Search

Summary: A major translational barrier to the use of stem cell (SC)‐based therapy in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is the lack of a clear understanding of the mechanism(s) underlying the cardioprotective effect of SCs. Numerous paracrine factors from SCs may account for reduction in infarct size, but myocardial salvage associated with transdifferentiation of SCs into vascular cells as well as cardiomyocyte‐like cells may be involved too. In this study, bone marrow‐derived rat mesenchymal SC (MSCs) were microencapsulated in alginate preventing viable cell release while supporting their secretory phenotype. The hypothesis on the key role of paracrine factors from MSCs in their cardioprotective activity was tested by comparison of the effect of encapsulated vs free MSCs in the rat model of MI. Intramyocardial administration of both free and encapsulated MSCs after MI caused reduction in scar size (12.1 ± 6.83 and 14.7 ± 4.26%, respectively, vs 21.7 ± 6.88% in controls, P = 0.015 and P = 0.03 respectively). Scar size was not different in animals treated with free and encapsulated MSC (P = 0.637). These data provide evidence that MSC‐derived growth factors and cytokines are crucial for cardioprotection elicited by MSC. Administration of either free or encapsulated MSCs was not arrhythmogenic in non‐infarcted rats. The consistency of our data with the results of other studies on the major role of MSC secretome components in cardiac protection further support the theory that the use of live, though encapsulated, cells for MI therapy may be replaced with heart‐targeted‐sustained delivery of growth factors/cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Use of mesenchymal stem cell ( MSC) transplantation after myocardial infarction ( MI) has been found to have infarct-limiting effects in numerous experimental and clinical studies. However, recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials on MSC-based MI therapy have highlighted the need for improving its efficacy. There are two principal approaches for increasing therapeutic effect of MSCs: (i) preventing massive MSC death in ischaemic tissue and (ii) increasing production of cardioreparative growth factors and cytokines with transplanted MSCs. In this review, we aim to integrate our current understanding of genetic approaches that are used for modification of MSCs to enable their improved survival, engraftment, integration, proliferation and differentiation in the ischaemic heart. Genetic modification of MSCs resulting in increased secretion of paracrine factors has also been discussed. In addition, data on MSC preconditioning with physical, chemical and pharmacological factors prior to transplantation are summarized. MSC seeding on three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds facilitates formation of both intercellular connections and contacts between cells and the extracellular matrix, thereby enhancing cell viability and function. Use of genetic and non-genetic approaches to modify MSC function holds great promise for regenerative therapy of myocardial ischaemic injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The unmet clinical need for myocardial salvage during ischaemia-reperfusion injury requires the development of new techniques for myocardial protection. In this study the protective effect of different local ischaemic preconditioning ( LIPC) and remote ischaemic preconditioning ( RIPC) protocols was compared in the rat model of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion, using infarct size and ischaemic tachyarrhythmias as end-points. In addition, the hypothesis that there is involvement of reactive oxygen species ( ROS) in the protective signalling by RIPC was tested, again in comparison with LIPC. The animals were subjected to 30-min coronary occlusion and 90-min reperfusion. RIPC protocol included either transient infrarenal aortic occlusion (for 5, 15 and 30 min followed by 15-min reperfusion) or 15-min mesenteric artery occlusion with 15-min reperfusion. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias during test ischaemia were quantified according to Lambeth Conventions. It was found that the infarct-limiting effect of RIPC critically depends on the duration of a single episode of remote ischaemia, which fails to protect the heart from infarction when it is too short or, instead, too prolonged. It was also shown that RIPC is ineffective in reducing the incidence and severity of ischaemia-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias. According to our data, the infarct-limiting effect of LIPC could be partially eliminated by the administration of ROS scavenger N-2-mercaptopropionylglycine (90 mg/kg), whereas the same effect of RIPC seems to be independent of ROS signalling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to investigate the effect of bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell ( BM- MSC and AD- MSC respectively) transplantation on left ventricular function and infarct area ( IA) in the rat model of ischaemic heart failure. In anaesthetized Wistar rats, the left coronary artery ( LCA) was occluded for 40 min with subsequent reperfusion for 7 days. Seven days following surgery, the animals with LCA occlusion/reperfusion were randomized into three groups: (i) Controls received intramyocardial injection of vehicle at three different locations within the peri-infarct zone, (ii) BM- MSC: cells were injected in the same way as in previous group (106), (iii) AD- MSC: using the same protocol as used in the BM- MSC group. In addition there was also a sham-treated group that had no injection. Two weeks following MSC transplantation, the hearts were isolated and perfused according to the Langendorff method followed by 30-min global ischaemia and 90-min reperfusion. After this IA was determined histologically. During Langendorff perfusion initial and postischaemic LV functions were the same in all groups although LV pressure at the 10th minute of reperfusion was higher in the AD- MSC group compared to controls. However, LV pressure during 30-min global ischaemia was significantly higher in BM- MSC as compared to controls and AD- MSC. The sham treated animals showed the same results as those seen with BM-MSC. Thus, BM- MSC transplantation, in contrast to transplantation of AD- MSC, resulted in better preservation of the LV ability to contract during ischaemia. Furthermore, IA was significantly smaller in BM- MSC group as compared to the controls and the AD- MSC groups. Thus this study has demonstrated that treatment with BM- MSC both ameliorates LV function and reduces histological scar size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]