Search

Macrophages regulate essential aspects of innate immunity against pathogens. In response to microbial components, macrophages activate primary and secondary inflammatory gene programs crucial for host defense. The liver X receptors (LXRα, LXRβ) are ligand‐dependent nuclear receptors that direct gene expression important for cholesterol metabolism and inflammation, but little is known about the individual roles of LXRα and LXRβ in antimicrobial responses. Here, the results demonstrate that induction of LXRα transcription by prolonged exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) supports inflammatory gene expression in macrophages. LXRα transcription is induced by NF‐κB and type‐I interferon downstream of TLR4 activation. Moreover, LPS triggers a reprogramming of the LXRα cistrome that promotes cytokine and chemokine gene expression through direct LXRα binding to DNA consensus sequences within cis‐regulatory regions including enhancers. LXRα‐deficient macrophages present fewer binding of p65 NF‐κB and reduced histone H3K27 acetylation at enhancers of secondary inflammatory response genes. Mice lacking LXRα in the hematopoietic compartment show impaired responses to bacterial endotoxin in peritonitis models, exhibiting reduced neutrophil infiltration and decreased expansion and inflammatory activation of recruited F4/80lo‐MHC‐IIhi peritoneal macrophages. Together, these results uncover a previously unrecognized function for LXRα‐dependent transcriptional cis‐activation of secondary inflammatory gene expression in macrophages and the host response to microbial ligands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rising prevalence of obesity over the past decades coincides with the rising awareness that a detailed understanding of both adipose tissue biology and obesity-associated remodeling is crucial for developing therapeutic and preventive strategies. Substantial progress has been made in identifying the signaling pathways and transcriptional networks that orchestrate alterations of adipocyte gene expression linked to diverse phenotypes. Owing to recent advances in epigenomics, we also gained a better appreciation for the fact that different environmental cues can epigenetically reprogram adipocyte fate and function, mainly by altering DNA methylation and histone modification patterns. Intriguingly, it appears that transcription factors and chromatin-modifying coregulator complexes are the key regulatory components that coordinate both signaling-induced transcriptional and epigenetic alterations in adipocytes. In this review, we summarize and discuss current molecular insights into how these alterations and the involved regulatory components trigger adipogenesis and adipose tissue remodeling in response to energy surplus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Macrophage differentiation and signal responses are coordinated by closely linked transcriptional and epigenomic mechanisms that trigger gene expression. In contrast to well-characterized transcriptional activation pathways in response to diverse metabolic and inflammatory signals, we just begin appreciating that transcriptional repression is equally important. Here, we will highlight macrophage pathways that are controlled by multifaceted repression events, along with a discussion of underlying regulatory mechanisms and components. We will particularly discuss pro- versus anti-inflammatory action of a fundamental corepressor complex, transcription factor cross-talk, repression at enhancers and during elongation, and diverse corepressor knockout mouse models. We will finally emphasize how alterations of macrophage repression pathways in humans contribute to, or even cause, metabolic inflammatory diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract TRAP220 (thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein) is a recently cloned nuclear receptor coactivator, which interacts with several nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner and stimulates transcription by recruiting the TRAP mediator complex to hormone responsive promoter regions. TRAP220 has been shown to interact with thyroid hormone receptors, vitamin D receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, retinoic acid receptors and oestrogen receptors. Thyroid hormone and retinoic acid play very important roles in brain development and they also influence adult brain. Using in situ hybridization we have examined expression of TRAP220 mRNA in the central nervous system during development and in adult rat and mouse brain. Expression of TRAP220 was seen already during early embryonic development in the epithelium of neural tube at E9 in mouse and at E12 in rat. At later stages of development the strongest signal was seen in different layers of cerebral neocortex, external germinal layer of cerebellum, differentiating fields of hippocampus and neuroepithelium, and a moderate signal was detected in basal ganglia, different areas of diencephalon and midbrain. In adult rat brain the signal was more restricted than during development. TRAP220 expression occurred mostly in the granular layer of cerebellar cortex, piriform cortex and hippocampal formation. The signal was found predominantly in neurons. Our work supports the assumption that TRAP220 plays an important role in growth and differentiation of central nervous system and may have a function in certain areas of adult brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SHP (short heterodimer partner, NROB2) is an atypical orphan member of the mammalian nuclear receptor family that consists only of a putative ligand-binding domain and thus cannot bind DNA. Instead, SHP acts as a transcriptional coregulator by inhibiting the activity of various nuclear receptors (downstream targets) via occupation of the coactivator-binding surface and active repression. However, repression mechanisms have remained elusive and may involve coinhibitory factors (upstream targets) distinct from known nuclear receptor corepressors. Here, we describe the isolation of mouse E1A-like inhibitor of differentiation 1 (EID1) as a candidate coinhibitor for SHP. We characterize the interactions between SHP and EID1 and identify two repression-defective SHP mutations that have lost the ability to bind EID1. We suggest histone acetyltransferases and histones as targets for EID1 action and propose that SHP inhibition of transcription involves EID1 antagonism of CBP/p300-dependent coactivator functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]