Search

Background: Sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with or without Type 2 diabetes and heart failure (HF). However, studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding their efficacy in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a pilot systematic review and meta‐analysis to synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in MI. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared clinical outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo following MI. We conducted the statistical analysis using RevMan, version 5.4 and pooled risk ratios (RRs) along the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for all outcomes. Results: Five RCTs reporting data for 11,211 patients were included in our study. The mean follow‐up duration was 43.8 weeks. Our pooled analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of hospitalisations for heart failure (HHF) (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.88, p = 0.001) in patients with MI. However, the risk of all‐cause mortality (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.78–1.41, p = 0.76), CV mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84–1.29, p = 0.73) and all‐cause hospitalisations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.96–1.17, p = 0.25) remained comparable across the two groups. Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HHF without affecting all‐cause mortality, CV mortality and all‐cause hospitalisations. However, further evidence is required to reach a definitive conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Despite significant improvements in cardiac output and functional capacity with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), incidence of sudden cardiac death still remains high. Reversal of physiological myocardial activation sequence during epicardial pacing increases the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of endocardial and epicardial biventricular pacing on repolarization parameters in the same patient group. Methods Seven patients who had transseptal endocardial left ventricle (LV) lead placement, in whom epicardial CRT had failed due to coronary sinus (CS) lead dislodgement after successful implantation, were admitted to the study. LV endocardial leads were implanted through the interatrial septum in a lateral position. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were scanned before and after successful epicardial and endocardial biventricular pacing and analyzed using digital calipers. ECG markers of TDR (TpTe and TpTe/QT ratio) were measured and compared. Results Baseline QRS durations (161.7 ± 15.9 ms vs 162.2 ± 17.8 ms, P = 0.95), TpTe values (107.1 ± 20.5 ms vs 108.5 ± 17.6 ms, P = 0.89), and TpTe/QT ratios (0.24 ± 0.05 vs 0.24 ± 0.03, P = 0.88) were similar before epicardial and endocardial CRT. QRS interval reduction was similar (-28.3 ± 11.6 ms vs -29.1 ± 11.4 ms, P = 0.89) in both groups. Compared to transseptal endocardial CRT, epicardial CRT was associated with a significant increase in TpTe (17.1 ± 19.5 ms vs -12.6 ± 18.9 ms, P = 0.01) and TpTe/QT ratio (0.03 ± 0.04 vs -0.02 ± 0.03, P = 0.04). Conclusion Transseptal LV endocardial pacing is associated with significant reduction in TDR characteristics compared to epicardial pacing in CRT. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these effects may contribute to reduction of arrhythmias in patients with CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims There are limited and contradictory data on the effects of CRT with implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( CRT-D) on mortality as compared with CRT with pacemaker ( CRT-P). Methods and results We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients implanted with a CRT-D or CRT-P device in our high-volume single-centre experience. Data on all-cause mortality were derived from clinic visits and the Hungarian National Healthcare Fund Death Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality in patients with CRT-D vs. CRT-P, stratified by the aetiology of cardiomyopathy. From 2000 to 2011, 1122 CRT devices, 693 CRT-P ( LVEF 28.2 ± 7.4%) and 429 CRT-D ( LVEF 27.6 ± 6.4%), were implanted at our centre. During the median follow-up of 28 months, 379 patients died from any cause, 250 patients (36%) with an implanted CRT-P and 129 patients (30%) with an implanted CRT-D. There was no evidence of mortality benefit in patients implanted with a CRT-D compared with a CRT-P in the total cohort [hazard ratio ( HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.73-1.32, P = 0.884]. In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D treatment was associated with a significant 30% risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with an implanted CRT-P ( HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97, P = 0.03). In non-ischaemic patients, there was no mortality benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P ( HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32, P = 0.894, interaction P-value = 0.15). Conclusions In heart failure patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D was associated with a mortality benefit compared with CRT-P, but no benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P in mortality was observed in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Coronary sinus (CS) leads used for cardiac resynchronization have undergone development in the last years. However, dislocation rate remained high (5–9%). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of stent implantation in a CS side vein to stabilize the left ventricular lead position after postoperative or intraoperative dislocation of the electrode. Methods and Results: Thirty-six patients (age: 64 ± 9.7 years, 19 primary, 17 ischemic cardiomyopathy, NYHA class III: 30, IV: 6) were treated with stenting. The procedure was performed because of postoperative dislocation in seven patients, while dislocation was observed during the implantation in 29 cases. The electrode was repositioned into the desired position and a bare metal coronary stent was introduced via another guide wire. The stent was deposited at 5- to 15-mm proximal to the tip of the electrode with a pressure of 6 to 14 atmospheres. Control angiography showed no blood flow compromise in any of the side branches or in the coronary sinus. Control echocardiography did not show pericardial effusion due to stenting. During follow-up (11.5 ± 5.5, 2–23 months), left ventricular pacing threshold increased from 2.2 to 5.6 V in one patient, but dislocation was not found by fluoroscopy. Clinically important pacing threshold increase was not detected in the other cases. Impedance measurements did not suggest lead insulation failure. Conclusion: Stent implantation to stabilize the left ventricular lead position seems to be a useful and safe procedure in the treatment of patients with complicated coronary sinus anatomy or lead instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a study that examined the physiological and pathological stretch-dependent regulation of cardiac contractility using rat isolated skinned cardiomyocytes from normal and diseased hearts. Passive properties of control and PMI cardiomyocytes; Transmural gradient of stretch-dependent contractile properties; Conclusions and significance.