1. The Role of Quartz Cementation in the Seismic Cycle: A Critical Review.
- Author
-
Williams, Randolph T. and Fagereng, Åke
- Abstract
Because quartz veins are common in fault zones exhumed from earthquake nucleation temperatures (150°C–350°C), quartz cementation may be an important mechanism of strength recovery between earthquakes. This interpretation requires that cementation occurs within a single interseismic period. We review slip‐related processes that have been argued to allow rapid quartz precipitation in faults, including: advection of silica‐saturated fluids, coseismic pore‐fluid pressure drops, frictional heating, dissolution‐precipitation creep, precipitation of amorphous phases, and variations in fluid and mineral‐surface chemistry. We assess the rate and magnitude of quartz growth that may result from each of the examined mechanisms. We find limitations to the kinetics and mass balance of silica precipitation that emphasize two end‐member regimes. First, the mechanisms we explore, given current kinetic constraints, cannot explain mesoscale fault‐fracture vein networks developing, even incrementally, on interseismic timescales. On the other hand, some mechanisms appear capable, isolated or in combination, of cementing micrometer‐to‐millimeter thick principal slip surfaces in days to years. This does not explain extensive vein networks in fault damage zones, but allows the involvement of quartz cements in fault healing. These end‐members lead us to hypothesize that high flux scenarios, although more important for voluminous hydrothermal mineralization, may be of subsidiary importance to local, diffusive mass transport in low fluid‐flux faults when discussing the mechanical implications of quartz cements. A renewed emphasis on the controls on quartz cementation rates in fault zones will, however, be integral to developing a more complete understanding of strength recovery following earthquake rupture.Plain Language Summary: The strength of faults varies in time throughout the earthquake cycle. We know from laboratory experiments that fault strength decreases dramatically and instantaneously during earthquakes. Some, much, or all of that strength loss is recovered between earthquakes. This process, often referred to as fault “healing,” is thought to influence the timing, location, and energy of future earthquakes. The speed and mechanism of the healing process are not well known. In many fault rocks from depths of earthquake nucleation (>10 km), seen in geological exposures, slip‐related fractures and cracks are sealed with quartz cements that formed from fluids residing within, or flowing through, the fault zone. This observation has led to the common inference that quartz cementation exerts a major control on fault healing. This interpretation requires that sufficient quartz grows between successive earthquakes. We review and explore a variety of processes that have been argued to facilitate such rapid cementation. Ultimately, we find that it is difficult for quartz to grow fast enough to heal faults on the timescale of the earthquake cycle in many circumstances. Therefore, we call for more work on understanding whether quartz growth or alternative mechanisms can explain healing between earthquakes.Key Points: We critically review the potential role(s) of quartz cementation as a mechanism of fault “healing” on seismic cycle timescalesOur current understanding of silica kinetics cannot explain cementation of mesoscale fault‐fracture networks within interseismic periodsThin principal slip zones may be cemented interseismically but a complete understanding of fault‐related quartz growth requires further work [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF