1. The Anthropocene as an epoch is distinct from all other concepts known by this term: a reply to Swindles et al. (2023).
- Author
-
Head, Martin J., Waters, Colin N., Zalasiewicz, Jan A., Barnosky, Anthony D., Turner, Simon D., Cearreta, Alejandro, Leinfelder, Reinhold, McCarthy, Francine M.G., Richter, Daniel de B., Rose, Neil L., Saito, Yoshiki, Vidas, Davor, Wagreich, Michael, Han, Yongming, SumMerhayes, Colin P., Williams, Mark, and Zinke, Jens
- Subjects
SWINDLERS & swindling ,EARTH system science ,GEOLOGICAL time scales ,ANTHROPOCENE Epoch ,PHYSICAL sciences - Abstract
However, recognition of this would be eased, not hindered, by formal recognition of an Anthropocene epoch justified by our present assessment that the Earth System state has decisively exceeded Holocene norms but not yet those of the Quaternary (Waters et al., [21]). As Zalasiewicz et al. ([28]) pointed out, defining a base for the Anthropocene will provide completeness for our understanding of the highly stable Holocene, with both top and base defined, in contrast with the uncertain planetary boundary conditions that characterise the Anthropocene. Swindles et al. ([15]) correctly point out that there are many conceptions of the "Anthropocene" in use, and they argue that this flexibility in terminology is desirable. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF