Search

Rationale and Objective: Older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) often present with nonspecific complaints (NSC) that might be associated with adverse health outcomes due to underestimating the seriousness of the illness by health care workers., Methods: We selected a random sample of patients aged 65 or older who complained of weakness and were hospitalised in internal medicine departments in 2019-2021. We divided the patients into those with and without specific reasons for hospitalisation after the ED evaluation. Outcome variables included changes in medical care based on CT head scans and blood tests, and whether a delay in diagnosis led to a longer stay, in-hospital mortality, or readmission within 30 days., Results: Patients were aged 82 ± 8 years and 43.6% (233/536)were female. 46.8% (260/556) of the patients had a specific reason for hospitalisation after the ED evaluation including four patients presenting with confusion, without neurological findings but with acute ischaemia found on the brain CT. Patients without a specific presentation had fewer blood tests done due to a significantly shorter hospital stay (median (1st-3rd quartiles: 3 (2-4) vs. 4 (3-6) days, p < 0.001), a lower mortality rate, 0.3% (n = 1) compared to 4.2% (n = 11), p = 0.002), and fewer readmissions 13.5%(n = 40) compared to 20.4% (n = 53). The deaths and readmissions in both groups were not due to a delay in diagnosis., Conclusions: Elderly patients with a chief complaint of weakness with and without a specific reason for hospitalisation were not at an increased risk for inappropriate treatment or a missed diagnosis., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background : Over recent years, there have been increasing concerns regarding an increase in the number of futile and inappropriate admissions to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods : A prospective cross-sectional survey was carried out using a data collection form distributed by mail to the directors of all PICUs in the UK. Respondents were asked to give details of all patients on their unit on a specific day including age, reason for admission and any preexisting medical conditions. An assessment was made by respondents of whether the care being provided in each case was, in their opinion, appropriate, futile or inappropriate according to standard definitions. Results : We received responses from 21 units (68%) who reported the details of 111 patients. Care was felt to be appropriate in 88 of these cases (79%), futile in nine cases (8%) and inappropriate in 14 cases (13%). Futile cases were most commonly admitted with respiratory failure and all had preexisting medical conditions, most commonly developmental delay. Where care was felt to be inappropriate, respiratory failure was again the most common reason for admission and all had a preexisting medical condition, most commonly cardiovascular disease. Conclusions : The care being provided in 21% of the PICU cases, described in this study, was felt to be either futile or inappropriate by the directors of those units. There is an urgent need to, accurately, establish the resource consumption associated with these patients and to establish a standard approach to futility and inappropriate care in PICU in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]