Search

Objectives: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common and carries significant personal and societal burden. Accurate assessment is necessary for good clinical and research practice but is highly dependent on the assessment technique used. Current practice with regards to UK/international clinical assessment is unknown. We aimed to capture current clinical practice, with reference to contemporaneously available guidelines. We further aimed to compare UK to international practice. Design: Anonymous online questionnaire with cross‐sectional non‐probability sampling. Subgroup analysis according to subspeciality training in rhinology ('rhinologists' and 'non‐rhinologists') was performed, with geographical comparisons only made according to subgroup. Participants: ENT surgeons who assess olfaction. Results: Responses were received from 465 clinicians (217 from UK and 17 countries total). Country‐specific response rate varied, with the lowest rate being obtained from Japan (1.4%) and highest from Greece (72.5%). Most UK clinicians do not perform psychophysical smell testing during any of the presented clinical scenarios—though rhinologists did so more often than non‐rhinologists. The most frequent barriers to testing related to service provision (e.g., time/funding limitations). Whilst there was variability in practice, in general, international respondents performed psychophysical testing more frequently than those from the UK. Approximately 3/4 of all respondents said they would like to receive training in psychophysical smell testing. Patient reported outcome measures were infrequently used in the UK/internationally. More UK respondents performed diagnostic MRI scanning than international respondents. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive UK‐based, and only international survey of clinical practice in the assessment of OD. We present recommendations to improve practice, including increased education and funding for psychophysical smell testing. We hope this will promote accurate and reliable olfactory assessment, as is the accepted standard in other sensory systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There is a need to develop a medical device which can accurately measure normal and abnormal nasal breathing which the patient can better understand in addition to being able to diagnose the cause for their nasal obstruction. The aim is to evaluate the accuracy of the nasal acoustic device (NAD) in diagnosing the common causes for nasal obstruction and diagnosing normal and abnormal (nasal obstruction) nasal breathing. Methods: This pilot study recruited 27 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS) which represents the common causes for NO and 26 controls (with normal nasal breathing). Nasal breathing sounds were recorded by the NAD akin to two small stethoscopes placed over the left and right nasal ala. The novel outcome metrics for the NAD include inspiratory nasal acoustic score (INA) score, expiratory nasal acoustic (ENA) score and the inspiratory nasal obstruction balance index (NOBI). The change in acoustic score following decongestant is key in this diagnostic process. Results: Pre‐decongestant ENA score was used to detect the presence of nasal obstruction in patients compared to controls, with a sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66‐0.96) and a specificity of 0.77 (0.54‐1.00). Post‐decongestant percentage change in INA score was used to identify the presence of AR or CRS, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.69‐1.00) and specificity of 0.72 (0.55‐0.89) for AR; and a sensitivity of 0.92 (0.75‐1.00) and specificity of 0.69 (0.52‐0.86) for CRS. Post‐decongestant inspiratory NOBI was used to identify DNS, with a sensitivity of 0.77 (0.59‐0.95) and specificity of 0.94 (0.82‐1.00). Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the NAD can help distinguish between normal and abnormal nasal breathing and help diagnose AR, CRS, and DNS. Such a device has not been invented and could revolutionize COVID‐19 recovery telemedicine. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic accuracy study—Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Olfaction is frequently impaired in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and often improves after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Data about dynamics of olfactory changes after ESS are lacking, and little information is available concerning whether preoperatively administered glucocorticosteroids predict postoperative olfaction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine dynamics of olfaction after ESS in relation to the effect of preoperative administration of glucocorticosteroids in CRSwNP.Methods: This prospective study included 52 CRSwNP patients (30 men, 22 women, mean age 54 ± 14 years) divided into a control group (n = 31) subjected to ESS without preoperative steroids and a treatment group (n = 21) receiving orally administered glucocorticosteroids preoperatively. Self-ratings of olfaction and olfactory testing using the extended Sniffin' Sticks test battery (threshold, discrimination and identification [TDI] score) were performed. Olfaction was measured preoperatively; after termination of glucocorticosteroid treatment (only treatment group); and 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.Results: After glucocorticosteroids, TDI score significantly improved in 57% of patients, and olfactory function remained unchanged in 43%. In addition, improvement in TDI score after steroids and 3 months postoperatively were significantly correlated (r = 0.66, P = 0.01). Patients whose olfaction did not improve after glucocorticosteroids did not benefit from surgery. Regarding postoperative olfactory dynamics, TDI score reached its maximum 1 month postoperatively and decreased again approximately 3 months after surgery.Conclusion: Glucocorticosteroids improved olfaction in CRSwNP comparable to surgery. In addition, changes in relation to steroids predicted olfactory outcome postoperatively. Regarding the olfactory dynamics, it could be demonstrated that olfactory function increased 1 month after surgery and decreased 3 months postoperatively.Level Of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 130:1616-1621, 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our primary aim in this study was to determine which of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” subtest components (threshold, discrimination, or identification) best reflect overall change in olfactory function during treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Our secondary aim was to determine whether duration of CRS affects olfactory outcomes after treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Sniffin’ Sticks test scores from patients medically treated for CRS at our center from 1999 to 2016 were analyzed. Only patients with 2 test scores available were included. Results: Results from 408 patients were included (mean age, 56 years; male:female ratio, 217:191). There was a statistically significant improvement in threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) scores as well as the composite “TDI” score between the two testing sessions. Controlling for age, there was a significantly greater improvement in composite TDI score in patients with CRS of ≤24 months duration. As expected, we found statistically significant correlations between change in overall composite TDI score and change in threshhold, discrimination, and identification, between sessions. Of the individual subcomponents, change in discrimination correlated best with change in composite TDI score (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001). This relationship was maintained irrespective of duration of CRS. Conclusions: In patients with CRS, odor discrimination appears to best reflect overall changes in olfactory function, as determined using the composite TDI score. Furthermore, olfactory outcomes are better when treatment is started sooner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory condition and a major cause of olfactory loss. Olfactory dysfunction has been associated with reduced olfactory bulb (OB) volume and gray matter (GM) density in the olfactory-related brain areas. The aim of this study was to investigate brain GM structural and OB volume alterations in patients with CRS. Methods Structural brain images were collected from 21 CRS patients and 31 healthy controls on a 3-T scanner. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed to investigate GM. Olfactory bulb volumes were measured using AMIRA software. Psychophysical olfactory testing for odor threshold (T) and identification (I) was performed using the Sniffin' Sticks battery. Results CRS patients had significantly lower scores for Sniffin' Sticks olfactory tests than controls ( p < 0.001 for T, I, and combined T and I [TI] scores). Region-of-interest analyses revealed no difference in GM volume between CRS patients and healthy controls; however, in CRS patients with severe olfactory dysfunction, GM reduction was observed in the gyrus rectus, orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, and the insula. In addition, no difference was observed for OB volume in CRS patients compared with healthy controls. Conclusion In this study we identified a reduction in gray matter in olfactory brain regions in CRS patients with severe olfactory dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to determine whether the pattern of olfactory impairment seen in psychophysical testing reflects underlying disease etiology.Study Design: Retrospective cohort.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,226 patients from our tertiary referral center. Only hyposmic patients with the following conditions were included: postinfectious hyposmia, posttraumatic hyposmia, hyposmia secondary to sinonasal disease, and hyposmia secondary to Parkinson disease. Patients with anosmia were excluded.Results: Using a repeated measures analysis of variance (within subject factor "test": threshold [T], discrimination [D], identification [I]; between subject factor: "etiology") with posthoc Bonferroni corrected t tests, we found significant interaction between the factors "test" and "etiology" (F6,2444 = 8.46, P < 0.001), indicating that different causes of hyposmia produce different patterns of olfactory loss with respect to the individual subtests T, D, and I . Specifically, patients with Parkinson disease performed relatively well in odor threshold testing, but poorly in odor identification and discrimination compared with the other etiology groups. Conversely, patients with sinonasal disease performed well in odor identification and discrimination but poorly in odor threshold. Patients with postinfectious and posttraumatic hyposmia performed relatively well in both thresholds and discrimination but poorly in identification. However, patients with posttraumatic hyposmia had globally reduced scores compared with the other groups.Conclusion: This is the first study to comprehensively show that patterns of olfactory impairment reflect underlying disease etiology. We suggest that multicomponent olfactory testing should be performed, especially if there is diagnostic uncertainty. However, to clearly separate different patterns of olfactory loss to the various causes at an individual level, more work is needed.Level Of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:291-295, 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]