1. Ongoing Exercise Intolerance Following COVID-19: A Magnetic Resonance-Augmented Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Study.
- Author
-
Brown JT, Saigal A, Karia N, Patel RK, Razvi Y, Constantinou N, Steeden JA, Mandal S, Kotecha T, Fontana M, Goldring J, Muthurangu V, and Knight DS
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Exercise Test methods, Exercise Tolerance, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Stroke Volume, COVID-19, Heart Failure
- Abstract
Background Ongoing exercise intolerance of unclear cause following COVID-19 infection is well recognized but poorly understood. We investigated exercise capacity in patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 with and without self-reported exercise intolerance using magnetic resonance-augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Methods and Results Sixty subjects were enrolled in this single-center prospective observational case-control study, split into 3 equally sized groups: 2 groups of age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched previously hospitalized patients following COVID-19 without clearly identifiable postviral complications and with either self-reported reduced (COVID
reduced ) or fully recovered (COVIDnormal ) exercise capacity; a group of age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The COVIDreduced group had the lowest peak workload (79W [Interquartile range (IQR), 65-100] versus controls 104W [IQR, 86-148]; P =0.01) and shortest exercise duration (13.3±2.8 minutes versus controls 16.6±3.5 minutes; P =0.008), with no differences in these parameters between COVIDnormal patients and controls. The COVIDreduced group had: (1) the lowest peak indexed oxygen uptake (14.9 mL/minper kg [IQR, 13.1-16.2]) versus controls (22.3 mL/min per kg [IQR, 16.9-27.6]; P =0.003) and COVIDnormal patients (19.1 mL/min per kg [IQR, 15.4-23.7]; P =0.04); (2) the lowest peak indexed cardiac output (4.7±1.2 L/min per m2 ) versus controls (6.0±1.2 L/min per m2 ; P =0.004) and COVIDnormal patients (5.7±1.5 L/min per m2 ; P =0.02), associated with lower indexed stroke volume (SVi:COVIDreduced 39±10 mL/min per m2 versus COVIDnormal 43±7 mL/min per m2 versus controls 48±10 mL/min per m2 ; P =0.02). There were no differences in peak tissue oxygen extraction or biventricular ejection fractions between groups. There were no associations between COVID-19 illness severity and peak magnetic resonance-augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing metrics. Peak indexed oxygen uptake, indexed cardiac output, and indexed stroke volume all correlated with duration from discharge to magnetic resonance-augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing ( P <0.05). Conclusions Magnetic resonance-augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing suggests failure to augment stroke volume as a potential mechanism of exercise intolerance in previously hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This is unrelated to disease severity and, reassuringly, improves with time from acute illness.- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF