Search

Micafungin is an antifungal agent metabolized by arylsulfatase with secondary metabolism by catechol-O-methyltransferase. The objectives of this study were to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters and plasma protein binding of micafungin in volunteers with moderate hepatic dysfunction (n = 8), volunteers with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min (n = 9), and matched controls (n = 8 and n = 9, respectively). Single-dose micafungin pharmacokinetics were estimated using noncompartmental techniques. There was a statistically lower area under the observed micafungin concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity for subjects with moderate hepatic dysfunction as compared to control subjects (97.5 +/- 19 microg x h/mL vs 125.9 +/- 26.4 microg x h/mL, P = .03), although there was no difference in micafungin weight-adjusted clearance (10.9 +/- 1.7 mL/h/kg vs 9.8 +/- 1.8 mL/h/kg, P = .2). The difference in area under the concentration-time curve may be explained by the differences in body weight between subjects and controls. Renal dysfunction did not alter micafungin pharmacokinetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, was examined in 23 patients with varying degrees of renal impairment (12 moderate [creatinine clearance between 30 and 50 mL/min/1.73 m2], 5 severe [creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2], and 6 with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis) following administration of single 120-mg oral doses of etoricoxib. Even the most severe renal impairment was found to have little effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics. The low recovery of etoricoxib in dialysate (less than 6% of the dose) supports that hemodialysis also has little effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics, and binding of etoricoxib to plasma proteins was generally unaffected by renal disease. Single doses of etoricoxib were generally well tolerated by patients with renal impairment. Based on pharmacokinetic considerations, dosing adjustments are not necessary for patients with any degree of renal impairment. However, because patients with advanced renal disease (creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) are likely to be very sensitive to any further compromise of renal function, and there is no long-term clinical experience in these patients, the use of etoricoxib is not recommended in patients with advanced renal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of renal impairment on the safety and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily formulation of alfuzosin, 10 mg, was evaluated. In an open, single-dose study, 26 volunteers, ages 18 to 65 years, were classified as having normal renal function (n = 8) or mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), or severe (n = 6) renal impairment. Mean Cmax values increased by a factor of 1.20, 1.52, and 1.20 in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively, compared with controls. Values for AUC(0-infinity) were 1.46, 1.47, and 1.44, respectively. The t(1/2z) was increased only in the group with severe renal impairment. Emergent vasodilatory adverse events were reported by 4 of 26 subjects. No discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. Laboratory parameters were satisfactory in all groups. In conclusion, once-daily alfuzosin, 10 mg, could be safely administered to patients with impaired renal function, and dosage adjustment does not seem necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha2b (PEG-Intron) following a single-dose subcutaneous injection into subjects with normal renal function, subjects with chronic renal impairment, and patients on hemodialysis. In this open-label, single-dose, parallel group study, subjects were divided into five groups according to their degree of renal function: four groups as defined by measured creatinine clearance and a fifth hemodialysis dependent group. They received 1 microg/kg PEG-Intron subcutaneously after a 10-hour fast. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed up to 168 hours postdose. Hemodialysis patients had a second PEG-Intron dose 12 hours prior to a hemodialysis session. PEG-Intron pharmacokinetic parameters (AUCtf, Cmax, and t1/2) increased progressively as CL(CR) declined. All subjects reported at least one adverse event, which were typical of those reported after alpha-interferon administration (e.g., flu-like symptoms, headache). Single-dose PEG-Intron administration to volunteers with normal renal function and chronic renal impairment was safe and well tolerated. In patients with CL(CR) < 30 ml/min, AUCand Cmax values were increased 90% compared with controls, while half-life was increased by up to 40% over controls. Based on the relationship between PEG-Intron apparent clearance and CL(CR), renal clearance accountsfor less than half of its total clearance. Hemodialysis did not affect PEG-Intron apparent clearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This phase I, multicentre, open-label, nonrandomised, parallel-group, two-part study aimed to evaluate the effect of mild to moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of risdiplam., Methods: Adult subjects (aged 18-70 years) with mild (Child-Pugh Class A; Part 1) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B; Part 2) hepatic impairment were matched with subjects with normal hepatic function on sex, age, body mass index and smoking status. Each subject received a single oral dose of 5 mg of risdiplam. Plasma concentrations of risdiplam and its metabolite M1 were measured and PK parameters were compared. Adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, vital signs and electrocardiogram measurements were assessed., Results: After a single dose (5 mg) of risdiplam, the risdiplam PK parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum observed plasma concentration were approximately 20% and 5% lower, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and approximately 8% and 20% higher, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. These differences were not statistically significant; all 90% confidence intervals for geometric least squares-means ratios spanned unity. No new risdiplam-related safety findings were observed in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment., Conclusion: Mild or moderate hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on the PK of risdiplam. Therefore, no dose adjustment is required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment when receiving risdiplam., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Aims: Capmatinib, a mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and aldehyde oxidase. In individuals with hepatic impairment, alterations in hepatobiliary excretion and metabolism could lead to higher capmatinib exposure. We compared the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of capmatinib 200 mg administered to participants with varying degrees of hepatic impairment vs. matched controls with normal hepatic function., Methods: This phase 1, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study enrolled adult participants with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairments. Eligible participants received a single oral dose of 200 mg capmatinib. The pharmacokinetic parameters of capmatinib were analysed and compared across participants with impaired and normal hepatic function., Results: Of 31 enrolled participants, 29 had an evaluable pharmacokinetic profile: normal (n = 9); mild (n = 6); moderate (n = 8); severe (n = 6). Compared with the normal group, geometric mean (GM) maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after single-dose administration decreased by 27.6% in the mild group (GM ratio [GMR] = 0.724; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.476-1.10), by 17.2% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.828; 90% CI: 0.563-1.22) and remained unchanged in the severe group (GMR = 1.02; 90% CI: 0.669-1.55). Compared with the normal group, GM area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity decreased by 23.3% in the mild group (GMR = 0.767; 90% CI: 0.532-1.11), by 8.6% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.914; 90% CI: 0.652-1.28) and increased by 24% in the severe group (GMR = 1.24; 90% CI: 0.858-1.78)., Conclusion: Mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on capmatinib pharmacokinetics. No new safety findings are reported in this study., (© 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Study Objective: Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Given that, lefamulin is primarily metabolized by CYP450 Phase-1 reactions, this study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of IV lefamulin in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment as compared with matched healthy subjects., Design: Open-label, Phase-1 clinical pharmacokinetic study., Setting: Research Study Center., Patients: Twenty-seven subjects; comprised of 11 individuals with normal hepatic function and eight each with moderate or severe hepatic impairment were included, as classified by Child-Pugh scores., Measurements and Main Results: Subjects were administered a single dose of IV lefamulin 150 mg over 1 h. Plasma was collected for 48 h and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041, concentrations in addition to assessing lefamulin plasma protein binding. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using least square geometric mean ratios. Lefamulin was well tolerated in all hepatic function groups. Statistical analyses revealed reductions in C max and increases in renal clearance for Moderate and Severe groups, as well as, the increased volume of distribution for the Severe group. Lefamulin plasma AUC mean (SD) was similar across groups at 7615 (1554), 8233 (2286), and 8938 (1640) h.ng/mL for Normal, Moderate, and Severe groups, respectively, despite decreased clearance observed primarily during terminal elimination phases. Decreased plasma-protein binding was seen in hepatically-impaired versus normal subjects., Conclusion: Lefamulin was generally well tolerated. Differences in lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were small, relative to the overall variability, and any changes appear to be compensated by increases in renal clearance and decreased protein binding., (© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Study Objective: Lefamulin is a novel IV and oral pleuromutilin recently approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Given that renal comorbidities are common in patients admitted for CABP, understanding the pharmacokinetics of lefamulin in the face of severe renal impairment, including those requiring hemodialysis, is needed., Design: Open-label, Phase-1 pharmacokinetic study., Setting: Research Study Center., Patients: Twenty-three matched subjects were included, seven with "Normal" renal function (creatinine clearance >90 ml/min), eight with "Severe" renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ), and eight subjects requiring hemodialysis., Measurements and Main Results: Subjects were administered a single dose of lefamulin IV 150 mg as a 1-h infusion. Subjects in the hemodialysis group started hemodialysis within 1 h after lefamulin infusion (On dialysis), as well as, on a non-dialysis day (Off dialysis). Plasma, urine, and dialysate fluid were collected for 36 h and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041. Lefamulin was primarily excreted non-renally across groups. Statistical analyses revealed lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were similar between Normal and Severe groups, except for renal clearance, which decreased in Severe subjects (mean 1.3 L/h Normal vs. 0.4 L/h Severe). Likewise, lefamulin pharmacokinetics during on and off dialysis were unchanged, with lefamulin not measurably filtered in dialysate fluid. Two, three, and three subjects reported drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in Normal, Severe, and Hemodialysis groups, respectively. All TEAEs were mild, except one (infusion-site reaction) that was classified as moderate., Conclusion: No dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal impairment, and lefamulin can be administered without regard to hemodialysis timing., (© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Aim: To investigate the glucosuric, renal and haemodynamic effects of licogliflozin, a dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: This multiple-dose, parallel-group, phase II mechanistic study randomized 53 participants (aged 18-78 years, body mass index ≤ 50 kg/m 2 ) with varying degrees of CKD or normal renal function to treatment with licogliflozin (50 mg once daily) or placebo for 7 days. The effects of licogliflozin on 24-h urinary glucose excretion (UGE 24 ), renal function, haemodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed., Results: Licogliflozin treatment for 7 days significantly (p < .01) increased UGE 24 from baseline in participants with normal renal function (adjusted mean change: 41.8 [33.6, 49.9] g) or with mild (32.6 [24.1, 41.0] g), moderate A (35.7 [28.6, 42.9] g) or moderate B (20.3 [13.1, 27.5] g) CKD, but not in severe (6.2 [-0.71, 13.18] g) CKD. Licogliflozin reduced urinary electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride), blood pressure and urinary volume to varying extents among different groups. Significant increases in renin (p < .05), angiotensin II (p < .05) and aldosterone (p < .01) levels were observed. Adverse events were generally mild, and most commonly included diarrhoea (94%), flatulence (68%) and abdominal pain (21%)., Conclusion: Licogliflozin treatment results in significantly increased UGE and favourable changes in urinary electrolytes and haemodynamics in patients with varying degrees of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 )., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Amongst Caucasian, Hispanic and African Americans with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV), there is a wide variation in response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN alfa-2a) and ribavirin., Aim: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of PEG-IFN alfa-2a and ribavirin among these three groups., Methods: Forty-seven patients with genotype 1 CHC (17 African Americans, 14 Hispanics and 16 Caucasians) received 8 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg/week) and ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day). PEG-IFN alfa-2a serum concentrations and ribavirin plasma concentrations were measured following the first dose and at week 8. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), T(max), AUC, CL/F) were estimated using noncompartmental methods., Results: There was no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters for PEG-IFN alfa-2a following single-dose or steady-state administration between African American or Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients. Ribavirin pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between Hispanic and Caucasian patients for single-dose and steady-state administration. The single-dose C(max) was 33% lower (P < 0.05) in African American compared with Caucasian patients. Other ribavirin single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters were slightly decreased (approximately 20% lower) in African American patients, but were not considered clinically meaningful., Conclusions: No differences were observed in PEG-IFN alfa-2a pharmacokinetic parameters between African American or Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients. For ribavirin, no differences were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters between Hispanic and Caucasian patients. While a trend towards increased ribavirin clearance and decreased exposure was observed in African American patients vs. Caucasian patients, the differences were small and not considered clinically meaningful (Clinical Trial Number: NP17354)., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Aims: PF-734200 is a potent, selective inhibitor of DPP-IV. This two-part study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral 20mg PF-734200 in subjects with varying degrees of renal insufficiency or with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring chronic haemodialysis (HD). The study also assessed the HD clearance of PF-734200 in ESRD., Methods: Part 1 included subjects with normal renal function or renal insufficiency but not on HD. Subjects received a single dose of 20mg PF-734200 while fasting and serum and urine samples were collected. In part 2, period 1, 1h after HD, a single 20-mg dose was given to subjects with ESRD and serum samples were collected. After a 7-day washout, subjects received another dose followed by collection of serum samples (period 2), during which HD was initiated 4h after dosing. Dialysate samples were collected to quantify amount of drug removed, from which HD clearance was calculated. The fraction of drug dialysed was calculated using an AUC-based method., Results: Systemic exposures of PF-734200 increased approximately 1.5-, 2.2-, 2.1- and 2.8-fold in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency or ESRD, respectively, compared with subjects with normal renal function. The terminal half-life increased from 16.2h in subjects with normal renal function to 36.6h in subjects with ESRD. Approximately, 29% of PF-734200 in the body after a single-dose administration was dialysed by 4h HD., Conclusions: Systemic exposure of PF-734200 increases with decreasing renal function. The effect of HD on drug removal is modest., (© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Aims: To characterize the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of donepezil in subjects with moderate renal impairment and matched healthy controls during single-dose and multiple-dose phases., Methods: This open-label study enrolled subjects with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CL(Cr)] 17-33 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) body surface area) and age, weight and sex-matched healthy controls. A single-dose (5 mg donepezil) phase was followed by a 23-day multiple dose (5 mg day(-1) donepezil) steady-state phase. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of donepezil were determined for up to 144 h after the first dose and 168 h after the last dose., Results: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled, 19 renally impaired and 17 healthy controls. All pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were similar between groups after a single dose of donepezil (C(max) 5.17 +/- 0.36 and 6.07 +/- 0.49 ng ml(-1); AUC(0-24) 76.05 +/- 5.54 and 77.45 +/- 4.49 ng.h ml(-1); mean maximum percentage inhibition [I(max)] red blood cell (RBC) AChE activity 32.07 +/- 2.00 and 31.69 +/- 2.45%; for subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects, respectively). Pharmacokinetic parameters under steady-state conditions did not differ between renally impaired and healthy subjects (C(SS) 20.83 +/- 1.78 and 18.38 +/- 1.52 ng ml(-1); AUC(0-24) 500.0 +/- 42.8 and 441.1 +/- 36.4 ng.h ml(-1); degree of accumulation [R(A)] 6.98 +/- 0.59 and 5.94 +/- 0.53; for subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects, respectively). Main pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar in renally impaired and healthy subjects at steady state (average percentage inhibition [I(SS)] RBC AChE activity 65.11 +/- 2.52 and 60.62 +/- 2.95, respectively). Protein binding was also similar between groups (% free donepezil 23.54 +/- 1.96 and 20.23 +/- 0.64, respectively). Donepezil was well tolerated by both groups., Conclusions: These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of donepezil are not altered after dosing to steady state, and that donepezil can be administered safely to subjects with moderate renal impairment.