1. Similarities and differences between crystal and enzyme environmental effects on the electron density of drug molecules
- Author
-
Michael J. Turner, Thomas C. Schmidt, Simon Grabowsky, Eiji Nishibori, Tanja Schirmeister, Erna K. Wieduwilt, Bernd Engels, Emanuel Hupf, Scott G. Stewart, Florian Kleemiss, Kunihisa Sugimoto, Ming W. Shi, and Dylan Jayatilaka
- Subjects
Electron density ,Static Electricity ,Electrons ,010402 general chemistry ,Ligands ,01 natural sciences ,Catalysis ,protease inhibitor ,540 Chemistry ,Molecule ,electron density ,Polarization (electrochemistry) ,Quantum ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,polarization ,Full Paper ,intermolecular interactions ,010405 organic chemistry ,Organic Chemistry ,Intermolecular force ,Enzyme Interaction ,General Chemistry ,Full Papers ,0104 chemical sciences ,3. Good health ,Molecular Recognition ,Enzyme ,electrostatic potential ,chemistry ,Pharmaceutical Preparations ,Loxistatin ,Chemical physics ,570 Life sciences ,biology - Abstract
The crystal interaction density is generally assumed to be a suitable measure of the polarization of a low‐molecular weight ligand inside an enzyme, but this approximation has seldomly been tested and has never been quantified before. In this study, we compare the crystal interaction density and the interaction electrostatic potential for a model compound of loxistatin acid (E64c) with those inside cathepsin B, in solution, and in vacuum. We apply QM/MM calculations and experimental quantum crystallography to show that the crystal interaction density is indeed very similar to the enzyme interaction density. Less than 0.1 e are shifted between these two environments in total. However, this difference has non‐negligible consequences for derived properties., The polarization of a drug molecule in an enzyme environment can be approximated by the polarization of the same molecule in its small‐molecule crystal structure. The degree of similarity is quantified in this study for a model compound of the protease inhibitor loxistatin acid in its interaction with cathepsin B by using interaction densities and interaction electrostatic potentials.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF