Search

Background The covalent linkage between DNA and the active site tyrosine of topoisomerase I can be stabilized by chemotherapeutic agents, adjacent DNA lesions, or mutational defects in the topoisomerase itself. Following collision with a replication fork, the covalent complex can be converted to a double-strand break. Tdp1, an enzyme that can hydrolyse the bond between topoisomerase I and DNA, is thought to be involved in the repair of these lesions, but little is known about how such repair is accomplished. Results Reaction kinetics with model substrates reveal that the catalytic efficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tdp1 is relatively poor when the scissile bond is located in the middle of a duplex, but much better when it is located at the end of a structure. Survival of yeast after induction of a toxic topoisomerase is substantially reduced by inactivation of the TDP1 gene. Comparison of survival of single and double mutants places TDP1 and RAD52 in the same epistasis group but TDP1 and RAD9 in different epistasis groups. In the absence of RAD9, inactivation of TDP1 has a significant effect on the survival of cells following exposure to camptothecin but is without consequence for the survival of agents that do not target topoisomerase I. Conclusions Tdp1 acts as a specific repair enzyme for topoisomerase I lesions. Rather than working at their earliest occurrence, the enzyme acts after covalent complexes have been converted to DSBs. A second repair pathway also exists that functions independently of Tdp1 but requires RAD9 function to efficiently repair topoisomerase I-linked DSBs. The efficiency of these pathways differs for complexes induced with the chemotherapeutic agent camptothecin vs. those accumulated by mutant forms of topoisomerase I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the nature and extent of foreign investment in U.S. food retailing. Background on foreign direct investment in the U.S. food-retailing sector; Characteristics of investing companies; Consequences of the inflow of foreign capital.

A letter to the editor about the nomenclature of the genes encoding integration host factor is presented.