Search

In addition, generalizability of the results may be limited to individuals with previous CV events, high CV risk or nephropathy, similar to the patients enrolled in the CANVAS programme and CREDENCE trial. This post-hoc analysis assessed the effects of canagliflozin versus placebo on CV and kidney outcomes in patients with T2DM and high CV risk, and/or chronic kidney disease according to baseline treatment target achievement and risk factors. Keywords: canagliflozin; cardiovascular disease; diabetic nephropathy; type 2 diabetes EN canagliflozin cardiovascular disease diabetic nephropathy type 2 diabetes 2038 2042 5 06/06/23 20230701 NES 230701 BACKGROUND Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a progressive metabolic disorder associated with substantial cardiovascular (CV) and kidney complications, includes risk factor optimization of glucose, blood pressure (BP) and lipids. [Extracted from the article]

Plasma exposure of the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan varies between individuals and is associated with nephroprotective effects and the risk of heart failure. We examined the influence of genetic polymorphisms on atrasentan plasma exposure and pharmacodynamic effects. We performed a substudy of the Study of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan (SONAR) trial which enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 25–75 mL/min/1.73 m2, and a urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio of 300–5,000 mg/g). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined for prespecified membrane transporters, metabolizing enzymes, and the endothelin‐1 peptide. The associations among genotype, atrasentan plasma exposure, and the effect of atrasentan on the prespecified kidney and heart failure hospitalization (HHF) outcomes was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 3,668 patients randomized, 2,329 (63.5%) consented to genotype analysis. Two SNPs in the SLCO1B1 gene (rs4149056 and rs2306283), encoding the hepatic organic anion transporter 1B1 (OATP1B1), showed the strongest association with atrasentan plasma exposure. Based on their SLCO1B1 genotype, patients were classified into normal (atrasentan area under the plasma‐concentration time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0−inf) 41.3 ng·h/mL) or slow (atrasentan AUC0−inf 49.7 ng·h/mL, P < 0.001) OATP1B1 transporter phenotypes. Among patients with a normal OATP1B1 phenotype, the hazard ratio (HR) with atrasentan for the primary kidney and HHF outcomes were 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.81) and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.84–2.13), respectively. In the slow transporter phenotype, HRs for kidney and HHF outcomes were 1.95 (95% CI: 0.95–4.03, P‐interaction normal phenotype = 0.004), and 4.18 (95% CI: 1.37–12.7, P‐interaction normal phenotype = 0.060), respectively. OATP1B1 gene polymorphisms are associated with significant between‐patient variability in atrasentan plasma exposure and long‐term efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrasentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, showed clinically significant albuminuria reduction with minimal signs of fluid retention in phase II trials. We evaluated whether plasma exposure was associated with long‐term outcomes for kidney protection and heart failure in the phase III SONAR trial (n = 3668) in type 2 diabetics with chronic kidney disease. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate plasma exposure of atrasentan 0.75 mg/day. Parametric time‐to‐event models were used to quantify the association between plasma exposure and long‐term outcomes. Mean atrasentan plasma exposure was 41.4 ng.h/mL (2.5th to 97.5th P: 14.2 to 139.9). Compared with placebo, a mean atrasentan exposure translated in a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28–0.85) for kidney events and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03–2.20) for heart failure events. At the mean atrasentan exposure, the kidney protective effect was larger than the increase in heart failure supporting the atrasentan 0.75 mg/day dose in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To better understand the healthcare burden of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Ontario, Canada. Materials and Methods: We used administrative data to evaluate the prevalence of T2D, eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and adverse cardiovascular co‐morbidities in individuals aged ≥ 30 years living in Ontario, Canada. We also examined incremental healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for these patients with specific incident cardiovascular and renal outcomes, in comparison with controls without these outcomes. Results: While the prevalence of T2D in the general population aged ≥ 30 years in Ontario increased by 1.8% over a 5‐year period (2011‐2012 to 2015‐2016), the prevalence of eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 among people with T2D increased by 35%. In comparison with corresponding controls without these outcomes, the per patient average total costs (Canadian dollars) over a 2‐year analysis period were higher for patients with cardiovascular disease/chronic kidney disease related death ($69 827; n = 32 407), doubling of serum creatinine ($52 260; n = 22 825), those who started dialysis ($150 627; n = 3499) or received a kidney transplant ($50 664; n = 651). Similarly, HCRU was significantly greater for patients with these incident outcomes. Conclusions: This real‐world retrospective study highlights an increasing prevalence of T2D, eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the substantially higher healthcare costs and HCRU when these patients have adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The existence of such a large economic burden underpins the importance of preventing these diabetes‐related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between‐patient variability in urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion. Methods: Type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run‐in period. Individual area under the concentration‐time‐curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression. Results: The median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th‐97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was −36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th‐97.5th P: −76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th‐97.5th P: −71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P <.01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P <.01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06). Conclusion: Atrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between‐patient variability in efficacy and safety response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension, the leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, affects more than 1 billion people globally. The rise in mobile health in particular the use of mobile phones and short message service (SMS) to support disease management provides an opportunity to improve hypertension awareness, treatment, and control, in remote and vulnerable patient populations. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to assess the effect of active (with hypertension specific management SMS) or passive (health behaviors SMS alone) on the difference in blood pressure (BP) reduction between the active and passive SMS groups in hypertensive Canadian First Nations people from six rural and remote communities. Pragmatic features of the study included shifting of BP measures to non-medical health workers. Despite an overall reduction in BP over the study, there was no difference in the BP change between groups from baseline to final for systolic 0.8 (95% CI -4.2 to 5.8 mm Hg) or diastolic -1.0 (95% CI -3.7 to 1.8 mm Hg, P = 0.5) BP. Achieved BP control was 37.5% (25.6%-49.4%, 95% CI) in the active group and 32.8% (20.6%-44.8%, 95% CI) in the passive group (difference in proportions -4.74% (-21.7% to 12.2%, 95% CI, P = 0.6). The study looked at changes in health services delivery, mobile health technologies, and patient engagement to support better management of hypertension in Canadian First Nations communities. The active hypertension specific SMS did not lead to improvements in BP control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The SONAR trial uses an enrichment design based on the individual response to the selective endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan on efficacy (the degree of the individual response in the urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio [UACR]) and safety/tolerability (signs of sodium retention and acute increases in serum creatinine) to assess the effects of this agent on major renal outcomes. The patient population and enrichment results are described here. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 25 to 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR between 300 and 5000 mg/g were enrolled. After a run‐in period, eligible patients received 0.75 mg/d of atrasentan for 6 weeks. A total of 2648 responder patients in whom UACR decreased by ≥30% compared to baseline were enrolled, as were 1020 non‐responders with a UACR decrease of <30%. Patients who experienced a weight gain of >3 kg and in whom brain natriuretic peptide exceeded ≥300 pg/mL, or who experienced an increase in serum creatinine >20% (0.5 mg/dL), were not randomized. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar for atrasentan responders and non‐responders. Upon entry to the study, median UACR was 802 mg/g in responders and 920 mg/g in non‐responders. After 6 weeks of treatment with atrasentan, the UACR change in responders was −48.8% (95% CI, −49.8% to −47.9%) and in non‐responders was −1.2% (95% CI, −6.4% to 3.9%). Changes in other renal risk markers were similar between responders and non‐responders except for a marginally greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and eGFR in responders. Conclusions: The enrichment period has successfully identified a population with a profound UACR reduction without clinical signs of sodium retention in whom a large atrasentan effect on clinically important renal outcomes is possible. The SONAR trial aims to establish whether atrasentan confers renal protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Individuals with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for renal events. Recent trials of novel treatments have been negative, possibly because of variability in response to treatment of the target risk factor. Atrasentan is a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist that reduces urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (UACR), with a large variability between patients. We are assessing its effect on renal outcomes in the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR; NCT01858532) with an enrichment design (>30% lowering of albuminuria) to select patients most likely to benefit. Materials and Methods: SONAR is a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with approximately 3500 participants who have stage 2–4 CKD and macroalbuminuria and are receiving a maximum tolerated dose of a renin‐angiotensin system inhibitor. Results: After 6 weeks of exposure to atrasentan 0.75 mg once daily (enrichment period), participants with ≥30% UACR decrease and no tolerability issues (responders) were randomly assigned to placebo or atrasentan 0.75 mg/day. The responder group will be used for primary efficacy and safety analyses. Approximately 1000 participants with <30% UACR reduction (non‐responders) were also randomized to placebo or atrasentan. The primary endpoint is a composite of a sustained doubling of serum creatinine or end‐stage renal disease. The original power calculation indicated that a total of 425 primary renal events in the responder group provides 90% power to detect a 27% reduction in relative risk (alpha level of .05). Conclusion: SONAR aims to determine whether atrasentan added to guideline‐recommended therapies safely reduces the risk of CKD progression and delays the onset of end‐stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. SONAR also aims to establish whether the enrichment of patients based on their initial “surrogate” response to atrasentan will deliver a trial design in accord with personalized treatment of diabetic kidney disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We assessed the effect of atrasentan therapy on a pre-specified panel of 13 urinary metabolites known to reflect mitochondrial function in patients with diabetic kidney disease. This post-hoc analysis was performed using urine samples collected during the RADAR study which was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that tested the effects of atrasentan on albuminuria reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. At baseline, 4 of the 13 metabolites, quantified by gas-chromatography mass spectrometry, were below detectable levels, and 6 were reduced in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. After 12 weeks of atrasentan treatment in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, a single-value index of the metabolites changed by −0.31 (95%CI −0.60 to −0.02; P = .035), −0.08 (−12 to 0.29; P = .43) and 0.01 (−0.21 to 0.19; P = .913) in placebo, atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/d, respectively. The metabolite index difference compared to placebo was 0.13 (−0.17 to 0.43; P = .40) and 0.35 (0.05-0.65; P = .02) for atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/d, respectively. These data corroborate previous findings of mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, nephropathy and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, suggesting that atrasentan may prevent the progression of mitochondrial dysfunction common to this specific patient population. Future studies of longer treatment duration with atrasentan are indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The selective endothelin ( ET) A receptor antagonist atrasentan has been shown to lower albuminuria in North American and Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. As drug responses to many drugs may differ between North American and Asian populations, we assessed the influence of geographical region on the albuminuria and fluid retention response to atrasentan. Materials and methods Two 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trials were performed with atrasentan 0.75 or 1.25 mg/d vs placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in albuminuria. Bodyweight change, a proxy of fluid retention, was used as a safety endpoint. Pharmacodynamics were determined in Asians ( N = 77) and North Americans ( N = 134). Atrasentan plasma concentration was measured in 161 atrasentan-treated patients. Results Mean albuminuria reduction in Asian, compared to North American, patients was, respectively, −34.4% vs −26.3% for 0.75 mg/d ( P = .44) and −48.0% vs −28.9% for 1.25 mg/d ( P = .035). Bodyweight gain did not differ between North American and Asian populations. Atrasentan plasma concentrations were higher in Asians compared to North Americans and correlated with albuminuria response (7.2% albuminuria reduction per doubling atrasentan concentration; P = .024). Body surface area (β = −1.09 per m2; P < .001) and bilirubin, as a marker of hepatic organic anion transporter activity, (β = 0.69 per mg/ dL increment; P = .010) were independent determinants of atrasentan plasma concentration; correction by body surface area and bilirubin left no significant difference in plasma concentration between Asian and North American populations. Conclusion The higher exposure and albuminuria reduction of atrasentan in Asian patients is not associated with more fluid retention, suggesting that Asian patients are less sensitive to atrasentan-induced sodium retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Russia have been among the highest in Europe. A comprehensive health system improvement program targeting better diagnosis and control of hypertension was undertaken in the Yaroslavl Region of Russia. This initiative was a joint program between clinicians, the Department of Health and Pharmacy of the Yaroslavl Region, and Novartis Pharma LLC. From 2011 to 2014, the blood pressure control rate improved substantially (94% relative improvement), the percentage of patients with a systolic blood pressure ≥180 mm Hg decreased (from 10% to 5%), and there was a reduction in stroke incidence rate from 4.6 to 3.7 per 1000 population. During this same period, significant changes were made to the way hypertension was diagnosed and treated across all regional government polyclinics, and the use of antihypertensive therapies increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective before-and-after survey of hypertensive patients visiting government-run outpatient health facilities in the Yaroslavl Region of Russia assessed blood pressure (BP)-related endpoints following initiation of a comprehensive health system improvement program for hypertension. Two cross-sectional surveys, one at baseline and the other approximately 1 year after program initiation, evaluated the primary measure of BP control rate. Secondary measures included mean BP levels and distribution, cardiovascular risk factors, and associated conditions, heart rate levels, and antihypertensive therapy. From the 2011 survey (n=1794) to the 2012 survey (n=2992), BP control rate (<140/90 mm Hg) significantly increased from 16.8% to 23.0%, reflecting a 37% relative improvement ( P<.0001). Mean BP level was significantly reduced from 151/90 mm Hg to 147/88 mm Hg ( P<.0001). Severe uncontrolled hypertension ( systolic BP ≥180 mm Hg) was reduced from 9.7% to 6.4% ( P<.0001). Implementing a guidelines-based treatment protocol with medical and patient education programs resulted in physician behavior change and improved patient BP control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This randomized, comparative, parallel-group trial investigated strategies of blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Patients not reaching goal BP (<130/80 mm Hg) after 4-week open-label treatment with quinapril 20 mg/d (n=374) received 40 mg/d quinapril (n=167) or 20 mg/d quinapril plus amlodipine besylate (5 mg/d; n=162) for 6 weeks. Patients receiving combination therapy vs monotherapy had significantly greater reductions in mean ± SE sitting systolic BP (9.9±1.0 mm Hg vs 4.3±1.1 mm Hg; P<.001) and diastolic BP (6.5±0.6 mm Hg vs 2.7±0.6 mm Hg; P<.001). No significant differences between groups were observed in percentage of patients achieving goal BP (10.1% with combination therapy vs 8.2% with monotherapy). A clinically neutral effect was observed on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in both groups. Treatments were well tolerated; fewer than 3% of patients in any group discontinued due to treatment-emergent or treatment-related adverse events. In diabetic hypertensive patients, 20 mg/d quinapril plus 5 mg/d amlodipine besylate was a more effective BP-lowering strategy than monotherapy with 40 mg/d quinapril. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: For patients with type 2 diabetes, newer antihyperglycaemic agents (AHA), including the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i), glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) offer a lower risk of hypoglycaemia relative to sulfonylurea or insulin. However, it is not clear how AHA compare to placebo on risk of any hypoglycaemia. This study evaluates the risk of any and severe hypoglycaemia with AHA and metformin relative to placebo. Design: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of randomized, placebo‐controlled trials ≥12 weeks in duration. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 16, 2019. Studies allowing use of other diabetes medications were excluded. Mantel‐Haenszel risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals were used to pool estimates based on class of AHA and number of concomitant therapies used. Patients: Eligible studies enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes ≥18 years of age. Results: 144 studies met our inclusion criteria. Any hypoglycaemia was not increased with AHA when used as monotherapy (DPP4i (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.81‐1.56), GLP1RA (1.77; 0.91‐3.46), SGLT2i (1.34; 0.83‐2.15)), or as add‐on to metformin (DPP4i (0.95; 0.67‐1.35), GLP1RA (1.24; 0.80‐1.91), SGLT2i (1.29; 0.91‐1.83)) or as triple therapy (1.13; 0.67‐1.91). However, metformin monotherapy (1.73; 1.02‐2.94) and dual therapy initiation (3.56; 1.79‐7.10) was associated with an increased risk of any hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia was rare not increased for any comparisons. Conclusions: Metformin and the simultaneous initiation of dual therapy, but not AHA used alone or as single add‐on combination therapy, was associated with an increased risk of any hypoglycaemia relative to placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To better understand the healthcare burden of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in Ontario, Canada., Materials and Methods: We used administrative data to evaluate the prevalence of T2D, eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and adverse cardiovascular co-morbidities in individuals aged ≥ 30 years living in Ontario, Canada. We also examined incremental healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for these patients with specific incident cardiovascular and renal outcomes, in comparison with controls without these outcomes., Results: While the prevalence of T2D in the general population aged ≥ 30 years in Ontario increased by 1.8% over a 5-year period (2011-2012 to 2015-2016), the prevalence of eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 among people with T2D increased by 35%. In comparison with corresponding controls without these outcomes, the per patient average total costs (Canadian dollars) over a 2-year analysis period were higher for patients with cardiovascular disease/chronic kidney disease related death ($69 827; n = 32 407), doubling of serum creatinine ($52 260; n = 22 825), those who started dialysis ($150 627; n = 3499) or received a kidney transplant ($50 664; n = 651). Similarly, HCRU was significantly greater for patients with these incident outcomes., Conclusions: This real-world retrospective study highlights an increasing prevalence of T2D, eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and the substantially higher healthcare costs and HCRU when these patients have adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The existence of such a large economic burden underpins the importance of preventing these diabetes-related complications., (© 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)