Search

Using a newly assembled data set on procedures filed in Mexican labor tribunals, we study the determinants of final awards to workers. On average, workers recover less than 30 percent of their claim. Our strongest result is that workers receive higher percentages of their claims in settlements than in trial judgments. We also find that cases with multiple claimants against a single firm are less likely to be settled, which partially explains why workers involved in these procedures receive lower percentages of their claims. Finally, we find evidence that a worker who exaggerates his or her claim is less likely to settle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the subtypes of serotonin 5-HT1 receptors have distinct structure and pharmacology, it has not been clear if they also exhibit differences in coupling to cellular signals. We have sought to compare directly the coupling of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors to adenylyl cyclase and to the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2). We found that 5-HT1B receptors couple better to activation of ERK2 and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase than do 5-HT1A receptors. 5-HT stimulated a maximal fourfold increase in ERK2 activity in nontransfected cells that express endogenous 5-HT1B receptors at a very low density and a maximal 13-fold increase in transfected cells expressing 230 fmol of 5-HT1B receptor/mg of membrane protein. In contrast, activation of 5-HT1A receptors stimulated only a 2.8-fold maximal activation of ERK2 in transfected cells expressing receptors at 300 fmol/mg of membrane protein but did stimulate a 12-fold increase in activity in cells expressing receptors at 3,000 fmol/mg of membrane protein. Similarly, 5-HT1A, but not 5-HT1B, receptors were found to cause significant inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation only when expressed at high densities. These findings demonstrate that although both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors have been shown to couple to G proteins of the Gi class, they exhibit differences in coupling to ERK2 and adenylyl cyclase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background COVID-19 is an infectious illness, featured by an increased risk of thromboembolism. However, no standard antithrombotic therapy is currently recommended for patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of additional therapy with aspirin over prophylactic anticoagulation (PAC) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and its impact on survival. Methods and Results A total of 8168 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were enrolled in a multicenter-international prospective registry (HOPE COVID-19). Clinical data and in-hospital complications, including mortality, were recorded. Study population included patients treated with PAC or with PAC and aspirin. A comparison of clinical outcomes between patients treated with PAC versus PAC and aspirin was performed using an adjusted analysis with propensity score matching. Of 7824 patients with complete data, 360 (4.6%) received PAC and aspirin and 2949 (37.6%) PAC. Propensity-score matching yielded 298 patients from each group. In the propensity score-matched population, cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality was lower in patients treated with PAC and aspirin versus PAC (15% versus 21%, Log Rank P =0.01). At multivariable analysis in propensity matched population of patients with COVID-19, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, kidney failure, and invasive ventilation, aspirin treatment was associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; [95% CI 0.42-0.92], P =0.018). Conclusions Combination PAC and aspirin was associated with lower mortality risk among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a propensity score matched population compared to PAC alone.