Search

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the utility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire–3rd Edition (ASQ‐3) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–2nd Edition (VABS‐II) as neurodevelopmental screening tools for infants exposed to antiseizure medications in utero, and to examine their suitability for use in large‐population signal generation initiatives. Methods: Participants were women with epilepsy who were recruited from 21 hospitals in England and Northern Ireland during pregnancy between 2014 and 2016. Offspring were assessed at 24 months old using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development–3rd Edition (BSID‐III), the VABS‐II, and the ASQ‐3 (n = 223). The sensitivity and specificity of the ASQ‐3 and VABS‐II to identify developmental delay at 24 months were examined, using the BSID‐III to define cases. Results: The ASQ‐3 identified 65 children (29.1%) as at risk of developmental delay at 24 months using standard referral criteria. Using a categorical approach and standard referral criteria to identify delay in the ASQ‐3 and BSID‐III at 24 months, the ASQ‐3 showed excellent sensitivity (90.9%) and moderate specificity (74.1%). Utilizing different cut‐points resulted in improved properties and may be preferred in certain contexts. The VABS‐II exhibited the strongest psychometric properties when borderline impairment (>1 SD below the mean) was compared to BSID‐III referral data (sensitivity = 100.0%, specificity = 96.6%). Significance: Both the ASQ‐3 and VABS‐II have good psychometric properties in a sample of children exposed to antiseizure medications when the purpose is the identification of at‐risk groups. These findings identify the ASQ‐3 as a measure that could be used effectively as part of a tiered surveillance system for teratogenic exposure by identifying a subset of individuals for more detailed investigations. Although the VABS‐II has excellent psychometric properties, it is more labor‐intensive for both the research team and participants and is available in fewer languages than the ASQ‐3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite widespread monotherapy use of lamotrigine or levetiracetam during pregnancy, prospectively collected, blinded child development data are still limited. The NaME (Neurodevelopment of Babies Born to Mothers With Epilepsy) Study prospectively recruited a new cohort of women with epilepsy and their offspring for longitudinal follow‐up. Methods: Pregnant women of <21 weeks gestation (n = 401) were recruited from 21 hospitals in the UK. Data collection occurred during pregnancy (recruitment, trimester 3) and at 12 and 24 months of age. The primary outcome was blinded assessment of infant cognitive, language, and motor development on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd edition) at 24 months of age with supplementary parent reporting on the Vinelands Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd edition). Results: There were 394 live births, with 277 children (70%) completing the Bayley assessment at 24 months. There was no evidence of an association of prenatal exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine (−.74, SE = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −6.5 to 5.0, p =.80) or levetiracetam (−1.57, SE = 3.1, 95% CI = −4.6 to 7.7, p =.62) with poorer infant cognition, following adjustment for other maternal and child factors in comparison to nonexposed children. Similar results were observed for language and motor scores. There was no evidence of an association between increasing doses of either lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Nor was there evidence that higher dose folic acid supplementation (≥5 mg/day) or convulsive seizure exposure was associated with child development scores. Continued infant exposure to antiseizure medications through breast milk was not associated with poorer outcomes, but the number of women breastfeeding beyond 3 months was low. Significance: These data are reassuring for infant development following in utero exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine or levetiracetam, but child development is dynamic, and future follow‐up is required to rule out later emerging effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Use of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy is associated with congenital malformations and developmental delay. Previous studies have suggested that women who have had one child with a congenital malformation are at increased risk of having other children with malformations. We sought to confirm the magnitude of risk in a large cohort drawn from the United Kingdom Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. Methods: The United Kingdom Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register is a prospective, observational registration and follow-up study set up to determine the relative safety of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy. We have extracted data for those women who prospectively registered more than one pregnancy and calculated the recurrence risks for fetal malformations. Key Findings: Outcome data were available for 1,534 pregnancies born to 719 mothers. For women whose first child had a congenital malformation there was a 16.8% risk of having another child with a congenital malformation, compared with 9.8% for women whose first child did not have a malformation (relative risk 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.96). The risk for recurrence was 50% for women who had had two previous children with a congenital malformation. There was a trend toward a higher risk for recurrent malformations in pregnancies exposed to valproate (21.9%, relative risk 1.47, 95% CI 0.68-3.20) and topiramate (50%, relative risk 4.50, 95% CI 0.97-20.82), but not for other drugs such as carbamazepine and lamotrigine. Recurrence risks were also higher for pregnancies exposed to polytherapy regimens and for those where the dose of antiepileptic drug treatment had been increased after the first pregnancy. Significance: Women who have had a child with a malformation are at increased risk of having other children with malformations. This is in keeping with previous reports that have suggested that genetic influences may be one of the factors determining the teratogenic risk of antiepileptic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents information related to epilepsy and pregnancy group in Great Britain. The Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register in Great Britain is a prospective, observational registration and follow-up study established in 1996 by J.I. Morrow in response to uncertainty regarding the relative safety in pregnancy of recently licensed antiepileptic drugs (AED). Members of the study scientific committee include the study coordinator, four epileptologists, a clinical geneticist, obstetrician general practitioner and specialist epilepsy nurses. The study has full ethical approval for a multicentre Great Britain study.