Search

Objective: To determine if higher-volume, fixed-dose administration of vasopressin further reduces blood loss at the time of minimally invasive myomectomy.Design: Randomised multicentre clinical trial.Setting: Tertiary-care academic centres in the USA.Population: Women undergoing conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.Methods: All participants received the same 10-unit (U) dose of vasopressin, but were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (i) received 200 ml of diluted vasopressin solution (20 U in 400 ml normal saline), and (ii) received 30 ml of concentrated vasopressin solution (20 U in 60 ml normal saline).Main Outcome Measures: The primary study outcome was estimated blood loss; the study was powered to detect a 100-ml difference.Results: A total of 152 women were randomised; 76 patients in each group. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. The primary outcome of intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different, as measured by three parameters: surgeon estimate (mean estimated blood loss 178 ± 265 ml and 198 ± 232 ml, dilute and concentrated groups respectively, P = 0.65), suction canister-calculated blood loss, or change in haematocrit levels. There were no vasopressin-related adverse events.Conclusion: Both dilute and concentrated vasopressin solutions that use the same drug dosing demonstrate comparable safety and tolerability when administered for minimally invasive myomectomy; however, higher volume administration of vasopressin does not reduce blood loss.Tweetable Abstract: This randomised trial failed to show benefit of high-volume dilute vasopression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents case studies of four women diagnosed with caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy who were treated using laparoscopic technique. Results reveal that the laparoscopic approach is a safe treatment option for caesarean ectopic pregnancy without complications. Also mentioned is the advantage of the technique compared to other methods.

Problem: Cervical cancer screening strategies in the United States include cotesting (human papillomavirus (HPV) with cytology), primary HPV with genotyping and reflex cytology, and cytology alone. An ongoing challenge is the appropriate triage of patients to colposcopy to those at highest risk. We investigated whether incorporation of p16INK4a immunodetection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on fresh cervical samples obtained at the time of screening could improve appropriate referral to colposcopy., Method of Study: A derivation group comprised of cervical swabs collected from subjects with high-grade dysplasia or cancer (positive control) and from subjects with negative screening history (negative control). Samples collected from colposcopy were used to evaluate the existing screening strategies individually and with incorporation of p16INK4a ELISA. Histology was used as the gold standard., Results: Among 163 subjects recruited, 138 were included. In the derivation group, mean p16INK4a level was 2.86 ng/mL (n = 31) and 0.58 ng/mL (n = 20) among positive and negative controls respectively (p = 0.002) with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.79 (p < 0.001). Among colposcopy subjects, sensitivity/specificity for cotesting, primary HPV, and cytology were 94%/42%, 88%/45%, and 88%/49%, respectively. Incorporation of p16INK4a resulted in similar sensitivity and improved specificity (cotesting+p16 88%/58%, primary HPV+p16 88%/57%, cytology+p16 81%/62%; p = 0.23/p = 0.008) with decrease in colposcopy referrals by 15% to 22% (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of quantifying p16INK4a by ELISA in fresh cervical samples, and its potential as an adjunct to existing screening strategies in the identification of high grade-dysplasia while reducing the number of colposcopic referrals., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To determine if higher-volume, fixed-dose administration of vasopressin further reduces blood loss at the time of minimally invasive myomectomy., Design: Randomised multicentre clinical trial., Setting: Tertiary-care academic centres in the USA., Population: Women undergoing conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy., Methods: All participants received the same 10-unit (U) dose of vasopressin, but were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (i) received 200 ml of diluted vasopressin solution (20 U in 400 ml normal saline), and (ii) received 30 ml of concentrated vasopressin solution (20 U in 60 ml normal saline)., Main Outcome Measures: The primary study outcome was estimated blood loss; the study was powered to detect a 100-ml difference., Results: A total of 152 women were randomised; 76 patients in each group. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. The primary outcome of intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different, as measured by three parameters: surgeon estimate (mean estimated blood loss 178 ± 265 ml and 198 ± 232 ml, dilute and concentrated groups respectively, P = 0.65), suction canister-calculated blood loss, or change in haematocrit levels. There were no vasopressin-related adverse events., Conclusion: Both dilute and concentrated vasopressin solutions that use the same drug dosing demonstrate comparable safety and tolerability when administered for minimally invasive myomectomy; however, higher volume administration of vasopressin does not reduce blood loss., Tweetable Abstract: This randomised trial failed to show benefit of high-volume dilute vasopression., (© 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)