Search

Background: Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are alternative treatments of steroid-refractory relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica (NMO)., Methods: Adverse events and neurological follow-ups in 127 MS- (62 PE, 65 IA) and 13 NMO- (11 PE, 2 IA) patients were retrospectively analyzed. Response was defined by improvements in either expanded disability status scale (EDSS) by at least 1.0 or visual acuity (VA) to 0.5, confirmed after 3 and/or 6 months., Results: Hundred and forty patients were included in safety analysis, 102 patients provided sufficient neurological follow-up-data. There were no significant differences between IA and PE in side effects (3.9% vs 3.6%, P = .96) or response-rate (P = .65). Responders showed significant lower age (P = .02) and earlier apheresis-initiation (P = .01). Subgroup-analysis confirmed significant lower age in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) /clinical isolated syndrome (CIS)., Conclusion: IA and PE seem equally safe and effective in steroid-resistant MS- or NMO-relapses. Early apheresis and low patient age are additional prognostic factors., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare paralyzing inflammatory neuropathy with probably autoimmune origin. While plasma exchange (PE) constitutes a first-line treatment option for CIDP, there is only little known about the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption (IA), a more selective apheresis procedure with assumed better tolerability., Methods: In this prospective-randomized pilot trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions of PE (n = 10) or IA (n = 10) treating equal plasma volumes. To evaluate efficacy, we calculated the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score at baseline (V1), after completion of 6 sessions (V2) as well as 4 weeks after completion (V3) in 9 patients per group (1 patient in each group did not complete follow-up). We additionally assessed safety and tolerability of treatments by monitoring adverse event and blood parameters., Results: With IA, 6 out of 9 (66.7%) patients improved clinically, whereas with PE, 4 out of 9 (44.4%) patients improved, most of them immediately with completion of the apheresis treatment series. There was one adverse event (AE) out of 52 treatment sessions for the 9 patients in the IA group. In the PE group of 9 patients, there was 1 AE out of 51 sessions and a trend of greater fibrinogen reduction. No severe AE occurred in either group., Conclusion: The results of this pilot study suggest that IA is at least equally effective and safe compared to PE in CIDP patients., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Transplanting immunized patients requires immunological monitoring in the pretransplant phase to follow reduction of donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) after Staphylococcus aureus protein A (SPA) immunoadsorption (IA) or therapeutic plasma exchange followed by IVIG and Rituximab administration. Pretreatment aims to significantly reduce DSA strength. The Tissue Typing Lab at Aarhus University Hospital performs immunological monitoring of approximately 150 kidney transplantation patients per year from two transplant centers. From 2012 to 2013, we experienced seven patients desensitized using SPA IA, initially presenting negative cytotoxic complement dependent (CDC) T-cell crossmatches but positive B and T cell flowcytometric crossmatch, who despite significant DSA reduction developed weakly positive CDC T-cell crossmatch shortly prior to transplantation. We hypothesised that leached SPA during IA could be the cause, as the complication was not observed in patients who received plasma exchanges. We found that the positive CDC was not donor specific and SPA column material incubated with control serum reproduced a positive CDC T-cell crossmatch. Finally, we detected leached SPA in one of the patient samples using a highly sensitive time-resolved fluorescent assay. In conclusion, the results emphasize the importance of carefully considering CDC crossmatch results subsequent to IA, before a planned transplantation is either postponed or cancelled. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:163-169, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The combined use of immunoadsorption (IA) and membrane filtration (MF) may markedly enhance removal of IgM and complement component C1q, supporting its use as an element of recipient desensitization in antibody-incompatible transplantation. However, coagulation factor removal may contribute to altered hemostasis, posing a risk of bleeding in the perioperative setting. This secondary endpoint analysis of standard coagulation assays and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) was performed in the context of a randomized controlled crossover study designed to assess the effect of combined IA (GAM-146-peptide) and MF on levels of ABO antigen-specific IgM. Fourteen patients with autoimmune disorders were randomized to a single treatment with IA+MF followed by IA alone, or vice versa. MF was found to markedly enhance fibrinogen depletion (57% vs. 28% median decrease after IA alone, P < 0.001), whereby four patients showed post-treatment fibrinogen concentrations below 100 mg dL(-1). In support of a critical contribution of fibrinogen depletion to impaired coagulation, extrinsically activated ROTEM(®) analysis revealed a marked reduction in fibrinogen-dependent clot formation upon IA+MF (59% median decrease in FIBTEM mean clot firmness (MCF) as compared to 24% after IA alone, P < 0.001). Moreover, the addition of MF led to a substantial prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time, possibly due to depletion of macromolecular coagulation factors contributing to intrinsically activated coagulation. Our study demonstrates substantial effects of combined IA+MF on clot formation, which may be mainly attributable to fibrinogen depletion. We suggest that the use of combined apheresis in the setting of transplant surgery may necessitate a careful monitoring of coagulation., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Myasthenic crisis is the most serious life-threatening event in Myasthenia gravis patients, affecting up to 27% within the first two years after onset of disease. Extracorporeal removal of circulating autoantibodies against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChRAb) by methods of therapeutic apheresis, e.g. plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) had been demonstrated as effective treatment especially in acute situations of myasthenic crisis. However, controlled data comparing clinical safety and efficacy of both methods in a clinical study were not available. Here the results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial are presented, investigating 19 patients with myasthenic crisis, who were randomized to receive either PE (n = 10) or IA (n = 9) in addition to combined drug treatment. Patients received 3 to 5 (mean 3.5 for PE, and 3.4 for IA) treatments over a period of 7 days with a predefined treatment volume of 1.5 l plasma (i.e., 20-25 ml/kg plasma representing 0.5-0.6 patients' plasma volumes). Clinical courses were monitored using disease specific clinical scores. After initiation of IA or PE the mean value of Myasthenia scores decreased equally until Day 14 of the post-treatment phase. Patients from both treatment groups improved to a stable clinical status of Oosterhuis Classes 1 and 2. Substantial reduction of AChRAb was documented after each session of PE or IA. In the treatment period 16 adverse effects (seven serious adverse events, SAE) in the PE and 10 (1 SAE) in the IA group were observed. In conclusion, IA proved to be equally effective compared with PE treatment in patients with myasthenic crisis. Three to five treatment sessions using low plasma volume dosage of 20-25 ml/kg were adequate to improve clinically relevant symptoms significantly in most patients., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate functional effects of immunoadsorption (IA) in patients with chronic nonfamilial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) regarding clinical and humoral markers of heart failure., Background: IA has been shown to induce early hemodynamic improvement in patients with nonfamilial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)., Methods: We performed IA using protein A agarose columns on five consecutive days in 51 patients with chronic DCM, congestive heart failure of NYHA class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%, and mean time since initial diagnosis of 5.0 ± 5.8 years., Results: Immediately after IA, immunoglobulin G (IgG) decreased by 89.4% and IgG3 by 66.7% (both P < 0.0001). Median NT-pro BNP was reduced from 1230.0 ng L(-1) at baseline to 829.0 ng L(-1) after 6 months (P < 0.0001). Also mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly improved (26.3% ± 9.4% to 28.7% ± 11.4% after 6 months, P = 0.016) and LVEF improved ≥5% (absolute) in 21 of 51 (41.2%) patients. After 6 months, bicycle spiroergometry showed a significant increase in exercise capacity from 82.0 ± 30.8 Watts to 93.1 ± 34.3 Watts (P = 0.008) while VO2max rose from 15.0 ± 4.1 to 16.4 ± 4.8 mL min(-1) kg(-1) (P = 0.01)., Conclusions: In this study, on heart failure patients with nonfamilial DCM, IA therapy significantly improved clinical and humoral markers of heart failure severity. These promising results may be due to the selected study population, with a shorter disease duration and the higher amount of IgG 3 reduction. Future blinded prospective multicenter studies are necessary to identify those patients that benefit most., (Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Extracorporeal immune adsorption with staphylococcal protein A (SPA) columns can remove immune complexes and immunoglobulins in the treatment of a variety of diseases. We present the case of an elderly man with neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy, treated by 3 on-line SPA procedures. At the completion of these treatments his neuropathy relapsed, progressing to near-total paralysis. Return to a baseline clinical status required several months. The reason for this severe relapse is not clear. Possible explanations include SPA activation of T-lymphocytes, with release of gamma interferon and increased antigen recognition, or removal of an antiidiotype control mechanism. We advise caution in the application of immunoadsorption to conditions in which it has not yet been evaluated.

Extracorporeal removal or modulation of circulating immune complexes (CIC) from plasma of animals and humans with malignant disease may be associated with induction of immune-mediated anti-tumor responses. Immunoadsorption columns containing heat-killed and formalin-fixed Staphylococcus aureus or staphylococcal protein A have been used for this purpose but treatments have often been associated with cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recently, an immunoadsorption device containing highly purified protein A covalently attached to a silica matrix (PROSORBA column) was used to treat 142 patients with refractory malignancies and 22 of 104 patients evaluated for anti-tumor response had objectively measurable reduction in tumor burden. In contrast to earlier experience with other devices, the procedures used in this trial were well tolerated and could be performed on an outpatient basis. The most common side effects observed among 1,306 treatments were chills (28% of treatments), low grade fever (28%), and musculoskeletal pain (16%). Side effects were mild to moderate and required no treatment or only symptomatic treatment. Treatment schedules were interrupted due to side effects for only six patients and there were no treatment-related deaths. Of 64 patients available for long-term follow-up evaluation (mean of 11 months), none exhibited evidence of long-term treatment-related side effects. None of the patient deaths in that period were associated with short or long-term treatment-related side effects. Protein A-silica (PROSORBA columns) can be used safely for development of further experimental treatments of malignant disease.