Search

Background: Multiple-breath inert gas washout (MBW) is a sensitive technique to assess lung volumes and ventilation inhomogeneity in infancy. Poor agreement amongst commercially available setups and a lack of transparency in the underlying algorithms for the computation of infant MBW outcomes currently limit the widespread application of MBW as a surveillance tool in early lung disease., Methods: We determined all computational steps in signal processing and the calculation of MBW outcomes in the current infant WBreath/Exhalyzer D setup (Exhalyzer D device, Eco Medics AG; WBreath software version 3.28.0, ndd Medizintechnik AG; Switzerland). We developed a revised WBreath version based on current consensus guidelines and compared outcomes between the current (3.28.0) and revised (3.52.3) WBreath version. We analyzed 60 visits from 40 infants with cystic fibrosis (CF) and 20 healthy controls at 6 weeks and 1 year of age., Results: Investigation into the algorithms in WBreath 3.28.0 revealed discrepancies from current consensus guidelines, which resulted in a potential overestimation of functional residual capacity (FRC) and underestimation of lung clearance index (LCI). We developed a revised WBreath version (3.52.3), which overall resulted in 6.7% lower FRC (mean (SD) -1.78 (0.99) mL/kg) and 14.1% higher LCI (1.11 (0.57) TO) than WBreath version 3.28.0., Conclusion: Comprehensive investigation into the signal processing and algorithms used for analysis of MBW measurements improves the transparency and robustness of infant MBW data. The revised software version calculates outcomes according to consensus guidelines. Future work is needed to validate and compare outcomes between infant MBW setups., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Multiple breath washout (MBW) is increasingly used in the clinical assessment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Guidelines for MBW quality control (QC) were developed primarily for retrospective assessment and central overreading. We assessed whether real-time QC of MBW data during the measurement improves test acceptability in the clinical setting., Methods: We implemented standardized real-time QC and reporting of MBW data at the time of the measurement in the clinical pediatric lung function laboratory in Bern, Switzerland, in children with CF aged 4-18 years. We assessed MBW test acceptability before (31 tests; 89 trials) and after (32 tests; 96 trials) implementation of real-time QC and compared agreement between reviewers. Further, we assessed the implementation of real-time QC at a secondary center in Zurich, Switzerland., Results: Before the implementation of real-time QC in Bern, only 58% of clinical MBW tests were deemed acceptable following retrospective QC by an experienced reviewer. After the implementation of real-time QC, MBW test acceptability improved to 75% in Bern. In Zurich, after the implementation of real-time QC, test acceptability improved from 38% to 70%. Further, the agreement between MBW operators and an experienced reviewer for test acceptability was 84% in Bern and 93% in Zurich., Conclusion: Real-time QC of MBW data at the time of measurement is feasible in the clinical setting and results in improved test acceptability., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: The multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBW) test offers a sensitive measure of airway function. In this study we aim to (a) assess the validity of the EasyOne Pro LAB (MBW ndd ) in an in vitro lung model, (b) assess the feasibility, repeatability, and reproducibility of MBW ndd and (c) compare outcomes with the Exhalyzer D (MBW EM ) and body plethysmography., Methods: In vitro, functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements were assessed using a lung model under quasi-physiological conditions and compared to measured FRC. In vivo plethysmography and MBW were performed in a prospective study of children at two visits (n = 45 healthy; n = 41 cystic fibrosis [CF]). Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) measurements., Results: In vitro FRC ndd measurements were repeatable but lung volumes were underestimated (mean relative difference -5.4% (limits of agreement [LA] -9.6%; -1.1%), 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.27; -4.45). In vivo, compared to plethysmography, FRC ndd was consistently lower (-19.3% [-40.5; 1.9], 95% CI [-23.9; -14.7]), and showed a volume dependency. LCI ndd values were also higher in children with smaller lung volumes. The within-test coefficient of variation of the FRC ndd and LCI ndd were 4.9% in health, and 5.6% and 6.9% in CF respectively. LCI ndd was reproducible between-visits (mean relative difference [LA] -3.7% [-14.8, -7.5; 95% CI -6.6; -0.73] in health [n = 17] and 0.34% [-13.2, 22.8; 95% CI -5.0; 5.69] in CF [n = 23]). When calculated using the same algorithm, LCI ndd was similar to LCI EM in health., Conclusions: MBW ndd measurements are feasible, repeatable, and reproducible, however, MBW-derived outcomes are not interchangeable with MBW EM ., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)