Search

Aims: The aim of the SCIENCE trial was to investigate whether a single treatment with direct intramyocardial injections of adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells (CSCC_ASCs) was safe and improved cardiac function in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: The study was a European multicentre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase II trial using allogeneic CSCC_ASCs from healthy donors or placebo (2:1 randomization). Main inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45%, and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels >300 pg/ml. CSCC_ASCs or placebo (isotonic saline) were injected directly into viable myocardium. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end‐systolic volume (LVESV) at 6‐month follow‐up measured by echocardiography. A total of 133 symptomatic HFrEF patients were included. The treatment was safe without any drug‐related severe adverse events or difference in cardiac‐related adverse events during a 3‐year follow‐up period. There were no significant differences between groups during follow‐up in LVESV (0.3 ± 5.0 ml, p = 0.945), nor in secondary endpoints of left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (−2.0 ± 6.0 ml, p = 0.736) and LVEF (−1.6 ± 1.0%, p = 0.119). The NYHA class improved slightly within the first year in both groups without any difference between groups. There were no changes in 6‐min walk test, NT‐proBNP, C‐reactive protein or quality of life the first year in any groups. Conclusion: The SCIENCE trial demonstrated safety of intramyocardial allogeneic CSCC_ASC therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF. However, it was not possible to improve the pre‐defined endpoints and induce restoration of cardiac function or clinical symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: We investigated the effects of CD34+ cell therapy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Methods and Results: In a prospective pilot study, we enrolled 30 patients with HFpEF. In Phase 1, patients were treated with medical therapy for 6 months. Thereafter, all patients underwent CD34+ cell transplantation. Using electroanatomical mapping, we measured local mechanical diastolic delay and myocardial viability to guide the targeting of cell injections. Patients were followed for 6 months after cell transplantation (Phase 2), and the primary endpoint was the difference in change in E/e' between Phase 1 and Phase 2. In Phase 1, the decrease in E/e' was significantly less pronounced than in Phase 2 (-0.33 ± 1.72 vs. -3.77 ± 2.66, p = 0.001). During Phase 1, there was no significant change in global systolic strain (GLS; from -12.5 ± 2.4% to -12.8 ± 2.6%, p = 0.77), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; from 1463 ± 1247 pg/ml to 1298 ± 931 pg/ml, p = 0.31), or 6-min walk test (6MWT; from 391 ± 75 m to 402 ± 93 m, p = 0.42). In Phase 2, an improvement was noted in NT-proBNP (from 1298 ± 931 pg/ml to 887 ± 809 pg/ml, p = 0.02) and 6MWT (from 402 ± 93 m to 438 ± 72 m, p = 0.02). Although GLS did not change significantly in Phase 2 (from -12.8 ± 2.6% to -13.8 ± 2.7%, p = 0.36), we found improved local systolic strain at cell injection sites (-3.4 ± 6.8%, p = 0.005).Conclusions: In this non-randomized trial, transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy in HFpEF was associated with an improvement in E/e', NT-proBNP, exercise capacity, and local myocardial strain at the cell injection sites.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02923609. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Non‐compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) is a congenital heart disease characterized by an arrest of the myocardial compaction process. Although NCM patients have impaired formation of microvasculature, the functional impact of these changes remains undefined. We sought to analyse a potential correlation between myocardial ischemia and heart failure severity in NCM patients. Methods and results: We enrolled 41 NCM patients (28 male and 13 female), aged 21–70 years. In all patients, we have determined left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) by echocardiography. At the same time, serum levels of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) have been measured, and myocardial single‐photon emission computed tomography at rest and on stress was used to define significant myocardial ischemia defined as summed difference score ≥ 2. Myocardial ischemia has been demonstrated in 11 patients (27%, Group A), and 30 patients showed no significant ischemic changes (73%, Group B). The groups did not differ in sex, age, kidney, or liver function. When compared with Group B, Group A had significantly lower LVEF (35 ± 15% in Group A vs. 53 ± 11% in Group B, P < 0.001), higher LVEDV (188 ± 52 mL vs. 136 ± 52 mL, P = 0.007), lower GLS (−9.9 ± 5.2% vs. −14.5 ± 4.1%, P = 0.001), and higher NT‐proBNP levels (1691 ± 1883 pg/mL vs. 422 ± 877 pg/mL, P = 0.006). Overall, higher summed difference score was associated with lower LVEF (r = −0.48, P = 0.001), higher LVEDV (r = 0.39, P = 0.012), lower GLS (r = 0.352, P = 0.024), and higher levels of NT‐proBNP (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The presence of myocardial ischemia in patients with NCM is associated with worse left ventricular function, dilation of the left ventricle, and more pronounced neurohumoral activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with heart failure, sacubitril/valsartan therapy was associated with a decrease in NT-proBNP and improved echocardiographic parameters, which suggests a potential effect on cardiac reverse remodeling.1,2 Despite optimization of medical management, a significant proportion of heart failure patients progress to an advanced stage of the disease and require implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). CASE SERIES We analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data in six LVAD patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy was introduced instead of ACE inhibitors at 1 year after LVAD implantation; patients were followed for 6 months. [Extracted from the article]