1. Evaluation of multidisciplinary team decisions in neuroendocrine neoplasms: Impact of expert centres.
- Author
-
Zandee, Wouter T., Merola, Elettra, Poczkaj, Karolina, de Mestier, Louis, Klümpen, Heinz‐Josef, Geboes, Karen, de Herder, Wouter W., and Munir, Alia
- Subjects
- *
CONFIDENCE intervals , *TUMOR classification , *HEALTH care teams , *NEUROENDOCRINE tumors , *CHI-squared test , *DECISION making in clinical medicine , *DATA analysis software , *LOGISTIC regression analysis , *LONGITUDINAL method , *TUMOR grading - Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings on the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods: All newly referred gastro‐entero‐pancreatic (GEP)‐NEN patients discussed from 1 April to 1 October 2017 in the MDT of seven European expert centres were prospectively included. The impact on patients' management was defined as a change in diagnosis, grade, stage or treatment. Results: A total of 292 patients were included, mainly small intestinal (siNENs) (32%) and pancreatic NENs (28%), with distant metastases in 51%. Patients had received prior surgery in 43% of cases and prior medical treatment in 32%. A significant change occurred in 61% of NENs: 7% changes in diagnosis, 8% in grade and 16% in stage. The MDT recommended a new treatment for 51% of patients, mainly surgery (9%) or somatostatin analogues (20%). A significant change was most frequently observed in patients with Stage IV disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9–6.9 vs. Stage I) and G2 NENs (vs. G1, HR 2.1 95% CI: 1.2–3.8). Conclusion: NEN‐dedicated MDT discussion in expert centres yields significant management changes in over 60% of patients and thus represents the gold standard for the management of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF