Search

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and antibiotic‐loaded bone cement (ALBC) are commonly used treatments for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). However, the combined efficacy of these two modalities remains unclear. This clinical study aimed to assess the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of NPWT&ALBC in the management of DFUs. A total of 28 patients were recruited, 16 of whom served as controls and received only NPWT, whilst 12 received NPWT&ALBC. Both groups underwent wound repair surgery following the treatments. Blood samples were obtained to detect infections and inflammation. Wound tissue samples were also collected before and after the intervention to observe changes in inflammation, vascular structure and collagen through tissue staining. Compared with the NPWT group, the NPWT&ALBC group exhibited a superior wound bed, which was characterised by reduced inflammation infiltration and enhanced collagen expression. Immunostaining revealed a decrease in IL‐6 levels and an increase in α‐SMA, CD68, CD206 and collagen I expression. Western blot analysis demonstrated that NPWT&ALBC led to a decrease in inflammation levels and an increase in vascularization and collagen content. NPWT&ALBC therapy tends to form a wound bed with increased vascularization and M2 macrophage polarisation, which may contribute to DFUs wound healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis which may be rapidly progressive. Standard guidelines for local treatment are lacking. Through our experience, we suggested a local treatment algorithm based on the tissue, infection, moisture balance, and epithelization (TIME) concept. The clinical and histopathological features of 52 patients with PG, the duration, and the evolution of the lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Systemic therapies, local treatments, and standard wound treatments were reported. We observed ulcerative PG in the majority of the patients (82.6%), followed by the pustular form (9.6%), the peristomal type (3.8%), the vegetative form (1.9%), and the bullous type (1.9%). The lower leg was the most commonly area affected (90.4% of cases). Pathergy was reported in 15.3% of cases. The first‐line treatment was the use of oral glucocorticosteroids (GCSs). We observed healing after 3 weeks of GCS in 17.3% of cases. In 25% of all cases, we obtained complete healing with long‐term low doses (<0.5 mg/kg) of GCS in the range of 2 to 6 months. We used second‐line treatments in 57.6% of patients. Local, systemic treatment, and correct wound management can be associated with better clinical results. We suggest a new local therapeutic algorithm in both the inflammatory and noninflammatory healing phases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare changes in wound size and appearance and health complication rates in patients with vasculopathy and lower‐extremity wounds treated with or without low‐frequency contact ultrasound debridement (LFCUD) This study was a randomised controlled trial. The study was conducted in a vascular surgery service, including outpatient wound clinic and inpatient ward, in a tertiary care academic centre. In total, 70 patients with vasculopathy and lower‐extremity wounds of mixed aetiology were enrolled in the trial; 68 completed the study. Patients were randomised to receive LFCUD plus usual care (n = 33) or usual care (n = 37) at 4 weekly visits, and were followed thereafter for up to 12 wk. The main outcome measures included closed wounds, change in wound surface area (WSA), and wound appearance by the revised Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (revPWAT). After 4 weekly LFCUD treatments, patients in the LFCUD group had significantly better wound appearance (total revPWAT score) compared with the control group treated only with usual care (P = <0.05). LFCUD‐treated wounds also had a significant reduction in WSA over 4 wk that was not found in the UC group. LFCUD treatment was also associated with a greater number of healed wounds, odds ratio 5.00 (95% CI 1.24‐20.25), and fewer instances of wound deterioration. Weekly LFCUD applications to patients with significant vasculopathy resulted in superior healing outcomes when compared with current usual wound care practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wound bed preparation is the management of a wound in order to accelerate endogenous healing or to facilitate the effectiveness of split-skin grafting. The formation of a healthy wound bed is a prerequisite to the use of advanced wound care products. Unless this is achieved, even the most sophisticated and expensive materials are unlikely to function correctly. An attempt has been made to use 3% citric acid ointment for wound bed preparation to prepare wound for grafting in five cases of wounds with large raw areas infected with multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While the overwhelming majority of wounds heal rapidly, a significant proportion fail to progress through the wound-healing process. These resultant chronic wounds cause considerable morbidity and are costly to treat. Wound bed preparation, summarised by the TIME (Tissue, Inflammation/infection, Moisture imbalance, Epithelial edge advancement) concept, is a systematic approach for assessing chronic wounds. Each of these components needs to be addressed and optimised to improve the chances of successful wound closure. We present an up-to-date literature review of the most important recent aspects of wound bed preparation. While there are many novel therapies that are available to the treating clinician, often, there are limited data on which to assess their clinical value, and a lack of appreciation for adequate wound bed preparation needed before expensive therapy is used to heal a wound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a cutting-edge technology and provides an alternative solution to the problem of wounds. This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of this technique in the treatment of chronic wounds. A prospective clinical study was used to evaluate our experience in use of NPWT in the healing of pressure ulcers and chronic wounds over 2 years. The primary end point of the study group was the time taken for appearance of healthy granulation tissue and full reepithelialisation without drainage. All patients with sepsis were excluded from the study. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out. Of the 60 patients studied, 41 had associated comorbidities including diabetes mellitus. The commonest site of occurrence was the lower limb. Coverage in the form of a flap was required at presentation in 63·33% of patients. However, after initiation of NPWT, none of them required the procedure and they healed spontaneously either by secondary intention or by skin grafting. The time taken for appearance of healthy granulation tissue was 14·36±4·24 days. Complete healing of wounds occurred by 33·1±10·22 days. There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of the wounds before and after the intervention (P =0·000). Complications resulting from NPWT were minimal. This technique is an excellent adjunct to surgical debridement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The TIME acronym (tissue, infection/inflammation, moisture balance and edge of wound) was first developed more than 10 years ago, by an international group of wound healing experts, to provide a framework for a structured approach to wound bed preparation; a basis for optimising the management of open chronic wounds healing by secondary intention. However, it should be recognised that the TIME principles are only a part of the systematic and holistic evaluation of each patient at every wound assessment. This review, prepared by the International Wound Infection Institute, examines how new data and evidence generated in the intervening decade affects the original concepts of TIME, and how it is translated into current best practice. Four developments stand out: recognition of the importance of biofilms (and the need for a simple diagnostic), use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), evolution of topical antiseptic therapy as dressings and for wound lavage (notably, silver and polyhexamethylene biguanide) and expanded insight of the role of molecular biological processes in chronic wounds (with emerging diagnostics and theranostics). Tissue: a major advance has been the recognition of the value of repetitive and maintenance debridement and wound cleansing, both in time-honoured and novel methods (notably using NPWT and hydrosurgery). Infection/inflammation: clinical recognition of infection (and non infective causes of persisting inflammation) is critical. The concept of a bacterial continuum through contamination, colonisation and infection is now widely accepted, together with the understanding of biofilm presence. There has been a return to topical antiseptics to control bioburden in wounds, emphasised by the awareness of increasing antibiotic resistance. Moisture: the relevance of excessive or insufficient wound exudate and its molecular components has led to the development and use of a wide range of dressings to regulate moisture balance, and to protect peri-wound skin, and optimise healing. Edge of wound: several treatment modalities are being investigated and introduced to improve epithelial advancement, which can be regarded as the clearest sign of wound healing. The TIME principle remains relevant 10 years on, with continuing important developments that incorporate new evidence for wound care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the evidence on the impact of different debridement techniques on healing and their efficacy in the treatment of leg ulcers. Methods: Web-based search (PubMed) for trials investigating surgical, enzymatic, autolytic, osmotic, ultrasound-assisted, and biosurgical wound debridement on leg ulcers with regard to healing and efficacy. Results: Both surgical and hydrosurgical methods proved to be effective debridement techniques. For conventional surgical debridement, a significantly greater reduction of the wound surface area and a higher healing rate were reported. Studies on autolytic, osmotic, and enzymatic wound debridement showed effective debridement for krill enzymes, dextranomer and manuka honey. Only for manuka honey was there a significantly greater reduction of the wound surface area compared to standard treatment. One study comparing fibrinolysin/DNAse with placebo and one comparing autolytic with enzymatic debridement showed no significant differences between the respective techniques. Trials on ultrasound-assisted wound debridement reported a positive impact on healing. A significant wound surface area reduction was demonstrated in one of them. Maggot therapy led to effective debridement. The largest trial showed no significantly improved healing. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to strengthen the evidence for a significant impact of wound debridement on the healing of leg ulcers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wound clinics are seeing an increase in the number of ‘complex’ wounds, which arise as the result of the interaction between multiple coexisting systemic pathologies, environmental factors and local wound factors. These complex wounds require an approach to diagnosis and management that can encapsulate all these factors. Unified wound assessment approaches such as HEIDI (History, Examination, Investigations, Diagnosis and management plan), wound bed preparation and applied wound management systems are essential to reach a definitive diagnosis and to ensure that management is agreed between the various clinical specialities that may be involved. A series of case histories is presented that illustrate the benefits of a unified approach to wound management. Results of a study into the cost-effectiveness of an improved foam dressing are presented, and the problems of demonstrating the ability to make long-term savings through short-term expenditure are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last few years, considerable progress has been made in the treatment of chronic ulcers, thanks to new therapy methods. Wound bed preparation is a modern approach for the removal of local barriers to healing by optimising debridement, reduction of bioburden and exudate management through the TIME principles, which have been introduced by the International Advisory Board on Wound Bed Preparation. However, this protocol does not evaluate the state of the repair process and therefore does not suggest the ideal therapeutic choice for each single patient. The revised TIME-H concept considers also the supposed healing time, H, and gives a score that correlates the wound condition with the incidental concomitance with medical pathologies related to the therapeutic measures, thus guiding the clinician towards a practical and systematic approach in the treatment. By applying this scheme to our situation, the average healing time was considerably reduced. The formulation of the new protocol TIME-H for a critical assessment of treatment scheme, which also includes the general conditions of the patient, represents a more rational and adequate approach for an accurate prognosis and therefore for a more suitable therapeutic choice in the treatment of difficult wounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adequate wound bed preparation is essential for healing of leg ulcers, and consists of controlling exudate and edema, decreasing the bacterial burden, promoting healthy granulation tissue, and removing necrotic tissue. Currently, there is no classification system for wound bed preparation that has predictive value. Based on past work and the authors’ experience, we have now developed and tested a new classification system that scores the following parameters: healing edges (wound edge effect), presence of eschar, greatest wound depth/granulation tissue, amount of exudate amount, edema, peri-wound dermatitis, peri-wound callus and or fibrosis, and a pink/red wound bed. Each parameter receives a score from 0 (worst score) to 2 (best score), and all the parameter scores are added for a total score. Each wound can have a maximum score of 16 (the best score possible), to a minimum score of 0 (the worst score possible). We used this wound bed score (WBS) system in a study of 177 patients with venous ulcers who had been prospectively treated with and randomized to either conventional therapy (compression alone) or a living bilayered skin construct (BSC). We evaluated serial photographs at baseline to determine whether the results would be predictive of complete wound closure and could validate the WBS. We found that wounds that ultimately achieved full closure had a statistically significant higher WBS than those that did not heal ( p = 0.0012). This was also true when separating wounds by treatment modality: standard therapy ( p = 0.044) and treatment with a BSC ( p = 0.011). When dividing the WBS in the following quartile groups: scores 4–10, 10–12, 12–13, and 13–16, the percentage of healed wounds correlated with the WBS ( p = 0.0008). For all wounds, a one unit increase in total WBS resulted on average in a 22.8% increase in odds of healing (OR = 1.228). This WBS seems to have validity in predicting complete wound closure in wounds treated with either standard therapy or advanced modalities, such as BSC. If confirmed and widely adopted in this and other types of wounds, it could be a useful tool in both the clinical and research setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of chronic wounds has progressed from merely assessing the status of a wound to understanding the underlying molecular and cellular abnormalities that prevent the wound from healing. The concept of wound bed preparation has simultaneously evolved to provide a systematic approach to removing these barriers to natural healing and enhancing the effects of advanced therapies. This brief review of wound bed preparation traces the development of these concepts and explains how to apply systematic wound management using the TIME acronym – tissue (non viable or deficient), infection/inflammation, moisture (imbalance) and edge (non advancing or undermined). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]