Search

Abstract: We investigate the L'Aquila 2009 earthquake (AQE, Mw 6.3, Italy) through a 3‐D Finite Element (FE) mechanical model based on the exploitation of ENVISAT DInSAR and GPS measurements and an independently generated fault model. The proposed approach mainly consists of (a) the generation of a 3‐D fault model of the active structures involved in the sequence and those neighboring to them, benefiting of a large geological and seismological data set; (b) the implementation of the generated 3‐D fault model in a FE environment, by exploiting the elastic dislocation theory and considering the curved fault geometry and the crustal heterogeneities information; and (c) the optimization of the seismogenic crustal blocks model parameters in order to reproduce the geodetic measurements. We show that our modeling approach allows us to well reproduce the coseismic surface displacements, including their significant asymmetric pattern, as shown by the very good fit between the modeled ground deformations and the geodetic measurements. Moreover, a comparative analysis between our FE model results and those obtained by considering a classical analytical (Okada) model, for both the surface displacements and the Coulomb stress changes, has been performed. Our model permits to investigate the coseismic stress and strain field changes relevant to the investigated volume and their relationships with the surrounding geological structures; moreover, it highlights the very good correlation with the seismicity spatial distribution. The retrieved stress field changes show different maxima: (a) at few kilometers depth, within the main event surface rupture zone; (b) at depths of 5–9 km in correspondence of main event hypocentral area, along the SW dipping Paganica Fault System (PFS); and (c) at depths of 12–14 km, in correspondence of the largest aftershock hypocentral area, along a steep segment of an underlying east dipping basal detachment. Moreover, the main event hypocenter is localized in a region of high‐gradient strain field changes, while a deeper volumetric dilatation lobe involves the largest aftershock zone. From these findings, we argue that the AQE hanging wall downward movement along the steep portion of PFS might have been modulated by the underlying basal detachment; on the other hand, the coseismic eastward motion of the PFS footwall might have triggered further slip on the OS, thus releasing the largest aftershock on an independent source. The retrieved stress and strain field changes, which support the active role of the OS, have been also validated through a comparative analysis with those obtained from independent geological, seismological, and GPS measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many joint inversion schemes use 1D forward modelling in the integrated interpretation of various geophysical data. In extending the joint inversion approach to the investigation of 2D structures, the discretization of the model parameters and the appropriate choice of the forward-modelling procedure play a very important role. In this paper, a hybrid seismic–geoelectric joint inversion method is proposed for the investigation of 2D near-surface geological structures. The electric and seismic models are coupled together through the use of common boundaries between the adjacent layers. Assuming a 2D model composed of homogeneous layers with curved boundaries, a fast ray-tracing algorithm is used for the calculation of refraction seismic traveltime data. In the geoelectric forward modelling, a locally 1D approximation is used. The boundary surfaces are written in the form of series expansion; the inversion algorithms are formulated for the expansion coefficients and the petrophysical parameters as unknowns. Two versions of the inversion method are proposed: in versions A and B, interval-wise constant functions and Chebyshev polynomials are, respectively, used as basis functions of the series expansion. The versions are tested by means of synthetic and in situ measured data. The tests show that both methods are stable and accurate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the high detection level of the Italian seismic network and the risk associated with its fault networks, Central‐Southern Italy has no unique geophysical model of the crust able to illuminate its complex tectonics. Here, we obtain seismic attenuation and scattering tomography models of this area; both reveal high attenuation and scattering anomalies characterizing the entire Apenninic Chain and related to its East‐ and West‐dipping extensional Quaternary tectonic alignments. Fault‐associated fractured zones become preferential ways for circulating and degassing high‐attenuation CO2‐bearing fluids. A previously undetected fluid source area is a high‐attenuation volume below the Matese complex, while a similar smaller anomaly supports a fluid source near L'Aquila. The most prominent low attenuation and scattering volumes reveal a locked aseismic zone corresponding to the Fucino‐Morrone‐Porrara fault systems, representing a zone of significant seismic hazard. Plain Language Summary: Geophysical methods are the most used tools for imaging the subsurface. Still, their resolution and reliability depend on the amount of good‐quality data and the sensitivity of the technique used for the target structures. Improvements in the seismic detection infrastructures of the last decade allow imaging zones characterized by sparse seismicity, like Central‐Southern Italy. Once combined with these data, new imaging techniques targeting attributes with higher sensitivity to stress and fluid saturation provide unprecedented resolution on tectonic interactions and fluid sources in this area. Here, we measured and mapped in 3D the energy lost by seismic waves during their propagation. Our results show a high‐attenuation volume elongated in the direction of the Apenninic Chain and particularly intense in Southern Italy, mapping fluid‐filled fracturing and a fluid source likely coinciding with the Matese area. The principal normal and reverse faults in the area control high‐attenuation zones. The most prominent low attenuation and scattering volume marked locked areas with low seismic energy release, suggesting them as the zones of stress accumulation. Key Points: Scattering and attenuation tomography image the tectonics of the Apennine Mountain Belt ChainHigh‐attenuation anomalies mark crustal sources of CO2 following major structural alignmentsA high‐attenuation/high‐scattering volume reveals an extended fluid source beneath the Matese Mountains [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]