Search

This document provides a summary of various studies and research on stillbirths, focusing on risk factors, interventions, and causes. The global stillbirth rate in 2021 was 13.9 per 1000 total births, with a significant number occurring during labor. Low- and lower-middle-income countries account for the majority of stillbirths, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to increased stillbirth rates in high-income countries. While the global stillbirth rate has decreased over the past two decades, it still lags behind other mortality indicators. The summary emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to address stillbirths, including improved access to healthcare services, health education for mothers, research investment, and international collaboration. Accurate data and high-quality care for pregnant women are urgently needed to reduce stillbirth rates and improve outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but there are limited data on COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women when administered according to the 12-week-interval dosing schedule recommended in the UK.Methods: This was a cohort study of pregnant women receiving COVID-19 vaccination between April and September 2021. The outcomes were immunogenicity and reactogenicity after COVID-19 vaccination. Pregnant women were recruited by phone, e-mail and/or text and were vaccinated according to vaccine availability at their local vaccination center. For immunogenicity assessment, blood samples were taken at specific timepoints after each dose to evaluate nucleocapsid protein (N) and spike protein (S) antibody titers. The comparator group comprised non-pregnant female healthcare workers in the same age group who were vaccinated as part of the national immunization program in a contemporaneous longitudinal cohort study. Longitudinal changes in serum antibody titers and association with pregnancy status were assessed using a two-step regression approach. Reactogenicity assessment in pregnant women was undertaken using an online questionnaire. The comparator group comprised non-pregnant women aged 18-49 years who had received two vaccine doses in primary care. The association of pregnancy status with reactogenicity was assessed using logistic regression analysis.Results: Overall, 67 pregnant women, of whom 66 had received a mRNA vaccine, and 79 non-pregnant women, of whom 50 had received a mRNA vaccine, were included in the immunogenicity study. Most (61.2%) pregnant women received their first vaccine dose in the third trimester, while 3.0% received it in the first trimester and 35.8% in the second trimester. SARS-CoV-2 S-antibody geometric mean concentrations after mRNA vaccination were not significantly different at 2-6 weeks after the first dose but were significantly lower at 2-6 weeks after the second dose in infection-naïve pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. In pregnant women, prior infection was associated with higher antibody levels at 2-6 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Reactogenicity analysis included 108 pregnant women and 116 non-pregnant women. After the first dose, tiredness and chills were reported less commonly in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women (P = 0.043 and P = 0.029, respectively). After the second dose, feeling generally unwell was reported less commonly (P = 0.046) in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women.Conclusions: Using an extended 12-week interval between vaccine doses, antibody responses after two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were found to be lower in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. Strong antibody responses were achieved after one dose in previously infected women, regardless of pregnancy status. Pregnant women reported fewer adverse events after both the first and second dose of vaccine. These findings should now be addressed in larger controlled studies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in women of childbearing age and to estimate the disease incidence and relative risk of IMD in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women.Design: Prospective enhanced national surveillance for IMD.Setting: England.Population: Women of reproductive age (15-44 years) with laboratory-confirmed IMD.Methods: Public Health England conducts enhanced national surveillance for IMD in England. Laboratory-confirmed cases are followed up with postal questionnaires to general practitioners. All cases confirmed in women of reproductive age from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014 were included.Main Outcome Measures: Annual IMD incidence and relative risk of IMD in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women of reproductive age.Results: During the 4-year surveillance period, there were 1502 cases of IMD in females across England; of these, 310 (20.6%) cases were in women of reproductive age, including four women who were pregnant at the time of IMD confirmation (1.3%). Serogroup distribution of IMD cases in women of childbearing age was similar to the overall distribution. The four cases in otherwise healthy pregnant women were confirmed across all trimesters and all survived; one case in the first trimester had a septic miscarriage. The incidence of IMD was lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant women (0.16 compared with 0.76 per 100 000 pregnant and non-pregnant years, respectively), giving a lower risk of IMD in pregnant women (incidence rate ratio, IRR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.54).Conclusions: Pregnant women are nearly five times less likely to develop IMD compared with non-pregnant women, but the infection can be severe.Tweetable Abstract: The risk of meningococcal disease is lower in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women; the infection can occur across all trimesters and can be severe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the incidence of maternal group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in England., Design: Population surveillance augmented through data linkage., Setting: England., Population: All pregnant women accessing the National Health Service (NHS) in England., Methods: Invasive GBS (iGBS) infections during pregnancy or within 6 weeks of childbirth were identified by linking Public Health England (PHE) national microbiology surveillance data for 2014 to NHS hospital admission records. Capsular serotypes of GBS were determined by reference laboratory typing of clinical isolates from women aged 15-44 years. Post-caesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) caused by GBS was identified in 21 hospitals participating in PHE SSI surveillance (2009-2015)., Main Outcome Measures: iGBS rate per 1000 maternities; risk of GBS SSI per 1000 caesarean sections., Results: Of 1601 patients diagnosed with iGBS infections in England in 2014, 185 (12%) were identified as maternal infections, a rate of 0.29 (95% CI 0.25-0.33) per 1000 maternities and representing 83% of all iGBS cases in women aged 18-44 years. Seven (3.8%) were associated with miscarriage. Fetal outcome identified excess rates of stillbirth (3.4 versus 0.5%) and extreme prematurity (<28 weeks of gestation, 3.7 versus 0.5%) compared with national averages (P < 0.001). Caesarean section surveillance in 27 860 women (21 hospitals) identified 47 cases of GBS SSI, with an estimated 4.24 (3.51-5.07) per 1000 caesarean sections, a median time-to-onset of 10 days (IQR 7-13 days) and ten infections that required readmission. Capsular serotype analysis identified a diverse array of strains with serotype III as the most common (43%)., Conclusions: Our assessment of maternal GBS infection in England indicates the potential additional benefit of GBS vaccination in preventing adverse maternal and fetal outcomes., (© 2021 Crown copyright. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.)