Search

This article discusses the cost-effectiveness of using natriuretic peptides (NPs) to screen for and treat stage B heart failure (HF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The study used a Markov state-transition model and conducted simulations over multiple annual cycles. The results showed that NP screening and treatment provided high value after at least 7 years, according to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). However, the study has limitations, such as not considering additive therapy with finerenone and using probabilities from different studies. Further research is needed to fill in data gaps and determine the most cost-effective screening strategy for individuals at high risk of incident HF. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: Diagnosing acute heart failure (AHF) remains particularly challenging in older patients. Natriuretic peptides are recommended as valuable diagnostic tools in this context. This study aims to establish the diagnostic thresholds of B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) for AHF in patients aged over 75 years, both with and without co‐morbidities. Methods and results: In this retrospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study, data were gathered from 12 071 hospitalized patients aged 75 years or older, presenting with acute dyspnoea and undergoing BNP or NT‐proBNP measurement within 48 h of admission across 10 Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris facilities between 2011 and 2022, encompassing geriatrics, cardiology, and pulmonology departments. Final diagnoses were categorized using ICD‐10 criteria as either AHF or other acute respiratory conditions such as COPD exacerbation, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia. The mean (SD) age of the population was 84.0 (80.0, 89.0) years, with 52.7% being female. Out of these, 7946 (65.8%) were diagnosed with AHF upon discharge. For NT‐proBNP, the identified 'optimal' threshold for diagnosing AHF was 1748 ng/L, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84%. Among patients aged over 85 years, a threshold of 2235 pg/mL for NT‐proBNP was associated with an 84% PPV. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), a threshold of 2332 pg/mL for NT‐proBNP demonstrated a PPV of 90% for AHF diagnosis. Additionally, in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min, a threshold of 3474 pg/mL for NT‐proBNP yielded a 90% PPV for AHF diagnosis. In male patients, a threshold of 1800 pg/mL showed an 85% PPV for AHF diagnosis, while in patients with obesity, a threshold of 1375 pg/mL demonstrated an 85% PPV for AHF diagnosis. Conclusions: In older patients, we found significant effects of co‐morbidities on natriuretic peptides results, particularly in patients over 85 years old, older patients with abnormal renal function, obesity, and atrial fibrillation. Despite the consideration of those co‐morbid conditions, NT‐proBNP and BNP level continue to demonstrate utility in the diagnosis of AHF in older patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heart failure (HF) and malnutrition exhibit overlapping risk factors, characterized by increased levels of natriuretic peptides and an inflammatory profile. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), N‐terminal‐pro B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), and C‐reactive protein (CRP) in patients with HF and malnutrition versus normal nutrition. Methods: From inception until July 2023, the databases, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched. To examine the association among malnutrition [controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score ≥2; Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) score <92] with BNP, NT‐proBNP and CRP in patients with HF, a meta‐analysis using a random‐effects model was conducted (CRD42023445076). Results: A significant association of GNRI with increased levels of BNP were demonstrated [mean difference (MD): 204.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) (101.02, 308.96, I2 = 88%, P < 0.01)], albeit no statistically significant findings were shown using CONUT [MD: 158.51, 95% CI (−1.78 to 318.79, I2 = 92%, P = 0.05)]. GNRI [MD: 1885.14, 95% CI (1428.76–2341.52, I2 = 0%, P < 0.01)] and CONUT [MD: 1160.05, 95% CI (701.04–1619.07, I2 = 0%, P < 0.01)] were associated with significantly higher levels of NT‐proBNP. Patients with normal GNRI scores had significantly lower levels of CRP [MD: 0.50, 95% CI (0.12–0.88, I2 = 87%, P = 0.01)] whereas significantly higher levels of CRP were observed in those with higher CONUT [MD: 0.40, 95% CI (0.08–0.72, I2 = 88%, P = 0.01)]. Employing meta‐regression, age was deemed a potential moderator between CRP and GNRI. Conclusions: Normal nutrition scores in patients with HF are linked to lower BNP, NT‐proBNP, and CRP levels compared with malnourished counterparts. Despite the significant link between CRP and malnutrition, their relationship may be influenced in older groups considering the sensitivity of GNRI due to ageing factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Clinical trials in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) commonly have detailed eligibility criteria. This may contribute to challenges with efficient enrolment and questions regarding the generalizability of trial findings. Methods and results: Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF from a large US healthcare system were identified through a computable phenotype applied in linked imaging and electronic health record databases. We evaluated shared eligibility criteria from five recent/ongoing HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (PARAGON‐HF, EMPEROR‐Preserved, DELIVER, FINE‐ARTS, and SPIRRIT‐HFpEF) and compared clinical and echocardiographic features as well as outcomes between trial‐eligible and trial‐ineligible patients. Among 5552 patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF, 792 (14%) were eligible for trial consideration, having met all criteria assessed. Causes of ineligibility included lack of recent loop diuretics (37%), significant pulmonary disease (24%), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (17%), recent stroke/transient ischaemic attack (13%), or low natriuretic peptides (12%); 53% of ineligible patients had >1 reason for exclusion. Compared with eligible patients, ineligible patients were younger (age 71 vs. 75 years, P < 0.001) with higher rates of coronary artery disease (66% vs. 59%, P < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (40% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), but less mitral regurgitation, lower E/e′ ratio, and smaller left atrial sizes. Both eligible and ineligible patients demonstrated high rates of structural heart disease consistent with HFpEF [elevated left atrial size or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy/increased LV mass], although this was slightly higher among eligible patients (95% vs. 92%, P = 0.001). The two cohorts demonstrated similar LV global longitudinal strain along with a similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and obesity. Ineligible patients had similar all‐cause mortality (33% vs. 33% at 3 years) to those eligible but lower rates of heart failure hospitalization (20% vs. 28% at 3 years, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF from a large health system, approximately one in seven were eligible for major trials based on key criteria applied through a clinical computable phenotype. These findings highlight the large proportion of patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF ineligible for contemporary trials for whom the generalizability of trial findings may be questioned and further investigation would be beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Real‐world data show that guidelines are insufficiently implemented, and particularly guideline‐directed medical therapies (GDMT) are underused in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in clinical practice. The Council for Cardiology Practice and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed a survey aiming to (i) evaluate the perspectives of the cardiology community on the 2021 ESC heart failure (HF) guidelines, (ii) pinpoint disparities in disease management, and (iii) propose strategies to enhance adherence to HF guidelines.A 22‐question survey regarding the diagnosis and treatment of HFrEF was delivered between March and June 2022. Of 457 physicians, 54% were general cardiologists, 19.4% were HF specialists, 18.9% other cardiac specialists, and 7.7% non‐cardiac specialists. For diagnosis, 52.1% employed echocardiography and natriuretic peptides (NPs), 33.2% primarily used echocardiography, and 14.7% predominantly relied on NPs. The first drug class initiated in HFrEF was angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARNi) (91.2%), beta‐blockers (BB) (73.8%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) (53.4%), and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (48.1%). The combination ACEi/ARNi + MRA+ BB was preferred by 39.3% of physicians, ACEi/ARNi + SGLT2 inhibitors + BB by 33.3%, and ACEi/ARNi + BB by 22.2%. The time required to initiate and optimize GDMT was estimated to be <1 month by 8.3%, 1–3 months by 52%, 3–6 months by 31.8%, and >6 months by 7.9%. Compared to general cardiologists, HF specialists/academic cardiologists reported lower estimated time‐to‐initiation, and more commonly preferred a parallel initiation of GDMT rather than a sequential approach.Participants generally followed diagnostic and treatment guidelines, but variations in HFrEF management across care settings or HF specialties were noted. The survey may raise awareness and promote standardized HF care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusions Non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP), an incurable disease terminating in systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]), causes immune activation, however anti‐inflammatory treatment strategies so far have failed to alter the course of this disease. Myeloperoxidase (MPO), the principal enzyme in neutrophils, has cytotoxic, pro‐fibrotic and nitric oxide oxidizing effects. Whether MPO inhibition ameliorates the phenotype in NICMP remains elusive.Prognostic information from MPO was derived from proteomic data of a large human cardiovascular health cohort (n = 3289). In a murine model of NICMP, we studied the mechanisms of MPO in this disease. In a case series, the MPO inhibitor was also evaluated in NICMP patients. Individuals with increased MPO revealed higher long‐term mortality and worsening of heart failure, with impaired prognosis when MPO increased during follow‐up. MPO infusion attenuated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in mice with NICMP, whereas genetic ablation or inhibition of MPO decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR, 9.4 ± 0.7 mmHg*min/ml in NICMP vs. 6.7 ± 0.8 mmHg*min/ml in NICMP/Mpo−/−mice, n = 8, p = 0.006, data expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean) and improved left ventricular function (LVEF 30.3 ± 2.2% in NICMP vs. 40.7 ± 1.1% in NICMP/Mpo−/− mice, n = 16, p < 0.0001). Four patients diagnosed with NICMP and treated with an MPO inhibitor over 12 weeks showed increase in LVEF, decline in natriuretic peptides and improved 6‐min walking distance. MPO inhibitor‐related changes in the proteome of NICMP patients predicted reduced mortality when related to the changes in the proteome of the above referenced cardiovascular health cohort.Myeloperoxidase predicts long‐term outcome in HFrEF and its inhibition elicits systemic anti‐inflammatory and vasodilating effects which translate into improved left ventricular function. MPO inhibition deserves further evaluation as a novel, complementary treatment strategy for HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by growing incidence and poor outcomes. A large majority of HFpEF patients are cared by non‐cardiologists. The availability of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as recommended therapy raises the importance of prompt and accurate identification and treatment of HFpEF across diverse healthcare settings. We evaluated HFpEF management across specialties through a survey targeting cardiologists, HF specialists, and non‐cardiologists.An independent web‐based survey was distributed globally between May and July 2023. We performed a post‐hoc analysis, comparing cardiologists, HF specialists, and non‐cardiologists. A total of 1460 physicians (61% male, median age 41[34–49]) from 95 countries completed the survey; 20% were HF specialists, 65% cardiologists, and 15% non‐cardiologists. Compared with HF specialists, non‐cardiologists and cardiologists were less likely to use natriuretic peptides (p = 0.003) and HFpEF scores (p = 0.004) for diagnosis, and were also less likely to have access to or consider specific echocardiographic parameters (p < 0.001) for identifying HFpEF. Diastolic stress tests were used in less than 30% of the cases, regardless of the specialty (p = 1.12). Multidrug treatment strategies were similar across different specialties. While SGLT2i and diuretics were the preferred drugs, angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors were the least frequently prescribed in all three groups. However, when constrained to choose one drug, the proportion of physicians favoring SGLT2i varied significantly among specialties (66% HF specialists, 52% cardiologists, 51% non‐cardiologists). Additionally, 10% of non‐cardiologists and 8% of cardiologists considered beta blocker the drug of choice for HFpEF.Significant differences among specialty groups were observed in HFpEF management, particularly in the diagnostic work‐up. Our results highlight a substantial risk of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of HFpEF patients, especially among non‐HF specialists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure to assess adiposity, alternative indices such as the waist‐to‐height ratio may better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat as well as the weight of the skeleton.The prognostic value of several alternative anthropometric measures was compared with that of BMI in 1116 patients with non‐ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in DANISH. The association between anthropometric measures and all‐cause death was adjusted for prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. Median follow‐up was 9.5 years (25th–75th percentile, 7.9–10.9). Compared to patients with a BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 (n = 363), those with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 had a higher risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular death, although this association was only statistically significant for a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 (n = 91) (all‐cause death: hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–2.48; cardiovascular death: HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.69–3.58). Compared to a BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n = 24) was associated with a numerically, but not a significantly, higher risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular death. Greater waist‐to‐height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) was also associated with a higher risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular death (HR for the highest vs. the lowest quintile: all‐cause death: HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53–2.92; cardiovascular death: HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49–3.15).In patients with non‐ischaemic HFrEF, there was a clear association between greater adiposity and higher long‐term mortality.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the need for reliable biomarkers to detect pulmonary congestion in patients with heart failure (HF) in order to prevent hospitalizations and improve patient outcomes. The current biomarkers used in clinical practice, B-type natriuretic peptides (NPs), have limitations such as being affected by comorbidities and having inconsistent measurement intervals. The article presents the BioMEMS study, which aims to identify alternative biomarkers that accurately reflect worsening congestion and can be easily measured. The study collects blood samples from HF patients and analyzes them using the Olink Cardiovascular III panel to evaluate the relationship between biomarkers and pulmonary artery pressures. The ultimate goal is to develop a biomarker-based management strategy for HF patients that is decentralized, manageable, and economically sustainable. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: The optimal echocardiographic predictors of cardiovascular outcome in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. We aimed to identify independent echocardiographic predictors of cardiovascular outcome in patients with HFpEF. Methods and results: Systematic literature search of three electronic databases was conducted from date of inception until November 2022. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for echocardiographic variables from multivariate prediction models for the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization were pooled using a random effects meta‐analysis. Specific subgroup analyses were conducted for studies that enrolled patients with acute versus chronic HF, and for those studies that included E/e′, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), renal function, natriuretic peptides and diuretic use in multivariate models. Forty‐six studies totalling 20 056 patients with HFpEF were included. Three echocardiographic parameters emerged as independent predictors in all subgroup analyses: decreased left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10–1.39 per 5% decrease), decreased left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13–1.1.50 per 5% decrease) and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PASP ratio (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.25 per 0.1 unit decrease). Other independent echocardiographic predictors of the primary endpoint were a higher E/e′, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, LV mass index and LA ejection fraction, although these variables were less robust. Conclusions: Impaired LV global longitudinal strain, lower LA reservoir strain and lower TAPSE/PASP ratio predict cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization in HFpEF and are independent of filling pressures, clinical characteristics and natriuretic peptides. These echocardiographic parameters reflect key functional changes in HFpEF, and should be incorporated in future prospective risk prediction models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteocrin (OSTN) is an endogenous protein sharing structural similarities with the natriuretic peptides [NPs; atrial (ANP), B‐type (BNP) and C‐type (CNP) NP], which are hormones known for their crucial role in maintaining pressure/volume homeostasis. Osteocrin competes with the NPs for binding to the receptor involved in their clearance (NPR‐C). In the present study, having identified, for the first time, the major circulating form of OSTN in human and ovine plasma, we examined the integrated haemodynamic, endocrine and renal effects of vehicle‐controlled incremental infusions of ovine proOSTN (83–133) and its metabolism in eight conscious normal sheep. Incremental i.v. doses of OSTN produced stepwise increases in circulating concentrations of the peptide, and its metabolic clearance rate was inversely proportional to the dose. Osteocrin increased plasma levels of ANP, BNP and CNP in a dose‐dependent manner, together with concentrations of their intracellular second messenger, cGMP. Increases in plasma cGMP were associated with progressive reductions in arterial pressure and central venous pressure. Plasma cAMP, renin and aldosterone were unchanged. Despite significant increases in urinary cGMP levels, OSTN administration was not associated with natriuresis or diuresis in normal sheep. These results support OSTN as an endogenous ligand for NPR‐C in regulating plasma concentrations of NPs and associated cGMP‐mediated bioactivity. Collectively, our findings support a role for OSTN in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. What is the central question of this study?What role does osteocrin (OSTN) have in integrated cardiovascular, renal and neurohumoral function in normal health?What is the main finding and its importance?Osteocrin is structurally similar to natriuretic peptides (NPs) that play a crucial role in cardiovascular homeostasis and binds to the NP receptor‐C (NPR‐C). Stepped doses of OSTN raised plasma atrial NP, B‐type NP, C‐type NP and cGMP and reduced arterial and venous pressures. Collectively, these findings provide strong evidence that increased NP levels result from competitive displacement from NPR‐C, not from increased NP secretion, suggesting that OSTN might play a role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity condition causes morphological and functional alterations involving the cardiovascular system. These can represent the substrates for different cardiovascular diseases, such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure (HF) with both preserved ejection fraction (EF) and reduced EF. Different pathogenetic mechanisms may help to explain the association between obesity and HF including left ventricular remodelling and epicardial fat accumulation, endothelial dysfunction, and coronary microvascular dysfunction. Multi‐imaging modalities are required for appropriate recognition of subclinical systolic dysfunction typically associated with obesity, with echocardiography being the most cost‐effective technique. Therapeutic approach in patients with obesity and HF is challenging, particularly regarding patients with preserved EF in which few strategies with high level of evidence are available. Weight loss is of extreme importance in patients with obesity and HF, being a primary therapeutic intervention. Sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors have been recently introduced as a novel tool in the management of HF patients. The present review aims at analysing the most recent studies supporting pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management in patients with obesity and HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The role of malnutrition among patients with severe heart failure (HF) is not well established. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of malnutrition in patients with severe HF. Methods and results: Nutritional status was measured using the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), based on body weight, height and serum albumin concentration, with malnutrition defined as GNRI ≤98. It was assessed in consecutive patients with severe HF, defined by at least one high‐risk 'I NEED HELP' marker, enrolled at four Italian centres between January 2020 and November 2021. The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. A total of 510 patients with data regarding nutritional status were included in the study (mean age 74 ± 12 years, 66.5% male). Among them, 179 (35.1%) had GNRI ≤98 (malnutrition). At multivariable logistic regression, lower body mass index (BMI) and higher levels of natriuretic peptides (B‐type natriuretic peptide [BNP] > median value [685 pg/ml] or N‐terminal proBNP > median value [5775 pg/ml]) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of malnutrition. Estimated rates of all‐cause death at 1 year were 22.4% and 41.1% in patients without and with malnutrition, respectively (log‐rank p < 0.001). The impact of malnutrition on all‐cause mortality was confirmed after multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.43–2.89, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In a contemporary, real‐world, multicentre cohort of patients with severe HF, malnutrition (defined as GNRI ≤98) was common and independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. Lower BMI and higher natriuretic peptides were identified as predictors of malnutrition in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The central role of natriuretic peptides (NPs) in the complex cardio‐renal integrated physiology and organ failure has been revealed over the last four decades. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), the oldest representative of the NPs family, is produced through conversion of proANP to the mature peptide by corin, a trans‐membrane protease localized to the cardiac myocyte membrane. Similarly, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is generated by furin, which cleaves proBNP to BNP in myocytes. Though the components of NPs system, their synthesis and target organs are well established, understanding their role in the interplay between the heart and the kidney is steadily evolving. In this context, Feldman et al. (New England Journal of Medicine, 389, 1685) recently described patients with hypertension, cardiomyopathy, atrial arrhythmia and left atrial fibrosis, associated with a homozygous loss‐of‐function variant of the gene encoding corin (Cor−/−). Notably, reduced baseline urinary electrolyte and creatinine excretion have been observed in one of the studied patients. This renal excretory functional impairment could be attributed to the lack of cardiac‐derived ANP in these patients, as implied by Feldman et al. Yet, in this mini‐review we suggest that this aberrant renal manifestation may principally stem from lack of local ANP production at renal tissue, as corin is normally expressed in proximal tubules, Henle's loop and collecting ducts, with locally produced ANP provoking Na+ and water exertion. Collectively, it seems that beside the classic well‐established cardio‐renal axis, the renal NPs system functions as local endocrine machinery in the regulation of sodium excretion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Sacubitril/valsartan treatment reduces mortality and hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but has limited application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on peak oxygen consumption (VO2) in patients with non‐obstructive HCM. Methods and results: This is a phase II, randomized, open‐label multicentre study that enrolled adult patients with symptomatic non‐obstructive HCM (New York Heart Association class I–III) who were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg) or control for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in peak VO2. Secondary endpoints included echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function, natriuretic peptides and other cardiac biomarkers, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure quality of life. Between May 2018 and October 2021, 354 patients were screened for eligibility, 115 patients (mean age 58 years, 37% female) met the study inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to sacubitril/valsartan (n = 79) or control (n = 36). At 16 weeks, there was no significant change in peak VO2 from baseline in the sacubitril/valsartan (15.3 [4.3] vs. 15.9 [4.3] ml/kg/min, p = 0.13) or control group (p = 0.47). No clinically significant changes were found in blood pressure, cardiac structure and function, plasma biomarkers, or quality of life. Conclusion: In patients with HCM, a 16‐week treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated but had no effect on exercise capacity, cardiac structure, or function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The use of large medical or healthcare claims databases is very useful for population‐based studies on the burden of heart failure (HF). Clinical characteristics and management of HF patients differ according to categories of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but this information is often missing in such databases. We aimed to develop and validate algorithms to identify LVEF in healthcare databases where the information is lacking. Methods and results: Algorithms were built by machine learning with a random forest approach. Algorithms were trained and reinforced using the French national claims database [Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS)] and a French HF registry. Variables were age, gender, and comorbidities, which could be identified by medico‐administrative code‐based proxies, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes for drug delivery, International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision) coding for hospitalizations, and administrative codes for any other type of reimbursed care. The algorithms were validated by cross‐validation and against a subset of the SNDS that includes LVEF information. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.84 for the algorithm identifying LVEF ≤ 40% and 0.79 for the algorithms identifying LVEF < 50% and ≥50%. For LVEF ≤ 40%, the reinforced algorithm identified 50% of patients in the validation dataset with a positive predictive value of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.96. The most important predictive variables were delivery of HF medication, sex, age, hospitalization, and testing for natriuretic peptides with different orders of positive or negative importance according to the LVEF category. Conclusions: The algorithms identify reduced or preserved LVEF in HF patients within a nationwide healthcare claims database with high positive predictive value and low rates of false positives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Hypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus intravenous (IV) loop diuretic appears to enhance the diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this therapy in the ambulatory setting have not been evaluated. We aimed to describe the design and baseline characteristics of the SALT‐HF trial participants. Methods and results: 'Efficacy of Saline Hypertonic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients with HF' (SALT‐HF) trial was a multicenter, double‐blinded, and randomized study involving ambulatory patients who experienced worsening heart failure (WHF) without criteria for hospitalization. Enrolled patients had to present at least two signs of volume overload, use ≥ 80 mg of oral furosemide daily, and have elevated natriuretic peptides. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with a 1‐h infusion of IV furosemide plus HSS (2.6–3.4% NaCl depending on plasmatic sodium levels) versus a 1‐h infusion of IV furosemide at the same dose (125–250 mg, depending on basal loop diuretic dose). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected at baseline and after 7 days, and a telephone visit was planned after 30 days. The primary endpoint was 3‐h diuresis after treatment started. Secondary endpoints included (a) 7‐day changes in congestion data, (b) 7‐day changes in kidney function and electrolytes, (c) 30‐day clinical events (need of IV diuretic, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, all‐cause mortality or HF‐hospitalization). Results: A total of 167 participants [median age, 81 years; interquartile range (IQR), 73–87, 30.5% females] were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. Half of the participants (n = 82) had an ejection fraction >50%. Most patients showed a high burden of comorbidities, with a median Charlson index of 3 (IQR: 2–4). Common co‐morbidities included diabetes mellitus (41%, n = 69), atrial fibrillation (80%, n = 134), and chronic kidney disease (64%, n = 107). Patients exhibited a poor functional NYHA class (69% presenting NYHA III) and several signs of congestion. The mean composite congestion score was 4.3 (standard deviation: 1.7). Ninety per cent of the patients (n = 151) presented oedema and jugular engorgement, and 71% (n = 118) showed lung B lines assessed by ultrasound. Median inferior vena cava diameter was 23 mm, (IQR: 21–25), and plasmatic levels of N‐terminal‐pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) were increased (median NT‐proBNP 4969 pg/mL, IQR: 2508–9328; median CA125 46 U/L, IQR: 20–114). Conclusions: SALT‐HF trial randomized 167 ambulatory patients with WHF and will determine whether an infusion of hypertonic saline therapy plus furosemide increases diuresis and improves decongestion compared to equivalent furosemide administration alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides information on the management of congestive heart failure, with a focus on managing water retention rather than salt intake. The authors discuss the challenges of treating congestion and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for diuretic use. They present various strategies for assessing congestion and monitoring diuretic response, including spot urinary sodium measurements. The article also discusses a study that evaluated the use of a point-of-care urinary sodium sensor to guide diuretic therapy in hospitalized patients with heart failure. The study found that adjusting diuretic dose based on spot urinary sodium results in greater natriuresis and diuresis, but did not lead to better resolution of congestion or shorter hospital stays. The authors emphasize the importance of a multidimensional clinical approach to managing congestion and achieving euvolemia. The article also discusses the use of diuretics in the treatment of acute heart failure, suggesting that lower initial doses may be appropriate for patients with few symptoms at rest in bed. However, if there is an inadequate initial response, it is important to intensify diuretic therapy to resolve congestion and improve the patient's condition. Accurately measuring urine volume is highlighted as an important measure of diuretic effect, and the success of treatment should be evaluated based on the patient's improvement in symptoms and overall well-being. [Extracted from the article]

The pathophysiology behind sodium retention in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with HFpEF have impaired natriuresis and diuresis in response to volume expansion and diuretic challenge, which is associated with renal hypo‐responsiveness to endogenous natriuretic peptides. Nine HFpEF patients and five controls received saline infusion (0.25 mL/kg/min for 60 min) followed by intravenous furosemide (20 mg or home dose) 2 h after the infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline, 2 h after saline infusion, and 2 h after furosemide administration; urinary volumes were recorded. The urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (ucGMP)/plasma B‐type NP (BNP) ratio was calculated as a measure of renal response to endogenous BNP. Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to compare the groups. Compared to controls, HFpEF patients had reduced urine output (2480 vs.3541 mL; p = 0.028), lower urinary sodium excretion over 2 h after saline infusion (the percentage of infused sodium excreted 12% vs. 47%; p = 0.003), and a lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratio (0.7 vs. 7.3 (pmol/mL)/(mg/dL)/(pg/mL); p = 0.014). Patients with HFpEF had impaired natriuretic response to intravenous saline and furosemide administration and lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratios indicating renal hypo‐responsiveness to NPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip device to treat functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) has been tested in previous clinical trials yielding somewhat heterogeneous results in heart failure (HF) patients. Over time, the MitraClip device system has been modified and clinical practice evolved to consider also less severely diseased HF patients with FMR for this therapeutic option. The RESHAPE‐HF2 trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip device system on top of medical therapy considered optimal in the treatment of clinically significant FMR in symptomatic patients with chronic HF. Methods: The RESHAPE‐HF2 is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, randomized, parallel‐controlled, multicentre trial designed to evaluate the use of the MitraClip device (used in the most up‐to‐date version as available at sites) plus optimal standard of care therapy (device group) compared to optimal standard of care therapy alone (control group). Eligible subjects have signs and symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II–IV despite optimal therapy), and have moderate‐to‐severe or severe FMR, as confirmed by a central echocardiography core laboratory; have an ejection fraction between ≥20% and ≤50% (initially 15–35% for NYHA class II patients, and 15–45% for NYHA class III/IV patients); have been adequately treated per applicable standards, and have received appropriate revascularization and cardiac resynchronization therapy, if eligible; had a HF hospitalization or elevated natriuretic peptides (B‐type natriuretic peptide [BNP] ≥300 pg/ml or N‐terminal proBNP ≥1000 pg/ml) in the last 90 days; and in whom isolated mitral valve surgery is not a recommended treatment option. The trial has three primary endpoints, which are these: (i) the composite rate of total (first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death during 24 months of follow‐up, (ii) the rate of total (i.e. first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations within 24 months, and (iii) the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall score. The three primary endpoints will be analysed using the Hochberg procedure to control the familywise type I error rate across the three hypotheses. Conclusions: The RESHAPE‐HF2 trial will provide sound evidence on the MitraClip device and its effects in HF patients with FMR. The recruitment was recently completed with 506 randomized patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Heart failure (HF) outcomes remain poor despite optimal guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT). We assessed safety, effectiveness, and transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) outcomes during the 12 months after Ventura shunt implantation in the RELIEVE‐HF open‐label roll‐in cohort. Methods and results: Eligibility required symptomatic HF despite optimal GDMT with ≥1 HF hospitalization in the prior year or elevated natriuretic peptides. The safety endpoint was device‐related major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events at 30 days, compared to a prespecified performance goal. Effectiveness evaluations included the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and TTE at baseline and 12 months. Overall, 97 patients were enrolled and implanted at 64 sites. Average age was 70 ± 11 years, 97% were in New York Heart Association class III, and half had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. The safety endpoint was achieved (event rate 0%, p < 0.001). KCCQ overall summary score was improved by 12–16 points at all follow‐up timepoints (all p < 0.004), with similar outcomes in patients with reduced and preserved LVEF. At 12 months, left ventricular end‐systolic and end‐diastolic volumes were reduced (p = 0.020 and p = 0.038, respectively), LVEF improved (p = 0.009), right ventricular end‐systolic and end‐diastolic areas were reduced (p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively), and right ventricular fractional area change (p < 0.001) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p < 0.001) improved. Conclusion: Interatrial shunting with the Ventura device was safe and resulted in favourable clinical effects in patients with HF, regardless of LVEF. Improvements of left and right ventricular structure and function were consistent with reverse myocardial remodelling. These results would support the potential of this shunt device as a treatment for HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Natriuretic peptide (NP) uptake varies in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Europe. The 'Peptide for Life' (P4L) initiative, led by Heart Failure Association, aims to enhance NP utilization for early diagnosis of heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that implementing an educational campaign in Western Balkan countries would significantly increase NP adoption rates in the ED. Methods and results: This registry examined NP adoption before and after implementing the P4L‐ED study across 10 centres in five countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia. A train‐the‐trainer programme was implemented to enhance awareness of NP testing in the ED, and centres without access received point‐of‐care instruments. Differences in NP testing between the pre‐P4L‐ED and post‐P4L‐ED phases were evaluated. A total of 2519 patients were enrolled in the study: 1224 (48.6%) in the pre‐P4L‐ED phase and 1295 (51.4%) in the post‐P4L‐ED phase. NP testing was performed in the ED on 684 patients (55.9%) during the pre‐P4L‐ED phase and on 1039 patients (80.3%) during the post‐P4L‐ED phase, indicating a significant absolute difference of 24.4% (95% CI: 20.8% to 27.9%, P < 0.001). The use of both NPs and echocardiography significantly increased from 37.7% in the pre‐P4L‐ED phase to 61.3% in the post‐P4L‐ED phase. There was an increased prescription of diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors during the post‐P4L‐ED phase. Conclusions: By increasing awareness and providing resources, the utilization of NPs increased in the ED, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and enhanced patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: International guidelines have recommended the use of echocardiography and natriuretic peptides (NP) testing in the diagnostic evaluation of heart failure (HF) for more than 10 years. However, real‐world utilization of these diagnostic tests in the US is not known. We sought to assess contemporary trends in echocardiography and NP testing for diagnosing HF in the US. Methods and results: The TriNetX data were queried for the total number of first HF diagnoses in adults aged >18 years in the US from 2016 to 2019 with exclusions applied. NP testing and echocardiography any time before through 1 year following the index diagnosis were assessed. Temporal trends significance was evaluated using Cochran–Armitage trend tests. A total of 124 126 patients were included. Mean age was 68 ± 13 years, 53% were male, and 71% were White. Overall, 61 023 (49%) incident diagnoses were made in the outpatient and 63 103 (51%) in the inpatient setting with a significantly increasing trend toward inpatient diagnoses (p < 0.001). Of all incident HF diagnoses, 70 612 (57%) underwent echocardiography, 67 991 (55%) underwent NP testing, and 31 206 (25%) did not undergo either diagnostic test. There were increasing trends in the proportion of patients diagnosed in the inpatient versus outpatient setting that underwent echocardiography, NP testing, and either diagnostic test (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: We found low rates of echocardiography and NP testing in those with HF, with more of such testing performed amongst inpatient diagnoses. We also found increasing rates of inpatient HF diagnoses, indicating lost opportunities for earlier treatment initiation and better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the role of natriuretic peptides, specifically B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), as biomarkers for heart failure (HF). BNP and NT-proBNP are produced by the heart and are used in clinical practice to diagnose and assess the risk of HF. The article explores the mechanisms of BNP and NT-proBNP production and elimination, as well as the factors that can affect their levels, such as age, sex, renal function, and body mass index (BMI). The authors present an analysis of the interaction between NT-proBNP, BMI, and HF hospitalizations in a large cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease. They found that higher BMI was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels and increased risk of HF hospitalization. The authors suggest that BMI should be taken into account when interpreting NT-proBNP levels, particularly in patients with lower elevations of NT-proBNP, and that these findings may have implications for the initiation of HF preventing therapies. Overall, this article provides valuable insights into the use of natriuretic peptides as biomarkers for HF and highlights the importance of considering BMI in their interpretation. [Extracted from the article]

Aim: N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations are lower in patients with obesity. The interaction between body mass index (BMI) and NT‐proBNP with respect to heart failure risk remains incompletely defined. Methods and results: Data were pooled across three randomized clinical trials enrolling predominantly patients who were overweight or obese with established cardiometabolic disease: SAVOR‐TIMI 53, DECLARE‐TIMI 58 and CAMELLIA‐TIMI 61. Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) was examined across strata of baseline BMI and NT‐proBNP. The effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo was assessed for a treatment interaction across BMI categories in patients with or without an elevated baseline NT‐proBNP (≥125 pg/ml). Among 24 455 patients, the median NT‐proBNP was 96 (interquartile range [IQR]: 43–225) pg/ml and the median BMI was 33 (IQR 29–37) kg/m2, with 68% of patients having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. There was a significant inverse association between NT‐proBNP and BMI which persisted after adjustment for all clinical variables (p < 0.001). Within any range of NT‐proBNP, those at higher BMI had higher risk of HHF at 2 years (comparing BMI <30 vs. ≥40 kg/m2 for NT‐proBNP ranges of <125, 125–<450 and ≥450 pg/ml: 0.0% vs. 0.6%, 1.3% vs. 4.0%, and 8.1% vs. 13.8%, respectively), which persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] 7.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.16–17.66, HRadj 3.22 [95% CI 2.13–4.86], and HRadj 1.87 [95% CI 1.35–2.60], respectively). In DECLARE‐TIMI 58, dapagliflozin versus placebo consistently reduced HHF across BMI categories in those with an elevated NT‐proBNP (p‐trend for HR across BMI = 0.60), with a pattern of greater absolute risk reduction (ARR) at higher BMI (ARR for BMI <30 to ≥40 kg/m2: 2.2% to 4.7%; p‐trend = 0.059). Conclusions: The risk of HHF varies across BMI categories for any given range of circulating NT‐proBNP. These findings showcase the importance of considering BMI when applying NT‐proBNP for heart failure risk stratification, particularly for patients with low‐level elevations in NT‐proBNP (125–<450 pg/ml) where there appears to be a clinically meaningful absolute and relative risk gradient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Extracellular matrix remodelling is one of the key pathways involved in heart failure (HF) progression. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) may have a role in attenuating myocardial fibrosis. The impact of SGLT2i on blood markers of collagen turnover in humans is not fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of empagliflozin on serum markers of collagen turnover in patients enrolled in the EMPEROR‐Preserved and EMPEROR‐Reduced trials. Methods and results: Overall, 1084 patients (545 in empagliflozin and 539 in placebo) were included in the analysis. Procollagen type I carboxy‐terminal propeptide (PICP), a fragment of N‐terminal type III collagen (PRO‐C3), procollagen type I amino‐terminal peptide (PINP), a fragment of C‐terminal type VIa3 collagen (PRO‐C6), a fragment of type I collagen (C1M), and a fragment of type III collagen (C3M) were measured in serum at baseline, 12 and 52 weeks. A mixed model repeated measurements model was used to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on the analysed biomarkers. Higher baseline PICP, PRO‐C6 and PINP levels were associated with older age, a more severe HF presentation, higher levels of natriuretic peptides and high‐sensitivity troponin T, and the presence of comorbid conditions such as chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation. Higher PICP levels were associated with the occurrence of the study primary endpoint (a composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death), and PRO‐C6 and PINP were associated with the occurrence of sustained worsening of kidney function. On the other hand, PRO‐C3, C1M, and C3M were not associated with worse HF severity or study outcomes. Compared to placebo, empagliflozin reduced PICP at week 12 by 5% and at week 52 by 8% (week 12: geometric mean ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–0.99, p = 0.012; week 52: geometric mean ratio = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97, p = 0.003). Additionally, empagliflozin reduced PRO‐C3 at week 52 by 7% (week 12: geometric mean ratio = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.02, p = 0.42; week 52: geometric mean ratio = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, p = 0.003), without impact on other collagen markers. Conclusion: Our observations are consistent with experimental observations that empagliflozin down‐regulates profibrotic signalling. The importance of such an effect for the clinical benefits of SGLT2i in HF remains to be elucidated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Emerging evidence suggests a beneficial effect of higher heart rates in some patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of higher backup pacing rates in HFpEF patients with preexisting pacemaker systems that limit pacemaker‐mediated dyssynchrony across left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: This is a post‐hoc analysis of the myPACE clinical trial that evaluated the effects of personalized accelerated pacing setting (myPACE) versus standard of care on changes in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), pacemaker‐detected activity levels, and atrial fibrillation (AF) burden in patients with HFpEF with preexisting pacemakers. Between‐treatment comparisons were performed using linear regression models adjusting for the baseline value of the exposure (ANCOVA design). This study included 93 patients with pre‐trial transthoracic echocardiograms available (usual care n = 49; myPACE n = 44). NT‐proBNP levels and MLHFQ scores improved in a higher magnitude in the myPACE group at lower indexed LV end‐diastolic volumes (iLVEDV) (NT‐proBNP–iLVEDV interaction p = 0.006; MLHFQ–iLVEDV interaction p = 0.068). In addition, personalized accelerated pacing led to improved changes in activity levels and NT‐proBNP, especially at higher LVEF (activity levels–LVEF interaction p = 0.009; NT‐proBNP–LVEF interaction p = 0.058). No evidence of heterogeneity was found across LV volumes or LVEF for pacemaker‐detected AF burden. Conclusions: In the post‐hoc analysis of the myPACE trial, we observed that the benefits of a personalized accelerated backup pacing on MLHFQ score, NT‐proBNP, and pacemaker‐detected activity levels appear to be more pronounced in patients with smaller iLVEDV and higher LVEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Co‐ordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Co‐ordinator) (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Jozef Bartunek (Belgium), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Sergio Buccheri (Sweden), Elisabetta Cerbai (Italy), Erwan Donal (France), Frank Edelmann (Germany), Gloria Färber (Germany), Bettina Heidecker (Germany), Borja Ibanez (Spain), Stefan James (Sweden), Lars Køber (Denmark), Konstantinos C. Koskinas (Switzerland), Josep Masip (Spain), John William McEvoy (Ireland), Robert Mentz (United States of America), Borislava Mihaylova (United Kingdom), Jacob Eifer Møller (Denmark), Wilfried Mullens (Belgium), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Jens Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Agnes A. Pasquet (Belgium), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Bianca Rocca (Italy), Xavier Rossello (Spain), Leyla Elif Sade (United States of America/Türkiye), Hannah Schaubroeck (Belgium), Elena Tessitore (Switzerland), Mariya Tokmakova (Bulgaria), Peter van der Meer (Netherlands), Isabelle C. Van Gelder (Netherlands), Mattias Van Heetvelde (Belgium), Christiaan Vrints (Belgium), Matthias Wilhelm (Switzerland), Adam Witkowski (Poland), and Katja Zeppenfeld (Netherlands) All experts involved in the development of this Focused Update have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and simultaneously published in a supplementary document to the Focused Update. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines See the European Heart Journal online for supplementary documents that include evidence tables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Guanylyl cyclase-A (GC-A), activated by endogenous atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), plays an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular and renal homeostasis and is an attractive drug target. Even though small molecule modulators allow oral administration and longer half-life, drug targeting of GC-A has so far been limited to peptides. Thus, in this study we aimed to develop small molecular activators of GC-A. Experimental Approach: Hits were identified through high-throughput screening and optimized by in silico design. Cyclic GMP was measured in QBIHEK293A cells expressing GC-A, GC-B or chimerae of the two receptors using AlphaScreen technology. Binding assays were performed in membrane preparations or whole cells using 125I-ANP. Vasorelaxation was measured in aortic rings isolated from Wistar rats. Key Results: We have identified small molecular allosteric enhancers of GC-A, which enhanced ANP or BNP effects in cellular systems and ANP-induced vasorelaxation in rat aortic rings. The mechanism of action appears novel and not mediated through previously described allosteric binding sites. In addition, the selectivity and activity depend on a single amino acid residue that differs between the two similar receptors GC-A and GC-B. Conclusion and Implications: We describe a novel allosteric binding site on GC-A, which can be targeted by small molecules to enhance ANP and BNP effects. These compounds will be valuable tools in further development and proof-of-concept of GC-A enhancement for the potential use in cardiovascular therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Intravenous (IV) iron increases haemoglobin/haematocrit and improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and iron deficiency. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) also increase haemoglobin/haematocrit and improve outcomes in heart failure by mechanisms linked to nutrient deprivation signalling and reduction of inflammation and oxidative stress. The effect of IV iron among patients using SGLT2i has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in haemoglobin, haematocrit, and iron biomarkers in HFrEF patients treated with IV iron with and without background SGLT2i treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in natriuretic peptides, kidney function and heart failure‐associated outcomes. Methods and results: Retrospective, single‐centre analysis of HFrEF patients with iron deficiency treated with IV iron using (n = 60) and not using (n = 60) SGLT2i, matched for age and sex. Mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 48% were men, with more than 65% of patients having chronic kidney disease and anaemia. After adjustment for all baseline differences, SGLT2i users experienced a greater increase in haemoglobin and haematocrit compared to SGLT2i non‐users: haemoglobin +0.57 g/dl (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04–1.10, p = 0.036) and haematocrit +1.64% (95% CI 0.18–3.11, p = 0.029). No significant differences were noted for iron biomarkers or any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Combined treatment with IV iron and background SGLT2i was associated with a greater increase in haemoglobin and haematocrit than IV iron without background SGLT2i. These results suggest that in HFrEF patients treated with IV iron, SGLT2i may increase the erythropoietic response. Further studies are needed to ascertain the potential benefit or harm of combining these two treatments in heart failure patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization worldwide. An early HF diagnosis is key to reducing hospitalizations. We used electronic health records (EHRs) to characterize HF pathways at the primary care physician (PCP) level prior to a first HF hospitalization (hHF). This study aimed to identify missed opportunities for HF diagnosis and management at the PCP level before a first hHF. Methods and results: This cohort study used EHRs of a large health care organization in Portugal. Patients with incident hHF between 2017 and 2020 were identified. Missed opportunities were defined by the absence of any of the following work‐up in the 6 months after signs or symptoms had been recorded: lab results and electrocardiogram, natriuretic peptides, echocardiogram, referral to HF specialist, or HF medication initiation. A total of 2436 patients with a first hHF were identified. The median (interquartile range) age at the time of hospitalization was 81 (14) years, and 1361 (56%) were women. Most patients were treated with cardiovascular drugs prior or at index event. A total of 720 (30%) patients had records of HF signs or symptoms, 94% (n = 674) within 6 months prior to hHF. Among patients with recorded HF signs or symptoms, 410 (57%) had clinical management considered adequate before signs and symptoms were recorded. Of the 310 remaining patients, 155 (50%) had a follow‐up that was considered inadequate. Conclusions: Relatively few patients with a first hHF had primary care records of signs or symptoms prior to admission. Of these, nearly half had inadequate management considering diagnosis and treatment. These data suggest the need to improve PCP HF awareness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) plays an important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure (HF). The plasma level of NT‐proBNP in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients was higher than of sinus rhythm patients. In HF, NT‐proBNP levels are affected by the concomitant presence of AF, making it difficult to distinguish between HF and AF in patients with elevated NT‐proBNP. Several other diseases, such as renal failure and pulmonary embolism, are known to further increase NT‐proBNP levels in patients with concomitant HF. Therefore, NT‐proBNP is a sensitive but non‐specific marker for the detection of HF. AF is very important in this regard because among patients with HF regardless of ejection fraction, symptoms such as shortness of breath and atrial enlargement develop and can mimic HF. In the present study, we investigated whether the prognostic value of natriuretic peptides in HF holds true for patients with concomitant AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the results of a randomized trial called the NICE study, which aimed to assess the role of measuring natriuretic peptides (NPs) in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The trial found that serial post-discharge measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) did not significantly reduce HF rehospitalizations at 6 months compared to usual care. However, there was a lower risk of all-cause death in the NT-proBNP group. The article highlights the limitations of the study and discusses the conflicting results of other trials on NP monitoring in HF. It suggests that NP measurements should be used as part of a comprehensive monitoring approach for HF treatment optimization. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: To assess the potential interaction between non‐cardiac comorbidities (NCCs) and the efficacy and safety of high‐intensity care (HIC) versus usual care (UC) in the STRONG‐HF trial, including stable patients with improved but still elevated natriuretic peptides. Methods and results: In the trial, eight NCCs were reported: anaemia, diabetes, renal dysfunction, severe liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, psychiatric/neurological disorders, and malignancies. Patients were classified by NCC number (0, 1, 2 and ≥3). The treatment effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint, 180‐day death or heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, was compared by NCC number and by each individual comorbidity. Among the 1078 patients, the prevalence of 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs was 24.3%, 39.8%, 24.5% and 11.4%, respectively. Achievement of full doses of HF therapies at 90 and 180 days in the HIC was similar irrespective of NCC number. In HIC, the primary endpoint occurred in 10.0%, 16.6%, 13.6% and 26.2%, in those with 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs, respectively, as compared to 19.1%, 25.4%, 23.3% and 26.2% in UC (interaction‐p = 0.80). The treatment benefit of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint did not differ significantly by each individual comorbidity. There was no significant treatment interaction by NCC number in quality‐of‐life improvement (p = 0.98) or the incidence of serious adverse events (p = 0.11). Conclusions: In the STRONG‐HF trial, NCCs neither limited the rapid up‐titration of HF therapies, nor attenuated the benefit of HIC on the primary endpoint. In the context of a clinical trial, the benefit–risk ratio favours the rapid up‐titration of HF therapies even in patients with multiple NCCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosing heart failure is often difficult due to the non‐specific nature of symptoms, which can be caused by a range of medical conditions. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) have been recognized as important biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure. This document from the Heart Failure Association examines the practical uses of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) in various clinical scenarios. The concentrations of NT‐proBNP vary according to the patient profile and the clinical scenario, therefore values should be interpreted with caution to ensure appropriate diagnosis. Validated cut‐points are provided to rule in or rule out acute heart failure in the emergency department and to diagnose de novo heart failure in the outpatient setting. We also coin the concept of 'heart stress' when NT‐proBNP levels are elevated in an asymptomatic patient with risk factors for heart failure (i.e. diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease), underlying the development of cardiac dysfunction and further increased risk. We propose a simple acronym for healthcare professionals and patients, FIND‐HF, which serves as a prompt to consider heart failure: Fatigue, Increased water accumulation, Natriuretic peptide testing, and Dyspnoea. Use of this acronym would enable the early diagnosis of heart failure. Overall, understanding and utilizing NT‐proBNP levels will lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of heart failure ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hyperemesis gravidarum occurs in up to 2 % of pregnancies. It is customary to regard the condition as purely an obstetric issue. However, there are reasonable grounds for reframing it as a neuropsychiatric state dependent upon genetic factors and involving peptides active within the central nervous system. Neurological abnormalities can also arise due to Wernicke's encephalopathy and the electrolyte abnormalities of refeeding syndrome. Aside from rehydration and antiemetic drugs, the condition can respond well to certain psychotropic medications and to psychological interventions, it may therefore be reasonable to regard hyperemesis of pregnancy as requiring both psychiatric and medical expertise for comprehensive management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Serial assessment of natriuretic peptides is widely utilized in heart failure clinics. Uncertainty exists regarding the value of multiple natriuretic peptide measurements and how they might be best interpreted. Methods and results: Six hundred thirty‐two patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) and complete biomarker data were enrolled to receive sacubitril/valsartan. Patients underwent periodic study visits during 1‐year follow‐ups. Echocardiographic data and cardiac biomarkers, including N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) were collected during study visits. Patients were categorized into three groups based on tertiles of baseline NT‐proBNP levels. The area under the curve (AUC) of NT‐proBNP measurements across study visits was calculated. Compared with patients with higher AUC (and thus higher concentrations over a longer period of time), those with lower AUC were younger, had a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft, atrial fibrillation, and higher body‐mass index. A significant interaction existed between baseline NT‐proBNP and subsequent AUC for predicting LVEF change across visits (P‐value < 0.001): among those with lower baseline NT‐proBNP, similar improvements in left ventricular (LV) volumes LV ejection fraction, and LV mass index were observed across subsequent AUC (P‐value > 0.1). However, among those with higher baseline NT‐proBNP, those with lower subsequent AUC had a greater improvement in cardiac remodelling indices (P‐value < 0.05). Conclusions: Serial NT‐proBNP monitoring (integrating the totality of measurements as an AUC) during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan informs unique information regarding the future changes in cardiac remodelling indices, especially among those with higher NT‐proBNP levels at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The prognostic value of 'high dose' loop diuretics in advanced heart failure outpatients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognosis associated with loop diuretic dose in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). Methods and results: All ambulatory patients (n = 700, median age 55 years and 70% men) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were divided into 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' loop diuretics corresponding to furosemide equivalent doses of ≤40, 40–250, and >250 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was a combined criterion of waitlist death and urgent HT. N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, creatinine levels, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary pressures gradually increased with higher diuretic dose. At 12 months, the risk of waitlist death/urgent HT was 7.4%, 19.2%, and 25.6% (P = 0.001) for 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' patients, respectively. When adjusting for confounders, including natriuretic peptides, hepatic, and renal function, the 'high dose' group was associated with increased waitlist mortality or urgent HT [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 1.33 to 3.73; P = 0.002] and a six‐fold higher risk of waitlist death (adjusted HR 6.18, 2.16 to 17.72; P < 0.001) when compared with the 'low dose' group. 'Intermediate doses' were not significantly associated with these two outcomes in adjusted models (P > 0.05). Conclusions: A 'high dose' of loop diuretics is strongly associated with residual congestion and is a predictor of outcome in patients awaiting HT despite adjustment for classical cardiorenal risk factors. This routine variable may be helpful for risk stratification of pre‐HT patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Patients with heart failure (HF) often suffer from a range of comorbidities, which may affect their health status. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different comorbidities on health status in patients with HF and reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results: Using individual patient data from HFrEF (ATMOSPHERE, PARADIGM‐HF, DAPA‐HF) and HFpEF (TOPCAT, PARAGON‐HF) trials, we examined the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) domain scores and overall summary score (KCCQ‐OSS) across a range of cardiorespiratory (angina, atrial fibrillation [AF], stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) and other comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease [CKD], anaemia). Of patients with HFrEF (n = 20 159), 36.2% had AF, 33.9% CKD, 33.9% diabetes, 31.4% obesity, 25.5% angina, 12.2% COPD, 8.4% stroke, and 4.4% anaemia; the corresponding proportions in HFpEF (n = 6563) were: 54.0% AF, 48.7% CKD, 43.4% diabetes, 53.3% obesity, 28.6% angina, 14.7% COPD, 10.2% stroke, and 6.5% anaemia. HFpEF patients had lower KCCQ domain scores and KCCQ‐OSS (67.8 vs. 71.3) than HFrEF patients. Physical limitations, social limitations and quality of life domains were reduced more than symptom frequency and symptom burden domains. In both HFrEF and HFpEF, COPD, angina, anaemia, and obesity were associated with the lowest scores. An increasing number of comorbidities was associated with decreasing scores (e.g. KCCQ‐OSS 0 vs. ≥4 comorbidities: HFrEF 76.8 vs. 66.4; HFpEF 73.7 vs. 65.2). Conclusions: Cardiac and non‐cardiac comorbidities are common in both HFrEF and HFpEF patients and most are associated with reductions in health status although the impact varied among comorbidities, by the number of comorbidities, and by HF phenotype. Treating/correcting comorbidity is a therapeutic approach that may improve the health status of patients with HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is currently considered the gold standard for diagnosing cardiac allograft rejection. However, significant limitations related to histological interpretation variability are well‐recognized. We sought to develop a methodology to evaluate EMB solely based on gene expression, without relying on histology interpretation. Methods: Sixty‐four EMBs were obtained from 47 post‐heart transplant recipients, who were evaluated for allograft rejection. EMBs were subjected to mRNA sequencing, in which an unsupervised classification algorithm was used to identify the molecular signatures that best classified the EMBs. Cytokine and natriuretic peptide peripheral blood profiling was also performed. Subsequently, we performed gene network analysis to identify the gene modules and gene ontology to understand their biological relevance. We correlated our findings with the unsupervised and histological classifications. Results: Our algorithm classifies EMBs into three categories based solely on clusters of gene expression: unsupervised classes 1, 2, and 3. Unsupervised and histological classifications were closely related, with stronger gene module‐phenotype correlations for the unsupervised classes. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed processes impacting on the regulation of cardiac and mitochondrial function, immune response, and tissue injury response. Significant levels of cytokines and natriuretic peptides were detected following the unsupervised classification. Conclusion: We have developed an unsupervised algorithm that classifies EMBs into three distinct categories, without relying on histology interpretation. These categories were highly correlated with mitochondrial, immune, and tissue injury response. Significant cytokine and natriuretic peptide levels were detected within the unsupervised classification. If further validated, the unsupervised classification could offer a more objective EMB evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A significant proportion of patients experience delays in the diagnosis of heart failure due to the non‐specific signs and symptoms of the syndrome. Diagnostic tools such as measurement of natriuretic peptide concentrations are fundamentally important when screening for heart failure, yet are frequently under‐utilized. This clinical consensus statement provides a diagnostic framework for general practitioners and non‐cardiology community‐based physicians to recognize, investigate and risk‐stratify patients presenting in the community with possible heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. There are three methods proposed as diagnostic tools. H2FPEF score was determined by six weighted clinical characteristics and echocardiographic variables. Heart Failure Association (HFA)‐PEFF algorithm consists of various functional and morphological variables as well as natriuretic peptides. SVI/S′ is a novel echocardiographic parameter calculated by stroke volume index and mitral annulus systolic peak velocity. This study aimed to compare the three approaches in patients with suspected HFpEF. Patients referred to right heart catheterization for suspected HFpEF were classified into low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐likelihood groups according to H2FPEF or HFA‐PEFF scores. A diagnosis of HFpEF was confirmed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≥15 mm Hg according to the guidelines. In result, a total of 128 patients were included. Of these, 71 patients with PCWP ≥15 mm Hg and 57 patients with PCWP <15 mm Hg. Moderate correlations were observed between H2FPEF score, HFA‐PEFF score, SVI/S′ and PCWP. The area under curve of SVI/S′ was 0.82 for diagnosis of HFpEF, compared with 0.67 for H2FPEF score and 0.75 for HFA‐PEFF score by receiver‐operating characteristics analysis. Combining SVI/S′ with diagnostic scores showed higher Youden index and accuracy than each score alone. Kaplan–Meier analysis reported that the high‐likelihood group showed poorer outcomes regardless the method used for diagnosis. Among the contemporary tools for identifying HFpEF in this study, the combination of SVI/S′ with risk scores showed best diagnostic ability. Each of the strategies can determine rehospitalisation because of heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Residual congestion at the time of hospital discharge is an important readmission risk factor, and its detection with physical examination and usual diagnostic techniques have strong limitations in overweight and obese patients. New tools like bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) could help to determine when euvolaemia is reached. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of BIA in management of heart failure (HF) in overweight and obese patients. Methods and results: Our study is a single‐centre, single‐blind, randomized controlled trial that included 48 overweight and obese patients admitted for acute HF. The study population was randomized into two arms: BIA‐guided group and standard care. Serum electrolytes, kidney function, and natriuretic peptides were followed up during their hospital stay and at 90 days after discharge. The primary endpoint was development of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) defined as an increase in serum creatinine by >0.5 mg/dL during hospitalization, and the main secondary endpoint was the reduction of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels during hospitalization and within 90 days after discharge. The BIA‐guided group showed a remarkable lower incidence of severe AKI, although no significant differences were found (41.4% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.057). The proportion of patients who achieved levels of NT‐proBNP < 1000 pg/mL at 90 days was significantly higher in the BIA‐guided group than in the standard group (58.8% vs. 25%; P = 0.049). No differences were observed in the incidence of adverse outcomes at 90 days. Conclusions: Among overweight and obese patients with HF, BIA reduces NT‐proBNP levels at 90 days compared with standard care. In addition, there is a trend towards lower incidence of AKI in the BIA‐guided group. Although more studies are required, BIA could be a useful tool in decompensated HF management in overweight and obese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Acute heart failure (AHF) has an impact on human health worldwide. Despite guidelines for treatment and management of AHF, mortality rates remain high. The main objective of this study was to compare standard in‐hospital treatment and management of AHF against current clinical guidelines and variations across regions. Methods: Between February 2018 and May 2021, investigators were approached to participate in the STRONG‐HF study. The lead investigator at 158 sites in 20 countries completed a site feasibility questionnaire. Sites were grouped by country into five different regions: Africa and the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Russia, South America, and Western Europe. Results: According to the questionnaires, there are large differences in how patients present due to AHF and where in the hospital they are treated. There were significant differences in reported percentage of AHF patients receiving angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors across the regions (P < 0.001), mostly due to prescription of more angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitors in South America and Western Europe. Reported beta‐blocker use was high across all of the regions. Device therapy and percutaneous interventions were more common in Europe. Sites reported a 5 to 8 day length of stay, while in Russia most have a 10 to 12 day length of stay. Regions reported that AHF patients follow up with a community cardiologist or general practitioner post‐discharge, although follow‐up was commonly more than 1 month post discharge, and not all sites had the capability to measure natriuretic peptides post discharge. Conclusions: In this analysis of feasibility questionnaires, most sites reported general adherence to ESC guidelines for treatment and management of AHF patients although percutaneous and device therapy was less common outside Europe and follow‐up after discharge took place late and was not as extensive as recommended. There were wide variations seen within and across regions in some areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Patients with heart failure experience a high burden of symptoms and physical limitations, and poor quality of life. Dapagliflozin reduces heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death in patients with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fractions. We examined the effects of dapagliflozin on health status, measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: Participant‐level data were pooled from the DAPA‐HF and DELIVER trials. Both trials were randomized, global, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials of patients with symptomatic heart failure and elevated natriuretic peptides. DAPA‐HF and DELIVER included patients with LVEF ≤40% and LVEF >40%, respectively. KCCQ was evaluated at randomization and at 4 and 8 months post‐randomization; the effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo on KCCQ total symptom score (TSS) was a pre‐specified secondary outcome in both trials. Interaction testing was performed to assess potential heterogeneity in the effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo on KCCQ‐TSS, clinical summary score (CSS), overall summary score (OSS), and physical limitation score (PLS), by continuous LVEF using restricted cubic splines. Responder analyses examining the proportion of patients with meaningful deterioration (≥5 point decline) and meaningful improvements (≥5 point increase) in KCCQ‐TSS was assessed across LVEF categories. Of 11 007 randomized participants, 10 238 (93%) had full data on KCCQ‐TSS at randomization. Benefits of dapagliflozin versus placebo on KCCQ‐TSS, ‐CSS, ‐OSS, ‐PLS, at 8 months were consistent across the full range of LVEF (pinteraction = 0.19, 0.10, 0.12, 0.10, respectively). In responder analyses, fewer dapagliflozin‐ versus placebo‐treated patients had clinically meaningful deteriorations in KCCQ‐TSS (overall: 21% vs. 23%; LVEF ≤40%: 21% vs. 29%; LVEF 41–60%: 21% vs. 26%; LVEF >60%: 22% vs. 27%). A greater proportion of patients randomized to dapagliflozin experienced at least small improvements in KCCQ‐TSS (overall: 50% vs. 45%; LVEF ≤40%: 48% vs. 41%; LVEF 41–60%: 51% vs. 49%; LVEF >60%: 53% vs. 45%). The effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo on clinically meaningful deteriorations and improvements in health status by KCCQ‐TSS were consistent across the full spectrum of LVEF assessed continuously (pinteraction = 0.20 and 0.64, respectively). Across the LVEF spectrum, the number needed to treat to affect ≥5 point improvement in health status assessed by KCCQ‐TSS was 20. Health status declines preceding a HF hospitalization by ∼10 points were observed in both trials, evident up to 3 months prior to hospitalization. Conclusions: In participant‐level pooled analyses of DAPA‐HF and DELIVER, dapagliflozin improved all key domains of health status across the full range of LVEF. Clinically meaningful improvements in health status were also observed consistently across LVEF, including in those with LVEF >60%. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03036124 and NCT03619213. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a very complex clinical syndrome that may lead to ischemic cerebral hypoxia condition. The aim of the present study is to analyze the effects of CHF on brain activity through electroencephalographic (EEG) complexity measures, like approximate entropy (ApEn). Methods: Twenty patients with CHF and 18 healthy elderly people were recruited. ApEn values were evaluated in the total spectrum (0.2–47 Hz) and main EEG frequency bands: delta (2–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha 1 (8–11 Hz), alpha 2 (11–13 Hz), beta 1 (13–20 Hz), beta 2 (20–30 Hz), and gamma (30–45 Hz) to identify differences between CHF group and control. Moreover, a correlation analysis was performed between ApEn parameters and clinical data (i.e., B‐type natriuretic peptides (BNP), New York Heart Association (NYHA), and systolic blood pressure (SBP)) within the CHF group. Results: Statistical topographic maps showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in the total spectrum and theta frequency band. Within the CHF group, significant negative correlations were found between total ApEn and BNP in O2 channel and between theta ApEn and NYHA scores in Fp1, Fp2, and Fz channels; instead, a significant positive correlation was found between theta ApEn and SBP in C3 channel and a nearly significant positive correlation was obtained between theta ApEn and SBP in F4 channel. Conclusion: EEG abnormalities in CHF are very similar to those observed in cognitive‐impaired patients, suggesting analogies between the effects of neurodegeneration and brain chronic hypovolaemia due to heart disorder and underlying high brain sensitivity to CHF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is a global health burden and new strategies to achieve timely diagnosis and early intervention are urgently needed. Natriuretic peptide (NP) testing can be used to screen for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), but evidence on test performance is mixed, and international HF guidelines differ in their recommendations. Our aim was to summarize the evidence on diagnostic accuracy of NP screening for LVSD in general and high‐risk community populations and estimate optimal screening thresholds. Methods: We searched relevant databases up to August 2020 for studies with a screened community population of over 100 adults reporting NP performance to diagnose LVSD. Study inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. Diagnostic test meta‐analysis used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves to obtain estimates of pooled accuracy to detect LVSD, with optimal thresholds obtained to maximize the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Results: Twenty‐four studies were identified, involving 26 565 participants: eight studies in high‐risk populations (at least one cardiovascular risk factor), 12 studies in general populations, and four in both high‐risk and general populations combined. For detecting LVSD in screened high‐risk populations with N‐terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.94] and specificity 0.84 (95% CI 0.55–0.96); for BNP, sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.83) and specificity 0.78 (95% CI 0.72–0.84). Heterogeneity between studies was high with variations in positivity threshold. Due to a paucity of high‐risk studies that assessed NP performance at multiple thresholds, it was not possible to calculate optimal thresholds for LVSD screening in high‐risk populations alone. To provide an indication of where the positivity threshold might lie, the pooled accuracy for LVSD screening in high‐risk and general community populations were combined and gave an optimal cut‐off of 311 pg/mL [sensitivity 0.74 (95% CI 0.53–0.88), specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.68–0.93)] for NT‐proBNP and 49 pg/mL [sensitivity 0.68 (95% CI 0.45–0.85), specificity 0.81 (0.67–0.90)] for BNP. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in high‐risk community populations NP screening may accurately detect LVSD, potentially providing an important opportunity for diagnosis and early intervention. Our study highlights an urgent need for further prospective studies, as well as an individual participant data meta‐analysis, to more precisely evaluate diagnostic accuracy and identify optimal screening thresholds in specifically defined community‐based populations to inform future guideline recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Natriuretic peptides, brain (B‐type) natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) are globally and most often used for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF). In addition, they can have an important complementary role in the risk stratification of its prognosis. Since the development of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), the use of natriuretic peptides as therapeutic agents has grown in importance. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project among the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus that aims to provide a comprehensive, up‐to‐date perspective on natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and management of HF, with a focus on the following main issues: (1) history and basic research: discovery, production and cardiovascular protection; (2) diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers: acute HF, chronic HF, inclusion/endpoint in clinical trials, and natriuretic peptide‐guided therapy; (3) therapeutic use: nesiritide (BNP), carperitide (ANP) and ARNIs; and (4) gaps in knowledge and future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: GLP-1 receptor agonists; lixisentatide; natriuretic peptides; randomized controlled trial EN GLP-1 receptor agonists lixisentatide natriuretic peptides randomized controlled trial 1125 1129 5 03/08/23 20230401 NES 230401 BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) lower glucose, weight and blood pressure, and reduce cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).[1], [2], [3] Although mechanisms for their effects remain unclear, small recent studies have reported that they may reduce natriuretic peptides.[4] B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its inactive precursor N-terminal-pro BNP (NT-proBNP) were measured at baseline and follow-up in the Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA) trial. GLP-1 receptor agonists, lixisentatide, natriuretic peptides, randomized controlled trial 2 Abbreviation: ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NT-proBNP, N terminal, pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is an important health problem for which multidisciplinary care is recommended, yet few studies involve primary care practitioners in the multidisciplinary management of HF. We set up a multifaceted prospective observational trial, OSCAR‐HF, piloting audit and feedback, natriuretic peptide testing at the point of care, and the assistance of a specialist HF nurse in primary care. The aim was to optimize HF care in general practice. Methods and results: This is an analysis at 6 month follow‐up of the study interventions of the OSCAR‐HF pilot study, a nonrandomized, noncontrolled prospective observational trial conducted in eight Belgian general practices [51 general practitioners (GPs)]. Patients who were assessed by their GP to have HF constituted the OSCAR‐HF study population. We used descriptive statistics and mixed‐effects modelling for the quantitative analysis and thematic analysis of the focus group interviews. There was a 10.2% increase in the registered HF population after 6 months of follow‐up (n = 593) compared with baseline (n = 538) and a 27% increase in objectified HF diagnoses (baseline n = 359 to 456 at T6 M). Natriuretic peptide testing (with or without referral) accounted for 54% (n = 60/111) of the newly registered HF diagnoses. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction who received their target dosage of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors or beta‐blockers at 6 months compared with baseline (P = 0.9). Patients who received an HF nurse intervention (n = 53) had significantly worse quality of life at baseline [difference in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score 9.2 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0, 14] and had a significantly greater improvement in quality‐of‐life scores at the 6 month follow‐up [change in MLHFQ score −9.8 points; 95% CI −15, −4.5] than patients without an HF nurse intervention. GPs found audit and feedback valuable but time intensive. Natriuretic peptides were useful, but the point‐of‐care test was impractical, and the assistance of an HF nurse was a useful addition to routine HF care. Conclusions: The use of audit and feedback combined with natriuretic peptide testing was a successful strategy to increase the number of registered and objectified HF diagnoses at 6 months. GPs and HF nurses selected patients with worse quality‐of‐life scores at baseline for the HF nurse intervention, which led to a significantly greater improvement in quality‐of‐life scores at the 6 month follow‐up compared with patients without an HF nurse intervention. The interventions were deemed feasible and useful by the participating GPs with some specific remarks that can be used for optimization. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905786), registered on 14 September 2016 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]