Search

Specimens from 53 pituitary adenomas (PAs), including 17 NFPA, 16 PRL-, 9 ACTH-, 9 GH- and 2 TSH-secreting tumors, underwent cytogenetic analysis by the direct and short-term culture methods. Only 8 tumors (15%) appeared to have an abnormal karyotype. To increase the resolution of cytogenetic analysis, direct preparations from 31 PAs were investigated by interphase FISH with probes specific for chromosomes 5, 8, 12 and X, for which gain in pituitary tumors has been reported. Of these 31 PAs, 17 (54.8%) had an abnormal dosage of one or more of the 4 chromosomes tested. Separate or combined trisomies of chromosomes 5, 8 and 12 were found in 10/10 prolactinomas and in 4/9 NFPA, whereas the combined loss of chromosomes 5 and 8 was observed in 1/6 ACTH- and 1/6 GH-secreting PAs. Present and earlier data on 23 PAs showed that tumors with the highest frequency of abnormal karyotypes revealed by cytogenetics and/or interphase FISH were PRL (78%), followed by NFPA (26%) and GH (18%). Recurrent structural rearrangements affecting chromosomes 1, 3 and 12 were also identified in prolactinomas, which therefore appear to be the only pituitary adenoma sub-type with a defined trend of tumor-specific chromosomal changes. Cytogenetic and FISH analyses of different pituitary tumor sub-types indicate that they may harbour genetically distinct lesions., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Only a few reports on supernumerary r(1) chromosomes associated with a clinical phenotype have been published. We describe two unrelated patients with congenital malformations and developmental delay who were found to have a de novo supernumerary r(1) in 50% (Case 1) and 80% (Case 2) of the examined cells. Conventional cytogenetic techniques (QFQ, CBG, and DA-DAPI), complemented by fluorescence in situ hybridization studies using alpha satellite probes, showed that both small marker chromosomes (SMCs) primarily consisted of the centromere and heterochromatin of chromosome 1, a conclusion that was also supported by chromosome 1 painting. In an attempt to establish phenotype-genotype correlations, a further investigation was performed using YACs mapped to the chromosome 1 pericentromeric region. A fluorescent signal was evident after hybridization with Y934G9 (1q21) in Case 1 and Y959C4 (1p11.1-12) in Case 2. Partial trisomy of unique sequences flanking pericentromeric sequences is shown to underlie the clinical phenotype in both patients. This evidence should be taken into account when SMCs are ascertained, particularly in prenatal diagnosis.

A small supernumerary chromosome was observed in two Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients. The clinical diagnosis of PWS was confirmed by the ascertainment of the deletion of region 15q11-13 in one case and uniparental disomy (UPD) of the same region in the other. The markers were negative for dystamycinA/DAPI banding, did not contain NOR-positive satellites, and had an appearance consistent with a very small ring chromosome. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with the "all human centromere" probe indicated the presence of centromeric sequences in both markers. Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization with chromosome specific libraries demonstrated that the small markers in the deleted and UPD patient originated from chromosome 15 and X, respectively. To the best of our knowledge these are the only PWS patients reported with a supernumerary marker chromosome other than inv dup(15) characterized by FISH.

We report on a combined high resolution cytogenetic and fluorescent in situ hybridization study (FISH) on 15 Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and 14 Angelman syndrome (AS) patients. High resolution banding showed a microdeletion in the 15q11-q13 region in 7 out of 15 PWS patients, and FISH analysis of the D15S11 and SNRPN cosmids demonstrated absence of the critical region in three additional cases. Likewise 8 out of 14 AS patients were found to be deleted with FISH, using the GABRB3 specific cosmid, whereas only 4 of them had a cytogenetically detectable deletion.