Search

Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests has led to a stage and grade shift as compared to the pre-PSA era. Effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer should be manifested by a reduction in detection rate of aggressive cancers during subsequent screening. In 6 centers of the European Randomized Screening study for Prostate Cancer, a total of 58,710 men were tested for prostate cancer. Screening centers differed with regard to age-range, screening interval and biopsy indications. During the 2nd visit, the proportion of Gleason score 6 cancers increased from 62.5 to 75%, mainly at the expense of Gleason score 7 cancers. High-grade (Gleason score 8-10) cancer detection rates varied per screening center during the 1st visit from 5.1 to 41.1, and during the 2nd visit from 6.4 to 29.3/10,000 men. The overall detection rate of high-grade cancers showed a reduction during the 2nd visit from 26 to 12/10,000 men, an effect mainly attributable to the screening center with the highest cancer detection rate (i.e. 507/10,000 men). Variations in detection rates among screening centers related among others to biopsy compliance and age range., (Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: The value of rectal examination as initial screening test for prostate cancer at low PSA values (0.0-3.9 ng/ml) was determined by evaluating the number and tumor characteristics of the cancers detected., Methods: Two study populations were subjected to screening with (n = 10,226) and without (n = 10,753) rectal examination as initial screening test. The number of cancers detected at low PSA values for both screening regimens, the corresponding biopsy and radical prostatectomy tumor characteristics were assessed. Possibly harmless cancers were defined as small (< 0.5 ml) organ-confined tumors without Gleason growth-patterns 4/5., Results: At low PSA, 26.6% (117/440) of screen-detected cancers were detected after the evaluation of a suspicious rectal examination. The number of cancers and tumor aggressiveness features were highly associated with serum-PSA level. The proportion of possibly harmless disease steadily declined from 100% (PSA 0.0-0.9 ng/ml) to 15.4% (PSA 3.0-3.9 ng/ml). Rectal examinations were performed unnecessarily in 94.7-100% of cases, when detection of clinically significant disease was aimed at. Using PSA (and a cut-off of 3.0 ng/ml) as the only screening tool, 24.3% (121/498) of screen-detected cancers were in the PSA range 3.0-3.9 ng/ml, and 60.0% were assessed as clinically significant., Conclusions: Rectal examination as initial screening test for prostate cancer at low PSA values may be replaced by screening using serum-PSA only. At PSA levels below 3.0 ng/ml, 289 rectal examinations are required to find one case of clinically significant disease, and 96 rectal examinations are needed to diagnose prostate cancer of any size, grade, or stage., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Subdividing cancers according to the natural course of disease, both at the time of diagnosis and after radical prostatectomy, may influence management decisions of patients with prostate cancer. We investigated whether categorization of prostate cancers into different prognostic subgroups is feasible., Methods: In 218 screened participants of a randomized study, conventional post-operative tumor features were assessed for their accuracy in predicting PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy using Cox regression analysis. Independent prognostic tumor features were combined to identify subsets of cancers with similar biological potential. A cancer was defined that may be curable after its detection by screening tests, though is destined to progress to clinically manifest disease and cancer-related mortality in the absence of screening., Results: After a median follow-up of 33.0 months, pathological stage (P = 0.03), tumor volume (P = 0.04), and margin status (P = 0.01) each independently predicted PSA relapse after surgery. The proportion of poorly differentiated cancer proved highly superior to the Gleason score and most strongly predicted PSA relapse (P < 0.0001). Based on combined independent prognostic tumor features, a tumor classification model powerfully predicted PSA relapse., Conclusions: Based on tumor characteristics, possibly harmless, and conversely, possibly non-curable disease, may be distinguished from cancers that are likely to show clinical progression in the absence of screening and treatment. Prediction of these subclasses prior to treatment may eventually lead to proper patient management., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Determining tumor stage provides a systematic way to describe the amount and the extent of a tumor at a certain point in time. In this short overview, the current version of the TNM system for prostate cancer is discussed. The TNM (tumor, lymph node, and metastasis) system is now used worldwide for determining tumor stage for prostate cancer. Tumor stage is essentially determined in two situations, at clinical evaluation of the patient (clinical stage) and after treatment by surgical removal of the prostate (pathological stage). In the ideal situation, clinical stage would be a reliable predictor of pathological stage, but in the current situation, tumors are clinically understaged in more than half of the cases. Additional clinical tools are needed to provide a firmer base on which the choice for patient treatment or management could be founded. Some of the criteria for the assessment of pathological stage are unclear. For instance, multifocal tumor, which occurs in more than half of the cases of prostate cancer, is not reckoned with in the current system, something that could hamper a correct and unambiguous assessment of pathological stage. In this report, we also discuss the criteria for extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and bladder neck invasion. Follow-up data obtained from a group of 123 patients that underwent radical prostatectomy at our hospital underline the importance of reporting the latter two., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)