Search

Background Recently, there has been a shift from using lecture-based teaching methods in undergraduate engineering courses to using more learner-centered teaching approaches, such as problem-based learning. However, research on the impact of these approaches has mainly involved student perceptions of the teaching method and anecdotal and opinion pieces by faculty on their use of the teaching method, rather than empirically collected data on students' learning outcomes. Purpose (Hypothesis) This paper describes an investigation of the impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on undergraduate electrical engineering students' conceptual understanding and their perceptions of learning using PBL as compared to lecture. Design/Method Fifty-five students enrolled in an electrical engineering course at a Midwestern university participated in this research. The study utilized a within-subjects A-B-A-B research design with traditional lecture as the baseline phase and problem-based learning as the experimental phase of the study. Participants completed pre- and post-tests surrounding the four topics covered in the study and also completed a Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) survey. Results Results suggested participants' learning gains from PBL were twice their gains from traditional lecture. Even though students learned more from PBL, students thought they learned more from traditional lecture. We discuss these findings and offer implications for faculty interested in implementing PBL. Conclusions Given the limited research on the beneficial effects of PBL on student learning, this study provides empirical support for PBL. We discuss findings from this study and provide specific implications for faculty and researchers interested in problem-based learning in engineering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article looks at the participation of two female students in science practices in a multimedia case-based environment. The participants interpreted simulated results, read and wrote multiple texts, role-played, and attended Internet conferencing. Helping the development of their identities in practice are multimedia cases shaping emotional involvement, creating web posters, and role-playing situated in cross-cultural social networks, and altruism associated with relevant global topics.

The article discusses the effects of supplemental instruction (SI) in chemistry. Problems arising in the student learning of science include the teaching of problem-solving strategies, the misconceptions by students on scientific events and the provision of a study environment conductive to critical thinking. SI is a cooperative learning program encouraging students to develop conceptual understanding by articulating both understandings and misconceptions. A study on 108 students, who were subjected to a two-year chemistry course, proved that supplemental instruction is effective in increasing students' achievement in chemistry as attested by their final grades in chemistry and their questionnaire responses.

Copyright of Reading Research Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)