Search

Background and Objectives: Monopolar radiofrequency (RF) treatment is used by physicians to tighten and contour the skin of their patients. In many cases, patients have received prior treatment with other aesthetic modalities such as soft-tissue augmentation or they may wish to receive these treatment modalities simultaneously. Together, soft-tissue augmentation and monopolar RF treatment have the potential to restore tissue volume and improve facial laxity. To date, no published studies have documented the effects of RF treatment directly over soft-tissue fillers., Study Design/materials and Methods: We examined the tissue interactions of monopolar RF heating with five commonly injected fillers in a juvenile pig model. This is the first part of a two-part study. In this study, the interaction of monopolar RF and filler substances was examined over a period of 4 months. The five soft-tissue fillers examined were cross-linked human collagen (Cosmoplast), hyaluronic acid (Restylane), calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse), polylactic acid (Sculptra), and liquid injectable silicone (Silikon 1000)., Results: There was no apparent increase in the risk of local burns and no observable effect of RF treatment on filler persistence in the tissue. With monopolar RF treatment, an increase in fibroplasia and collagen deposition surrounding Restylane, Radiesse, and Sculptra was observed. When scored in a blinded fashion, the increase in collagen deposition was statistically significant for Radiesse., Conclusions: In this animal study, RF treatment had no observed adverse effect on filler collagen responses or persistence. Filler presence did not increase the risk of undesirable thermal effects with monopolar RF treatment. Further clinical studies are required to evaluate the effect of monopolar RF treatment over dermal fillers with respect to aesthetic outcome., ((c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background and Objective: To compare the in vivo histologic effects of the pulsed carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and erbium:ytrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) lasers and to assess the effects of combining CO(2) and Er:YAG laser modalities during a single treatment session. We previously reported 10 patients treated with four laser regimens: CO(2) alone, CO(2)/Er:YAG, Er:YAG alone, Er:YAG/CO(2) with time points at 1 hour and 7 days between laser treatment and histologic analysis. This study found that the optimal treatment consisted of limited CO(2) laser passes followed by Er:YAG. This treatment produced less collagen injury, less thermal necrosis, and more robust epithelial and dermal fibrous tissue regeneration in the acute phase of healing. The present study examines the histologic changes resulting from the host healing response to laser treatment on long-term follow-up of 4-6 months., Study Design/materials and Methods: The Stanford University Committee on Human Subjects in Medical Research approved this study. Nine patients with actinic damage and indications for rhytidectomy volunteered for this interventional study in which each patient served as both experimental and control. The right preauricular area was treated at five sites with the following: (1) CO(2), (2) CO(2) followed by Er:YAG, (3) Er:YAG, (4) blended CO(2)/Er:YAG (Derma-Ktrade mark), (5) phenol. Each was subjected to full-face or sub-unit treatment. Each patient was followed up initially daily then weekly for healing of the full-face laser and for differences in healing of the five treatment areas. Five patients were selected for histologic evaluation. At 4-6 months, these patients underwent rhytidectomy with immediate removal of laser-treated skin, which was evaluated histologically by the study dermatopathologist, who was blinded to the treatment at each site., Results: CO(2) laser treatment produced the greatest thickness of neocollagen (0.27 mm; P < 0.05), the highest neocollagen density (P < 0.05), the greatest decrease in elastosis (27%), but took the longest time for healing and resolution of erythema and inflammation (up to 6 months). Er:YAG used alone produced the least collagen density, with the thinnest band of neocollagen (0.08 mm), but the most rapid resolution of erythema and inflammation (within 10 days). Combined CO(2)/Er:YAG treatments, including Derma-Ktrade mark and CO(2) followed by Er:YAG produced histologic changes that were intermediate, as well as recovery that was intermediate (resolution of erythema within 1 month); the development of neocollagen was greater in CO(2)-containing modalities than Er:YAG used alone by a statistically significant margin (P = 0.001). These histologic findings were corroborated by clinical correlation by examination of the five treatment spots in nine patients and in full-face treatments in 100 patients., Conclusion: Collagenesis is greatest with CO(2) and least with Er:YAG. Elastosis decreased to the greatest degree with CO(2), least with erbium, and to an intermediate extent with blended CO(2)/Er:YAG regimens (sequential and Derma-K). These changes from control are statistically significant with all regimens (P < 0.05). Blended CO(2)/Er:YAG treatments provide an optimal combination of the benefits of CO(2) but with lesser erythema and healing delay. Clinical and histologic findings change over time for different treatments. Thus, long-term histology is critical for predicting results of treatment.

Background and Objective: To compare the in vivo histologic effects of the carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) lasers. To ascertain the effects of combining CO2 and Er:YAG laser modalities during a single treatment session., Study Design/materials and Methods: Ten patients underwent laser treatment to four left preauricular sites 7 days prior to rhytidectomy as follows: CO2 alone, CO2/Er:YAG, Er:YAG alone, and Er:YAG/CO2. The right preauricular area was identically treated 1 hour prior to rhytidectomy. Laser treated skin was excised during rhytidectomy and was evaluated histopathologically in a blinded manner., Results: After 7 days, all groups were reepithelialized and showed equal neo-collagen formation. After 7 days, CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone had the least collagen injury and thickest epidermis and papillary dermis of all groups. Specimens lased 1 hour prior to excision showed the least collagen injury and thermal necrosis when treated with CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone. Four passes with CO2 removed 250 microm of tissue, while eight passes with the Er:YAG removed 160 microm of tissue., Conclusions: Limiting CO2 laser passes and ending with Er:YAG produces less collagen injury, less thermal necrosis, and more robust epithelial and dermal fibrous tissue regeneration. CO2 followed by Er:YAG has similar thermal necrosis and collagen injury as Er:YAG alone, presumably due to Er:YAG removal of CO2 induced thermal injury.