1. Using an intersectionality framework to assess gender inequities in food security: A case study from Uganda.
- Author
-
Barak, Farzaneh, Musiimenta, Peace, and Melgar‐Quiñonez, Hugo
- Subjects
- *
HOUSING , *GENDER inequality , *GENDER differences (Sociology) , *SOCIAL determinants of health , *FOOD security - Abstract
Prior research in health equity, including food security, indicates that disadvantaged groups, such as women with limited resources, face many obstacles in achieving food security. One of the first of its kind to draw on intersectionality and the social determinants of health frameworks, this study identified and tested gender differences in experiencing food security inequities using nationally representative data from the Gallup World Poll, Uganda 2019 (N = 951). Binary logit models disaggregated by gender were estimated to identify gender differences in food security. Three points of intersection were categorized: individual characteristics (gender, age, region, marital status, household number of children and adults); available resources (education, income, employment, shelter, social support); and the socio‐political context (community infrastructures, corruption within the business). Testing the moderation effect of gender with each variable (difference‐in‐difference) showed that although most variables correlated with a difference in experiencing food security by gender, only two—marital status, and social support—presented a statistically significant difference. Accounting for this moderation effect, the final model showed that lacking shelter and residing in Eastern Uganda decreased food security. More adults in the household, higher education, higher income, available social support, and satisfaction with community infrastructures enhanced the odds of food security. Results suggest that (a) conventional food security quantitative approaches may not suffice to model inequities when gender is a control variable rather than a foundation to explain inequities; and (b) gendered‐centered analysis helps better identify disadvantaged groups and inform policies that target associated inequities. Key points: Using the social determinants of health framework while employing an intersectionality theoretical approach enhanced the identification of gender differences in experiencing food security inequities through new analytical approaches (i.e., difference‐in‐difference).Challenging the conventional analytical approaches that control for gender, results revealed layers of gender differences. Most previous studies narrowly focus on describing unequal food security outcomes by gender. Our study's diff‐in‐diff analysis revealed that the gender gap size differed significantly between levels of social support (social strata) and marital status (social identity), which is consistent with previous studies.This study provides evidence of the importance of including an intersectional lens in studying gender as a focal point in generating unequal experiences of food insecurity.Having shelter and being satisfied with everyday life, including infrastructure, air quality, water, healthcare, affordable housing, and education system are strong contributors to food security status, regardless of gender differences. Results highlight the importance of incorporating intermediary and structural determinants when studying food security equity and call for a more in‐depth analysis of food security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF