Search

Introduction: Studies have suggested that in addition to antimicrobials, some non‐antibiotics may alter the gut microbiome. This systematic review sought to determine if there is an association between immunosuppressive agents used in recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) and alterations in the gut microbiome. Methods: English language PubMed and Scopus searches were conducted to identify relevant articles. Inclusion criteria were defined as pertaining to solid organ transplantation, immunosuppression, and the gut microbiome. Articles were excluded if they contained only genetic microbiota descriptions, narrative reviews of bacteria, or described bacteria as a pathogen for infections. PRISMA reporting was used to guide this literature review. Results: A preliminary search identified 665 articles, of which 75 articles met the inclusion criteria, and 10 articles remained after application of exclusion criteria. Seventy‐one percent of articles discussed calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus, 38% included mycophenolate mofetil, and 52% included steroids, such as prednisone. Some studies utilized a combination of immunosuppressants or had multiple study arms. Seventy percent of the articles indicated changes in quantities of anaerobic bacteria including Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, and Clostridiales. Combinations of immunosuppressant agents were associated with an increase in colonization of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus sp. Conclusion: Some immunosuppressants are associated with changes in gut flora, but the impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. Robust clinical trials delineating the direct effect of immunosuppressants on the gut microbiome as well as the impact on clinical outcomes are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The predominant Veillonella spp. were isolated from the dorsum surface of the tongues of 11 healthy adults and identified to species level using rpoB sequencing because 16S ribosomal RNA sequence analysis does not reliably differentiate between all members of this genus. In all, 253 isolates were identified and the mean proportion (± SE) of Veillonella spp. per sample was 16.2 (± 3.6) with a range of 3.0% to 36.3% of the total anaerobic colony count. The predominant species were Veillonella atypica (10/11), Veillonella dispar (9/11) and Veillonella rogosae (8/11) because they were isolated from the majority of subjects. Veillonella parvula was isolated from only one subject while Veillonella dentocariosi and Veillonella montpelleriensis were not isolated from any subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The oral distribution of Kingella oralis was investigated in 10 periodontally healthy subjects, 11 untreated adult periodontitis patients and 6 untreated localized juvenile periodontitis patients. From each subject, 6-8 each of supra- and subgingival tooth samples, 4 mucosa samples and a saliva sample were examined by culture for the presence of K. oralis. K. oralis was found in at least one oral site in 26 of the 27 study subjects, and in at least one tooth site in each of these 26 positive subjects. Its prevalence in dental plaque ranged from 23% to 59% in different subject groups. The mean percentage of K. oralis in total microbiota in the dental plaque ranged from 0.40% in the periodontally healthy group to 4.60% in localized juvenile periodontitis subjects. The organism was a significant species in a few periodontitis sites, constituting > 5% of the total microbiota. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]