7 results on '"Karsten, T M"'
Search Results
2. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection
- Author
-
MS CGO, Cancer, MS Gynaecologische Oncologie, Sparreboom, C L, Komen, N, Rizopoulos, D, Verhaar, A P, Dik, W A, Wu, Z, van Westreenen, H L, Doornebosch, P G, Dekker, J W T, Menon, A G, Daams, F, Lips, D, van Grevenstein, W M U, Karsten, T M, Bayon, Y, Peppelenbosch, M P, Wolthuis, A M, D'Hoore, A, Lange, J F, MS CGO, Cancer, MS Gynaecologische Oncologie, Sparreboom, C L, Komen, N, Rizopoulos, D, Verhaar, A P, Dik, W A, Wu, Z, van Westreenen, H L, Doornebosch, P G, Dekker, J W T, Menon, A G, Daams, F, Lips, D, van Grevenstein, W M U, Karsten, T M, Bayon, Y, Peppelenbosch, M P, Wolthuis, A M, D'Hoore, A, and Lange, J F
- Published
- 2020
3. Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far?
- Author
-
Verpleegafd Vaatchirurgie D4 Oost, MS CGO, Cancer, Sparreboom, C L, Komen, N, Rizopoulos, D, van Westreenen, H L, Doornebosch, P G, Dekker, J W T, Menon, A G, Tuynman, J B, Daams, F, Lips, D, van Grevenstein, W M U, Karsten, T M, Lange, J F, D'Hoore, A, Wolthuis, A M, Verpleegafd Vaatchirurgie D4 Oost, MS CGO, Cancer, Sparreboom, C L, Komen, N, Rizopoulos, D, van Westreenen, H L, Doornebosch, P G, Dekker, J W T, Menon, A G, Tuynman, J B, Daams, F, Lips, D, van Grevenstein, W M U, Karsten, T M, Lange, J F, D'Hoore, A, and Wolthuis, A M
- Published
- 2019
4. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection.
- Author
-
Sparreboom, C. L., Komen, N., Rizopoulos, D., Verhaar, A. P., Dik, W. A., Wu, Z., van Westreenen, H. L., Doornebosch, P. G., Dekker, J. W. T., Menon, A. G., Daams, F., Lips, D., van Grevenstein, W. M. U., Karsten, T. M., Bayon, Y., Peppelenbosch, M. P., Wolthuis, A. M., D'Hoore, A., and Lange, J. F.
- Subjects
ONCOLOGIC surgery ,RECTAL surgery ,RECTAL cancer ,ILEOSTOMY ,LEAKAGE ,COHORT analysis ,ENTEROCOCCUS faecalis - Abstract
Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications after rectal resection. This study aimed to assess a combination of biomarkers for early detection of AL after rectal cancer resection. Method: This study was an international multicentre prospective cohort study. All patients received a pelvic drain after rectal cancer resection. On the first three postoperative days drain fluid was collected daily and C‐reactive protein (CRP) was measured. Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP2), MMP9, glucose, lactate, interleukin 1‐beta (IL1β), IL6, IL10, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, lipopolysaccharide‐binding protein and amylase were measured in the drain fluid. Prediction models for AL were built for each postoperative day using multivariate penalized logistic regression. Model performance was estimated by the c‐index for discrimination. The model with the best performance was visualized with a nomogram and calibration was plotted. Results: A total of 292 patients were analysed; 38 (13.0%) patients suffered from AL, with a median interval to diagnosis of 6.0 (interquartile ratio 4.0–14.8) days. AL occurred less often after partial than after total mesorectal excision (4.9% vs 15.2%, P = 0.035). Of all patients with AL, 26 (68.4%) required reoperation. AL was more often treated by reoperation in patients without a diverting ileostomy (18/20 vs 8/18, P = 0.03). The prediction model for postoperative day 1 included MMP9, TNFα, diverting ileostomy and surgical technique (c‐index = 0.71). The prediction model for postoperative day 2 only included CRP (c‐index = 0.69). The prediction model for postoperative day 3 included CRP and MMP9 and obtained the best model performance (c‐index = 0.78). Conclusion: The combination of serum CRP and peritoneal MMP9 may be useful for earlier prediction of AL after rectal cancer resection. In clinical practice, this combination of biomarkers should be interpreted in the clinical context as with any other diagnostic tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far?
- Author
-
Sparreboom, C. L., Komen, N., Rizopoulos, D., van Westreenen, H. L., Doornebosch, P. G., Dekker, J. W. T., Menon, A. G., Tuynman, J. B., Daams, F., Lips, D., van Grevenstein, W. M. U., Karsten, T. M., Lange, J. F., D'Hoore, A., and Wolthuis, A. M.
- Subjects
PROPENSITY score matching ,SURGICAL excision ,RECTAL cancer ,SURGICAL complications ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge - Abstract
Aim: This subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study aims to compare postoperative morbidity between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). Method: The study was designed as a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study. Patients undergoing TaTME or LaTME for rectal cancer were selected. All patients were followed up until the first visit to the outpatient clinic after hospital discharge. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Propensity score matching was performed. Results: In total, 220 patients were selected from the overall prospective multicentre cohort study. After propensity score matching, 48 patients from each group were compared. The median tumour height for TaTME was 10.0 cm (6.0–10.8) and for LaTME was 9.5 cm (7.0–12.0) (P = 0.459). The duration of surgery and anaesthesia were both significantly longer for TaTME (221 vs 180 min, P < 0.001, and 264 vs 217 min, P < 0.001). TaTME was not converted to laparotomy whilst surgery in five patients undergoing LaTME was converted to laparotomy (0.0% vs 10.4%, P = 0.056). No statistically significant differences were observed for Clavien–Dindo classification, CCI, readmissions, reoperations and mortality. Conclusion: The study showed that TaTME is a safe and feasible approach for rectal cancer resection. This new technique obtained similar postoperative morbidity to LaTME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Comparison of a low Hartmann's procedure with low colorectal anastomosis with and without defunctioning ileostomy after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: results from a national registry.
- Author
-
Jonker, F. H. W., Tanis, P. J., Coene, P. P. L. O., Gietelink, L., Harst, E., Aalbers, A. G, Bemelman, W. A., Boerma, D., Dam, R. M., Dekker, J. W., Eddes, E. H., Elferink, M. A, Graaf, E. J. R., Karsten, T. M., Krieken, H., Lemmens, V. E. P. P., Manusama, E. R., Meijerink, W. J. H. J., Noo, M. E., and Rutten, H. J. T.
- Subjects
OPERATIVE surgery ,SURGICAL anastomosis ,RECTAL cancer treatment ,CANCER radiotherapy complications ,ILEOSTOMY ,SURGICAL excision ,SURGICAL complications - Abstract
Aim This study used a national registry to compare the outcome after a low Hartmann's procedure ( LHP), defined as removal of most of the rectum to leave a short anorectal stump and an end colostomy, and low anterior resection (LA) with or without a diverting ileostomy ( DI) in rectal cancer patients all of whom had received preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy ( RT). Method Patients who underwent LHP or LA with or without DI for rectal cancer after RT between 2009 and 2013 were identified from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. The postoperative outcome was compared between the three groups and risk of complications, reoperation and mortality were analysed in a multivariable model. Results The study included 4288 patients were included, of whom 27.8% underwent LHP, 20.2% LA and 52.0% LA with DI. Thirty-day mortality was higher after LHP (3.2% vs 1.3% and 1.3% for LA with or without DI, P < 0.001), but LHP was not an independent predictor of mortality in multivariable analysis. LHP and LA with DI were associated with a lower rate of abdominal infective complications (6.5% and 10.1% vs 16.2%, P < 0.001) and reoperation (7.3% and 8.1% vs 16.5%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LHP ( OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26-0.47) and LA with DI ( OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.54) were associated with a lower risk of reoperation than LA alone. LHP was associated with a lower risk of any postoperative complication than LA with or without DI ( OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98). Conclusion LHP and LA with DI were associated with fewer infective complications and reoperations than LA alone. The rate of any complication was less after LHR than LA with or without DI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. High mortality rates after nonelective colon cancer resection: results of a national audit.
- Author
-
Bakker, I. S., Snijders, H. S., Grossmann, I., Karsten, T. M., Havenga, K., and Wiggers, T.
- Subjects
COLON cancer diagnosis ,COLON cancer patients ,COLON cancer treatment ,SURGICAL complications ,POSTOPERATIVE care - Abstract
Aim Colon cancer resection in a nonelective setting is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify risk factors for overall mortality after colon cancer resection with a special focus on nonelective resection. Method Data were obtained from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Patients undergoing colon cancer resection in the Netherlands between January 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient, treatment and tumour factors were analysed in relation to the urgency of surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. Results The study included 30 907 patients. A nonelective colon cancer resection was performed in 5934 (19.2%) patients. There was a 4.4% overall mortality rate, with significantly more deaths after nonelective surgery (8.5% vs 3.4%, P < 0.001). Older patients, male patients and patients with high comorbidity, advanced tumours, perforated tumours, a tumour in the right or transverse colon and postoperative anastomotic leakage were at risk of postoperative death. In nonelective resections, a right-sided tumour and postoperative anastomotic leakage were associated with high mortality. Conclusion Nonelective colon cancer resection is associated with high mortality. In particular, right-sided resections and patients with tumour perforation are at particularly high risk. The optimization of patients prior to surgery and expeditious operation after diagnosis might prevent the need for a nonelective resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.