1. Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay as primary screening test: Results from the NTCC2 trial.
- Author
-
Giorgi Rossi P, Ronco G, Mancuso P, Carozzi F, Allia E, Bisanzi S, Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L, Rizzolo R, Gustinucci D, Del Mistro A, Frayle H, Confortini M, Iossa A, Cesarini E, Bulletti S, Passamonti B, Gori S, Toniolo L, Barca A, Bonvicini L, Venturelli F, and Benevolo M
- Subjects
- Colposcopy, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Female, Humans, Ki-67 Antigen genetics, Papillomaviridae genetics, Pregnancy, RNA, Messenger genetics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Papillomavirus Infections, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms genetics, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
As the primary screening test, E6/E7 mRNA has shown similar sensitivity for CIN3+ and lower positivity rate than the HPV DNA test. Nevertheless, the overall mRNA positivity is too high for immediate colposcopy, making a triage test necessary. The aim was to estimate the mRNA performance as a primary test with different triage strategies. All HPV DNA-positives were tested for mRNA, cytology and p16/ki67. A sample of HPV DNA-negatives was also tested for mRNA to estimate test specificity. We included all CIN3+ histologically diagnosed within 24 months since recruitment. Of the 41 127 participants, 7.7% were HPV DNA-positive, of which 66.4% were mRNA-positive. Among the HPV DNA-negatives, 10/1108 (0.9%) were mRNA-positive. Overall, 97 CIN3+ were found. If mRNA was used as the primary test, it would miss about 3% of all CIN3+ with a 22% reduction of positivity compared with HPV DNA. The weighted specificity estimate for
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF