Search

Previous studies have demonstrated that the administration of zoledronic acid (ZOL) once yearly for 3 years or once over 3 years, yields similar antifracture efficacy. Bone turnover markers can predict the antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive agents, with procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) being the most useful marker. In this retrospective cohort study, we explored the effects of intravenous dosing of ZOL guided by serum (S)-P1NP assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. Consenting patients (N  = 202, mean age 68.2 years) with osteoporosis were treated with ZOL for an average of 4.4 (range 2-8) years. S-P1NP and BMD were measured at baseline and every 1-2 years. We assessed the number of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in the 2-year time periods. The number of patients assessed was 202, 147, 69, and 29 at years 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, and 7-8, respectively. A new ZOL infusion was given if S-P1NP exhibited values above 35 μg/L. BMD increased by 6.2% (SD 4.0) over the first 2 years and stabilized in years 2-8 (P  <.05). Median S-P1NP exhibited an initial reduction from 58.0 to 31.3 μg/L at year 2 and then increased to 39.0 μg/L at years 7-8. Compared with fractures observed in the last 2 years before baseline, fracture rates exhibited consistent reductions, for vertebral fractures odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] = 0.61 [0.47, 0.80], P  <.001 and for nonvertebral fractures OR = 0.23 [0.18, 0.31], P  <.001. In conclusion, intermittent dosing of intravenous ZOL based on the assessment of S-P1NP with cut-off at 35 μg/L resulted in an initial increase followed by a stable BMD, suppression of S-P1NP, and stable reduction of fractures for 8 years. Only 39% of patients needed more than one infusion. This approach reduces healthcare costs and might also reduce the risk of rare side effects such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) has been postulated to mediate skeletal fragility in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) induces a substantial weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. However, the procedure induces increased bone turnover and fracture rates. No previous study has evaluated biopsy‐measured BMAT fraction preoperatively and after RYGB. In this study, we aimed to investigate BMAT fraction of the hip in participants with and without T2D preoperatively and 1 year after RYGB and explore factors associated with BMAT change. Patients with morbid obesity scheduled for RYGB were examined preoperatively and 1 year after RYGB. Forty‐four participants were included and preoperative examinations were possible in 35. Of these, 33 (94%) met for follow‐up, 2 were excluded, and BMAT estimation was not possible in 1. Eighteen (60%) of the participants were females and 11 (37%) had T2D. Preoperative BMAT fraction was positively associated with glycosylated hemoglobin and negatively associated with areal bone mineral density (aBMD). After RYGB, BMAT fraction decreased from 40.4 ± 1.7% to 35.6 ± 12.8%, p = 0.042, or with mean percent change of 10.7% of preoperative BMAT fraction. Change in BMAT fraction was positively associated with change in body mass index (BMI) and total body fat. In females, we observed a mean percent reduction of 22.4 ± 19.6%, whereas in males BMAT increased with a mean percent of 6.8 ± 37.5%, p = 0.009. For males, changes in estradiol were associated with BMAT change; this was not observed for females. In participants with and without T2D, the mean percent BMAT reduction was 5.8 ± 36.9% and 13.5 ± 28.0%, respectively, p = 0.52. We conclude that a high BMAT seems to be associated with lower aBMD and poorer glycemic control in obese subjects. After RYGB, we observed a significant decrease in BMAT. The reduction in BMAT did not differ between participants with and without T2D, but appeared sex specific. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: The high prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) after obesity surgery is a concern for long‐term bone health. Limited knowledge exists about optimal vitamin D and suppression of parathyroid hormone (PTH) after these procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SHPT and its relation to vitamin D status. Design: A cross‐sectional study at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients: A total of 502 consecutive patients, age 22‐64 years, attending 2‐year follow‐up after Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass. Measurements: A serum intact PTH >7.0 pmol/L in the absence of elevated serum ionized calcium (iCa) was considered as SHPT. Vitamin D status was defined by serum concentrations of 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (S‐25(OH)D). Results: Altogether, 171 patients (34%) had SHPT. The prevalence of SHPT varied across the range of S‐25(OH)D (P < 0.001), being highest (71%) with S‐25(OH)D < 25 nmol/L. Compared with S‐25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L, the prevalence of SHPT was lower with S‐25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/L (29.0%; RR = 0.64 (95%‐CI:0.50‐0.81)) and S‐25(OH)D ≥ 75 nmol/L (27.7%; RR = 0.61 (95%‐CI:0.44‐0.84)). S‐25(OH)D ≥ 100 nmol/L was associated with the lowest PTH and the lowest prevalence of SHPT (16.0%; RR = 0.35 (95%‐CI:0.14‐0.88) compared with S‐25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L) and the most normal calcium distribution. These associations were most pronounced with iCa in the lower range. A synergistic association was found for S‐25(OH)D and iCa on SHPT. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficient patients had the highest prevalence of SHPT 2 years after gastric bypass. PTH and the prevalence of SHPT were notably lower with S‐25(OH)D ≥ 100 nmol/L, compared with lower target levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intranasal bevacizumab injections have been used in treating hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT)-related epistaxis since 2009. It is believed to be a safe and effective treatment for a selected group of HHT patients in reducing frequency and intensity of epistaxis, with few or none adverse effects. In this case report, however, we will describe a patient who developed bilateral osteonecrosis in the knees while undergoing regular intranasal submucosal bevacizumab injections. Although osteonecrosis previously has been documented in patients receiving bevacizumab intravenously in oncologic doses, thus far it has not been reported in patients treated with intranasal submucosal injections. Laryngoscope, 128:593-596, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical data suggest concomitant therapy with bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) may blunt the anabolic effect of PTH; rodent models suggest that infrequently administered bisphosphonates may interact differently. To evaluate the effects of combination therapy with an intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg and daily subcutaneous recombinant human (rh)PTH(1-34) (teriparatide) 20 µg versus either agent alone on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers, we conducted a 1-year multicenter, multinational, randomized, partial double-blinded, controlled trial. 412 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 65 ± 9 years) were randomized to a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg plus daily subcutaneous teriparatide 20 µg ( n = 137), zoledronic acid alone ( n = 137), or teriparatide alone ( n = 138). The primary endpoint was percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) at 52 weeks versus baseline. Secondary endpoints included change in BMD at the spine at earlier time points and at the total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck at all time points. At week 52, lumbar spine BMD had increased 7.5%, 7.0%, and 4.4% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively ( p < .001 for combination and teriparatide versus zoledronic acid). In the combination group, spine BMD increased more rapidly than with either agent alone ( p < .001 versus both teriparatide and zoledronic acid at 13 and 26 weeks). Combination therapy increased total-hip BMD more than teriparatide alone at all times (all p < .01) and more than zoledronic acid at 13 weeks ( p < .05), with final 52-week increments of 2.3%, 1.1%, and 2.2% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively. With combination therapy, bone formation (assessed by serum N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) increased from 0 to 4 weeks, declined minimally from 4 to 8 weeks, and then rose throughout the trial, with levels above baseline from 6 to 12 months. Bone resorption (assessed by serum β-C-telopeptide of type I collagen [β-CTX]) was markedly reduced with combination therapy from 0 to 8 weeks (a reduction of similar magnitude to that seen with zoledronic acid alone), followed by a gradual increase after week 8, with levels remaining above baseline for the latter half of the year. Levels for both markers were significantly lower with combination therapy versus teriparatide alone ( p < .002). Limitations of the study included its short duration, lack of endpoints beyond DXA-based BMD (e.g., quantitative computed tomography and finite-element modeling for bone strength), lack of teriparatide placebo, and insufficient power for fracture outcomes. We conclude that while teriparatide increases spine BMD more than zoledronic acid and zoledronic acid increases hip BMD more than teriparatide, combination therapy provides the largest, most rapid increments when both spine and hip sites are considered. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of once-yearly intravenous zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg in reducing risk of clinical vertebral, nonvertebral, and any clinical fractures in elderly osteoporotic postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from the Health Outcome and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid One Yearly (HORIZON) Pivotal Fracture Trial and the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial. SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women (aged ≥75) with documented osteoporosis ( T-score ≤−2.5 at femoral neck or ≥1 prevalent vertebral or hip fracture) or a recent hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n=1,961) or placebo (n=1,926) at baseline and 12 and 24 months. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoints were incidence of clinical vertebral and nonvertebral and any clinical fracture after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 years, incidence of any clinical, clinical vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture were significantly lower in the ZOL group than in the placebo group (10.8% vs 16.6%, 1.1% vs 3.7%, and 9.9% vs 13.7%, respectively) (hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.54–0.78, P<.001; HR=0.34, 95% CI=0.21–0.55, P<.001; and HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60–0.90, P=.002, respectively). The incidence of hip fracture was lower with ZOL but did not reach statistical significance. The incidence rate of postdose adverse events were higher with ZOL, although the rate of serious adverse events and deaths was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Once-yearly intravenous ZOL 5 mg was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of new clinical fractures (vertebral and nonvertebral) in elderly postmenopausal women with osteroporosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study about the antifracture efficacy of zoledronic acid in relation to the timing of the administration of its first dose following hip fracture. It describes zoledronic acid as a potent biphosphonate which can prevent bone turnover markers as well as increase body mass index (BMD) when administered intravenously once a year. The study involved patients aged 50 years and above who were administered with the drug within 90 days after undergoing surgery for low-trauma hip fracture.

The article presents the study that investigates the close association between bone and vasculature which play a vital role in the regulation of bone remodeling and fracture repair. The researchers found a decrease in bone turnover that lead to a decrease in surfaces covered with remodeling compartments. The reduction of bone remodeling compartment space brought about by antiresorptive therapies reduce the number of skeletal events in advanced cancer.

The author offers information on slerostin deficiency and its association with altered bone composition. He mention three variables responsible for bone strength such as bone mass, distribution of mass and bone material properties, discusses relation of sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease to mutations of the SOST gene, the gene responsible for producing sclerostin and mentions the study of bone material properties of bone formed during sclerostin inhibition by author N. Hassler and others.

The last 25 years have seen the development of a plethora of new, effective agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. These agents reduce the risk of spine fractures by up to 70%, hip fractures by 40-50% and non-vertebral fractures by up to 50-80%. Amino-bisphosphonates, taken orally or intravenously, remain the dominant treatment modalities for osteoporosis. These so-called anti-resorptive or anti-catabolic agents stabilize the skeleton and reduce fracture risk in osteoporotic as well as osteopenic individuals. A monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand, Denosumab, constitutes a new anti-resorptive agent recently approved worldwide. In younger postmenopausal women, low-dose estrogen or estrogen/progestin still has a place for short-term (up to 5 years) preservation of bone mass, especially in women with menopausal symptoms. Likewise, selective estrogen receptor modulators should be considered in younger postmenopausal women, especially those at increased risk of breast cancer. Anabolic (bone forming) regimens, of which parathyroid hormone is the only agent currently available, aid in the build up of new bone, increase bone mass and improve bone architecture. In cancellous bone, 30-60% increases of bone mass have been documented, but cortical bone thickness also increases. These improvements lead to profound reduction in fracture rates in both the axial and appendicular skeleton. Owing to cost and the need for parenteral administration, in most countries these agents are reserved for severe osteoporosis with multiple fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]