Search

Purpose/background: Quetiapine is a first-line augmenting agent for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and is used off-label in insomnia. Quetiapine and its active metabolite norquetiapine act mostly on 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, H1, and D2 as antagonists and on 5-HT1A as partial agonists. Patients with TRD often have comorbid personality disorder (PD), and evidence suggests an association between sleep disturbance and recovery among patients with PD. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of quetiapine on sleep in TRD patients with and without PD (PD+/PD-)., Methods/procedures: We reviewed health records of 38 patients with TRD (20 TRD/PD+) who had been treated with a pharmacotherapy regimen including quetiapine. Clinical outcomes were determined by comparing changes in sleep items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at the beginning (T0) and after 3 months of an unchanged treatment (T3)., Findings/results: Patients with TRD/PD+ and TRD/PD- taking quetiapine showed significant improvement in sleep items from T0 to T3 (P < 0.001, ηp2 ≥ 0.19). There was a significant personality × time interaction for sleep-maintenance insomnia (P = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.23), with TRD/PD+ showing a greater improvement at T3 compared with TRD/PD- (P = 0.01). While exploring other sleep items, no personality × time interaction was found. In the TRD/PD- group, improvement in sleep items was associated with an overall improvement in depressive symptoms (r = 0.55, P = 0.02)., Implications/conclusions: Quetiapine induced greater improvements in sleep-maintenance insomnia among TRD/PD+ patients than TRD/PD-. These findings suggest quetiapine could have a therapeutic role for insomnia in PD underscoring a distinct underlying neurobiological mechanism of sleep disturbance in people living with PD., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/background: There is a dearth of studies comparing the clinical outcomes of patients with treatment-resistant unipolar (TRD) depression and depression in bipolar disorder (BD) despite similar treatment strategies. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the pharmacological combinations (antidepressants [AD], mood stabilizers [MS], and/or antipsychotics [AP]) used for TRD and BD at the McGill University Health Center., Methods/procedures: We reviewed health records of 206 patients (76 TRD 130 BD) with TRD and BD treated with similar augmentation strategies including AD with MS (AD+MS) or AP (AD+AP) or combination (AD+AP+MS). Clinical outcomes were determined by comparing changes on the 17-time Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness at the beginning (T0) and after 3 months of an unchanged treatment (T3)., Findings/results: Baseline HAMD-17 scores in TRD were higher than in BD (P < 0.001), but TRD patients had a greater improvement at end point (P = 0.003). Antidepressants with AP generated greater reductions in HAMD-17 in TRD compared with BD (P = 0.02). Importantly, in BD patients, the addition of AD compared with other treatment strategies failed to improve the outcome. The limitations of this study include possibly unrepresentative subjects from tertiary care settings, incomplete matching of BD and TRD subjects, nonrandomized treatment with unmatched agents, doses, and times, unknown treatment adherence, and nonblinded retrospective outcome assessments. Nevertheless, the findings may reflect real-world interactions of clinically selected pharmacotherapies., Implications/conclusions: Combination of augmentation strategies such as AD+AP and/or MS showed a better clinical improvement in patients with TRD compared with BD suggesting a limited evidence for AD potentiation in BD., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/background: The link between substances of abuse, impulsivity, and violence in psychotic patients remains unclear. This study aims at unraveling whether cannabis use disorder is associated with violent and/or psychotic behavior in patients who are hospitalized in a high-security hospital., Methods/procedures: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study in 124 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders admitted to a high-security hospital. Lifetime violent behavior was assessed using the History of Aggressive Behavior Form-Subject of the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study and impulsivity using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (considering items: "proneness to boredom," "lack of self-control," and "impulsive thoughtless gestures"). Substance use disorder was diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was also administered., Findings/results: Violent and nonviolent psychotic patients showed similar prevalence of cannabis use disorder. Alcohol and cocaine use disorders were more prevalent among violent psychotic patients. Cannabis use disorder was not associated with any dimension of impulsivity, whereas alcohol use disorder was positively correlated to impulsive thoughtless gestures (standardized β = 0.213, P = 0.027) and cocaine use disorder with proneness to boredom (standardized β = 0.290, P = 0.002). Finally, logistic regression analysis revealed that, unlike cannabis and cocaine use disorders, alcohol use disorder (odds ratio, 3.964; 95% confidence interval, 1.729-9.087; P = 0.001) was a factor associated with violence., Implications/conclusions: These findings show that cannabis and alcohol are largely abused and coabused by psychotic patients with a propsensity for violence, but only alcohol is associated with impulsive and violent behavior. Therefore, especially alcohol abuse should be seriously considered by practitioners when evaluating the dangerousness of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients experiencing mental disorders are at an elevated risk for developing aggressive behavior. In the past 10 years, the psychopharmacological treatment of aggression has changed dramatically owing to the introduction of atypical antipsychotics on the market and the increased use of anticonvulsants and lithium in the treatment of aggressive patients.This review (second of 2 parts) uses a translational medicine approach to examine the neurobiology of aggression, discussing the major neurotransmitter systems implicated in its pathogenesis (serotonin, glutamate, norepinephrine, dopamine, and γ-aminobutyric acid) and the neuropharmacological rationale for using atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and lithium in the therapeutics of aggressive behavior. A critical review of all clinical trials using atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, loxapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, and amisulpride), anticonvulsants (topiramate, valproate, lamotrigine, and gabapentin), and lithium are presented. Given the complex, multifaceted nature of aggression, a multifunctional combined therapy, targeting different receptors, seems to be the best strategy for treating aggressive behavior. This therapeutic strategy is supported by translational studies and a few human studies, even if additional randomized, double-blind, clinical trials are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy of this framework.

Patients with mental disorders are at an elevated risk for developing aggressive behavior. In the last 19 years, the psychopharmacological treatment of aggression has changed dramatically because of the introduction of atypical antipsychotics into the market and the increased use of anticonvulsants and lithium in the treatment of aggressive patients.Using a translational medicine approach, this review (part 1 of 2) examines the neurobiology of aggression, discussing the major neurotransmitter systems implicated in its pathogenesis, namely, serotonin, glutamate, norepinephrine, dopamine, and γ-aminobutyric acid, and also their respective receptors. The preclinical and clinical pharmacological studies concerning the role of these neurotransmitters have been reviewed, as well as research using transgenic animal models. The complex interaction among these neurotransmitters occurs at the level of brain areas and neural circuits such as the orbitoprefrontal cortex, anterior cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, periaqueductal gray, and septal nuclei, where the receptors of these neurotransmitters are expressed. The neurobiological mechanism of aggression is important to understand the rationale for using atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and lithium in treating aggressive behavior. Further research is necessary to establish how these neurotransmitter systems interact with brain circuits to control aggressive behavior at the intracellular level.