Search

Brown trout (Salmo trutta L. 1758) and Arctic charr [Salvelinus alpinus (L. 1758)] tagged with acoustic transmitters migrated from fresh water to the sea mainly in May and June, but with large individual variation in migration timing. For S. trutta, large individuals (42–86 cm total length) migrated earlier in the season than small individuals (18–27 cm). For S. alpinus, no such pattern was found, likely because of the small size range of tagged fish (28–41 cm). S. trutta stayed longer at sea than S. alpinus (average 2 vs. 1 month). Early migrants of S. trutta stayed for a shorter period at sea than late migrants, whereas no such pattern was observed for S. alpinus. Large S. trutta moved quickly away from the river and spent average 3 days to reach a receiver line 20 km from the river mouth, whereas small S. trutta and S. alpinus migrating that far spent 2–3 weeks on the same distance. S. trutta utilized the entire fjord system and had a greater proportion of long‐distance migrants (>20 km, 78% and 59% of large and small S. trutta, respectively) than S. alpinus (29%). S. alpinus mostly stayed in the inner fjord areas, and none were recorded in the outermost part of the fjord. The difference in the use of marine areas may be caused by variation in prey choice and spatial distribution of the preferred prey groups. Stable isotope analysis showed that S. trutta had been feeding at a higher trophic level than S. alpinus. S. trutta had mainly fed on marine fish and shrimps, whereas S. alpinus had large proportions of freshwater invertebrates in the diet, suggesting that the estuary with benthos and amphipods drifting from the river was an important feeding habitat for S. alpinus. In conclusion, major differences in habitat use, migration patterns and feeding strategies were found between sympatric anadromous S. trutta and S. alpinus while at sea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Behaviour observations of the endangered native marble trout (Salmo marmoratus, Cuvier, 1829) and introduced rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum, 1792) in the laboratory and in a tributary to the Idrijca River in Slovenia were combined to study the movements and dominance relationships between individuals of the two species in an open field test. Under laboratory conditions, no difference between the species was detected for neither time spent actively or distance moved. In species paired tests, rainbow trout initiated more aggressive behaviours towards marble trout than vice versa, and rainbow trout were clearly the dominant individuals. After simultaneous release in the river, marble trout immediately left the release area and spent twice as long time as rainbow trout until they settled in an area of the river; therefore, the release site was immediately occupied exclusively by rainbow trout. Thus, the dominant and aggressive behaviour of rainbow trout seen in the laboratory before release might have influenced marble trout's subsequent behaviour in the river, by marble trout leaving the areas occupied by rainbow trout and moving to locations further away from the release site. In the field, the marble trout occupied sites individually, whereas rainbow aggregated at a few locations. Rainbow trout showed higher movement activity in the morning compared to marble trout. There was a positive correlation between swimming speed in the laboratory and movement in the field for marble trout but not for rainbow trout. In conclusion, the results in this study support the need to end stocking of rainbow trout in rivers with native marble trout. To better understand the interaction between the species, and to develop efficient management plans to protect the native marble trout, reference behaviours should first be understood, and future research in sites where the two species do not co‐exist is needed. This is especially important for marble trout for which behavioural research and data are lacking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The year‐round thermal habitat at sea for adult Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (n = 49) from northern Norway was investigated using archival tags over a 10 year study period. During their ocean feeding migration, the fish spent 90% of the time in waters with temperatures from 1.6–8.4°C. Daily mean temperatures ranged from −0.5 to 12.9°C, with daily temperature variation up to 9.6°C. Fish experienced the coldest water during winter (November–March) and the greatest thermal range during the first summer at sea (July–August). Trends in sea‐surface temperatures influenced the thermal habitat of salmon during late summer and autumn (August–October), with fish experiencing warmer temperatures in warmer years. This pattern was absent during winter (November–March), when daily mean temperatures ranged from 3.4–5.0°C, in both colder and warmer years. The observations of a constant thermal habitat during winter in both warmer and colder years, may suggest that the ocean distribution of salmon is flexible and that individual migration routes could shift as a response to spatiotemporal alterations of favourable prey fields and ocean temperatures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]