Search

Background: Youths with coexisting learning disabilities (LD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at risk for poor academic and social outcomes. The underlying cognitive deficits, such as poor working memory (WM), are not well targeted by current treatments for either LD or ADHD. Emerging evidence suggests that WM might be improved by intensive and adaptive computerized training, but it remains unclear whether this intervention would be effective for adolescents with severe LD and comorbid ADHD. Methods: A total of sixty 12- to 17-year olds with LD/ADHD (52 male, 8 female, IQ > 80) were randomized to one of two computerized intervention programs: working memory training (Cogmed RM) or math training (Academy of Math) and evaluated before and 3 weeks after completion. The criterion measures of WM included auditory-verbal and visual-spatial tasks. Near and far transfer measures included indices of cognitive and behavioral attention and academic achievement. Results: Adolescents in the WM training group showed greater improvements in a subset of WM criterion measures compared with those in the math-training group, but no training effects were observed on the near or far measures. Those who showed the most improvement on the WM training tasks at school were rated as less inattentive/hyperactive at home by parents. Conclusions: Results suggest that WM training may enhance some aspects of WM in youths with LD/ADHD, but further development of the training program is required to promote transfer effects to other domains of function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Twin studies indicate genetic overlap between symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading disabilities (RD), and linkage studies identify several chromosomal regions possibly containing common susceptibility genes, including the 15q region. Based on a translocation finding and association to two specific alleles, the candidate gene, DYX1C1, has been proposed as the susceptibility gene for RD in 15q. Previously, we tested markers in DYX1C1 for association with ADHD. Although we identified association for haplotypes across the gene, we were unable to replicate the association to the specific alleles reported. Thus, the risk alleles for ADHD are yet to be identified. The susceptibility alleles may be in a remote regulatory element , or DYX1C1 may not be the risk gene. To continue study of 15q, we tested a coding region change in DYX1C1, followed by markers across the gene Protogenin ( PRTG) in 253 ADHD nuclear families. PRTG was chosen based on its location and because it is closely related to DCC and Neogenin, two genes known to guide migratory cells and axons during development. The markers in DYX1C1 were not associated to ADHD when analyzed individually; however, six markers in PRTG showed significant association with ADHD as a categorical trait ( P = 0.025–0.005). Haplotypes in both genes showed evidence for association. We identified association with ADHD symptoms measured as quantitative traits in PRTG, but no evidence for association with two key components of reading, word identification and decoding was observed. These findings, while preliminary, identify association of ADHD to a gene that potentially plays a role in cell migration and axon growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood-onset psychiatric condition with a strong genetic component. Evidence from pharmacological, clinical and animal studies has suggested that the nicotinic system could be involved in the disorder. Previous studies have implicated the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α4 subunit gene, CHRNA4, in ADHD. Particularly, a polymorphism in the exon 2–intron 2 junction of CHRNA4 has been associated with severe inattention defined by latent class analysis. In the current study, we used the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to investigate four polymorphisms encompassing this region of CHRNA4 for association with ADHD in a sample of 264 nuclear families from Toronto. No significant evidence of biased transmission was observed for any of the marker alleles for ADHD defined as a categorical trait (all subtypes included), although one haplotype showed marginal evidence of under-transmission. No association was found with the ADHD predominantly inattentive subtype or with symptom dimension scores of inattention. On the contrary, nominally significant evidence of association of individual markers was obtained for the ADHD combined subtype and with teacher-rated hyperactivity–impulsivity scores, with the same haplotype being under-transmitted. Based on our results and others, CHRNA4 may be involved in ADHD; however, its role in ADHD symptomatology remains to be clarified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The glutamatergic signaling pathway represents an ideal candidate susceptibility system for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Disruption of specific N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptor subunit genes ( GRIN1, 2A-D) in mice leads to significant alterations in cognitive and/or locomotor behavior including impairments in latent learning, spatial memory tasks and hyperactivity. Here, we tested for association of GRIN2B variants with ADHD, by genotyping nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 205 nuclear families identified through probands with ADHD. Transmission of alleles from heterozygous parents to affected offspring was examined using the transmission/disequilibrium test. Quantitative trait analyses for the ADHD symptom dimensions [inattentive (IA) and hyperactive/impulsive (HI)] and cognitive measures of verbal working memory and verbal short-term memory were performed using thefbat program. Three SNPs showed significantly biased transmission ( P < 0.05), with the strongest evidence of association found for rs2284411 ( χ2= 7.903, 1 degree of freedom, P= 0.005). Quantitative trait analyses showed associations of these markers with both the IA and the HI symptom dimensions of ADHD but not with the cognitive measures of verbal short-term memory or verbal working memory. Our data suggest an association between variations in the GRIN2B subunit gene and ADHD as measured categorically or as a quantitatively distributed trait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our objective was to investigate time perception in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with and without comorbid reading difficulties (RD) in child and adolescent participants. Method: In study 1, 50 children with ADHD (31 ADHD, 19 ADHD+RD) and age-matched healthy controls ( n = 50) completed three psychophysical tasks: duration discrimination (target duration of 400 ms versus a foil duration), frequency discrimination (a control condition to evaluate general perceptual ability), and a duration estimation task using the method of reproduction for intervals of 400 ms, 2000 ms, and 6000 ms. Study 2 used the same tasks with an adolescent sample (35 ADHD, 24 ADHD+RD, 39 controls). Results: In both studies, children and adolescents with ADHD and ADHD+RD displayed some impairments in duration discrimination and the precision with which they reproduced the intervals on the estimation task, particularly the shorter 400 ms interval. The most severe impairments tended to occur in the comorbid ADHD+RD group. No impairments were found on the frequency discrimination task. ADHD participants also displayed significant intra-individual variability in their performance on the estimation task. Finally, short-term and working memory, estimated full-scale IQ, and teacher report of hyperactivity/impulsivity were found to differentially predict performance on the time perception measures in the adolescent clinical sample. Conclusions: Deficits in duration discrimination, duration estimation, and intra-individual performance variability may have cascaded effects on the temporal organisation of behaviour in children and adolescents with ADHD and ADHD+RD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reading disabilities (RDs) have been associated with chromosome 6p with recent studies pointing to two genes, DCDC2 and KIAA0319. In this study, markers across the 6p region were tested for association with RD. Our strongest findings were for association with markers in KIAA0319, although with the opposite alleles compared with a previous study. We also found association with markers in VMP, but not with DCDC2. Current evidence indicates that differential regulation of KIAA0319 and DCDC2 contributes to RD, thus we used chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with genomic tiling arrays (ChIP-chip) to map acetylated histones, a molecular marker for regulatory elements, across a 500 kb genomic region covering the RD locus on 6p. This approach identified several regions marked by acetylated histones that mapped near associated markers, including intron 7 of DCDC2 and the 5' region of KIAA0319. The latter is located within the 70 kb region previously associated with differential expression of KIAA0319. Interestingly, five markers associated with RD in independent studies were also located within the 2.7 kb acetylated region, and six additional associated markers, including the most significant one in this study, were located within a 22 kb haplotype block that encompassed this region. Our data indicates that this putative regulatory region is a likely site of genetic variation contributing to RD in our sample, further narrowing the candidate region., ((c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Linkage of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to the short arm-centromeric region of chromosome 5 has been reported in multiple studies. The overlapping region (5p13-q11) contains a number of strong candidate genes for ADHD, based on their role in brain function or neurodevelopment. The aim of this study was to investigate some of the top candidates among these genes in relation to ADHD in a sample of 245 nuclear families from the Toronto area. We investigated the genes for the glial cell-derived neurotropic factor (GDNF), the fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10), islet-1 (ISL1), the hyperpolarized potassium channel (HCN1) and the integrin alpha 1 (ITGA1). In addition to these genes, we assessed the 3'region of the SLC1A3 gene, a glutamate transporter implicated in ADHD by a previous association study. A total of 36 polymorphisms were selected across the six genes. We performed family-based association and haplotype analyses. ADHD is a dimensional disorder, with symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity therefore, we also conducted quantitative analysis in relation to symptom scores for both dimensions. Single marker and haplotype analyses yielded little evidence of association for any of the genes tested in this study. Moreover, we were unable to replicate the positive association findings reported for SLC1A3. Our results suggest that these six genes are unlikely to be susceptibility genes in the chromosome 5p13-q11 region and other genes should now be considered for priority study., (Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has a strong genetic basis, and evidence from human and animal studies suggests that a dopamine system dysfunction plays a role in the disorder pathophysiology. Several genes involved in dopamine neurotransmission have shown replicated genetic association with ADHD. These include the dopamine receptors D4 (DRD4), D5 (DRD5), and the dopamine transporter (DAT1) genes. Recently, evidence has also accumulated in favor of the dopamine receptor D1 gene (DRD1). The dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of relative molecular mass of 32 kDa (DARPP-32) is a key component of dopamine signaling, acting as a converging point for several neurotransmitter systems influencing dopaminergic neurons and regulating a wide variety of downstream effectors. Here, we tested the DARPP-32 gene, PPP1R1B, for association with ADHD using four polymorphic markers selected across the gene in a sample of 255 ADHD families. We did not detect evidence of association of individual marker alleles and haplotype analysis did not reveal significant association in this sample of families. Moreover, we found no relationship between the same alleles or haplotypes and symptom scores of inattention or hyperactivity/impulsivity in these families using a quantitative approach. In conclusion, albeit a key regulatory role in dopamine signaling, our data do not support a major contribution of the DARPP-32 gene in ADHD., (Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental childhood psychiatric disorder. Brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of ADHD and two family-based association studies demonstrated an association of BDNF polymorphisms with ADHD. The aim of the current study was to investigate the BDNF gene for association with ADHD in a large sample of families from Toronto. The transmission of three polymorphisms of the BDNF gene (rs6265, rs11030104, and rs2049046) was examined in 266 nuclear families ascertained through a proband with ADHD (315 affected children) using the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT). In addition, we conducted quantitative analysis to assess the relationship between these marker alleles and the symptom dimensions of ADHD (inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity) and cognitive measures of working memory. None of the individual marker alleles showed significant evidence of association with ADHD, dimensional symptom scores, or working memory ability in our sample of ADHD families. There was no significant evidence for biased transmission of individual haplotypes with frequency >10% (global chi2 for these three haplotypes: chi2 = 6.349, df = 3, P = 0.096). One uncommon haplotype (A-G-G; frequency 2.2%) showed a significant association with ADHD in the categorical (chi2 = 5.293, df = 1, P = 0.021) and quantitative analyses (parents' rated inattention: Z = -2.504, P = 0.012; and hyperactivity/impulsivity: Z = -2.651, P = 0.008). These results should be interpreted cautiously, however, because of the low haplotype frequency. In light of the evidence for an involvement of BDNF in ADHD, further analysis of the BDNF gene in ADHD is warranted., (2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Serotonin plays an essential role in cognition, locomotor activity, and the regulation of sleep, pain, mood, and aggression. Polymorphisms of the HTR1B gene have been implicated in a variety of psychiatric disorders including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The objectives of this study were to: (i) expand our original investigation of the relationship between the HTR1B receptor gene and attention deficit/hyperactivity and; (ii) to investigate a possible association of obsessive behaviors/perfectionism and the HTR1B gene in a sample of 203 families with an ADHD proband. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HTR1B receptor gene were genotyped using standard methods. Evidence for an association between the HTR1B gene and ADHD as a qualitative diagnosis, or the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive quantitative traits was not supported by either TDT single marker analysis or haplotype analysis. In addition we did not find evidence to suggest an association between HTR1B and perfectionism in this sample of ADHD families.

Evidence from both human and animal studies implicates the serotonergic system in the development of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) including positive association studies for several key serotonergic genes. The serotonin transporter (HTT) regulates the availability of serotonin by reuptake of the neurotransmitter from the synaptic cleft. Several studies have reported an association of this gene to ADHD, specifically the long variant of a common insertion/deletion polymorphism located in the promoter of this gene that results in increased transcription and higher HTT expression. An additional study found no evidence for an association with this polymorphism. Recently, an A/G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was found within the promoter polymorphism with functional studies indicating that the long variant containing the G allele at this site behaves like the short variant. This previously unidentified functional change may have confounded earlier association studies. We investigated the relationship of several variants to ADHD: the promoter polymorphisms, SNP in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) with a reported association to ADHD and a rare, non-synonymous coding SNP. These polymorphisms were genotyped in 209 ADHD families identified through an affected proband. We did not find evidence for an association of these polymorphisms, or haplotypes of these polymorphisms, to ADHD in this sample.

The dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) has been reported to be associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a number of studies [Cook et al. (1995): Am J Human Genet 56(4):9993-998; Gill et al. (1997): Mol Psychiatry 2(4):311-313; Waldman et al. (1998): Am J Human Genet 63(6):1767-1776; Barr et al. (2001): Biol Psychiatry 49(4):333-339; Curran et al. (2001): Mol Psychiatry 6(4):425-428; Chen et al. (2003): Mol Psychiatry 8(4):393-396]. Specifically, the 10-repeat allele of the 40-bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the gene has been found to be associated with ADHD. There is evidence from in vitro studies indicating that variability in the repeat number, and sequence variation in the 3'-UTR of the DAT1 gene may influence the level of the dopamine transporter protein [Fuke et al. (2001): Pharmacogenomics J 1(2):152-156; Miller and Madras (2002): Mol Psychiatry 7(1):44-55]. In this study, we investigated whether DNA variation in the DAT1 3'UTR contributed to ADHD by genotyping DNA variants around the VNTR region in a sample of 178 ADHD families. These included a MspI polymorphism (rs27072), a DraI DNA change (T/C) reported to influence DAT1 expression levels, and a BstUI polymorphism (rs3863145) in addition to the VNTR. We also screened the VNTR region by direct resequencing to determine if there was sequence variation within the repeat units that could account for the association. Our results indicate that DAT1 is associated with ADHD in our sample but not with alleles of the VNTR polymorphism. We did not find any variation in the sequence for either the 10- or 9-repeat alleles in the probands screened nor did we observe the reported DraI (T/C) variation. Our results therefore refute the possibility of the reported DraI variation or alleles of the VNTR as the functional variants contributing to the disorder., ((c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

In this paper we examine the current status of the science of ADHD from a theoretical point of view. While the field has reached the point at which a number of causal models have been proposed, it remains some distance away from demonstrating the viability of such models empirically. We identify a number of existing barriers and make proposals as to the best way for these to be overcome in future studies. These include the need to work across multiple levels of analysis in multidisciplinary teams; the need to recognize the existence of, and then model, causal heterogeneity; the need to integrate environmental and social processes into models of genetic and neurobiological influence; and the need to model developmental processes in a dynamic fashion. Such a model of science, although difficult to achieve, has the potential to provide the sort of framework for programmatic model-based research required if the power and sophistication of new neuroscience technologies are to be effectively exploited.