Search

The use of oncolytic recombinant polioviruses has an important therapeutic potential in the treatment of human gliomas. This study was carried out to assess parameters of the utility of the oncolytic poliovirus/human rhinovirus type 2 chimeras (PV/HRV2). The prototype PV/HRV2 chimera was constructed containing the complete genome of wild-type PV type 1 (Mahoney) [PV1(M)] in which the cognate IRES was replaced with that of HRV2 [called PV1(RIPO)]. A derivative of PV1(RIPO) is PV1(RIPOS) in which the capsid coding region (P1) was replaced with the capsid-coding region of the PV type 1 (Sabin) [PV1(S)] vaccine strain. In addition, a third PV/HRV2 chimera was constructed containing the complete genome of PV1(S) in which the cognate IRES was replaced with that of HRV2 [termed PVS(RIPO)]. To analyze the growth phenotypes of PV/HRV2 recombinants [PV1(RIPO), PV1(RIPOS), PVS(RIPO)], one-step growth experiments were performed in four human cell lines at three different temperatures. To address the safety profile, PVS(RIPO) was injected into the brain of CD155 tg mice at the dose 10(7) PFU. Then, clinical signs, persistence of the virus in the CNS and genetic stability of PVS(RIPO) replicating in the CNS were evaluated. The data obtained in the present study suggest (i) a correlation between temperature-sensitive (ts) phenotype in both neuronal and non-neuronal cell lines and neuroattenuation in experimental animals, (ii) that PVS (RIPO) is genetically stable on replication in the CNS of poliovirus-susceptible mice. These findings highlight the safety of intracerebral inoculation of PVS(RIPO) for the treatment of human glioma., ((Copyright) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Several real-time PCR and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) primer pairs and a modified real-time PCR primer pair for the detection of enteroviruses were compared. The modified real-time PCR primer pair was evaluated on clinical samples in comparison with cell culture using the MagnaPure LC Isolation instrument for nucleic acid extraction. Six hundred forty samples could be examined both by cell culture and real-time PCR. Faecal specimens (n = 285), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 210), throat swabs (n = 113), biopsies (n = 1--, vesicular fluid (n = 11), and pleural fluid specimens (n = 9) were included. By culture, 26/640 (4%) samples were positive for enterovirus. By real-time PCR, the number of positive specimens was 50 (7.8%). Of the 210 cerebrospinal fluid samples, three were positive by culture and nine by real-time PCR. Seventeen and 33 of a total of 285 faecal specimens were positive by culture and real-time PCR, respectively. In case of discrepant results, the clinical symptoms were in accordance with an infection due to enteroviruses. Genotyping using the VP1 gene correlated with serotyping by neutralization. In contrast, six of the 19 specimens that could be typed both by neutralization and by sequencing using the VP4 domain yielded a different genotype, yet within the same species. Real-time PCR turned out to be suitable for the detection of enteroviruses in the daily routine setting. In comparison to rapid culture, it offers a rapid, more sensitive, and reliable assay; especially in cerebrospinal fluid, the yield of enteroviruses is much higher., ((c) Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Rhinoviruses are epidemiologically connected to the majority of acute asthma exacerbations; however, their ability to infect and replicate in the lower airways is disputed. A frequent argument against this possibility involves the temperature preference for rhinovirus replication, generally accepted to be 33 degrees C, the temperature of the nasal passages. However, this argument is based on studies with a single rhinovirus serotype. In this study, differences in temperature preferences were evaluated between several serotypes and relative titers were determined than can be achieved at upper and lower airway temperatures. Rhinovirus serotypes 1b, 2, 7, 9, 14, 16, 41, and 70 were titrated in Ohio-HeLa cell cultures at either 33 degrees C or 37 degrees C. Possible selection by culture temperature was examined by continuous culture at 33 degrees C and 37 degrees C for 2-4 passages and subsequent titration at both temperatures. Finally, nasal aspirate samples derived from patients with wild-type rhinoviral common colds were cultured at 33 degrees C and 37 degrees C and RT-PCR was used to assess rhinovirus replication at each temperature. The majority of the serotypes and wild-type viruses replicated slightly better at 33 degrees C than at 37 degrees C. However, titers achieved after one or more replicative cycles at 37 degrees C were still high enough to initiate infection. Furthermore, in some instances equal or even better replication was observed at 37 degrees C. It is concluded that temperature preferences may vary between rhinoviruses and are not likely to be a prohibitive factor for infection of the lower airways.

Ohio HeLa cells in multichamber slides were inoculated with nasal samples from patients presenting with common cold symptoms and incubated at 33 degrees C with gentle shaking for 48 hours. The cultures were fixed with cold acetone, and viral antigens were detected by immunofluorescence using an antirhinovirus type 2 (HRV-2) polyclonal serum. Of 158 samples, 58 (36.7%) and 57 (36%) were positive for HRV by virus isolation (confirmed by acid lability test) and by culture-amplified immunofluorescent (CAIF) test, respectively. The correlation between the two tests was highly significant (P = 0.0001). Nasal washings or nasal/throat swabs were equally suitable for detecting virus by isolation but not by CAIF. On the other hand, nasal washings were better than nasal/throat swabs for detecting HRV by CAIF. In an ELISA system, the polyclonal anti-HRV-2 serum recognized a rhinovirus antigen expressed in situ within 48 hr postinfection by all the 11 HRV serotypes investigated. However, 60 hr postinfection, the anti-HRV-2 serum recognized only homologous and closely related HRV antigens. These results suggest that a rhinovirus "common" antigen may be expressed some 48 hr after infection of Ohio HeLa cells with rhinoviruses. The CAIF test provides a sensitive, rapid and reliable procedure to detect wild-type rhinovirus infection as well as a clear alternative to detection by isolation.

To facilitate understanding of human rhinovirus (HRV) pathogenesis, methods were developed for detection of HRV infection in vitro using in situ hybridization (ISH). HRV-14 RNA probes and oligonucleotide probes representing conserved sequences in the 5'-non-translated region were labeled with 35S and used to detect infected HeLa or WI-38 strain human embryonic lung cells in cytological preparations. ISH was shown to be specific for detection of HRV on a single-cell basis. Subsequently, in human nasal polyps infected in vitro, both oligonucleotide- and ribo-probes produced a strong signal in association with ciliated epithelial cells. In human adenoids infected in vitro, a signal was observed in non-ciliated epithelial cells. This study shows that HRV replicates in ciliated cells in the epithelium of human nasal polyps infected in vitro, and the presence of viral RNA in non-ciliated cells of the human adenoid infected in vitro suggests that other cell types may also support rhinovirus replication.