Search

Objectives Depression is common among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) and is associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes and risky behaviours. We sought to estimate the prevalence of major depressive episode (MDE) across PLWHIV groups, to compare this with its prevalence in the general population and to assess factors associated with it. Methods We used data from the Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales (ANRS)-Vespa2 study, a national study on a representative sample of PLWHIV conducted in France in 2011. The short form of the depression module of the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Instrument (CIDI-SF) was used to characterize the occurrence of an MDE during the previous year. MDE prevalence was assessed among the various groups of PLWHIV and compared with that in the general population, accounting for the sociodemographic characteristics of the two populations, using multivariate Poisson regression models. The same method was used to assess associated factors. Results MDE prevalence was 28.1% among PLWHIV, ranging from 10.9 to 55.7% across groups. Compared with the general population by sex, regardless of sexual orientation and origin, MDE prevalence was 5.1-fold higher in HIV-infected men who have sex with men [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-6.6], 3.1-fold higher in non-sub-Saharan African (SSA) heterosexual men (95% CI 2.2-4.4), 1.6-fold higher in SSA migrant men (95% CI 0.9-2.6), 2.6-fold higher in non-SSA heterosexual women (95% CI 2.1-3.3), and 1.9-fold higher in SSA migrant women (95% CI 1.5-2.5). In the HIV-infected population, MDE was positively related to unemployment, material deprivation, disclosure, experience of discrimination, and untreated hepatitis C, and negatively related to age. Conclusions The prevalence of depression varied across the different groups of PLWHIV, with levels much higher than in the general population. Moreover, there was a strong association with socioeconomic status and HIV experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Cancer is a growing concern for HIV-infected people, and screening plays a major role in alleviating the burden it causes. We sought to investigate the levels and determinants of breast cancer screening ( BCS) and cervical cancer screening ( CCS) in HIV-infected women as compared with the general population. Methods The Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales ( ANRS)-Vespa2 study was conducted in 2011 in a national representative sample of 3022 HIV-infected hospital out-patients in France. The rates and correlates of BCS and CCS among HIV-infected women were compared with those in the general population using multivariate Poisson regression models. Results The BCS rate during the 2 years preceding the survey interview was 80.7% among HIV-infected women vs. 89.1% in the general population ( P = 0.146). The CCS rate during the preceding 3 years was 88.1% among HIV-infected women vs. 83.1% in the general population ( P = 0.021). During the preceding year, the CCS rate among HIV-infected women was 76.5%. The barriers to BCS and CCS were a low educational level [ BCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.80-0.97; CCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99], not having supplementary health insurance ( CCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98), an irregular gynaecological follow-up ( BCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; CCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.72; 95% CI 0.64-0.81) and a low CD4 count ( BCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.97; CCS: adjusted prevalence rate ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.98). The disparities in CCS uptake in terms of age, employment and gynaecological follow-up were less pronounced among HIV-infected women than in the general population. Conclusions BCS and CCS uptake was not lower among HIV-infected women than in the general population, but CCS was suboptimal. Specificities in the profile of barriers to screening emerged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Polypharmacy increase the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the elderly population living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Several expert databases can be used to evaluate DDIs. The aim of the study was to describe actual DDIs between antiretroviral drugs and comedications in an elderly population and to compare grading of the DDIs in 3 databases., Methods: All treatments of HIV-infected subjects aged 65 years and older were collected in 6 French HIV centres. Summary of Product Characteristic (SPC), French DDI Thesaurus (THES), and Liverpool HIV DDI website (LIV) were used to define each DDI and specific grade. DDIs were classified in yellow flag interaction (undefined grade in SPC and THES or potential weak interaction in LIV), amber flag interaction (to be considered/precaution of use in SPC and THES and potential interaction in LIV) and red flag interaction (not recommended/contraindication in SPC and THES and do not administer/contraindication in LIV)., Results: Among 239 subjects included, 60 (25.1%) had at least 1 DDI for a total of 126 DDIs: 23/126 red flag DDIs were identified in 17 patients. All these 23 DDIs were identified in LIV. THES and SPC missed 6 and 1 red flag DDIs, respectively. Seven of 23 red flag DDIs were identified in the 3 databases concomitantly., Conclusion: Polypharmacy is frequent in this elderly HIV population leading to DDI in a quarter of the subjects. The discrepancies between databases can be explained by differences in analysis methods. A consensus between databases would be helpful for clinicians., (© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.)