Search

Objectives: To assess the influence of patients' gender on the outcomes of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) using the MitraClip system., Background: Although gender-related differences have been extensively documented in patients who undergo surgery for moderate-to-severe (3+) and severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR), studies assessing whether these differences exist after PMVR are lacking., Methods: Clinical and echocardiographic data through 12-month follow up from 171 consecutive patients whom underwent MitraClip implantation and were dichotomized by the gender (106 males and 65 females) were obtained. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse events at 30 days and the primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade≥3+ MR at 12-month follow up., Results: The primary safety endpoint was observed in four males (3.8%) and four females (6.2%) (P=0.358). Remarkable reduction in MR postprocedure was revealed in both groups, and these results were mostly sustained. Furthermore, left ventricle reverse remodeling and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement were revealed in both groups, but females tended to demonstrate worse results over time (P=0.083). The primary efficacy endpoint obtained by Kaplan-Meier estimates was observed in 76.3 and 70.2%, respectively (log rank P=0.231)., Conclusions: MitraClip implantation in patients with 3+ and 4+ MR is safe and efficacious until mid-term follow up, regardless of patients' gender. Despite improvement in NYHA functional class in both groups, female gender demonstrated a trend toward poorer results. Further validation of our findings is warranted., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: Whether predicting the risk of early serum creatinine rise using the ratio of the volume of contrast media administered to the estimated creatinine clearance (V/CrCl) is applicable to the broader definition of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (≥0.5 mg/dL absolute and/or 25% relative increase from baseline serum creatinine) is unknown., Background: A V/CrCl ≥4 has been proven to predict the risk of ≥0.5 mg/dL postprocedural absolute rise in serum creatinine., Methods: A total of 722 patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March 2011 and October 2011 with paired serum creatinine determinations at preprocedure and within 72-hr postprocedure were analyzed. The V/CrCl ratio was calculated by dividing the volume of contrast received by the patient's creatinine clearance. CIN using different definitions was termed as CINnarrow (rise in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL) and CINbroad (rise in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL and/or ≥25% increase in baseline serum creatinine)., Results: The mean age was 66 ± 11 years and the mean baseline serum creatinine was 1.1 ± 0.8 mg/dL. Patients with V/CrCl ≥4 were significantly older and more frequently underwent ad hoc PCI compared with those with V/CrCl <4. CINnarrow and CINbroad were observed in 13 versus 3% (P < 0.001) and 23 versus 11% (P < 0.001) of patients with or without V/CrCl ≥4, respectively. After statistical adjustment, a V/CrCl ratio ≥4 remained significantly associated with the risk of both CINnarrow [adjusted OR 3.5, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.7-7.3; P < 0.001] and CINbroad (adjusted OR 2.5, 95% 1.6-3.9; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: A volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio ≥4 significantly predicts the risk of early postprocedural rise in serum creatinine regardless of the CIN definition adopted., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: We investigated the prognostic accuracy of a standardized quantification of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) named residual SYNTAX score (rSS)., Background: Prognostic implications of coronary lesions left untreated after ULMCA PCI are confounded by the lack of a uniform definition of incomplete revascularization., Methods: Baseline SYNTAX score (bSS), rSS, and the difference between bSS and rSS (ΔSS ) were assessed in predicting the risk of 2-year cardiac mortality of 400 patients undergoing ULMCA PCI., Results: The rSS and bSS showed comparable discrimination (rSS area under the curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.61-0.83; bSS AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.84). Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics were 0.60 for rSS (P = 0.44) and 2.45 (P = 0.12) for bSS, reflecting better calibration ability of the rSS. The ΔSS provided the worst discrimination and calibration characteristics (AUC 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.66; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 3.13, P = 0.08). The rSS was independently associated with the 2-year adjusted-risk of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12, P = 0.001). The risk information from both the rSS and bSS slightly improved the discrimination ability compared with risk information from each single risk assessment (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.86) with a net reclassification improvement of +14.2% and +13.6% over rSS and bSS alone, respectively., Conclusions: The rSS carries a prognostic value as independent predictor of 2-year cardiac mortality. Compared with a single assessment of the SYNTAX score, information coming from repeat assessment of the angiographic risk may improve the ability to discriminate and reclassify patients undergoing ULMCA PCI., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)