Search

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) make up a family of extracellular signaling molecules that play a critical role in vertebrate development and both inhibit and stimulate growth in cancer cells. BMP7 was recently identified in our genomewide copy number and expression survey as being activated through amplification in breast cancer cell lines. In the present study, we further explored BMP7 gene copy number and expression changes in 22 breast cancer cell lines and 146 primary breast tumors. FISH analysis revealed that BMP7 copy number varied greatly from one cell line to another, with three cell lines showing extremely high-level amplification. Among primary tumors, BMP7 copy number was increased in 16% of the cases. BMP7 mRNA expression was determined in the cell lines and in a subset of 44 tumor samples by RT-PCR or quantitative real-time RT-PCR, respectively. Despite elevated mRNA levels in cancer cells, there was no significant association between copy number increase and mRNA expression, even though the highest expression was seen in cell lines and tumors with increased BMP7 copy number. Most interestingly, immunohistochemical analysis revealed BMP7 protein staining in all 11 breast cancer cell lines examined and strongly elevated BMP7 protein expression in 71.4% of the tumor samples as compared to normal mammary epithelium. Our results illustrate the frequent involvement of BMP7 alterations in breast cancer and especially highlight overexpression of the BMP7 protein in a very large fraction of primary breast tumors, thus suggesting a possible functional role for BMP7 in breast cancer development.

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), the most common genetic disease in northern Europeans, is an autosomal recessive disorder of iron metabolism. The association between hepatocellular carcinoma and HFE homozygosity is well documented, but recently HFE hetero- and homozygosity has also been linked to nonhepatocellular malignancies, including female breast cancer. We hypothesized that C282Y and H63D mutations in the HFE gene could contribute to male breast cancer (MBC) and prostate cancer (PC) susceptibility at the population level in Finland. We screened the 2 major HFE mutations, H63D and C282Y, from 116 MBC cases diagnosed in Finland between 1967 and 1996, 843 consecutive unselected PC cases diagnosed at the Pirkanmaa Hospital District between 1999 and 2001 and 480 anonymous blood donor controls by minisequencing. Our results indicate that the frequencies of the HFE mutations do not significantly differ between MBC and PC patients and the population-based controls. No significantly altered risks for MBC or PC among carriers of the 2 variants were observed. However, HFE mutations were seen twice as often among carriers of a common BRCA2 mutation 9346(-2)A-->G compared with the rest of the MBC cases, indicating that HFE may be an MBC risk modifier gene among BRCA2 mutation carriers. In conclusion, our results indicate a minor role for the HFE mutations C282Y and H63D in the causation of MBC and PC, but carriers of both BRCA2 9346(-2)A-->G and an HFE mutation may be at an increased risk., (Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Genetic events underlying the pathogenesis of breast cancer have been studied extensively and several clinically significant markers have been identified. For example, amplification and overexpression of the ERBB2 oncogene is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer and ERBB2 serves as a target for antibody-based therapy. Current knowledge on the pathogenesis of male breast cancer (MBC) is limited. The purpose of our study was to investigate the potential relevance of a series of genes known to be amplified in female breast cancer (FBC) in a the development and pathogenesis of MBC. To this end, we applied fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to the analysis of 128 breast tumors from males. Amplification of ERBB2, MYC, PPM1D and ZNF217 was detected rarely (1-2% of tumors) indicating a considerably lower amplification frequency than in FBC. CCND1 amplification was observed in 12% of cases, being in good concordance with findings from FBC. In addition, CCND1 overexpression was detected in 63% of tumors and was associated with ER positivity (p < 0.0001). Our results indicate distinct differences in the genetic basis of MBC and FBC and suggest that marked differences exist in the pathogenesis of these diseases. The lack of ERBB2 involvement was especially unexpected and implies that ERBB2-targeted therapies are unlikely to be beneficial in MBC. Furthermore, the high frequency of hormone receptor positivity and the association between ER positivity and CCND1 overexpression supports the notion that hormonal regulation is likely to be essential for the development of MBC.

Genetic risk factors for male breast cancer (MBC) are poorly understood. High penetrance genes such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 account for only a small proportion of the disease. A 1100delC mutation in CHEK2 (previously known as CHK2), a cell-cycle checkpoint kinase, has been implicated in predisposition of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and breast cancer in families suggestive of LFS. This 1100delC mutation has also been shown to confer a 2-fold increase of breast cancer risk in women and a 10-fold increase of risk in men. It was estimated to account for 1% of breast cancers in women and as much as 9% of breast cancers in men at the population level based on analysis of breast cancer families without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We wanted to evaluate the significance of CHEK2 1100delC in predisposition to MBC by assessing its frequency in a population-based material of 114 Finnish MBC patients. Two patients (1.8%) carried the 1100delC mutation. The mutation frequency among MBC cases was similar to that seen in population controls (26/1885, 1.4%). Our results indicate that CHEK2 1100delC variant does not substantially increase the risk of male breast cancer at the population level. We cannot exclude the fact that a small fraction of hereditary, family-positive male breast cancers could be attributable to CHEK2 mutations., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Germline mutations in recessive cancer predisposition genes are uncovered by somatic genetic deletions during tumor development. Analysis of genetic changes in tumor tissues from patients with an inherited predisposition may therefore highlight regions of the genome containing susceptibility or modifier genes. Our aim was to characterize genetic changes in familial prostate cancer, Methods: Twenty-one primary prostate cancers from 19 Finnish prostate cancer families were analyzed for somatic genetic changes by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)., Results: The average number of genetic alterations per tumor was 4.0 +/- 1.9, distributed equally among losses and gains. The most common losses were found at chromosomal regions 13q14-q22 (29%), 8p12-pter (24%), and 6q13-q16 (14%), and the most common gains at 19p (25%), 19q (14%) and 7q (14%)., Conclusions: These results suggest that prostate cancers in genetically predisposed individuals arise for the most part through similar somatic genetic progression pathways as sporadic prostate cancers. This also implies that the biological properties of tumors from the two groups may not be different from one another., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

With the recent rapid expansion in the use of the comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique, increased attention to quality control is essential. In the present study, we show that despite optimization and standardization of metaphase preparation techniques and the commercial availability of metaphase spreads, batch-to-batch variability of the preparations remains a significant problem. To facilitate reliable CGH analysis despite this variability, we have developed a rapid denaturation test to assess the quality of the preparations without hybridization and quantitative image analysis criteria for assuring the day-to-day quality of CGH experiments, including sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range. Monitoring the dynamic range of the hybridizations was found to be particularly critical for achieving sensitive and reliable CGH results. This reliability can be achieved, for example, by hybridization of a green-labeled normal male DNA against red-labeled female DNA and monitoring of the green:red ratio of the X chromosome in relation to that of the autosomes.

The standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) protocol relies on availability of macroscopic tumor samples, which do not contain too much interfering normal cells. Recently, CGH after universal amplification of genomic DNA with degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR) has been used to detect genetic aberrations in microdissected tumor specimens. However, owing to the technical difficulties, CGH results of only few microdissected samples have so far been published. We have developed an improved protocol for DOP-PCR, which includes direct incorporation of fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotides into the PCR product. Among the four polymerase enzymes tested. ThermoSequenase gave the best yield, with PCR products ranging from 100-4,000 bp. A two-step PCR-procedure was used, consisting of a preamplification with low stringency conditions followed by amplification in more stringent conditions. The method was first validated by hybridizing DOP-PCR-amplified normal DNA against nick-translated reference DNA, which showed uniform amd even hybridization result for all chromosomes. Comparison of DOP-PCR CGH to conventional CGH in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line further indicated that genetic aberrations can be reliable detected after DOP-PCR amplification. The sensitivity of the DOP-PCR-CGH was tested by serial dilution of MCF-7 DNA. Fifty picograms of sample DNA (corresponding roughly to two MCF-7 cells) was sufficient for high quality CGH. Experiments with cells microdissected from intraductal breast cancer demonstrated that carcinoma cells from 1 to 2 ducts were sufficient for a successful DOP-PCR CGH analysis. We conclude that the improved DOP-PCR-CGH protocol provides a powerful tool to study genetic aberrations in different histological subpopulations of malignant as well as precancerous lesions. DOP-PCR also improves the success rate of conventional paraffin-block CGH, because a poor quality or a too low yield of extracted DNA can be compensated by universal DNA amplification by DOP-PCR.