screws and robotic-assisted spinopelvic fixation effectively managed bilateral SI fracture-dislocations, despite narrow osseous corridors, providing adequate stabilization while minimizing complications. The combination of these 2 techniques helped overcome anatomical limitations and reduced technical challenges, leading to a successful short-term outcome., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C360)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesions are disruptions at the meniscocapsular junction and/or meniscotibial attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, and occur in up to 42% of all acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears 1,3-5 . Ramp lesions are frequently missed because of the limited diagnostic sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), physical examination, and standard anterior compartment arthroscopic exploration 4,6,7 . Arthroscopic evaluation of ramp lesions often requires a modified Gillquist maneuver and/or a posteromedial accessory portal for adequate assessment of the posteromedial "blind spot." 4,8-10 Clinically, ramp lesions are associated with increased preoperative anterior knee instability, which may increase the risk of ACL graft failure if left untreated 6,13 . Although long-term comparative data on ramp-repair techniques are limited, proper arthroscopic assessment and treatment is recommended for all patients with ramp lesions at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) 1-5 . In the present video article, we demonstrate a systematic approach for the identification and assessment of ramp lesions and describe a mini-open inside-out arthroscopically assisted repair technique for unstable ramp lesions at the time of ACLR., Description: (1) The patient is placed in the supine position, and a contralateral leg holder is utilized to create more working room on the medial side. (2) Standard diagnostic arthroscopy is performed through anteromedial and anterolateral portals. (3) Next, with the arthroscope in the anterolateral portal, the scope is advanced through the intercondylar notch with the knee in 30° of flexion in order to inspect the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Probing is directed both over the superior aspect of the posterior horn to assess for tears, separation, and/or displacement of the meniscocapsular junction, and under the inferior aspect of the posterior horn to assess the integrity of the meniscotibial attachment. (4) After confirmation of a ramp tear, an open dissection is carried out through the sartorial fascia, with blunt dissection performed anterior to the medial gastrocnemius and above the semimembranosus to create the posteromedial surgical site. (5) A suture-shuttling device is utilized, and the corresponding cannula is placed into the anterolateral portal and directed toward the tear under arthroscopic visualization from the anteromedial portal. (6) Next, the first needle is passed through the meniscus, and the second is delivered through the adjacent capsule to create a vertical or oblique suture pattern. The needles are retrieved from the posteromedial surgical site and promptly cut, and the sutures are tied. (7) Multiple sutures, both above (femoral) and below (tibial) the meniscus, are placed 3 to 5 mm apart in a similar fashion. (8) On completion of the repair, the meniscocapsular junction is probed in order to confirm adequate stability with minimal translation of the medial meniscus., Alternatives: In the setting of an ACL tear, surgical options for concomitant repair of an unstable ramp lesion include all-inside, inside-out, or hybrid techniques (i.e., outside-in, inside-in, and/or all-inside)., Rationale: Repair of ramp lesions using an inside-out technique restores preoperative excessive knee instability, which may decrease the risk of ACL graft failure. In addition, an inside-out ramp repair has a reported low secondary meniscectomy rate (2%), offers flexibility regarding the number and placement of the sutures, and creates a potentially stronger repair; however, this procedure is more technically challenging compared with other repair techniques 6,10 . All-inside ramp repairs have been reported to have higher secondary meniscectomy rates, ranging from 11% to 31%, because of the inability to repair the meniscotibial ligament from the anterior portals 13,14 . Suture hook repair using a posteromedial portal is becoming more popular and reportedly has a significantly lower secondary meniscectomy rate compared with all-inside techniques (19% compared with 30.6%) 15 ., Expected Outcomes: At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, DePhillipo et al. reported similar clinical outcomes and return to sports for patients who underwent combined ACLR plus inside-out repair of ramp lesions (n = 50) compared with a matched cohort who underwent isolated ACLR (n = 50). Although the ACLR plus ramp lesion repair group had had significantly greater preoperative knee instability compared with the isolated ACLR group, there was no difference in postoperative instability between groups at an average of 2.8 years (range, 2 to 8 years) of follow-up 6 ., Important Tips: The exterior posteromedial incision should be facilitated by inside-out transillumination of the medial compartment and by palpation using an intra-articular probe at the medial aspect of the joint in order to avoid saphenous vein injury 10 .Two-thirds of the posteromedial incision should be distal to the joint line, with one-third proximal, because the suture needles often angle downwards as they exit the capsule 10 .The pes anserinus tendons should be retracted during the posteromedial dissection in order to avoid injury to the saphenous nerve (which lies posteromedial to the tendons) 10 .70° to 90° of flexion relaxes the hamstring and gastrocnemius, which improves visualization and aids in retrieval of the suture needles as they exit the posterior capsule 10 .Entering the anterolateral portal with the suture-delivery device decreases the risk of neurovascular damage and optimizes the direction of the needle 10 .After placement of the first needle, keep slight tension on the first suture to avoid inadvertent suture damage during advancement of the second needle 10 .Recent reports have suggested that ramp lesions can occur in isolation without ACL injury or accompanying isolated or combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. Do not forget to assess for ramp lesions in these scenarios 16 ., Acronyms: ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentMMBH = medial meniscus bucket-handleMRI = magnetic resonance imagingMFC = medial femoral condyleMTP = medial tibial plateauPMC = posteromedial capsuleMM = medial meniscusAT = adductor tuberclesMCL = superficial medial collateral ligamentSM = semimembranosusMGT = medial head of gastrocnemius tendonACLR = anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionPROMs = patient-reported outcome measuresMTL = meniscotibial ligament., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A462)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly popular because of the improved implant design, porous ingrowth surface, and surgical techniques. When avoiding the risks of cement use, a press-fit arthroplasty stem that has been implanted may not feel immediately stable, especially if the medullary canal size is in between standard stem diameters. To help surgeons improve fixation and avoid overstuffing the medullary canal, we present the matchstick autograft augmentation technique. The use of humeral autograft, analogous to impaction grafting in hip arthroplasty, has been reported to have promising short-term outcomes 2,3 . This technique of using humeral autograft material, dubbed matchstick autografts because of their shape and size, allows for optimization of humeral stem stability with the option of smaller cementless humeral implants. By avoiding overstuffing of the medullary canal, this technique aims to reduce the incidences of intraoperative fracture, postoperative stress shielding, and potential implant loosening 4-6 ., Description: Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is routinely performed via the anterosuperior approach 7 ; however, a deltopectoral approach can be utilized if desired. The canal is sequentially broached with implant trials until the tactile feedback demonstrates axial and rotational stability. In cases in which tactile feedback during implantation demonstrates slight movement, the smaller implant size can be selected and augmented with matchstick autograft. An oscillating saw is utilized to cut the edges of the previously resected humeral head in order to expose the subchondral bone surface. Graft sticks about 20 mm in length and 1 to 3 mm in width are then fashioned. Humeral trials are then implanted with the matchstick grafts placed lengthwise alongside the humeral stem. Axial and rotational press-fit is again assessed. If adequate, the formal humeral implant is selected and implanted in position. As in conventional impaction grafting, the grafts are compressed to the side of the humeral canal, but they offer more corticocancellous structure than bone chips. This technique is applicable even in some fracture scenarios., Alternatives: When a specific press-fit humeral stem size does not achieve adequate stability, there are typically 3 surgical alternatives. First, a larger stem size can be selected. Second, the implant can be inserted deeper to achieve press-fit stability. Third, cement can be added to fill the medullary canal and create immediate stability., Rationale: When implanting the humeral prosthesis, the operating surgeon's primary goal is stem stability. When faced with lack of stability, the surgeon can select a larger humeral stem, risking stress shielding; implant the stem deeper, compromising length and risking humeral fracture; or consider a cemented implant. In order to minimize the risk of intraoperative cardiopulmonary events and complicated subsequent revision surgeries 8 , the use of cement should be avoided if at all possible. Shoulder surgeons have reported grafting techniques, analogous to hip impaction grafting, that have yielded good success 3 . The technique that we describe utilizes a matchstick structural autograft that helps improve cementless fixation in primary humeral implantation cases and allows for the use of a smaller stem. The structural shape of the graft allows this technique to be utilized even in selected proximal humeral fractures., Expected Outcomes: Other studies have reported on the use of softer cancellous autografts to stabilize humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty. In a study of 286 arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, Lucas et al. reported that 267 humeral stems (93.3%) had not subsided 3 . Humphrey and Bravman used cancellous autograft to achieve metaphyseal centering of the humeral component in 53 patients, with no cases of humeral implant loosening at 12 months 2 . Lo et al. reported 91% tuberosity healing in their series of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties augmented with matchstick autografts 1 , with no cases of aseptic humeral stem loosening. Montemaggi et al. used matchstick autografts to augment 46 primary cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasties and found zero instances of humeral loosening at 1-year follow-up 9 ., Important Tips: The strongest humeral matchstick grafts come from the subchondral surface.After creating the graft, it is palpated for structural integrity. A stiffer or softer graft can be chosen, depending on surgeon preference.Surgeons can try impacting the graft with humeral trials to assess the stem stability prior to final implantation., Acronyms and Abbreviations: RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyFX = fracture3D CT = 3-dimensional computed tomographyXR = x-rayFU = follow-up., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A466)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Available codes in the ICD-10 do not accurately reflect soft tissue sarcoma diagnoses, and this can result in an underrepresentation of soft tissue sarcoma in databases. The National VA Database provides a unique opportunity for soft tissue sarcoma investigation because of the availability of all clinical results and pathology reports. In the setting of soft tissue sarcoma, natural language processing (NLP) has the potential to be applied to clinical documents such as pathology reports to identify soft tissue sarcoma independent of ICD codes, allowing sarcoma researchers to build more comprehensive databases capable of answering a myriad of research questions., Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of patients with myxofibrosarcoma within the National VA Database would be missed by searching only by soft tissue sarcoma ICD codes? (2) Is a de novo NLP algorithm capable of analyzing pathology reports to accurately identify patients with myxofibrosarcoma?, Methods: All pathology reports (10.7 million) in the national VA corporate data warehouse were identified from 2003 to 2022. Using the word-search functionality, reports from 403 veterans were found to contain the term "myxofibrosarcoma." The resulting pathology reports were manually reviewed to develop a gold-standard cohort that contained only those veterans with pathologist-confirmed myxofibrosarcoma diagnoses. The cohort had a mean ± SD age of 70 ± 12 years, and 96% (287 of 300) were men. Diagnosis codes were abstracted, and differences in appropriate ICD coding were compared. An NLP algorithm was iteratively refined and tested using confounders, negation, and emphasis terms for myxofibrosarcoma. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for the NLP-generated cohorts through comparison with the manually reviewed gold-standard cohorts., Results: The records of 27% (81 of 300) of myxofibrosarcoma patients within the VA database were missing a sarcoma ICD code. A de novo NLP algorithm more accurately (92% [276 of 300]) identified patients with myxofibrosarcoma compared with ICD codes (73% [219 of 300]) or basic word searches (74% [300 of 403]) (p < 0.001). Three final algorithm models were generated with accuracies ranging from 92% to 100%., Conclusion: An NLP algorithm can identify patients with myxofibrosarcoma from pathology reports with high accuracy, which is an improvement over ICD-based cohort creation and simple word search. This algorithm is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/sarcoma-shark/myxofibrosarcoma-shark) and is available to facilitate external validation and improvement through testing in other cohorts., Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Study Design: A retrospective comparative study was conducted to analyze the outcome of surgical and conservative treatment for patients over 80 years old with thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS)., Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of posterior spinal cord decompression surgery for over 80-year-old patients with TSS., Summary of Background Data: Concerned about the risk of surgery, over 80-year-old patients with TSS are usually treated conservatively, which often leads to a decline in quality of life. So far as we know, no study demonstrates the risk and benefit of spine surgery for these patients., Methods: Over 80 years of age who underwent dorsal decompression surgery or conservative treatment due to TSS between January 2010 and November 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-four patients who completed follow-up PROM (patient-reported outcome measure) data were collected, including the mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score) scoring system, VAS (visual analogue scale), questionnaire-based assessment of the ODI (Oswestry disability index), BI (Barthel index), and SF-36v2 (Short Form-36v2) Health Survey. The clinical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative imaging findings, operative records, complications, and individual outcomes were analyzed., Results: Of the 64 patients, 38 underwent posterior decompression, pedicle screw fixation, and posterolateral fusion; another 26 chose conservative treatment. The baseline characteristics of the TSS patients in 2 groups show no significant differences. The clinical symptoms and imaging outcomes showed a significant improvement in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group, according to mJOA, VAS, ODI, BI, and SF-36v2. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 6 patients, and transient neurological impairment occurred in 2 patients., Conclusions: Posterior decompression surgery for over 80-year-old patients with TSS is a safe and effective treatment, it has a good clinical outcome as well as an acceptable complication rate. However, there were no obvious improvements in quality of life or pain with conservative treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: For distal forearm fractures in children, it has been shown that a below-elbow cast is an adequate treatment that overcomes the discomfort of an above-elbow cast and unnecessary immobilization of the elbow. For reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures, our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT)-which compared an above-elbow cast with early conversion to a below-elbow cast-revealed no differences in the risk of redisplacement or functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Although studies with a longer follow-up after diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children are scarce, they are essential, as growth might affect the outcome., Questions/purposes: In this secondary analysis of an earlier RCT, we asked: (1) Does early conversion from an above-elbow to a below-elbow cast in children with reduced, stable diaphyseal forearm fractures result in worse clinical and radiological outcome? (2) Does a malunion result in inferior clinical outcomes at 7.5 years of follow-up?, Methods: In this study, we evaluated children at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up who were included in a previous RCT. The median (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 years (5.2 to 9.9). The patients for this RCT were included from the emergency departments of four different urban hospitals. Between January 2006 and August 2010, we treated 128 patients for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. All 128 patients were eligible; 24% (31) were excluded because they were lost before the minimum study follow-up or had incomplete datasets, leaving 76% (97) for secondary analysis. The loss in the follow-up group was comparable to the included population. Eligible patients were invited for secondary functional and radiographic assessment. The primary outcome was the difference in forearm rotation compared with the uninjured contralateral arm. Secondary outcomes were the ABILHAND-kids and QuickDASH questionnaire, loss of flexion and extension of the elbow and wrist compared with the contralateral forearm, JAMAR grip strength ratio, and radiological assessment of residual deformity. The study was not blinded regarding the children, parents, and clinicians., Results: At 7.5-year follow-up, there were no differences in ABILHAND-kids questionnaire score (above-elbow cast: 41 ± 2.4 versus above/below-elbow cast: 41.7 ± 0.7, mean difference -0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.4 to 0.04]; p = 0.06), QuickDASH (above-elbow cast: 5.8 ± 9.6 versus 2.9 ± 6.0 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 2.9 [95% CI -0.5 to 6.2]; p = 0.92), and grip strength (0.9 ± 0.2 for above-elbow cast versus 1 ± 0.2 for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference -0.04 [95% CI -1 to 0.03]; p = 0.24). Functional outcomes showed no difference (loss of forearm rotation: above-elbow cast 7.9 ± 17.7 versus 4.1 ± 6.9 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 3.8 [95% CI -1.7 to 9.4]; p = 0.47; arc of motion: above-elbow cast 152° ± 21° versus 155° ± 11° for the above/below-elbow cast group, mean difference -2.5 [95% CI -9.3 to -4.4]; p = 0.17; loss of wrist flexion-extension: above-elbow cast group 1.0° ± 5.0° versus 0.6° ± 4.2° for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference 0.4° [95% CI -1.5° to 2.2°]; p = 0.69). The secondary follow-up showed improvement in forearm rotation in both groups compared with the rotation at 7 months. For radiographical analysis, the only difference was in AP ulna (above-elbow cast: 6° ± 3° versus above/below-elbow cast: 5° ± 2°, mean difference 1.8° [0.7° to 3°]; p = 0.003), although this is likely not clinically relevant. There were no differences in the other parameters. Thirteen patients with persistent malunion at 7-month follow-up showed no clinically relevant differences in functional outcomes at 7.5-year follow-up compared with children without malunion. The loss of forearm rotation was 5.5ׄ° ± 9.1° for the malunion group compared with 6.0° ± 13.9° in the no malunion group, with a mean difference of 0.4 (95% CI of -7.5 to 8.4; p = 0.92)., Conclusion: In light of these results, we suggest that surgeons perform an early conversion to a below-elbow cast for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children. This study shows that even in patients with secondary fracture displacement, remodeling occurred. And even in persistent malunion, these patients mostly showed good-to-excellent final results. Future studies, such as a meta-analysis or a large, prospective observational study, would help to establish the influence of skeletal age, sex, and the severity and direction of malunion angulation of both the radius and ulna on clinical result. Furthermore, a similar systematic review could prove beneficial in clarifying the acceptable angulation for pediatric lower extremity fractures., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Pain after orthopaedic trauma is complex, and many patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma are at increased risk for prolonged opioid utilization after the injury. Patient-centered interventions capable of delivering enhanced education and opioid-sparing pain management approaches must be implemented and evaluated in trauma care settings to improve pain outcomes and minimize opioid-related risks., Questions/purposes: Does personalized pain education and management delivered by coaches (1) improve pain-related outcomes, (2) reduce opioid consumption, and (3) improve patient-reported outcome measures (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] scores) compared to written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety?, Methods: This clinical trial aimed to examine the effect of a personalized pain education and management intervention, delivered by paraprofessional coaches, on pain-related outcomes and opioid consumption compared with usual care (written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety). Between February 2021 and September 2022, 212 patients were randomized to the intervention (49% [104]) or control group (51% [108]). A total of 31% (32 of 104) and 47% (51 of 108) in those groups, respectively, were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 12 weeks or had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (72 of 104) and 53% (57 of 108) for analysis in the intervention and control group, respectively. Patients randomized to the intervention worked with the paraprofessional coaches throughout hospitalization after their orthopaedic injury and at their 2-, 6-, and 12-week visits with the surgical team after discharge to implement mindfulness-based practices and nonpharmacological interventions. Most participants in the final sample of 129 identified as Black (73% [94 of 129]) and women (56% [72 of 129]), the mean Injury Severity score was 8 ± 4, and one-third of participants were at medium to high risk for an opioid-use disorder based on the Opioid Risk Tool. Participants completed surveys during hospitalization and at the 2-, 6-, and 12-week follow-up visits. Surveys included average pain intensity scores over the past 24 hours measured on the pain numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 and PROMIS measures (physical functioning, pain interference, sleep disturbance). Opioid utilization, measured as daily morphine milligram equivalents, was collected from the electronic health record, and demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from self-report surveys. Groups were compared in terms of mean pain scores at the 12-week follow-up, daily morphine milligram equivalents both during inpatient and at discharge, and mean PROMIS scores at 12 weeks of follow-up. Additionally, differences in the proportion of participants in each group achieving minimum clinically important differences (MCID) on pain and PROMIS scores were examined. For pain scores, an MCID of 2 points on the pain numeric rating scale assessing past 24-hour pain intensity was utilized., Results: We found no difference between the intervention and control in terms of mean pain score at 12 weeks nor in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID of 2 points for 24-hour average pain scores (85% [61 of 72] versus 72% [41 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 5.3]; p = 0.08). No differences were noted in daily morphine milligram equivalents utilized between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization, at discharge, or in prescription refills. Similarly, we observed no differences in the proportions of patients in the intervention and control groups who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Physical Function (81% [58 of 72] versus 63% [36 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.2]; p = 0.06). We saw no differences in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance between the intervention and control groups (58% [42 of 72] versus 47% [27 of 57], respectively, OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.0]; p = 0.31). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Pain Interference scores did not differ between the intervention and the control groups (39% [28 of 72] versus 37% [21 of 57], respectively, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.1]; p = 0.95)., Conclusion: In this trial, we observed no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pain outcomes, opioid medication utilization, or patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, future targeted research with diverse samples of patients at increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes is warranted to ascertain a potentially meaningful patient perceived effect on pain outcomes after working with coaches. Other investigators interested in this interventional approach may consider the coach program as a framework at their institutions to increase access to evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions among patients who are at increased risk for poor postoperative pain outcomes. Smaller, more focused programs connecting patients to coaches to learn about nonpharmacological pain management interventions may deliver a larger impact on patient's recovery and outcomes., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Joint-sparing resection of periarticular bone tumors can be challenging because of complex geometry. Successful reconstruction of periarticular bone defects after tumor resection is often performed with structural allografts to allow for joint preservation. However, achieving a size-matched allograft to fill the defect can be challenging because allograft sizes vary, they do not always match a patient's anatomy, and cutting the allograft to perfectly fit the defect is demanding., Questions/purposes: (1) Is there a difference in mental workload among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation approaches? (2) Is there a difference in conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft), elapsed time during reconstruction, and qualitative assessment of goodness-of-fit of the allograft reconstruction among the approaches?, Methods: Seven surgeons used three modalities in the same order (freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation) to fashion synthetic bone to reconstruct a standardized bone defect. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mental task load index questionnaires and procedure time were captured. Cone-beam CT images of the shaped allografts were used to measure conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft) to a computer-generated ideal bone graft model. Six additional (senior) surgeons blinded to modality scored the quality of fit of the allografts into the standardized tumor defect using a 10-point Likert scale. We measured conformance using the root-mean-square metric in mm and used ANOVA for multipaired comparisons (p < 0.05 was significant)., Results: There was no difference in mental NASA total task load scores among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation techniques. We found no difference in conformance root-mean-square values (mean ± SD) between surgical navigation (2 ± 0 mm; mean values have been rounded to whole numbers) and patient-specific instrumentation (2 ± 1 mm), but both showed a small improvement compared with the freehand approach (3 ± 1 mm). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.1; p = 0.01). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% CI -0.1 to 0.9; p = 0.02). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 0 mm (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2; p = 0.82). In evaluating the goodness of fit of the shaped grafts, we found no clinically important difference between surgical navigation (median [IQR] 7 [6 to 8]) and patient-specific instrumentation (median 6 [5 to 7.8]), although both techniques had higher scores than the freehand technique did (median 3 [2 to 4]). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 4 (p < 0.001). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the difference of medians was 3 (p < 0.001). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 1 (p = 0.03). The mean ± procedural times for freehand was 16 ± 10 minutes, patient-specific instrumentation was 14 ± 9 minutes, and surgical navigation techniques was 24 ± 8 minutes. We found no differences in procedure times across three shaping modalities (freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation: mean difference 2 minutes [95% CI 0 to 7]; p = 0.92; freehand versus surgical navigation: mean difference 8 minutes [95% CI 0 to 20]; p = 0.23; patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: mean difference 10 minutes [95% CI 1 to 19]; p = 0.12)., Conclusion: Based on surgical simulation to reconstruct a standardized periarticular bone defect after tumor resection, we found a possible small advantage to surgical navigation over patient-specific instrumentation based on qualitative fit, but both techniques provided slightly better conformance of the shaped graft for fit into the standardized post-tumor resection bone defect than the freehand technique did. To determine whether these differences are clinically meaningful requires further study. The surgical navigation system presented here is a product of laboratory research development, and although not ready to be widely deployed for clinical practice, it is currently being used in a research operating room setting for patient care. This new technology is associated with a learning curve, capital costs, and potential risk. The reported preliminary results are based on a preclinical synthetic bone tumor study, which is not as realistic as actual surgical scenarios., Clinical Relevance: Surgical navigation systems are an emerging technology in orthopaedic and reconstruction surgery, and understanding their capabilities and limitations is paramount for clinical practice. Given our preliminary findings in a small cohort study with one scenario of standardized synthetic periarticular bone tumor defects, future investigations should include different surgical scenarios using allograft and cadaveric specimens in a more realistic surgical setting., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Cancers are chronic manageable diseases in the era of the second phase of the Cancer Moonshot program by the US government. Patients with cancer suffer from various forms of orthopaedic morbidities, namely locomotive syndrome in cancer patients (Cancer Locomo). Type I encompasses orthopaedic conditions directly caused by cancers such as pathological fractures. Type II includes conditions caused by cancer treatments in cases of osteopenia, bone necrosis, insufficiency fractures, nonunions, and postsurgical complications. Type III defines coexisting conditions such as arthritis. The fundamental philosophy is that orthopaedic surgeons facilitate lifesaving ambulatory anticancer drug therapies by preventing and improving Cancer Locomo. Skeletal metastasis-specific procedures are evolving currently. Recently emerging percutaneous ambulatory minimally invasive procedures address skeletal reinforcement and local cancer control while avoiding many complications and drawbacks from extensive open surgical reconstructive procedures. Three-dimensional imaging techniques are useful but are not always available for acetabular procedures in all healthcare facilities. In this review, the techniques of percutaneous guidewire and antegrade cannulated screw placement under standard C-arm fluoroscopy are described in detail. In addition, cancer-induced bone loss, biomechanical data of percutaneous skeletal reinforcement, and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive procedures were reviewed., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Patients and caregivers may experience immense distress when receiving the diagnosis of a primary musculoskeletal malignancy and subsequently turn to internet resources for more information. It is not clear whether these resources, including Google and ChatGPT, offer patients information that is readable, a measure of how easy text is to understand. Since many patients turn to Google and artificial intelligence resources for healthcare information, we thought it was important to ascertain whether the information they find is readable and easy to understand. The objective of this study was to compare readability of Google search results and ChatGPT answers to frequently asked questions and assess whether these sources meet NIH recommendations for readability., Questions/purposes: (1) What is the readability of ChatGPT-3.5 as a source of patient information for the three most common primary bone malignancies compared with top online resources from Google search? (2) Do ChatGPT-3.5 responses and online resources meet NIH readability guidelines for patient education materials?, Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 12 most common online questions about osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma. To be consistent with other studies of similar design that utilized national society frequently asked questions lists, questions were selected from the American Cancer Society and categorized based on content, including diagnosis, treatment, and recovery and prognosis. Google was queried using all 36 questions, and top responses were recorded. Author types, such as hospital systems, national health organizations, or independent researchers, were recorded. ChatGPT-3.5 was provided each question in independent queries without further prompting. Responses were assessed with validated reading indices to determine readability by grade level. An independent t-test was performed with significance set at p < 0.05., Results: Google (n = 36) and ChatGPT-3.5 (n = 36) answers were recorded, 12 for each of the three cancer types. Reading grade levels based on mean readability scores were 11.0 ± 2.9 and 16.1 ± 3.6, respectively. This corresponds to the eleventh grade reading level for Google and a fourth-year undergraduate student level for ChatGPT-3.5. Google answers were more readable across all individual indices, without differences in word count. No difference in readability was present across author type, question category, or cancer type. Of 72 total responses across both search modalities, none met NIH readability criteria at the sixth-grade level., Conclusion: Google material was presented at a high school reading level, whereas ChatGPT-3.5 was at an undergraduate reading level. The readability of both resources was inadequate based on NIH recommendations. Improving readability is crucial for better patient understanding during cancer treatment. Physicians should assess patients' needs, offer them tailored materials, and guide them to reliable resources to prevent reliance on online information that is hard to understand., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Shoulder Group conducted a prospective cohort study of 452 patients with symptomatic atraumatic rotator cuff tears treated with a physical therapy program to determine the predictors of failure of nonsurgical treatment, to provide insight into indications for surgery. After 10 years, we found the following: (1) Physical therapy was effective for over 70% of patients. (2) PROMs showed statistical and clinical improvement after 12 weeks of therapy and did not decline over 10 years. (3) Cuff tear severity did not correlate with pain, duration of symptoms, or activity level. (4) Of those who had surgery, 56.7% had surgery in the first 6 months while 43.3% had surgery between 6 months and 10 years. (5) Early surgery was primarily driven by low patient expectations regarding the effectiveness of therapy. (6) Later surgery predictors included workers' compensation status, activity level, and patient expectations. (7) Only 1 patient had a reverse arthroplasty (0.2% of the cohort). These data suggest that physical therapy is an effective and durable treatment of atraumatic symptomatic rotator cuff tears and most patients successfully treated with physical therapy do not exhibit a decline in patient-reported outcomes over time. Reverse arthroplasty after nonsurgical treatment is exceptionally rare., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Whereas partial quadriceps tendon ruptures may be treated nonoperatively if the extensor mechanism remains functional, complete ruptures require primary operative repair to achieve optimal functional results 1,2 . The 2 most common techniques are the use of transosseous tunnels and the use of suture anchors. The goal of these procedures is to reconstruct and restore mobility of the extensor mechanism of the leg., Description: The patient is positioned supine with the injured leg exposed. A midline incision to the knee is made over the quadriceps tendon defect, exposing the distal quadriceps and proximal patella. Irrigation is utilized to evacuate the residual hematoma, and the distal quadriceps and proximal patella are debrided of degenerative tissue. When utilizing transosseous tunnels, a nonabsorbable suture is passed full-thickness through the medial or lateral half of the quadriceps tendon in a locked, running pattern (i.e., Krackow). A second nonabsorbable suture is passed full-thickness through the other half of the tendon. There should then be 4 loose strands at the distal quadriceps. The anatomic insertion of the quadriceps tendon is roughened with a sharp curet to expose fresh cancellous bone. Three parallel bone tunnels are created along the longitudinal axis of the patella. The knee is placed in full extension, with a bump under the heel in order to provide slight recurvatum at the knee and to allow for a properly tensioned repair. In pairs, the free ends of the sutures are passed through the tunnels. The sutures are tensioned and tied together in pairs at the distal aspect of the patella. Alternatively, when utilizing suture anchors, Arthrex FiberTape is passed full-thickness through the medial or lateral half of the quadriceps tendon in a Krackow pattern. A second FiberTape is passed full-thickness through the other half of the tendon. There should then be 4 loose tails at the distal quadriceps. The 2 tails of the medial FiberTape are placed into a knotless Arthrex SwiveLock anchor; this step is repeated for the 2 lateral tails. The anatomic insertion of the quadriceps tendon is roughened to expose fresh cancellous bone. With use of a 3.5-mm drill, create 2 parallel drill holes along the longitudinal axis of the patella, with sufficient depth to bury the SwiveLock anchor. Unlike in the transosseous tunnel technique, these drill holes do not run the length of the patella. The holes are then tapped. Following irrigation, the anchors are tensioned into the bone tunnels, and extra tape is cut flush to the bone. For both techniques, additional tears in the medial and lateral retinacula are repaired if present., Alternatives: Alternatives include nonoperative treatment with use of a hinged knee brace; operative treatment with use of simple sutures; and augmentation with use of wire reinforcement, cancellous screws, the Scuderi technique, the Codivilla technique, tensor fasciae latae reinforcement, and/or MERSILENE tape (Ethicon)., Rationale: Primary operative repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures is a well-documented, successful procedure with biomechanical, clinical, and patient-reported data to support its use 3-7 . However, literature comparing the 2 most common surgical techniques remains controversial. Transosseous tunnel repair is the most common technique utilized to repair quadriceps tendon ruptures, but suture anchors have become increasingly popular in the past several years 1,4 . Most studies have reported no significant difference in biomechanical, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures between these 2 techniques 3,4,8-10 . Decreased operative time and a smaller incision have been suggested as advantages of suture anchors 4,9 . However, this method incurs a higher average cost of surgery and risks a more complex revision in the event of deep infection 9,10 . Simple suture repair is a less commonly utilized technique and is now reserved for midsubstance tendon repairs. Nonoperative treatment of complete quadriceps tendon rupture is exceedingly rare and not recommended because of the profound functional consequences. Relative indications for nonoperative treatment include a patient who is unfit for surgery, is not ambulatory at baseline, or retains full extensor mechanism function. Nonoperative treatment is typically reserved for partial quadriceps ruptures and typically involves early immobilization with a hinged knee brace., Expected Outcomes: Primary repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures, utilizing either the transosseous tunnel or suture anchor technique, yields excellent outcomes. Following surgical treatment, patients have near-full recovery in range of motion, with studies reporting a <5° deficit compared with the contralateral, uninjured limb 3,4,10,11 . The vast majority of patients (>90%) return to pre-injury levels of function and work 3,4,7,11 . The majority of patients also report satisfactory results, as assessed with use of patient-reported outcome measures 3,4,10 . The most commonly reported complications are knee stiffness and quadriceps muscle atrophy, which can both be treated with proper rehabilitation. Even in the event of these complications, however, patients can maintain adequate knee function 2,3 . More severe complications are rare (<3%) and include deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, superficial and/or deep infection, and tendon rerupture 2-4,10-12 . Delayed operative treatment is associated with worse outcomes and increased complication rates 1,3,4,10,11 ., Important Tips: When performing the Krackow stitch, be sure to tension and remove all slack before performing another tissue pass.Surgical repair should be performed as soon as possible from the time of injury in order to minimize risks and to achieve optimal surgical outcomes.If there is concern that the primary construct would be unstable, it can be augmented with wire reinforcement, cancellous screws, the Scuderi technique, the Codivilla technique, tensor fasciae latae reinforcement, and/or MERSILENE tape.Identify and repair patellar retinaculum tears, which are common concomitant injuries in the setting of complete quadriceps rupture., Acronyms and Abbreviations: MRI = magnetic resonance imaging., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A463)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Case: A 22-year-old man with habitual dislocation of the patella (HDP), characterized by lateral dislocation in flexion with spontaneous relocation with extension, presented with right knee pain and inability to actively extend. Imaging revealed lateral patellar dislocation, flat articular surface of the patella, and trochlear dysplasia. His symptoms persisted despite physical therapy. A 4-directional patellar stabilization surgery, incorporating lateral release, medial tibial tuberosity osteotomy, quadriceps muscle lengthening, and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, was performed, with significant improvement in pain and function postoperatively., Conclusion: The procedure could be feasible in cases of severe HDP when conservative measures failed to relieve the patient's symptoms., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C436)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Case: This case report details the rare presentation of a scaphoid waist fracture in a 27-year-old right-hand-dominant man, with an atypical displacement of the proximal fracture fragment into the flexor compartment of the forearm. Urgent open reduction and internal fixation using a Herbert screw were performed, resulting in fracture union and favorable wrist function at the 1-year follow-up., Conclusion: This case serves as a reminder that tailored, timely interventions for challenging scaphoid fractures can yield favorable long-term results, underscoring the significance of individualized approaches in fracture management., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C449)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the procedure of choice for osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) when conservative treatment fails; however, high rates of dissatisfaction and poor implant longevity dissuade younger patients from TKA. There is a paucity of evidence that report outcomes and clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic knee procedures in patients with end-stage (grade 3-4) OAK. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe (grade 3-4) OAK., Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed with the terms "Knee," "Osteoarthritis," and/or "Arthroscopic debridement," "Arthroscopic lavage," "Arthroscopic microfracture," "Arthroscopic chondroplasty," "debridement," "lavage," "chondroplasty," "microfracture," and/or "arthroscopy" in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases in November 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases were searched for studies that evaluated outcomes (e.g., pain, function, and conversion to TKA) for patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4 OAK after knee arthroscopy (including debridement, lavage, microfracture, or chondroplasty) at a minimum 6-month follow-up. Percent improvement from preoperative score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included achievement of minimal clinically importance difference and conversion to TKA., Results: Nine studies (410 knees with grades 3-4 OAK) were included. Arthroscopic debridement and lavage resulted in a 18.8% to 53.1% improvement at short-term follow-up (e.g., 6 months to 3 years) and a 50.0% improvement at long-term follow-up (e.g., 10 years) in knees with grade 3 OAK and a 15.0% to 41.3% improvement at short-term follow-up and a 46.9% improvement at long-term follow-up in knees with grade 4 OAK. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture resulted in 1.6% to 50.8% improvement at short-term follow-up in knees with grade 3 OAK. No studies included long-term outcomes or evaluated knees with grade 4 OAK after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and lavage occurred in 21.9% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 35.0% of patients with grade 4 OAK at short-term follow-up and in 47.4% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 76.5% of patients with grade 4 OAK at long-term follow-up. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture occurred in 10.9% of patients with grade 3 and 4 OAK at long-term follow-up., Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement, lavage, and microfracture can provide short- and long-term symptomatic relief and improvement in function by up to 50.0% in patients with grade 3 to 4 OAK. These procedures may result in fewer patients with grade 3 OAK undergoing TKA compared with patients with grade 4 OAK., Level of Evidence: Level IV; systematic review of Level II-IV studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B153)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, together with The Hip Society, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American College of Radiology, and American Physical Therapy Association, recently released the updated 2023 Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. 8 recommendations and 9 options comprise these guidelines intended to optimize treatment outcomes in a patient population that is growing exponentially over time. In this article, we present case studies that illustrate utilization of the clinical practice guideline workgroup's evidence-based recommendations in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Study Design: Retrospective study., Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores are associated with interbody cage subsidence following transforaminal (TLIF) and posterior (PLIF) lumbar interbody fusions and whether there is a clinically sensitive threshold for subsidence., Background: Interbody cage subsidence following lumbar fusion is a complication that can generate poor surgical outcomes. Prior research has correlated cage subsidence with bone mineral density. VBQ scores derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been proposed as a tool for measuring bone mineral density, offering a potential new and convenient preoperative risk assessment tool for subsidence., Methods: The study involved patients undergoing single-level PLIF or TLIF between 2007 and 2022. Exclusions were for nondegenerative diagnoses, multilevel/revision surgeries, inadequate radiographs, missing immediate postoperative radiographs, and preoperative MRI studies older than 1 year. VBQ was calculated at L1-L4 from preoperative T1-weighted MRI images. Subsidence was assessed by changes in disc height (DH; >2 mm difference) and segmental lordosis (SL; >5 degrees difference) between immediate weight-bearing postoperative and latest postoperative lateral radiographs. Statistical analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics., Results: Subsidence was observed in 27% (SL parameter) and 47% (DH parameter) of 51 total patients. VBQ scores were significantly associated with cage subsidence based on both SL (odds ratio = 7.750, P = 0.012; correlation coefficient = 0.382, P = 0.006) and DH (odds ratio = 4.074, P = 0.026; correlation coefficient = 0.258, P = 0.057) in the combined TLIF/PLIF cohorts. In the cohort of 36 patients undergoing TLIF, a VBQ of 2.70 yielded 100.0% sensitivity and 46.2% specificity in detecting subsidence with SL measurement (area under the curve = 0.812, P < 0.001) and 86.7% sensitivity and 47.6% specificity with the DH measurement (area under the curve = 0.692, P = 0.033)., Conclusions: We found that MRI-based VBQ scores are effective predictors of cage subsidence following TLIF surgery. A VBQ score of 2.70 demonstrated a reliable model and high sensitivity for doing so, identifying a potential clinical threshold for preoperative subsidence risk assessment., Level of Evidence: Level III., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The utility and risks associated with the use of cervical collars in the postoperative period after cervical spine surgery have been of debate. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the currently available evidence on the use of cervical collars after cervical spine surgery to assess their impact on outcomes., Methods: A literature search of the PubMed database was performed using keywords "cervical collar," "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)," "posterior cervical decompression and fusion," "laminoplasty," "post-operative orthotic bracing," "cervical decompression," and "cervical orthosis" in all possible combinations. All English studies with the level of evidence of I to IV that were published from May 1, 1986, to December 3, 2023, were considered for inclusion., Results: A total of 25 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and reviewed. Regarding anterior and posterior fusion procedures, cervical collar use demonstrated improved short-term patient-reported outcomes and pain control. While surgeon motivation for collar use was to increase fusion rates, this is not well drawn out in the literature with the majority of studies demonstrated no significant difference in fusion rates between patients who wore a cervical collar and those who did not. Regarding motion-preserving procedures such as cervical laminoplasty, patients with prolonged postoperative cervical collar use demonstrated increased rates of axial neck pain and decreased final range of motion (ROM)., Conclusion: Surgeon motivation for postoperative cervical collar immobilization after completion of fusion procedures is to increase fusion rates and improve postoperative pain and disability despite this not being fully drawn out in the literature. After completion of motion-sparing procedures, the benefits of collar immobilization diminish with their prolonged use which could lead to increased rates of axial neck pain and decreased ROM. Cervical collar immobilization in the postoperative period should be considered its own intervention, with its own associated risk-benefit profile., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosures: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B156)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is potentially the most nuanced decision a surgeon has to make. This article reviews the literature on the range-of-motion loss related to the LIV, ability to return to sports based on LIV, correlation between LIV and disk degeneration, and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes related to LIV., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Case: Odontoid fractures with atlantoaxial dislocations are rare injuries. We report a case of a 41-year-old man with a Type 2 odontoid fracture with locket facet and posterolateral dislocation. He underwent single-stage C1-C4 posterior fixation and fusion, and at 2-year follow-up, he is symptom-free without any residual pain. Follow-up radiograph and CT scan show healed odontoid fracture with posterior fusion., Conclusion: This case highlights successful management of a complex odontoid fracture by a single-stage posterior surgery. Closed reduction is usually unsuccessful, and open reduction using posterior approach is preferable., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C422)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Electrolyte derangement, defined as disorders of clinically impactful physiologic ions such as potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate, has a variety of clinical manifestations. These electrolytes have narrow windows of normal in vivo concentration before neurologic, cardiac, renal, or gastrointestinal consequences occur. Perioperative disturbances in electrolyte concentration can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, longer length of stay, and higher rates of short and medium-term readmission in orthopaedic and spine surgery postoperatively. To prevent electrolyte related complications, careful monitoring and repletion of at-risk patients must be undertaken. A systematic approach to repletion allows for a safe and efficacious treatment of these disorders., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Extended oral prophylactic antibiotics have been increasingly used in arthroplasty with the goal of reducing the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). While a reduction in the rate of PJI has been noted with extended oral antibiotic regimens in high-risk patients, no large database study has assessed infection risk after primary total hip arthroplasty among well-balanced cohorts receiving and not receiving postoperative extended oral antibiotics., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database, TriNetX, to identify patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. This cohort was stratified by oral antibiotic prescription within one day of procedure. A one-to-one propensity score matching based on age, sex, class of obesity, and medical comorbidities was conducted. Outcomes explored in this study were 90-day risk of PJI, superficial skin infection, deep skin infection, and all-cause revision., Results: 90-day postoperative infection complications of PJI were higher in the group receiving antibiotics (hazard ratio: 1.83, P -value = 0.012). Other complications such as superficial skin infection, deep skin infection, and all-cause revision showed no statistically significant differences., Conclusion: This database analysis of 5,476 patients demonstrated no decrease in complications of PJI, superficial or deep skin infection, or revision at 90 days. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of extended oral antibiotics., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Camptocormia, also known as bent spine syndrome, primarily affects individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). This review provides an overview of camptocormia in PD, covering its definition, epidemiology, causes, diagnosis, and treatment. In the epidemiology section, we delve into its prevalence, gender disparities, and ongoing genetic research. Regarding diagnosis and assessment, we discuss evolving diagnostic criteria and measurement techniques, as well as new diagnostic tools. For management and treatment, a wide array of options is available, from conservative methods such as physical therapy and botulinum toxin injections to surgical interventions such as spinal orthopedic surgery and deep brain stimulation. We stress the significance of personalized care and multidisciplinary collaboration. This comprehensive review aims to provide clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals with a comprehensive understanding of camptocormia in PD, highlighting its clinical features, diagnostic strategies, management approaches, and future perspectives., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Case: This case demonstrates a 2-year-old boy with a rare benign supraclavicular mass diagnosed as neuromuscular choristoma through open biopsy. Postoperatively, he underwent semiannual surveillance with ultrasound without development of neurological complaints, limb deformity, or recurrence at 2-year follow-up., Conclusion: Neuromuscular choristoma involving the brachial plexus is a rare tumor that should be in the differential diagnosis of pediatric peripheral nerve-based tumors. The intimate association with neural elements limits complete resection. Therefore, open biopsy with partial resection is recommended. While postoperative fibromatosis may occur, open biopsy remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Ultrasound can be used to monitor recurrence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C432)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Patients with hemophilia A can develop joint hemarthroses, degenerative changes, and eventually undergo total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Few data exist concerning complications and prosthesis survival after TSA in this population., Questions/purposes: (1) Is hemophilia A associated with more bleeding and thromboembolic adverse events after TSA relative to matched controls? (2) Is 5-year TSA prosthesis survival reduced in patients with hemophilia A compared with matched controls?, Methods: The 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver M161 database was used to identify patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA. Given that the X-linked recessive condition hemophilia A presents nearly exclusively in males, male patients with hemophilia A who underwent TSA were matched 1:10 with male patients without hemophilia who underwent TSA based on age and Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI). This yielded 73 patients with hemophilia A who underwent TSA who were matched 1:10 with 729 patients without hemophilia. Ninety-day adverse events were compared with multivariable analysis. Revision within 5 years was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: Compared with the control cohort, patients with hemophilia had greater odds of bleeding issues (hematoma, OR 6.8 [95% CI 3.0 to 15.3]; p < 0.001; anemia, OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.2]; p < 0.001, transfusion, OR 5.0 [95% CI 2.4 to 10.3]; p < 0.001), venous thromboembolic events (VTE) (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.1]; p = 0.01), and prosthetic loosening (OR 3.5 [95% CI 1.4 to 8.0]; p = 0.004). Based on available data, 5-year implant survival was not different in patients with hemophilia (97.3% [95% CI 93.6% to 100.0%]) relative to matched controls (95.2% [95% CI 93.4% to 97.2%]; p = 0.60)., Conclusion: The elevated risks of both 90-day bleeding complications (hematoma, anemia, and transfusion) and VTE (DVT and PE) in patients with hemophilia emphasize the special challenges of carefully balancing factor replacement and VTE prophylaxis pre-, intra-, and postoperatively on an individual patient basis with careful hematologist coordination. Further study on Factor VIII levels and targets as well as tranexamic acid and VTE prophylaxis in this population is necessary to provide further guidance. Furthermore, 5-year implant survival was not different between patients with hemophilia and matched controls (patients without hemophilia) based on available data, suggesting that TSA survivorship remains durable and may be offered to patients in this population as indicated., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pedicle screw trajectory planning based on artificial intelligence (AI) software in patients with different levels of bone mineral density (BMD)., Summary of Background Data: AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning has potential to improve pullout force (POF) of screws. However, there is currently no literature investigating the efficacy of AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning in patients with different levels of BMD., Methods: The patients were divided into 5 groups (group A-E) according to their BMD. The AI software utilizes lumbar spine CT data to perform screw trajectory planning and simulate AO screw trajectories for bilateral L3-5 vertebral bodies. Both screw trajectories were subdivided into unicortical and bicortical modes. The AI software automatically calculating the POF and pullout risk of every screw trajectory. The POF and risk of screw pullout for AI-planned screw trajectories and AO standard trajectories were compared and analyzed., Results: Forty-three patients were included. For the screw sizes, AI-planned screws were greater in diameter and length than those of AO screws (P<0.05). In groups B-E, the AI unicortical trajectories had a POF of over 200N higher than that of AO unicortical trajectories. POF was higher in all groups for the AI bicortical screw trajectories compared with the AO bicortical screw trajectories (P<0.05). AI unicortical trajectories in groups B-E had a lower risk of screw pullout compared with that of AO unicortical trajectories (P<0.05)., Conclusions: AI unicortical screw trajectory planning for lumbar surgery in patients with BMD of 40-120 mg/cm3 can significantly improve screw POF and reduce the risk of screw pullout., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bone metastasis in advanced cancer is challenging because of pain, functional issues, and reduced life expectancy. Treatment planning is complex, with consideration of factors such as location, symptoms, and prognosis. Prognostic models help guide treatment choices, with Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithms (SORG-MLAs) showing promise in predicting survival for initial spinal metastases and extremity metastases treated with surgery or radiotherapy. Improved therapies extend patient lifespans, increasing the risk of subsequent skeletal-related events (SREs). Patients experiencing subsequent SREs often suffer from disease progression, indicating a deteriorating condition. For these patients, a thorough evaluation, including accurate survival prediction, is essential to determine the most appropriate treatment and avoid aggressive surgical treatment for patients with a poor survival likelihood. Patients experiencing subsequent SREs often suffer from disease progression, indicating a deteriorating condition. However, some variables in the SORG prediction model, such as tumor histology, visceral metastasis, and previous systemic therapies, might remain consistent between initial and subsequent SREs. Given the prognostic difference between patients with and without a subsequent SRE, the efficacy of established prognostic models-originally designed for individuals with an initial SRE-in addressing a subsequent SRE remains uncertain. Therefore, it is crucial to verify the model's utility for subsequent SREs., Question/purpose: We aimed to evaluate the reliability of the SORG-MLAs for survival prediction in patients undergoing surgery or radiotherapy for a subsequent SRE for whom both the initial and subsequent SREs occurred in the spine or extremities., Methods: We retrospectively included 738 patients who were 20 years or older who received surgery or radiotherapy for initial and subsequent SREs at a tertiary referral center and local hospital in Taiwan between 2010 and 2019. We excluded 74 patients whose initial SRE was in the spine and in whom the subsequent SRE occurred in the extremities and 37 patients whose initial SRE was in the extremities and the subsequent SRE was in the spine. The rationale was that different SORG-MLAs were exclusively designed for patients who had an initial spine metastasis and those who had an initial extremity metastasis, irrespective of whether they experienced metastatic events in other areas (for example, a patient experiencing an extremity SRE before his or her spinal SRE would also be regarded as a candidate for an initial spinal SRE). Because these patients were already validated in previous studies, we excluded them in case we overestimated our result. Five patients with malignant primary bone tumors and 38 patients in whom the metastasis's origin could not be identified were excluded, leaving 584 patients for analysis. The 584 included patients were categorized into two subgroups based on the location of initial and subsequent SREs: the spine group (68% [399]) and extremity group (32% [185]). No patients were lost to follow-up. Patient data at the time they presented with a subsequent SRE were collected, and survival predictions at this timepoint were calculated using the SORG-MLAs. Multiple imputation with the Missforest technique was conducted five times to impute the missing proportions of each predictor. The effectiveness of SORG-MLAs was gauged through several statistical measures, including discrimination (measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), calibration, overall performance (Brier score), and decision curve analysis. Discrimination refers to the model's ability to differentiate between those with the event and those without the event. An AUC ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 0.5 indicating the worst discrimination and 1.0 indicating perfect discrimination. An AUC of 0.7 is considered clinically acceptable discrimination. Calibration is the comparison between the frequency of observed events and the predicted probabilities. In an ideal calibration, the observed and predicted survival rates should be congruent. The logarithm of observed-to-expected survival ratio [log(O:E)] offers insight into the model's overall calibration by considering the total number of observed (O) and expected (E) events. The Brier score measures the mean squared difference between the predicted probability of possible outcomes for each individual and the observed outcomes, ranging from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating perfect overall performance and 1 indicating the worst performance. Moreover, the prevalence of the outcome should be considered, so a null-model Brier score was also calculated by assigning a probability equal to the prevalence of the outcome (in this case, the actual survival rate) to each patient. The benefit of the prediction model is determined by comparing its Brier score with that of the null model. If a prediction model's Brier score is lower than the null model's Brier score, the prediction model is deemed as having good performance. A decision curve analysis was performed for models to evaluate the "net benefit," which weighs the true positive rate over the false positive rate against the "threshold probabilities," the ratio of risk over benefit after an intervention was derived based on a comprehensive clinical evaluation and a well-discussed shared-decision process. A good predictive model should yield a higher net benefit than default strategies (treating all patients and treating no patients) across a range of threshold probabilities., Results: For the spine group, the algorithms displayed acceptable AUC results (median AUCs of 0.69 to 0.72) for 42-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival predictions after treatment for a subsequent SRE. In contrast, the extremity group showed median AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 for the corresponding survival periods. All Brier scores were lower than those of their null model, indicating the SORG-MLAs' good overall performances for both cohorts. The SORG-MLAs yielded a net benefit for both cohorts; however, they overestimated 1-year survival probabilities in patients with a subsequent SRE in the spine, with a median log(O:E) of -0.60 (95% confidence interval -0.77 to -0.42)., Conclusion: The SORG-MLAs maintain satisfactory discriminatory capacity and offer considerable net benefits through decision curve analysis, indicating their continued viability as prediction tools in this clinical context. However, the algorithms overestimate 1-year survival rates for patients with a subsequent SRE of the spine, warranting consideration of specific patient groups. Clinicians and surgeons should exercise caution when using the SORG-MLAs for survival prediction in these patients and remain aware of potential mispredictions when tailoring treatment plans, with a preference for less invasive treatments. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the importance of enhancing prognostic algorithms and developing innovative tools for patients with subsequent SREs as the life expectancy in patients with bone metastases continues to improve and healthcare providers will encounter these patients more often in daily practice., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Introduction: Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technologies have increased the sensitivity for detecting the bacterial presence and have been used in other areas of orthopaedics to better understand the native microbiome of various joints. This study uses NGS to determine whether (1) a unique microbiome exists in human ankle tissues, (2) if components of the ankle microbiome affect patient outcomes, and (3) whether microbes found on the skin are a normal part of the ankle microbiome., Methods: A prospective study recruited 32 patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (n = 23) or ankle arthrodesis (n = 9) via direct anterior approach between November 2020 and October 2021. During surgery, five layers of the ankle were swabbed: skin (n = 32), retinaculum (n = 31), tibialis anterior tendon (n = 31), joint capsule (n = 31), and distal tibia (n = 32). These swabs (N = 157) were sent to MicroGen Diagnostics (Lubbock) for NGS. Demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical indication, postoperative complications, readmission, and revision surgery rates were collected from patient records., Results: The mean age was 60.7 (range, 19 to 85) years, and the mean follow-up duration was 10.2 (range, 4.8 to 20.6) months. Of 157 swabs sent for NGS, 19 (12.1%) indicated that bacteria were present (positive), whereas the remaining 138 (87.9%) had no bacteria present (negative). The most common organisms were Cutibacterium acnes in eight ankles (25.0%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in two ankles (6.25%). Most bacteria were found in the retinaculum (29.6%). Complications, nonunions, infections, 90-day readmission, and revision surgery rates did not differ by NGS profile., Discussion: This study found that C acnes and S epidermidis were the most common bacteria in the ankle microbiome, with C acnes being present in 25% of ankles. Complication rates did not differ between patients with or without positive bacterial DNA remnants. Thus, we concluded that a unique ankle microbiome is present in some patients, which is unique from that of the skin of the ankle., Level of Evidence: Level II, Prospective cohort study., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effect of adverse events (AEs) on orthopaedic surgeons, illustrate common ways orthopaedic surgeons deal with AEs, and describe solutions to reduce the negative effect of AEs and prevent them from recurring. AEs are common in orthopaedic surgery and increase the risk of depression, anxiety, and suicide. Orthopaedic surgeons may experience negative effects after AEs even when they are not at fault. AEs are linked to moral injury, second victim syndrome, burnout, and disruptive physician behaviors. Many surgeons deal with AEs in isolation out of fear of a negative effect on their professional reputation, potentially leading to increased psychological distress and unhealthy coping mechanisms. Healthy ways to address AEs and improve the well-being of surgeons include destigmatizing psychological stress after AEs and creating a culture of receptivity and peer support., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: In patients with a degenerative tear of the medial meniscus, recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown no treatment benefit of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) over conservative treatment or placebo surgery. Yet, advocates of APM still argue that APM is cost effective. Giving advocates of APM their due, we note that there is evidence from the treatment of other musculoskeletal complaints to suggest that a treatment may prove cost effective even in the absence of improvements in efficacy outcomes, as it may lead to other benefits, such as diminished productivity loss and reduced costs, and so the question of cost effectiveness needs to be answered for APM., Questions/purposes: (1) Does APM result in lower postoperative costs compared with placebo surgery? (2) Is APM cost-effective compared with placebo surgery?, Methods: One hundred forty-six adults aged 35 to 65 years with knee symptoms consistent with a degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria were randomized to APM (n = 70) or placebo surgery (n = 76). In the APM and placebo surgery groups, mean age was 52 ± 7 years and 52 ± 7 years, and 60% (42 of 70) and 62% (47 of 76) of participants were men, respectively. There were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics. In both groups, a standard diagnostic arthroscopy was first performed. Thereafter, in the APM group, the torn meniscus was trimmed to solid meniscus tissue, whereas in the placebo surgery group, APM was carefully mimicked but no resection of meniscal tissue was performed; as such, surgical costs were the same in both arms and were not included in the analyses. All patients received identical postoperative care including a graduated home-based exercise program. At the 2-year follow-up, two patients were lost to follow-up, both in the placebo surgery group. Cost effectiveness over the 2-year trial period was computed as incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) for improvements in quality-adjusted life years (QALY), using both the societal (primary) and healthcare system (secondary) perspectives. To be able to consider APM cost effective, the CEA analysis should yield a positive INMB value. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to assess uncertainty. Several one-way sensitivity analyses were also performed., Results: APM did not deliver lower postoperative costs, nor did it convincingly improve quality of life scores when compared with placebo surgery. From a societal perspective, APM was associated with € 971 (95% CI -2013 to 4017) higher costs and 0.015 (95% CI -0.011 to 0.041) improved QALYs over 2-year follow-up compared with placebo surgery. Both differences were statistically inconclusive (a wide 95% CI that crossed the line of no difference). Using the conventional willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of € 35,000 per QALY, APM resulted in a negative INMB of € -460 (95% CI -3757 to 2698). In our analysis, APM would result in a positive INMB only when the WTP threshold rises to about € 65,000 per QALY. The wide 95% CIs suggests uncertain cost effectiveness irrespective of chosen WTP threshold., Conclusion: The results of this study lend further support to clinical practice guidelines recommending against the use of APM in patients with a degenerative meniscus tear. Given the robustness of existing evidence demonstrating no benefit or cost effectiveness of APM over nonsurgical treatment or placebo surgery, future research is unlikely to alter this conclusion.Level of Evidence Level III, economic analysis., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is one of the most common complications after knee arthroscopy. Sequelae of VTE include VTE recurrence, postthrombotic syndrome, and potential for loss of limb or life. Given the increasing volume of knee arthroscopy procedures worldwide and the considerable morbidity and mortality associated with VTE, it is important to prevent, diagnose, and treat VTEs efficiently and effectively. Risk factors such as history of VTE, family history of VTE, genetic coagulopathy, oral contraceptive use, cancer history, and old age increase the risk of postoperative VTE and warrant consideration of prophylaxis. Diagnosis and treatment should be initiated rapidly in the setting of concerning symptoms and positive imaging diagnosis, respectively. The purpose of this review was to provide a framework to individualized VTE risk, weigh prophylaxis options, expedite diagnostic pathways, and implement outpatient treatment algorithms., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Case: An 18-year-old immunocompetent man presented with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis, discharging sinuses, and cold abscess for 3 years treated with multiple incision drainage procedures with cottonoid packing antibiotic therapy. Radiographic imaging showed a soft tissue mass in the canal causing bony destruction. Postoperative histopathological examination showed an Aspergillus fungal ball. Patient showed improvement at 6-month follow-up with medical management., Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first case report showing an aspergilloma involving the vertebral column. Inadequate antibiotic treatment and blind introduction of a foreign body into sinus tracts can lead to fungal infections mimicking tuberculosis, causing disastrous outcomes. Fungal cultures are recommended routinely., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C423)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a dreaded complication that may lead to catastrophic outcomes. Risk factors include a history of surgery on the operated ankle, low preoperative function scores, diabetes, extended surgical time, and postoperative wound-healing problems. Clinical presentation varies and may include increasing ankle pain and swelling, high temperature, local erythema, wound drainage, and dehiscence. The initial diagnostic evaluation should include plain radiographs, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein levels, and leukocyte count. In suspected cases with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, aspiration of the ankle joint for synovial fluid analysis, Gram staining, and culture should be performed. Antibiotic therapy should be based on the pathogen identified, and the surgical strategy should be determined based on the time lines of PJI. Early PJI can be treated with irrigation and débridement with polyethylene exchange. The surgical treatment of choice for late PJI is two-stage revision arthroplasty, which includes removal of the implant, insertion of an antibiotic spacer, and reimplantation of a TAA. In certain chronic PJI cases, permanent articulating antibiotic spacers can be left in place or an ankle arthrodesis can be performed. Below-knee amputation is considered as the final option after limb-sparing procedures have failed., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Introduction: The perfect knee lateral radiograph visualizes anatomic landmarks on the distal femur for clinical and scientific purposes. However, radiographic imaging is a two-dimensional (2D) representation of a three-dimensional (3D) physis. The aim of this study was to characterize the perceived radiographic projection of the femoral physis using perfect lateral digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and to evaluate discrepancies from this projection to the physis at the lateral and medial cortices., Methods: Pediatric patients from a cohort of CT scans were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were an open physis; exclusion criteria were any implant or pathology affecting the physis. CT scans were imported into 3D imaging software and transformed into lateral DRRs and 3D renderings of the femur. The physis was divided into four equal segments, with fiducial markers placed at the "anterior," "midpoint," and "posterior" points. Lines extended from these points in the lateral and medial direction. The vertical distance from these lines, representing the radiographic projection of the physis, was measured relative to the physis at the lateral and medial cortex of the femur on coronal CT slices., Results: Thirty-one patients were included. On the perfect lateral radiograph DRR, the physis on the medial cortex was located proximal to the visualized physis by 6.64 ± 1.74 mm, 11.95 ± 1.67 mm, and 14.30 ± 1.75 mm at the anterior (25%), midpoint (50%), and posterior (75%) locations, respectively. On the lateral side, the physis on the lateral cortex was proximal to the visualized physis by 2.19 ± 1.13 mm, 3.71 ± 1.19 mm, and 6.74 ± 1.25 mm at the anterior, midpoint, and posterior locations, respectively., Discussion: In this cohort of pediatric patients, the location of the cortical physis was, in all areas measured, proximal to the projection of the visualized physis as seen on the perfect knee lateral DRR. The distance from radiographic physis to cortical physis was greater at the medial cortex compared with the lateral cortex., Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study., Level of Evidence: III, observational radiographic anatomic study., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)