Search

Aims: Distinction between well‐differentiated endometrial carcinoma (EMCA) with microglandular/mucinous features and benign endocervical microglandular hyperplasia (MGH) can be a diagnostic challenge, especially when tissue is limited. The immunostains used to distinguish endocervical and endometrial carcinoma are less useful when the differential diagnosis is MGH. Here, we investigate the utility of p63 and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) to aid accurate classification. Methods and results: Cases obtained from our pathology archives included 25 EMCA with mucinous/microglandular features, 26 MGH and nine atypical microglandular proliferations. Cases were assessed for glandular architecture, presence of mucinous and/or eosinophilic luminal secretions, subnuclear vacuoles, foamy histiocytes, inflammation, squamous metaplasia, cytological atypia and mitotic activity. The presence and pattern of immunohistochemical staining for p63 and PTEN was recorded. Microglandular proliferations with cytological atypia, mitotic activity, foamy histiocytes and complex glandular architecture were more commonly seen in EMCA, while small glands, bland nuclei and subnuclear vacuoles were enriched in MGH. All MGH cases displayed p63‐positive subcolumnar reserve cells and retained PTEN expression. Four EMCA cases showed non‐specific focal p63 staining either at the surface of the tumour or in areas of squamous differentiation. p63 and PTEN immunostains accurately predicted the final diagnosis for 3 atypical microglandular proliferation cases with follow‐up. Conclusions: While there are morphological characteristics that differentiate EMCA and MGH, there is frequent overlap between these entities. Nonetheless, the pattern and extent of p63 and PTEN can aid accurate classification. Consistent p63‐positive subcolumnar reserve cells were seen only in MGH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: As gender‐affirming surgery is becoming more common, it is important for pathologists to recognize potential benign findings to avoid misinterpretation. Cervical transitional cell metaplasia and superficial clusters of small basophilic cells have been described in the context of gender‐affirming testosterone therapy; these findings may be misdiagnosed as high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or endometrial cells on Pap smears. Prostatic metaplasia has been reported in the surface squamous epithelium of the vagina and the uterine cervix in individuals undergoing gender‐affirming androgen therapy; this finding is often associated with NKX3.1‐positive basal keratinocytes. The aim of this study was to assess the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the uterine cervix in gender‐affirming hysterectomies in comparison with benign hysterectomies from cisgender women. Methods and results: We assessed the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the uterine cervix in 49 gender‐affirming hysterectomies as compared with 57 hysterectomies from cisgender patients to establish the relative prevalences of surface prostatic metaplasia, NKX3.1‐positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, and small basophilic cells in the cervical squamous epithelium. The cervical tissue from the gender‐affirming therapy cohort showed significantly higher prevalences of NKX3.1‐positive basal keratinocytes (86% versus 1.8%), transitional cell metaplasia (80% versus 3.5%), superficial clusters of small basophilic cells (67% versus 7%), and surface prostatic metaplasia (43% versus 3.5%). Conclusion: NKX3.1‐positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, small basophilic cells and surface prostatic metaplasia are all more prevalent in the cervices of individuals receiving gender‐affirming testosterone therapy; awareness of this fact allows pathologists to avoid the overdiagnosis of dysplasia or the recommendation of unnecessary follow‐up procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APAM) is an uncommon uterine lesion composed of complex endometrioid glands with frequent squamous morular metaplasia and fibromuscular stroma. On endometrial curettage, biopsy or polypectomy specimens, the admixture of endometrioid glands and smooth muscle raises the differential diagnosis of myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma. Reproductive‐age APAM patients may opt for fertility preservation, whereas myoinvasive carcinoma is treated surgically. One previous study reported an incidental finding that the stroma of APAM, in contrast to that of other polypoid lesions, was SATB2‐positive. APAM has also been reported to show increased stromal p16 staining. We aimed to assess whether SATB2 and p16 are useful stains for the distinction of APAM from myoinvasive carcinoma and benign adenomyomatous polyps. Methods and results: Cases of 'atypical polypoid adenomyoma' (n = 32), 'adenomyomatous polyp' (n = 39) and 'myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma' (n = 30) were identified. Morphological features were assessed, along with the intensity and extent of SATB2 and p16 staining in the stromal component of each lesion. SATB2 expression was seen in the stromal components of 30 of 32 (94%) APAMs, versus none of 39 (0%) benign adenomyomatous polyps and five of 30 (17%) myoinvasive endometrioid carcinomas. Stromal p16 expression was seen in 31 of 31 (100%) APAMs, versus 20 of 39 (51%) benign adenomyomatous polyps and 12 of 30 (40%) myoinvasive endometrioid carcinomas. Conclusions: Patchy to diffuse SATB2 and block‐type p16 staining of fibromuscular stroma separating atypical endometrioid glands is more consistent with APAM than with myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma. These stains are potentially useful adjuncts to careful morphological evaluation of endometrial biopsies/curettings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Follicle center lymphomas, including primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL), may rarely show plasmacytic differentiation. Such cases can pose a diagnostic challenge and can be mistaken for other lymphomas that more commonly include plasma cells. Here, we report four cases of PCFCL and one case of systemic follicular lymphoma involving the skin with associated monotypic plasma cells, including the clinical, morphologic and immunophenotypic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Metastatic melanoma involving the epidermis and/or upper dermis may show significant histological overlap with primary cutaneous melanoma, especially the nodular subtype. Proper histopathological classification is crucial to appropriate staging and management, but is often challenging. The aim of this study was to identify helpful histopathological features for differentiating epidermotropic/dermal metastatic melanoma (EDMM) and primary nodular melanoma (PNM). Methods and results: A cohort of EDMMs (n = 74) and PNMs (n = 75) was retrospectively reviewed for various histopathological features, and the data were compared between groups by the use of univariate analysis. Features significantly associated with EDMM included a tumour size of <2 mm, an absence of tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes and plasma cells, monomorphism, and involvement of adnexal epithelium. Features associated with PNM included a polypoid (exophytic) configuration, prominent tumour‐infiltrating plasma cells (TIPs), a tumour size of >10 mm, ulceration, epidermal collarettes, a higher mitotic rate, necrosis, multiple phenotypes, significant pleomorphism, and lichenoid inflammation. In multivariate analysis, a logistic regression model including large tumour size, ulceration, prominent TIPs, lichenoid inflammation and epidermal collarettes was highly predictive of PNM. Six (8%) EDMMs from three patients showed an ‘epidermal‐only’ or ‘epidermal‐predominant’ pattern closely simulating in‐situ or microinvasive melanoma. Two of these cases were tested by fluorescence in‐situ hybridisation, which confirmed clonal relationships with their corresponding primary melanomas. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive histopathological comparison of EDMM and PNM. Recognition of the above histopathological associations should aid in the correct classification and staging of cutaneous melanoma. Epidermotropic metastatic melanomas may occasionally show an epidermal‐only/epidermal‐predominant pattern; accurate diagnosis requires prudent clinical correlation and, when necessary, ancillary molecular tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]