1. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant‐supported single‐unit crowns with cantilever extensions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
- Author
-
De Angelis, Paolo, Manicone, Paolo Francesco, Liguori, Margherita Giorgia, D'addona, Antonio, Ciolfi, Alessandro, Cavalcanti, Camilla, Piccirillo, Davide, and Rella, Edoardo
- Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients rehabilitated using a single implant supporting a crown with a cantilever extension or two implants supporting two single crowns. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review of relevant literature published from 2000 was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases. Moreover, a manual search was performed. A meta‐analysis of the resulting data was carried out. Peri‐implant marginal bone level, probing pocket depth, prevalence of technical and mechanical complications, implant survival rate, and prosthesis survival rate were assessed. Results: The meta‐analysis showed a non‐statistically significant change in the peri‐implant marginal bone level and probing pocket depth in the cantilever group and revealed a non‐significant prevalence of technical complications, showing a 27% rate in the cantilever group. The analysis of the prosthesis survival rate in the cantilever group showed a mean survival rate of 99% while the comparison of the implant survival between the two groups revealed an odds ratio of 0.50. Conclusions: The use of a single implant supporting a crown with a cantilever extension does not result in lower implant survival rate if compared with two implants supporting two single crowns. Moreover, a high prosthesis survival rate was observed in the cantilever group even if the high prevalence of complications should be carefully considered by the clinician. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF