Search

This article discusses the results of six randomized trials that examined the effects of fibrates and gemfibrozil on the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The trials showed inconsistent results, and the authors sought to understand these discrepancies by examining the effects of mass changes in remnant cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. Using the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) to mimic the study population of these trials, the authors compared estimated changes in ASCVD risk through mass changes in cholesterol with the observed changes in the original trials. The results suggest that mass changes in total atherogenic cholesterol can explain the results of these trials, regardless of whether statins were used or not. The authors conclude that to reduce ASCVD, cholesterol-lowering agents should aim to reduce the total mass of atherogenic cholesterol. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The atherogenic characteristics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) increase the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including not only coronary artery disease but ischemic stroke. Asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis/occlusion (IASO) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, but it has not yet been fully characterized in patients with HeFH., Methods and Results: This study analyzed 147 clinically diagnosed subjects with HeFH who underwent magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography imaging for evaluation of IASO (≥50% diameter stenosis). Major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (cardiac death, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome) were compared in patients with HeFH with and without asymptomatic IASO. Asymptomatic IASO was observed in 13.6% of patients with HeFH. The untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (240±95 versus 244±75 mg/dL; P =0.67) did not differ between the 2 groups. Despite the use of lipid-lowering therapies (statin, P =0.71; high-intensity statin, P =0.81; ezetimibe, P =0.33; proprotein convertase subxilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, P =0.39; low-density lipoprotein apheresis, P =0.14), on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in patients with both HeFH and IASO was still suboptimally controlled (97±62 versus 105±50 mg/dL; P =0.17), accompanied by a higher triglyceride level (median, 109 versus 79 mg/dL; P =0.001). During the 12.4-year observational period (interquartile range, 6.2-24.6 years), asymptomatic IASO exhibited a 4.04-fold greater likelihood of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (95% CI, 1.71-9.55; P =0.001) in patients with HeFH. This increased risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event was consistently observed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusting clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 4.32 [95% CI, 1.71-10.9]; P =0.002)., Conclusions: A total of 13.6% of Japanese subjects with HeFH presented with asymptomatic IASO. Despite lipid-lowering therapies, patients with both HeFH and IASO more likely had elevated risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Our findings highlight asymptomatic IASO as a phenotypic feature of HeFH-related atherosclerosis, which ultimately affects future outcomes.

Background Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) more likely exhibits extensive atherosclerotic disease at multiple vascular beds. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic lipoprotein that elevates HeFH-related atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks. Whether circulating Lp(a) level associates with polyvascular propagation of atherosclerosis in subjects with HeFH remains uncertain. Methods and Results The current study analyzed 370 subjects with clinically diagnosed HeFH who received evaluation of systemic arteries. Polyvascular disease (polyVD) was defined as more than 2 coexisting atherosclerosis conditions including coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, or peripheral artery disease. Clinical characteristics and lipid features were analyzed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD; 5.7% of patients with HeFH (21/370) had polyVD. They were more likely to have a clustering of risk factors, tendon ( P <0.001) and skin xanthomas ( P =0.004), and corneal arcus ( P =0.026). Furthermore, an elevated Lp(a) level ( P =0.006) and a greater frequency of Lp(a) level ≥50 mg/dL ( P <0.001) were observed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD. On multivariable analysis adjusting risk factors and lipid-lowering agents, Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR], 5.66 [95% CI, 1.68-19.0], P =0.005), age, and family history of premature coronary artery disease independently predicted polyVD in subjects with HeFH. Of note, the prevalence of polyVD rose to 33.3% in patients with HeFH and age >58 years old, family history of premature coronary artery disease, and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (OR, 10.3 [95% CI, 3.12-33.4], P <0.001). Conclusions An increased level of circulating Lp(a) levels predicted concomitance of polyVD in patients with HeFH. The current findings suggest subjects with HeFH and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL as a high-risk category who require meticulous screening of systemic vascular beds.

Background Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who harbored both low-density lipoprotein receptor ( LDLR ) and PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) gene variants exhibit severe phenotype associated with substantially high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In this study, we investigated the cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both LDLR and PCSK9 gene variants. Methods and Results A total of 232 unrelated patients with LDLR and/or PCSK9 gene variants were stratified as follows: patients with LDLR and PCSK9 ( LDLR/PCSK9 ) gene variants, patients with LDLR gene variant, and patients with PCSK9 gene variant. Clinical demographics and the occurrence of primary outcome (nonfatal myocardial infarction) were compared. The observation period of primary outcome started at the time of birth and ended at the time of the first cardiac event or the last visit. Patients with LDLR/PCSK9 gene variants were identified in 6% of study patients. They had higher levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( P =0.04) than those with LDLR gene variants. On multivariate Cox regression model, they experienced a higher incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 4.62; 95% CI, 1.66-11.0; P =0.003 versus patients with LDLR gene variant). Of note, risk for nonfatal myocardial infarction was greatest in male patients with LDLR/PCSK9 gene variants compared with those with LDLR gene variant (86% versus 24%; P <0.001). Conclusions Patients with LDLR/PCSK9 gene variants were high-risk genotype associated with atherogenic lipid profiles and worse cardiovascular outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of genetic testing to identify patients with LDLR/PCSK9 gene variants, who require more stringent antiatherosclerotic management.