Search

Background: This study is aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) treatment with contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a "real-world" population.Methods and Results: Overall, 558 consecutive patients with ULMCAD (mean age 71 ± 9 years, male gender 81%) undergoing PCI or CABG were compared. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. Diabetes was present in 29% and acute coronary syndrome in 56%; mean EuroSCORE was 11 ± 8. High coronary complexity (SYNTAX score >32) was present in 50% of patients. The primary composite endpoint was similar after PCI and CABG up to 4 years (15.5 ± 3.1% vs. 17.1 ± 2.6%; p=0.585). The primary end point was also comparable in a two propensity score matched cohorts. Ischemia-driven revascularization was more frequently needed in PCI than in CABG (5.5% vs. 1.5%; p=0.010). By multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (HR 2.00; p=0.003) and EuroSCORE (HR 3.71; p < 0.001) were the only independent predictors associated with long-term outcome.Conclusions: In a "real-world" population with ULMCAD, a contemporary revascularization strategy by PCI or CABG showed similar long-term clinical outcome regardless of the coronary complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Recently, NICE guidelines recommend the use of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as the first line of investigation for new onset chest pain. We sought to evaluate the impact of the integration of CTA in the diagnostic workup, as either a first- or second-line of investigation, in the clinical practice for patients presenting with new onset chest pain, with suspicion that it may be due to coronary artery disease (CAD). Method and Results. From 2014 to 2016, 208 outpatients (mean age 63.8 ± 12.7, 37% female) with an unknown CAD diagnosis were evaluated. About half (n=106, 51%) received usual testing care plus CTA as a second-line investigation (group A), while the other half (n=102, 49%) received CTA as a first-line investigation (group B). Care decisions and test interpretations were made by the attending physician. Obstructive CAD (O-CAD) was defined as >50% stenosis in the principal branch. As determined by CTA, the rates of CAD in group A vs. group B were the following (P=0.001): 31.1% vs. 27.4% for normal/minimal CAD; 42.5% vs. 63.7% for no O-CAD; and 26.4% vs. 8.8% with O-CAD. Based on a diagnostic result of no O-CAD, invasive angiography was cancelled in 42.6% (n=45) of group A patients, and additional functional tests were cancelled for the same reason in 63.7% (n=65) of group B patients, without adverse events at median 3-year. The average diagnostic cost for patients in our study was lower in group B (206 vs. 324.42 euro; P<0.0001). Conclusions. In clinical practice, CTA, as a first- or second-line investigation, most commonly detected no O-CAD in new onset chest pain patients, leading us to safely avoid unnecessary ICA or additional functional tests. The use of CTA as a first-line investigation also appears to be cost saving, but its cost-effectiveness remains to be demonstrated in larger studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stable chest pain is a common clinical presentation that often requires further investigation using noninvasive or invasive testing, resulting in a resource-consuming problem worldwide. At onset of 2016, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published an update on its guideline on chest pain. Three key changes to the 2010 version were provided by the new NICE guideline. First, the new guideline recommends that the previously proposed pretest probability risk score should no longer be used. Second, they also recommend that a calcium score of zero should no longer be used to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with low pretest probability. Third, the new guideline recommends that all patients with new onset chest pain should be investigated with a coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a first-line investigation. However, in real world the impact of implementation of CTA for the evaluation of new onset chest pain remains to be evaluated, especially regarding its cost effectiveness. The aim of the present report was to discuss the results of the studies supporting new NICE guideline and its comparison with European and US guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronary stenosis severity is both a powerful and a still debated predictor of prognosis in coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a noninvasive technique that enables anatomic visualization of coronary artery disease (CAD). CCTA with newer applications, plaque characterization and physiologic/functional evaluation, allows a comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic assessment of otherwise low-intermediate subjects for primary prevention. CCTA measures the overall plaque burden, differentiates plaque subtypes, and identifies high-risk plaque with good reproducibility. Research in this field may also advance towards an era of personalized risk prediction and individualized medical therapy. It has been demonstrated that statins may delay plaque progression and change some plaque features. The potential effects on plaque modifications induced by other medical therapies have also been investigated. Although it is not currently possible to recommend routinely serial scans to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of medical interventions, the plaque modulation, as a part of risk modification, appears a feasible strategy. In this review we summarize the current evidence regarding vulnerable plaque and effects of lipid lowering therapy on morphological features of CAD. We also discuss the potential ability of CCTA to characterize coronary atherosclerosis, stratify prognosis of asymptomatic subjects, and guide medical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stent thrombosis is a major complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is associated with reinfarction and increased risk of death. Patients treated with the turbostratic carbon-coated stent (CID, Saluggia, Italy) for AMI were identified from a prospective primary PCI database. Primary end-point was stent thrombosis within 6 months. Forward stepwise Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify independent predictors of stent thrombosis. Between 2001 and 2008, 746 patients underwent turbostratic carbon-coated stent implantation for AMI. Patients had a mean age of 65 ± 12 years, 9% had cardiogenic shock on admission, 48% had multivessel coronary disease, 78% had baseline target vessel TIMI grade 0-1. Multiple stent implantation was performed in 26% of patients. The majority of patients (78%) received abciximab treatment and a postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow was achieved in 98% patients. Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 10 patients (1.3%), while three patients (0.4%) had possible stent thrombosis. No probable stent thrombosis occurred. There were no procedural stent thromboses. In patients who received abciximab stent thrombosis the rate was 1%, while it was 4.3% in patients not receiving abciximab treatment. After adjusting for all clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables, abciximab treatment (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.05-0.56, P = 0.003) and major bleedings (HR 14.2; 85% CI 2.79-72.44, P = 0.001) were the only two predictors related to stent thrombosis. Patients with AMI treated with turbostratic carbon-coated stent implantation and abciximab treatment have a low incidence of stent thrombosis. Abciximab treatment along with major bleeding complications are the only predictors related to stent thrombosis. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:554-559) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Scanty data exist about the relation between acute heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Aim: To assess the impact of HF on outcome in AMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results: Out of 2089 AMI patients, 82% did not present HF, 17% presented HF on admission and 1% developed HF after hospitalisation. Predictors of HF on admission were age, diabetes, prior MI, time delay to admission, anterior location, and TIMI grade 0–1 in the culprit vessel. Predictors of HF during hospitalisation were age and peak creatine kinase. The 1- and 6-month mortalities were 1.1% and 2.2%, 8% and 12%, 26% and 33% in patients without HF, with HF on admission and after hospitalisation, respectively. The risk of death was higher in patients with HF than in patients without HF (HR 3.47), as well as in patients with HF after admission (HR 5.19) than in patients with HF on admission (HR 2.44). Conclusions: In a primary PCI setting, the incidence of HF on hospital admission remains high, but mortality is lower when compared with historical patient series. Primary PCI may prevent the development of HF during hospitalisation; however, when HF develops, the prognosis remains severe. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To compare across four age groups (<65, 65–74, 75–84, ≥85) the determinants of coronary reperfusion therapy (CRT) use in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STE-AMI). Population-based, observational study. Performed in the health district of Florence, Italy, where percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred CRT. Nine hundred thirty patients with STE-AMI prospectively enrolled in the Florence AMI registry. Use of CRT, clinical factors associated with CRT use. CRT use was reduced from 71% at younger than 65 to 31% at aged 85 and older ( P<.001). After adjusting for chronic comorbidity, Killip class, admission hospital category, hospitalization delay, and AMI location, CRT use was 29% ( P=.17) lower at age 75 to 84 and 63% ( P<.001) lower at age 85 and older than at younger than 65. Within each age group, the probability of receiving CRT was three to five times greater in patients directly admitted to the hospital with PCI facilities. Acute cardiac failure and chronic comorbidity were associated with lower CRT use only in patients aged 65 and older. Patients aged less than 85 years who received reperfusive therapy had a significantly lower risk of death (−44%, P=.045) at 1 year, whereas it was less evident and nonsignificant (−27%, P=.27) in patients aged 85 and older. Results confirm that, although they might substantially benefit from CRT during STE-AMI, older patients are excluded from CRT even when eligible. This further indicates that clinicians are not yet completely prepared to manage most efficiently frail elderly with AMI, a task requiring a specific interdisciplinary training program in geriatric cardiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]